Effects of Vip3AcAa+Cry1Ac Cotton on Midgut Tissue in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Ovomermis sinensis parasitism arrests midgut replacement by altering ecdysone and juvenile hormone in Helicoverpa armigera larvae

Many entomopathogens regulate the development of their insect hosts. However, the influence of mermithid nematodes on the development of their host remains unclear. In the current study, we provide insights into how Ovomermis sinensis parasitism affects the development of Helicoverpa armigera. We observed that O. sinensis arrests host development, as evidenced by the reduced body size and failure of Helicoverpa armigera to pupate. Moreover, midgut replacement of the host was significantly blocked by parasitism. Furthermore, juvenile hormone (JHIII) titers of the host were dramatically elevated by parasitism, but JH esterase (JHE) activities were strongly inhibited. By contrast, steroid hormone (20-hydroxyecdysone, 20E) titers of the host were significantly depressed by parasitism on days 4-6. The expression profiles of hormone-related genes in the host also showed similar patterns with the hormone titer. For this reason, rescue experiments were performed by injecting 20E and JHIII into developmentally arrested hosts. Notably, the midgut replacement of the host was rescued by the injection of 20E, whereas JHIII injection resulted in negative effects. Altogether, O. sinensis arrests H. armigera midgut replacement by reducing 20E and maintaining JH, thereby causing developmental arrests. Our study is the first report of the possible mechanism of mermithid nematodes in regulating insect development.

Biotechnological Approaches for Host Plant Resistance to Insect Pests

Annually, the cost of insect pest control in agriculture crosses billions of dollars around the world. Until recently, broad-spectrum synthetic pesticides were considered as the most effective means of pest control in agriculture. However, over the years, the overreliance on pesticides has caused adverse effects on beneficial insects, human health and the environment, and has led to the development of pesticide resistant insects. There is a critical need for the development of alternative pest management strategies aiming for minimum use of pesticides and conservation of natural enemies for maintaining the ecological balance of the environment. Host plant resistance plays a vital role in integrated pest management but the development of insect-resistant varieties through conventional ways of host plant resistance takes time, and is challenging as it involves many quantitative traits positioned at various loci. Biotechnological approaches such as gene editing, gene transformation, marker-assisted selection etc. in this direction have recently opened up a new era of insect control options. These could contribute towards about exploring a much wider array of novel insecticidal genes that would otherwise be beyond the scope of conventional breeding. Biotechnological interventions can alter the gene expression level and pattern as well as the development of transgenic varieties with insecticidal genes and can improve pest management by providing access to novel molecules. This review will discuss the emerging biotechnological tools available to develop insect-resistant engineered crop genotypes with a better ability to resist the attack of insect pests.

Introgressing cry1Ac for Pod Borer Resistance in Chickpea Through Marker-Assisted Backcross Breeding

The gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera is a major constraint to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) production worldwide, reducing crop yield by up to 90%. The constraint is difficult to overcome as chickpea germplasm including wild species either lacks pod borer resistance or if possessing resistance is cross-incompatible. This study describes conversion of elite but pod borer-susceptible commercial chickpea cultivars into resistant cultivars through introgression of cry1Ac using marker-assisted backcross breeding. The chickpea cultivars (PBG7 and L552) were crossed with pod borer-resistant transgenic lines (BS 100B and BS 100E) carrying cry1Ac that led to the development of BC₁F₁, BC₁F₂, BC₁F₃, BC₂F₁, BC₂F₂, and BC₂F₃ populations from three cross combinations. The foreground selection revealed that 35.38% BC₁F₁ and 8.4% BC₁F₂ plants obtained from Cross A (PBG7 × BS 100B), 50% BC₁F₁ and 76.5% BC₁F₂ plants from Cross B (L552 × BS 100E), and 12.05% BC₂F₂ and 82.81% (average) BC₂F₃ plants derived from Cross C (PBG7 × BS 100E) carried the cry1Ac gene. The bioassay of backcross populations for toxicity to H. armigera displayed up to 100% larval mortality. BC₁F₁ and BC₁F₂ populations derived from Cross B and BC₂F₃ population from Cross C segregated in the Mendelian ratio for cry1Ac confirmed inheritance of a single copy of transgene, whereas BC₁F₁ and BC₁F₂ populations obtained from Cross A and BC₂F₂ population from Cross C exhibited distorted segregation ratios. BC₁F₁ plants of Cross A and Cross B accumulated Cry1Ac protein ranging from 11.03 to 11.71 µgg⁻¹ in leaf tissue. Cry1Ac-positive BC₂F₂ plants from Cross C demonstrated high recurrent parent genome recovery (91.3%) through background selection using SSR markers and phenome recovery of 90.94%, amongst these 30% plants, were homozygous for transgene. The performance of BC₂F₃ progenies derived from homozygous plants was similar to that of the recurrent parent for main agronomic traits, such as number of pods and seed yield per plant. These progenies are a valuable source for H. armigera resistance in chickpea breeding programs.

Vegetative Insecticidal Protein (Vip): A Potential Contender From Bacillus thuringiensis for Efficient Management of Various Detrimental Agricultural Pests

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacterium is found in various ecological habitats, and has natural entomo-pesticidal properties, due to the production of crystalline and soluble proteins during different growth phases. In addition to Cry and Cyt proteins, this bacterium also produces Vegetative insecticidal protein (Vip) during its vegetative growth phase, which is considered an excellent toxic candidate because of the difference in sequence homology and receptor sites from Cry proteins. Vip proteins are referred as second-generation insecticidal proteins, which can be used either alone or in complementarity with Cry proteins for the management of various detrimental pests. Among these Vip proteins, Vip1 and Vip2 act as binary toxins and have toxicity toward pests belonging to Hemiptera and Coleoptera orders, whereas the most important Vip3 proteins have insecticidal activity against Lepidopteran pests. These Vip3 proteins are similar to Cry proteins in terms of toxicity potential against susceptible insects. They are reported to be toxic toward pests, which can’t be controlled with Cry proteins. The Vip3 proteins have been successfully pyramided along with Cry proteins in transgenic rice, corn, and cotton to combat resistant pest populations. This review provides detailed information about the history and importance of Vip proteins, their types, structure, newly identified specific receptors, and action mechanism of this specific class of proteins. Various studies conducted on Vip proteins all over the world and the current status have been discussed. This review will give insights into the significance of Vip proteins as alternative promising candidate toxic proteins from Bt for the management of pests in most sustainable manner.

Current Insights on Vegetative Insecticidal Proteins (Vip) as Next Generation Pest Killers

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a Gram negative soil bacterium. This bacterium secretes various proteins during different growth phases with an insecticidal potential against many economically important crop pests. One of the important families of Bt proteins is vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip), which are secreted into the growth medium during vegetative growth. There are three subfamilies of Vip proteins. Vip1 and Vip2 heterodimer toxins have an insecticidal activity against many Coleopteran and Hemipteran pests. Vip3, the most extensively studied family of Vip toxins, is effective against Lepidopteron. Vip proteins do not share homology in sequence and binding sites with Cry proteins, but share similarities at some points in their mechanism of action. Vip3 proteins are expressed as pyramids alongside Cry proteins in crops like maize and cotton, so as to control resistant pests and delay the evolution of resistance. Biotechnological- and in silico-based analyses are promising for the generation of mutant Vip proteins with an enhanced insecticidal activity and broader spectrum of target insects.

Chlorantraniliprole degenerates microvilli goblet cells of the Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) midgut

Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is mainly controlled with synthetic insecticides such as chlorantraniliprole. However, these compounds may affect non-target organs of insect metabolism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxic effect in the midgut goblet cells of A. gemmatalis caterpillars exposed to chlorantraniliprole. The midgut of these caterpillars, which ingested the insecticide in medium-lethal dose (LD₅₀), was dissected and evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. The goblet cells microvilli, after exposure to the insecticide, were disorganized and degenerated. This can compromise ionic homeostasis and nutrient absorption, impair physiological mechanisms of detoxification, and reduce the movement of food boluses throughout the insect midgut.

Bacillus thuringiensis Vip1 Functions as a Receptor of Vip2 Toxin for Binary Insecticidal Activity against Holotrichia parallela

Bacillus thuringiensis is a well-known entomopathogenic bacterium that produces vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vips, including Vip1, Vip2, Vip3, and Vip4) during the vegetative phase. Here, we purified Vip1 and Vip2 from B. thuringiensis and characterized the insecticidal effects of these protoxins. Bioassay results showed that a 1:1 mixture of Vip1Ad and Vip2Ag, purified by ion-affinity chromatography independently, exhibited insecticidal activity against Holotrichia parallela larvae, with a 50% lethal concentration value of 2.33 μg/g soil. The brush border membrane (BBM) in the midgut of H. parallela larvae was destroyed after feeding the Vip1Ad and Vip2Ag mixture. Vacuolization of the cytoplasm and slight destruction of BBM were detected with Vip2Ag alone, but not with Vip1Ad alone. Notably, Vip1Ad bound to BBM vesicles (BBMVs) strongly, whereas Vip2Ag showed weak binding; however, binding of Vip2Ag to BBMV was increased when Vip1Ad was added. Ligand blotting showed that Vip2Ag did not bind to Vip1Ad but bound to Vip1Ad-t (Vip1Ad was activated by trypsin), suggesting the activation of Vip1Ad was important for their binary toxicity. Thus, our findings suggested that Vip1Ad may facilitate the binding of Vip2Ag to BBMVs, providing a basis for studies of the insecticidal mechanisms of Vip1Ad and Vip2Ag.