National average for the process of radiation therapy in Japan by Patterns of Care Study

Radiotherapy in oncological emergencies--final results of a patterns of care study in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

Radiotherapy (RT) is an important treatment option for emergencies in oncology. A multicenter patterns of care study (PCS) was conducted in all RT institutions in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. In 2003 a standardized structured questionnaire was sent to all RT institutions. Number and type of staff involved, number of patients, over time distribution and expense, treatment indications and concepts of emergency RT were assessed. In addition, treatment outcome for the different indications was evaluated. The PCS was structured and analyzed according to the model for quality assessment set up by Donabedian in three major components: structure, process and outcome. One hundred and forty institutions (70%) answered the questionnaire. For the baseline of 2003 a total of 3244 emergency radiotherapy indications with a mean of 28 per institution were reported. Forty percent of all institutions provide a special 24 h service at night or weekends. Seventy percent of the emergency indications were irradiated between Monday and Thursday, 30% between Friday and Sunday. Ninety percent of all emergencies were referred to RT between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m., 10% between 6 p.m. and 8 a.m. The applied doses for emergency RT ranged between 2 Gy and 8 Gy (median: 3.5 Gy). Time expense was reported with a median of 90 min. The outcome analysis based on the treatment results of 1 033 patients: There was an improvement of myelocompression in 50% of the cases, vena cava superior compression in 70%, bronchial obstruction in 70% and bleedings in 80%. A clear dose-response relationship could not be established, but single doses of over 3 Gy in vena cava superior syndrome exhibited a significant advantage. This study represents the largest database in literature on emergency RT. RT was shown to be fast, time sparing and a very effective treatment option for special oncological emergencies.

Patterns of Care Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

The Patterns of Care Study (PCS), started in the 1970's, is a well-known study used for clinical quality assurance (QA) in radiation oncology in the United States. PCS has been introduced in Japan since 1996.

METHODS

Three national PCS surveys have been performed by means of external audit to evaluate patterns of care for the patients with carcinoma of any of esophagus and cervix treated with radiation between 1992 and 1994, for those with carcinoma of any of esophagus, cervix, breast, lung and prostate between 1995 and 1997, and for those with any of the five disease sites between 1999 and 2001. In the first PCS, feasibility of the study was confirmed. In the second PCS, two-stage cluster sampling of institutions and patients was performed and national averages for the survey items were calculated as QA measures. In the third PCS, additional imaging data were collected. The Japan/USA PCS workshops were held at San Francisco in 2001 and at Tokyo in 2003.

RESULTS

Significant variations in process and structure were observed according to institutional stratification. In academic institutions, external beam energy > or =6 MV for deep-seated tumors of esophagus, lung, prostate and cervix, and brachytherapy for those of cervix and esophagus were used more frequently. There was an average of less than one full-time equivalent radiation oncologist in most non-academic institutions. These variations influenced the outcomes. There were also significant differences between USA and Japan in various aspects, e.g. a difference in radiation dose of 20% for uterine cervix cancer patients. It is higher in the USA. The number of new cancer patients requiring radiation is increasing steeply (120,000 in 2000 and 170,000 in 2005). Based on PCS data, structural guidelines were published and distributed throughout Japan.

CONCLUSION

PCS is useful for establishing the clinical QA for radiation oncology as well as other specialties through detailed monitoring and evaluation of their structures, processes and outcomes.

The patterns of care study for breast-conserving therapy in Japan: Analysis of process survey from 1995 to 1997

PURPOSE

To present the results of a process survey on breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in Japan from 1995 to 1997.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 1998 to December 1999, data on the treatment process of 865 randomly selected BCT patients were collected by extramural audits.

RESULTS

For primary surgery, wide excision or tumorectomy was performed in 372 patients (43.0%), and quadrantectomy or segmental mastectomy was performed in 493 patients (57%). The extent of axillary dissection was equal or beyond Level II in 590 patients (68.2%). Systemic chemotherapy was administered to 103 of 160 node-positive patients (64.4%) and 180 of 569 node-negative patients (31.6%). Tamoxifen was administered to 234 of 323 hormone receptor-positive patients (72.5%) and 68 of 130 hormone receptor-negative patients (52.3%). Photon energy of 10 MV was administered for whole breast irradiation in 38 patients (4.4%) without bolus.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of surgical resection for BCT was large in Japan. Pathologic assessment and the technique of radiation therapy were apparently suboptimal in some cases. Information on prognostic/predictive factors was not fully utilized to individualize systemic adjuvant therapy. Establishment and widespread use of guidelines for BCT for in Japan are desirable. Repeated surveys will demonstrate how such guidelines affect clinical practices.

The Patterns of Care Study and Regional Cancer Registry for non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan

PURPOSE

We examined whether the data registered in the Japanese Patterns of Care Study (PCS) for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent the actual situation of radiotherapy in Japan. The Osaka Cancer Registry (OCR) data, forming the largest database of a regional cancer registry in Japan, were adopted for use as a benchmark against the national condition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 906 patients of the PCS treated between 1995 and 1997 and 845 patients of the OCR registered between 1988 and 1992. The investigation was made by descriptive statistical methods to measure age, stage, combined treatments, type of treated hospitals, and prognosis. Furthermore, the national averages (NAs) of the PCS process (PCS NA) were also calculated to compensate for the imbalance in the PCS data sampling.

RESULTS

The mean age was 67.3 +/- 10.1 in PCS and 64.4 +/- 11.0 in OCR (p < 0.001), 67.2 in PCS NA. The male ratio was 84.2% in PCS and 84.0% in OCR (p = 0.411), 84.1% in PCS NA. The ratio of the patients at the localized stage was 24.2% in PCS and 15.6% in OCR (p = 0.001), 21.1% in PCS NA. The ratio of surgery combined was 24.2% in PCS and 28.9% in OCR (p = 0.026), 25.3% in PCS NA. The ratio of chemotherapy combined was 50.1% in PCS and 67.5% in OCR (p = 0.001), 47.4% in PCS NA. Because the definitions of institution classification and period of prognostic inquiry were different between the two databases, the 3-year survival rates were calculated for reference. In the nonsurgery group, it was 20.3% in PCS and 11.3% in OCR (p = 0.001), and in the surgery group it was 52.5% in PCS and 42.2% in OCR (p = 0.057).

RESULTS

Ages in the two databases were inconsistent. Sex distributions were consistent. Surgery and chemotherapy were more frequently performed for the OCR patients, and more patients at more advanced stages were also observed in OCR. The PCS NAs of sex, stage, and ratio of surgery combined were at the midpoints between those of PCS and OCR. The survival rate of NSCLC patients in the OCR was significantly inferior to that in the PCS. The follow-up rate of the PCS was lower than that of the OCR. The general features of PCS data showed similarity to OCR data, and the results of the PCS NAs suggested the effectiveness of this method to adjust the sampling imbalance in PCS.

Process of care and preliminary outcome in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the 1995-1997 patterns of care study in Japan

PURPOSE

To evaluate the practice process using the national average (NA); to compare differences in the process of care by age group; and to provide a preliminary outcome data for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in Japan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Patterns of Care Study conducted a nationwide survey of the care process for Stage I-III small-cell lung cancer in Japan. Patients were divided into three age groups: <65 years (younger group, n = 73); between 65 and 74 years (intermediate group, n = 81); and >or=75 years (elderly group, n = 20).

RESULTS

The NA for the total dose was 49.0 Gy, and for use of photon energy >or=6 MV, chemotherapy, and prophylactic cranial irradiation was 77.3%, 93.2%, and 1.69%, respectively. Age stratification had no impact on the variables of radiotherapy (RT) such as total dose and field size. Only 37% of patients received chemotherapy and thoracic RT concurrently. The proportion of patients who received chemotherapy and RT concurrently was 44%, 27%, and 25% of the younger, intermediate, and elderly groups, respectively (p = 0.029). Etoposide and cisplatin were less frequently used in the elderly group (>or=75 years old). Overall survival at 3 years for the entire group was 26%. The 3-year survival rate was 30% in the younger group, 28% in the intermediate group, and 9% in the elderly group. Variables found to have a significant impact on survival by multivariate analysis were the use of chemotherapy (p = 0.030), age (p = 0.032), and T stage (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Calculated NAs showed that the results of clinical study had favorably penetrated into the practice process in Japan. The results demonstrated that patient age significantly influenced the process of chemotherapy such as the use of etoposide and cisplatin for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in Japan. More concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic RT and the application of prophylactic cranial irradiation for complete responders need to be investigated in the future.

Patterns of Care Study quantitative evaluation of the quality of radiotherapy in Japan

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance (QA) of clinical practice is important for any medical specialty. Programs based on the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) have been developed to compare the quality of radiotherapeutic care at individual institutions, with the national average representing the process and outcome of radiotherapy. The feasibility of these programs was analyzed.

METHODS

Calculation programs for the national average and standard score were developed to evaluate quantitatively the process and outcome of radiotherapy at individual institutions as well as at the national level. The programs were used to evaluate the quality of radiotherapy for 561 esophageal carcinoma patients surveyed in the Japanese PCS.

RESULTS

As a representative example of QA measurement, the national average for the 5-year survival rate for these patients in the nonsurgery group was 5%. The regional averages for those in academic and nonacademic institutions were 9% and 1%, respectively (P = 0.0142), showing a significant difference between these two institutional strata. The standard score compared with the national average for institution No.105, for example, was 16.3 (P < 0.0001), with the positive value indicating that the outcome at this institution was significantly higher than the national average. The corresponding figure compared with the regional average was -0.3 (P = 0.7391), with the negative value indicating the outcome is not superior to the regional average of academic institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

These programs make it possible to compare quantitatively the quality of radiation therapy at individual institutions with the national and regional averages. They should also be useful for nationwide QA projects in radiation oncology as well as in other medical specialities.

A preliminary outcome analysis of the Patterns of Care Study in Japan for esophageal cancer patients with special reference to age: non surgery group

BACKGROUND

The Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was imported to Japan from the United States in July 1996. A preliminary outcome analysis of the PCS for esophageal cancer patients in Japan was made with special reference to age, because the elderly population is rapidly increasing in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From July 1996 to February 1998, external PCS audits were performed for 37 institutions nationwide and detailed information of 561 esophageal cancer patients treated during the period 1992-1994 was collected by using the fifth PCS data format developed in the United States. This format was provided courtesy of the American College of Radiology. For this study, patients who had not undergone surgery (n = 336) were selected. The patients were classified into three age groups: < 65 years old (n = 119), between 65 and 74 years (n = 93), and 75 years or older (n =123). Cox's proportional hazards model was used for the statistical analysis, with survival, acute/subacute complication and late complication of grade 3 or more based on RTOG criteria, as the endpoints.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic factors for the entire non-surgery group were Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.0007), stage (p = 0.0001), and external irradiation dose (p = 0.0001). For the younger group, KPS (p = 0.0004), stage (p = 0.0197), and utilization of brachytherapy (p = 0.0010) were significant, while for the intermediate age group it was KPS (p = 0. 0027), history of pulmonary disease (p = 0.0339), stage (p = 0.0001), and external dose (p = 0.0001), and for the elderly group, stage (p = 0.0001) and external irradiation dose (p = 0.0224) were significant. Significant risk factors for complications for the entire group were stage (p = 0.0411), external dose (p = 0.0163), and stratification of institution (academic vs. nonacademic) (p = 0. 0114). Significant risk factors for the younger group were history of pulmonary disease (p = 0.0495) and external dose (p = 0.0037), and the other age groups showed no significant risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Age was not a significant prognostic or risk factor for esophageal cancer patients in the non-surgery group treated with radiation therapy. Therefore, radiation therapy represented an important treatment modality for the elderly as well as for the younger esophageal cancer patients. External dose was a treatment-related prognostic factor for the elderly as well as for the intermediate age group.