Recent advances and future perspectives in adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies for lung cancer

Current Management of Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

There have been numerous recent advances in the treatmetn of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. The most significant involve the addition of targeted therapies adn immune checkpoint inhibitors into perioperative care. These exciting advances are improving survival in this challenging patient population, but some-decade old controveries around the definition of resectability, prognositic importance of tumor response to induction therapy, and the role of pneumonectomy persist.

The role of immunotherapy in treating lung cancer: current status and future perspective

Lung cancers have the worst incident and mortality rates. Cancers such as advanced non-small-cell lung carcinomas are inoperable and often the only treatment available is chemo-radiotherapy. There has been little improvement in long-term survival recently, prompting research into novel treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a form of immunotherapy used in lung cancer. The efficacy of ICIs is dependent on: the part of the pathway affected; the presence of prognostic biomarkers; the method of efficacy assessment; the stage of the disease and other drugs involved. Monoclonal antibodies, Toll-like receptor agonists and cancer vaccines have shown modest effects on survival. Refinement of treatment regimens and prognostic biomarkers will help improve the survival of patients in the future.

A narrative review of primary research endpoints of neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer: past, present and future

Objective

This review summarizes the current status of neoadjuvant therapy and discusses the choice of new clinical research endpoints for non-small cell lung cancer.

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a recognized practice in patients with resectable and locally advanced lung cancer. With the introduction of molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the overall survival (OS) of patients with lung cancer has been significantly improved, and the original traditional clinical research endpoints are no longer suitable for existing clinical research. In order to accelerate the process of clinical trials and the development and approval of drugs, it is necessary to find suitable alternative indicators as the main indicators of clinical research.

Methods

Therefore, this article focuses on clinical trials using disease-free survival (DFS), progression free survival, and pathological evaluation indicators, pathologic complete response and major pathologic response, as surrogate endpoints. We search related literature through PubMed database and clinical trials through clinicaltrials.gov.

Conclusions

Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response are recommended as surrogate endpoints in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and secondary endpoints are listed for the prediction of pathological results. In addition, the definitions of major pathological response (MPR) and PCR should be standardized, and a new pathological evaluation standard should be developed, which is applicable to all current treatment methods.

Keywords

Neoadjuvant therapy; resectable lung cancer; clinical research endpoint; pathological response.

EGFR Status Assessment for Better Care of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: What Is Changing in the Daily Practice of Pathologists?

The recent emergence of novel neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for early stage (I-IIIA) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR mutations and immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, has suddenly required the evaluation of biomarkers predictive of the efficacy of different treatments in these patients. Currently, the choice of one or another of these treatments mainly depends on the results of immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 and of the status of EGFR and ALK. This new development has led to the setup of different analyses for clinical and molecular pathology laboratories, which have had to rapidly integrate a number of new challenges into daily practice and to establish new organization for decision making. This review outlines the impact of the management of biological samples in laboratories and discusses perspectives for pathologists within the framework of EGFR TKIs in early stage NSCLC.