Association of tumor burden with outcome in first-line therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Programmed Death Ligand-1 and Tumor Burden Score Dictate Treatment Responses in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The significance of tumor burden for survival is unknown for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor burden score (TBS) in patients with R/M HNSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

R/M HNSCC patients who were treated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil plus cetuximab (EPF) or pembrolizumab (PPF) as first-line treatment were included in our study. PD-L1 and TBS were estimated and correlated with treatment responses. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for outcomes estimation.

RESULTS

A total of 252 R/M HNSCC patients were included, with 126 high tumor burden (HTB) and 126 low tumor burden (LTB) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months in LTB and 3.9 months in HTB (p < 0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months in LTB and 9.2 months in HTB (p = 0.001). Patients with LTB had better PFS and OS than those with HTB independent of PD-L1 status. Subgroup analysis showed HTB patients treated with EPF had better survival than those treated with PPF, regardless of PD-L1 expression. For LTB PD-L1 positive patients, there was a longer survival with PPF than EPF, while for LTB PD-L1 negative patients, survival was similar between PPF and EPF. Multivariate analysis exhibited that tumor burden was significantly correlated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor burden is significantly correlated with survival in patients with R/M HNSCC. PD-L1 and TBS should be taken into consideration to determine first-line treatment.

Impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to combination therapy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been suggested in the real-world setting. We retrospectively examined the efficacy of CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab systemic therapy for synchronous mRCC.

METHODS

Synchronous mRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab at Kobe University Hospital or five affiliated hospitals between October 2018 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) between patients with CN prior to systemic therapy and without CN. In addition, patients were 1:1 matched by propensity scores accounting for factors associated with treatment assignment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Prior CN) and 33 received nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone (Without CN). PFS of the Prior CN group was 10.8 months (95%CI 5.5-NR) and 3.4 months (95%CI 2.0-5.9) for the Without CN group (p = 0.0158). OS of Prior CN was 38.4 months (95%CI NR-NR) and 12.6 months (95%CI 4.2-30.8) for Without CN (p = 0.0024). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified prior CN as a significant prognostic indicator for PFS and OS. Moreover, propensity score matching analysis showed significant improvements in PFS and OS in Prior CN.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab systemic therapy for synchronous mRCC had a better prognosis than patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone. These results suggest the efficacy of prior CN for synchronous mRCC with ICI combination therapy.

Relation of overall tumor burden with severe immune-related adverse events in nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment for lung cancer

Compared to chemotherapy alone, monoclonal antibodies like ipilimumab and nivolumab, with or without chemotherapy, improve the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than those with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if baseline overall tumor burden was associated with the development of Grade ≥ 3 irAEs (severe irAEs) when treated with first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab with or without chemotherapy.We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital between December 2020 and December 2021. Baseline overall tumor burden was measured as the sum of unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. We defined irAEs as ICI therapy-related toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0.A significant difference in tumor burden was observed between patients with and without severe irAEs (100 mm vs. 67.5 mm, p = 0.001). We evaluated various clinical parameters, including baseline overall tumor burden, before treatment initiation. Of the various parameters, only high tumor burden correlated with severe irAEs, independent of complementary chemotherapy. The multivariate odds ratio of severe irAEs and high tumor burden was 6.62.Conclusively, baseline overall tumor burden may be a risk factor for severe irAEs in patients treated with first-line combination ICI therapy. Therefore, patients with large tumor burden should be carefully monitored to prevent irAEs.

Risk factors for severe immune-related adverse events after first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Pembrolizumab treatment is associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we investigated the associations among pre-treatment clinical factors, baseline overall tumor burden, and development of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs; grade ≥ 3) after pembrolizumab treatment with or without chemotherapy. We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital from March 2017 to February 2021. The baseline overall tumor burden was measured as the sum of the unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions. We defined irAEs as toxicities related to immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Tumor burden differed significantly between patients with and without severe irAEs (85 vs. 65 mm, p = 0.0367). The cutoff value for overall tumor burden was set to 80 mm. Good performance status (PS = 0) and PD-L1 expression > 80%, but not overall tumor burden, were correlated with severe irAEs, regardless of complementary chemotherapy. The multivariate odds ratios of good PS and high PD-L1 expression for severe irAEs were 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-8.77, p = 0.019) and 4.44 (95% CI: 1.59-12.42, p = 0.0044), respectively. Baseline overall tumor burden, good PS, and high PD-L1 expression were associated with severe irAEs in patients with NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. Patients with these factors should be carefully monitored to prevent irAEs.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and second-line therapy in Japanese untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: 2-year analysis from a multicenter retrospective clinical study (J-cardinal study)

Background

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy is one of the standard therapies for untreated renal cell carcinoma patients with an International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate/poor risk. We have previously reported the 1-year analysis results of the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in the real-world setting in Japan. Here, we report the effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy and of second-line therapy, using 2-year analysis.

Methods

This retrospective observational study enrolled Japanese patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma who initiated nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy between August 2018 and January 2019. Data were collected from patients’ medical records at baseline and at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after the last enrollment.

Results

Of the 45 patients enrolled, 10 patients (22.2%) each had non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 at baseline. Median follow-up period was 24.0 months; objective response rate was 41.5%, with 6 patients achieving complete response; median progression-free survival was 17.8 months and 24-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 41.6 and 59.1%, respectively. Second-line therapy achieved an objective response rate of 20%; median progression-free survival was 9.8 months. Median progression-free survival 2 was 26.4 months.

Conclusions

The effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy at 2-year analysis in the real-world setting in Japan was comparable to that reported in CheckMate 214. The current analysis also demonstrated the effectiveness of second-line therapy after nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy.

Pathologic complete response with pembrolizumab plus axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Immunotherapy-based combinations have played a central role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and long-term survival of patients is expected. In this context, it is clear that a certain number of patients can achieve a complete response. However, the diagnosis of complete response is usually based on imaging, and there are few cases of pathological complete response. In this study, we report a case of a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who was treated with pembrolizumab plus axitinib, followed by resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions, and pathologically achieved a complete response.

Immune-related adverse events are clinical biomarkers to predict favorable outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors cause various immune-related adverse events. The present study examined the association between the incidence of immune-related adverse events and survival outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. In addition, we compared the effect of adverse event profiles on survival for patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from August 2018 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses, and hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients, 22 (62.9%) experienced immune-related adverse events. The median progression-free survival (P = 0.0012) and overall survival (P = 0.0147) were significantly longer in patients with immune-related adverse events than in those without immune-related adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed that the incidence of immune-related adverse events was an independent factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 4.940, 95% confidence interval: 1.558-15.664, P = 0.0067). Skin reaction was a positive predictive immune-related adverse events for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 9.322, 95% confidence interval: 1.954-44.475, P = 0.0051).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with immune-related adverse events had superior clinical outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment than those without immune-related adverse events. Skin immune-related adverse events may be effective biomarkers in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.