Early specialized palliative care for patients with metastatic lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a feasibility study of a nurse-led screening-triggered programme

Spiritual care in Portuguese palliative care settings: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Spirituality is a core dimension of palliative care. However, Portuguese palliative care teams do not have many spiritual care resources.

METHODS

Cross-sectional and observational survey studies were used to characterise spiritual care resources in Portuguese palliative care teams based on a non-probabilistic convenience sampling. An electronic questionnaire was used for data collection.

RESULTS

A total of 150 responses were obtained. In 68.7% of the teams, there was no specific professional dedicated to spiritual care, although 68% of the participants considered that a spiritual assessment or intervention was a part of their role; 47.3% considered that their colleagues were reasonably prepared to develop a spiritual assessment or follow-up; for a patient, and 54.7% were considered to be reasonably involved. However, 50.0% did not consider themseleves to be competent at providing spiritual care. Most referred to not using any specific assessment tool or document (67.3%); 49.3% dedicated less than 10% of their time to specific education or training about spirituality.

CONCLUSION

This study involved different professionals from multidisciplinary teams. Most recognised the importance of attending to the patient's spirituality and spiritual care. Results suggest that there is a need for specific training, resources and techniques to meet a patient's spiritual care needs at the end of life. This need may be similar in all teams, not just palliative care teams, to facilitate comparing indicators and promote the implementation of holistic care in palliative care.

Nurse-Led Screening-Triggered Early Specialized Palliative Care Program for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine the effectiveness of a nurse-led, screening-triggered early specialized palliative care intervention program for patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced lung cancer who underwent initial chemotherapy were randomized to intervention and usual care groups between January 2017 and September 2019. The intervention comprised comprehensive needs assessments, counseling, and service coordination by advanced-level nurses. Patients in the usual care group received the usual oncological care. The primary end point was a change in the trial outcome index (TOI) scores from baseline to 12 weeks. The secondary end-points were TOI scores at week 20, depression, anxiety, and survival.

RESULTS

In total, 102 patients were assigned to each group. Compared with the usual care group, no significant improvement in TOI scores was observed at 12 weeks in the intervention group (mean group difference: 2.13; 90% confidence interval: -0.70, 4.95; p = 0.107, one-sided), whereas significant improvement was observed at 20 weeks (3.58; 90% confidence interval: 0.15, 7.00; p = 0.043). There were no significant differences in the change from baseline depression and anxiety between the groups from baseline at week 12 and 20 weeks (depression: p = 0.60 and 0.10, anxiety: p = 0.78 and 0.067). Survival did not significantly differ between the groups (median survival time: 12.1 vs. 11.1 months; p = 0.302).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialized palliative care did not show significant superiority over usual care during the 12-week study period. However, it may have yielded delayed clinical benefits, such as improved quality of life and this feasible model can be acceptable in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000025491.

The Use of Person-Centered Outcome Measures to Support Integrated Palliative Care for Older People: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to synthesize evidence on the use of person-centered outcome measures to facilitate integrated palliative care for older people and build a logic model depicting the mechanisms through which person-centered outcome measures support integrated care.

DESIGN

Mixed methods systematic review using a data-based convergent synthesis design.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Older people aged ≥60 years who are approaching the end of their lives in multiple settings.

METHODS

The study was underpinned by a conceptual framework of integrated palliative care, which informed the search strategy, data extraction, analysis, and synthesis. A hybrid search strategy was implemented, with database searches (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ASSIA) complemented by snowball searches. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed by narrative synthesis to summarize and explain the findings. The findings informed a logic model depicting the mechanisms of using person-centered outcome measures to support integrated palliative care.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included. Three mixed methods studies, 2 qualitative studies, and 21 quantitative studies were included. There was evidence that person-centered outcome measures could support integrated palliative care through informing palliative care policy development (n = 4), facilitating joint working across settings (n = 5), enabling close collaboration of multidisciplinary teams (n = 14), promoting joint education (n = 1), facilitating timing and specialist referral (n = 6), and enhancing patient-centered care (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This review makes an important, novel, and theoretically informed contribution to the delivery of scalable and sustainable integrated palliative care into the care of older people using person-centered outcome measures. The constructed logic model provides a conceptual framework and practical approach to how person-centered outcome measures support multilevel integration. A future area of research is the development of person-centered outcome measure interventions informed by the logic model to meet clinical needs.

Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

A wide variety of screening tools for the need for specialist palliative care (SPC) have been proposed for the use in oncology. However, as there is no established reference standard for SPC need to compare their results with, their sensitivity and specificity have not yet been determined. The aim of the study was to explore whether SPC need assessment by means of multi-professional case review has sufficient interrater agreement to be employed as a reference standard.

METHODS

Comprehensive case descriptions were prepared for 20 inpatients with advanced oncologic disease at the University Hospital Freiburg (Germany). All cases were presented to the palliative care teams of three different hospitals in independent, multi-professional case review sessions. The teams assessed whether patients had support needs in nine categories and subsequently concluded SPC need (yes / no). Interrater agreement regarding SPC need was determined by calculating Fleiss' Kappa.

RESULTS

In 17 out of 20 cases the three teams agreed regarding their appraisal of SPC need (substantial interrater agreement: Fleiss' Kappa κ = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.55-1.0; p < 0.001)). The number of support needs was significantly lower for patients who all teams agreed had no SPC need than for those with agreed SPC need.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed expert case review process shows sufficient reliability to be used as a reference standard. Key elements of the case review process (e.g. clear definition of SPC need, standardized review of the patients' support needs) and possible modifications to simplify the process are discussed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00021686, registered 17.12.2020.