Treatment cost of pancreatic cancer in Japan: analysis of the difference after the introduction of gemcitabine

Cost-effectiveness of MicroRNA for Pancreatic Cancer Screening in Patients With Diabetes

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of microRNA compared with carbohydrate antigen 19-9, abdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and no screening for pancreatic cancer (PC) screening in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We developed a state-transition model from a health care payer perspective and a lifetime horizon. We targeted 3 hypothetical cohorts of patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes (LSD), new-onset diabetes (NOD), and LSD having intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), aged 40, 50, 60, and 70 years. The main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years, life expectancy life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and deaths from PC.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, abdominal ultrasound in patients with LSD and microRNA in patients with NOD and LSD having IPMN were the most cost-effective for all age groups. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to PC incidence and the cost of microRNA. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that microRNA was 42% to 54% cost-effective for NOD and 76% to 78% cost-effective for LSD having IPMN at a willingness-to-pay level of US $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. MicroRNA prevented 30,641 PC deaths in diabetic patients compared with no screening.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NOD and LSD having IPMN, microRNA-based PC screening is cost-effective and recommended for early PC detection.

Cost-effectiveness of Abdominal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pancreatic Cancer Screening in Familial High-Risk Individuals in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess cost-effectiveness of abdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and no screening for pancreatic cancer screening in familial high-risk individuals (HRIs).

METHODS

We developed decision trees with Markov models for a hypothetical cohort of familial HRIs at the age of 50 year using a healthcare sector perspective and a lifetime horizon. Main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

In a base-case analysis, abdominal ultrasound was the most cost-effective (US $11,035, 17.4875 QALYs). Magnetic resonance imaging yielded the best benefits. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to the incidence of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound was more cost-effective than abdominal ultrasound when the incidence of pancreatic cancer was greater than 0.008 and under 0.016. Magnetic resonance imaging was more cost-effective than endoscopic ultrasound when the incidence of pancreatic cancer was greater than 0.016. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo simulation for 10,000 trials demonstrated that abdominal ultrasound was cost-effective 76% of the time at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US $50,000/QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal ultrasound is the most cost-effective and recommended for pancreatic cancer screening in familial HRIs in Japan. Evaluating the risk of pancreatic cancer among familial HRIs as a target for screening is significant.

Gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer - the use of Roux loop significantly shortens the hospital length of stay

AIM: To evaluate the use of the Roux loop on the postoperative course in patients submitted for gastroenteroanastomosis (GE).

METHODS: Non-jaundiced patients (n = 41) operated on in the Department of General and Transplant Surgery in Lodz, between January 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled. The tumor was considered unresectable when liver metastases or major vascular involvement were confirmed. Patients were randomized to receive Roux (n = 21) or conventional GE (n = 20) on a prophylactic basis.

RESULTS: The mean time to nasogastric tube withdrawal in Roux GE group was shorter (1.4 ± 0.75 vs 2.8 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). Time to starting oral liquids, soft diet and regular diet were decreased (2.3 ± 0.86 vs 3.45 ± 1.19; P < 0.001; 3.3 ± 0.73 vs 4.4 ± 1.23, P < 0.001 and 4.5 ± 0.76 vs 5.6 ± 1.42, P = 0.002; respectively). The Roux GE group had a lower use of prokinetics (10 mg thrice daily for 2.2 ± 1.8 d vs 3.7 ± 2.6 d, P = 0.044; total 62 ± 49 mg vs 111 ± 79 mg, P = 0.025). The mean hospitalization time following Roux GE was shorter (7.7 d vs 9.6 d, P = 0.006). Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was confirmed in 20% after conventional GE but in none of the patients following Roux GE.

CONCLUSION: Roux gastrojejunostomy during open abdomen exploration in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is easy to perform, decreases the incidence of DGE and lowers hospitalization time.

Costs and trends in pancreatic cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden in the United States, and predominantly affects older adults. The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of pancreatic cancer treatment in a population-based cohort of Medicare beneficiaries, and the contribution of different treatment modalities and health care services to the total cost of care and trends in costs over time.

METHODS

In the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, pancreatic cancer patients were identified who were aged 66 years or older and who were diagnosed from 2000 to 2007. Total direct medical costs were estimated from Medicare payments overall and within categories of care. Costs attributable to pancreatic cancer were estimated by subtracting the costs of medical care in a matched cohort of cancer-free beneficiaries.

RESULTS

A total of 15,037 patients were identified, of whom 97% were observed from diagnosis until death. Mean total direct medical costs were $65,500. Mean total costs were greater for patients with resectable locoregional disease ($134,700) than for those with unresectable locoregional or distant disease ($65,300 and $49,000, respectively). Hospitalizations and cancer-directed procedures collectively accounted for the largest fraction of health care costs. The total cost of care appeared to increase slightly over the study period (P = .05). The mean costs attributable to pancreatic cancer were $61,700.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite poor prognosis and short survival, the economic burden of pancreatic cancer in the elderly is substantial. Demographic trends, greater use of targeted therapies, and possible implementation of screening strategies are likely to impact treatment patterns and costs in the future.

Antitumor Effect of Gemcitabine on Orthotopically Inoculated Human Gallbladder Cancer Cells in Nude Mice

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma is poor; therefore, investigating the efficacy of new chemotherapy agents is essential for the treatments for this tumor. Recently, several studies have reported clinical trials using gemcitabine as treatment for advanced gallbladder cancers. However, the antitumor effects of gemcitabine on gallbladder carcinoma have not been examined in in vitro and in vivo model systems.

METHODS

We examined the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in four biliary tract cancer cell lines using the WST-1 assay. In addition, we examined the effect of gemcitabine on gallbladder cancers resulting from orthotopic inoculation of NOZ gallbladder tumor cells into nude mice. One week after transplantation, the mice were randomized into two groups: In Group A, the mice were treated by an intra-peritoneal injection of 0.9% sodium chloride for three weeks after inoculation (control). In Group B, the mice were treated by an intra-peritoneal injection of gemcitabine (125 mg / kg) for three weeks. All mice were sacrificed one week after the end of treatment, and macroscopic and histological findings were evaluated. The expression levels of proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were examined to investigate cellular proliferation activity, and Tunnel assays were performed to determine apoptotic status. Survival duration of the mice after gemcitabine treatment was compared to that of untreated mice.

RESULTS

The gemcitabine sensitivity of the four biliary tract cancer cell lines was similar in a dose dependent manner. In the in vivo models, the Group A mice showed huge tumors of the gallbladder, with liver invasion and lymph node metastases. However, there were no abdominal tumors in the Group B mice, and microscopic gallbladder cancer could only be detected from histological findings. The mean percent of PCNA-positive tumor cells was significantly higher in tumors from mice in Group A (71.9%) compared to those of Group B (34.7%). The mean percent of Tunnel-positive tumor cells was significantly lower in mice from Group A (2.0%) than those from Group B (5.7%). Survival duration was prolonged significantly in the gemcitabine-treated mice relative to untreated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine treatment may inhibit tumor progression and prolong survival in gallbladder cancer by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis.