Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction in China according to Siewert's classification

Modified hepatic left lateral lobe inversion in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: An analysis of 13 cases

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG), the prolapse of the hepatic left lateral lobe near the lesser curvature and esophageal hiatus can obstruct the field of vision and operation. Therefore, it is necessary to retract or obstruct the hepatic left lateral lobe to ensure a clear field of vision.

AIM

To investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of the modified hepatic left lateral lobe inversion technique for LPG.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 13 consecutive patients with early-stage upper gastric adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction treated with LPG from January to December 2023 at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The modified hepatic left lateral lobe inversion technique was used to expose the surgical field in all patients, and short-term outcomes were observed.

RESULTS

In all 13 patients, the modified hepatic left lateral lobe inversion technique was successful during surgery without the need for re-retraction or alteration of the liver traction method. There were no instances of esophageal hiatus occlusion, eliminating the need for forceps to assist in exposure. There was no occurrence of intraoperative hepatic hemorrhage, hepatic vein injury, or hepatic congestion. No postoperative digestive complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II occurred within 30 days after surgery, except for a single case of pulmonary infection. Some patients experienced increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels on the first day after surgery, which significantly decreased by the third day and returned to normal by the seventh day after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The modified hepatic left lateral lobe inversion technique has demonstrated satisfactory results, offering advantages in terms of facilitating surgical procedures, reducing surgical trauma, and protecting the liver.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimal Proximal Resection Margin in Total Gastrectomy for Siewert II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the minimal proximal resection margin (PRM) in total gastrectomy (TG) for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

METHODS

This study finally included 178 Siewert II advanced AEG patients who underwent TG from January 2017 to September 2020. According to the PRM length, patients were divided into 20-25 mm group and 30-35 mm group. Intraoperative, short-, and long-term postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The PRM of the 20-25 mm group had significantly less operation time compared with the PRM of the 30-35 mm group (P < .001), but the amount of blood loss, management of the diaphragmatic crura, and the incidence of positive resection margin were not significantly different between two groups (P > .05). In short-term postoperative outcomes, first gas-passing time, gastric-tube removal time, start time of diet, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and body weight loss were similar between two groups (P > .05). During the follow-up, the 3-year overall survival rates and the recurrence rates were not significantly different between the PRM of 20-25 mm and 30-35 mm groups (81.2% vs 83.5%, P = .695; 18.8% vs 15.5%, P = .812, respectively).

CONCLUSION

With less operation time and more preserved esophagus, the minimal PRM length of 20-25 mm could be an appropriate option in TG for patients with Siewert II advanced AEG.

Hub genes in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common malignant tumor, and it is usually fatal. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) accounts for about 50% of all GC cases. However, the systematic co-expression analysis of this tumor does not fully explain its pathogenesis. This study aimed to identify hub genes based on weighted gene co-expression networks and immunohistochemistry analyses.

METHODS

The RNA-seq data of 22 AEG patients were processed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. We differentiated the modules with clinical tumor markers and performed Gene Ontology and pathway enrichment analysis. We identified the hub genes related to the biological processes of tumorigenesis based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five distinct co-expression gene modules were identified; the tumorigenic genes CD93, TRIM28, SLC3A2, CBX4, PATL1, and ZNF473 had high intramodular connectivity. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that these hub genes are upregulated in AEG. Statistical analysis indicated that the expression of CD93 was correlated with the T stage and maximum tumor diameter.

CONCLUSION

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry identified CD93 as a hub gene that might be critical for AEG biology.

Total laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted transabdominal posterior mediastinal digestive tract reconstruction in the treatment of Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective study

Background

The method of operation and the range of resection for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remain controversial. This study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and short-term postoperative effect of total laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted transabdominal posterior mediastinal digestive tract reconstruction in the treatment of Siewert II AEG.

Methods

Total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted gastrointestinal reconstruction through abdominal posterior mediastinum was performed in 108 patients with Siewert II AEG from October 2017 to February 2019. This study evaluated the loss of intraoperative blood, the number of lymph nodes, the marginal of the tumor, short-term postoperative complications (within 30 days), the rate of survival at follow-up, and the economic cost, feasibility, and effect of short-term postoperative recovery for patients who received these two operations.

Result

There were no significant differences in general data between the total laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic-assisted group (P > 0.05). However, the total laparoscopic group cost more time on the surgical procedure and digestive tract reconstruction, lost less intraoperative blood, and had more mediastinal lymph nodes compared with the laparoscopic-assisted group (P < 0.05). The total laparoscopic group was significantly better than the laparoscopic-assisted group compared with the short-term postoperative recovery indexes, such as the first exhaust time, the first defecation time, the first fluid time, the first semi-fluid diet time, the postoperative hospital stay, and other postoperative recovery indexes (P < 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, postoperative pathological indexes, the recurrence rate, and mortality between the total laparoscopic group and laparoscopic-assisted group (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The safety, feasibility, and short-term effect of total laparoscopic transabdominal posterior mediastinal digestive tract reconstruction in the treatment of Siewert II AEG were better than those for the laparoscopic-assisted group.

Clinicopathologic and survival differences between adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus (DO) and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) are increasing. They may represent differing disease processes. This study aimed to assess clinicopathological and survival differences between patients with DO and GOJ adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a prospective single-surgeon database of consecutive patients undergoing an open Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (distal oesophagus, Siewert type I and II). Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and survival were evaluated and prognostic factors examined using univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

RESULTS

The data were available for 234 patients who underwent an oesophagectomy between 1992 and 2019. DO tumours had higher rates of Barrett's oesophagus (P < 0.001), presented with lower tumour stage (P = 0.02) and were more likely to be associated with fewer lymph nodes resected (P = 0.003) than GOJ tumours. The median overall survival for distal oesophageal tumours was 29.2 months, while gastro-oesophageal tumours was 38.6 months. Kaplan Meier analysis did not show a difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.08). However, when adjusted for potential confounders, GOJ tumours were associated with a reduced adjusted hazard of death (adjusted HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92, P = 0.022) compared with DO tumours.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that GOJ cancers have different clinicopathological characteristics and improved survival compared to DO tumours.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

The proportions of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) diagnosed by Barrett's oesophagus surveillance or with pre-existing Barrett's oesophagus are unclear.

AIM

To estimate the prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis among patients with OAC or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas (OGJAC).

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase to identify studies published 1966-1/8/2020 that examined the prevalence of prior (≥6 months) or concurrent Barrett's diagnosis (at cancer diagnosis) among OAC and OGJAC patients. Random effects models estimated overall and stratified pooled prevalence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 69 studies, including 33 002 OAC patients (53 studies) and 2712 patients with OGJAC (28 studies) were included. The pooled prevalence of prior Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis in OAC was 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4%-15.6%). The prevalence of prior Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis was higher in single-centre resection studies (16.0%, 95% CI 8.7%-24.9%) than population-based cancer registry studies (8.4%, 95% CI 5.5%-11.9%). The prevalence of concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in OAC was 56.6% (95% CI 48.5%-64.6%). Studies with 100% early stage OAC had higher prevalence of concurrent Barrett's oesophagus (91.3%, 95% CI 82.4%-97.6%) than studies with <50% early OAC (39.7%, 95% CI 33.7%-45.9%). In OGJAC, the prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus was 23.2% (95% CI 7.5%-44.0%) and 26.3% (95% CI 17.8%-35.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with OAC have Barrett's oesophagus. Our meta-analysis found ~12% of OAC patients had prior Barrett's diagnosis, but concurrent Barrett's oesophagus was found in ~57% at the time of OAC diagnosis. This represents a considerable missed opportunity for Barrett's oesophagus screening.

Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive versus open Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Background

Surgical resection is still the main treatment option for patients with resectable Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). This retrospective study evaluated the significance of minimally invasive Sweet esophagectomy (MISE) for the treatment of Siewert type II AEG.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 174 patients with Siewert type II AEG who received a Sweet esophagectomy in our center between October 2013 and September 2017. Of these patients, 73 underwent MISE and 101 underwent open Sweet esophagectomy (OSE). The clinicopathologic factors, operational factors and postoperative complications were compared.

Results

The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, preoperative staging and incidence of comorbidities (P > 0.05). Relative to the OSE approach, the MISE approach was associated with a significant decrease in surgical blood loss (P < 0.001), chest tube duration (P = 0.003) and postoperative admission duration (P = 0.002). The minimally invasive approach was associated with significantly less total morbidity and fewer respiratory complications than the open approach (P = 0.015 and P = 0.016, respectively). Relative to the open approach, the MISE approach was associated with a significant increase in the number of total lymph nodes removed and the locations of the total lymph nodes removed (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Our MISE technique can be safely and effectively performed for intrathoracic anastomosis with favorable early outcomes.

Analysis of the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in 734 cases of Chinese Hui and Han patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of 734 cases of Chinese Hui and Han patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

METHODS

In total, 734 patients were confirmed to have AEG by gastroscopy and pathology at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between January 2002 and December 2012. Univariate and multivariate analyses of demographic, clinicopathological, and prognostic data were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 734 AEG patients underwent surgical intervention, including 169 Hui patients and 565 Han patients. The male to female ratio was 9.5:1 in Hui patients and 6.4:1 in Han patients, and the average age in both groups was approximately 61 years. The Han patients were more likely to have a cigarette smoking history and an alcohol consumption history than the Hui patients (58.8% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.000; 45.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.000). The 5-year survival rate in the Hui and Han patients was 54.3% and 39.9%, respectively (p = 0.024). Age (p = 0.005), sex (p = 0.015), pathologic T stage (p = 0.056), pathologic N stage (p = 0.000), pathologic M stage (p = 0.001), number of resected lymph nodes (p = 0.001) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.002) were significant independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The AEG patients were primarily male and elderly in both Hui and Han groups with the prognosis of Hui patients better than Han patients. Age, sex, pathologic T3-4 stage, pathologic N stage, pathologic M stage, number of resected lymph nodes, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were significant independent factors predictive of the prognosis of AEG in both groups.

Changing Pattern of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction in Recent 10 Years: Experience at a Large Tertiary Medical Center in China

Aims and background

To investigate the changing pattern of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction subtypes and its time trend relationship with that of reflux esophagitis over 10 years at a tertiary medical center in China.

Methods and study design

The medical records of all patients who underwent gastroscopy from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert's classification, gastric non-cardiac adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, reflux esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection were diagnosed according to the results of gastroscopy and mucosal histopathology. All the patients were divided into three cohorts (cohort A [2000–2003], cohort B [2004–2006]), cohort C [2007–2009]), and the proportion of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and its subtypes in all upper gastrointestinal tumors (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, gastric non-cardiac adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma) in each cohort were compared. The annual percentages of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, reflux esophagitis and H pylori in all patients were also compared.

Results

70,073 patients (cohort A, n = 20298, cohort B, n = 20443, cohort C, n = 29332) who underwent gastroscopy were reviewed. Totally there were 279 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (0.398%, M:F = 5.6:1), 794 gastric non-cardiac adenocarcinoma patients (1.133%, M:F = 2:1), 366 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (0.522%, M:F = 3.4:1) and 4681 reflux esophagitis patients. Among the three subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, only type I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in upper GI tumors exhibited increasing trend over time (1.86%, 3.39% and 4.94% for cohort A, B and C, respectively, P = 0.009). According to the WHO classification of histological types, the tubular types of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction have decreased (P = 0.008), whereas papillary type (P = 0.001) increased. The annual detection rate of type I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction appeared to be positively correlated with reflux esophagitis (r = 0.846, P = 0.002) and negatively with H pylori infection (r = -0.785, P = 0.007) in time trend.

Conclusions

Over a recent 10-year period, the three subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction showed different changing trends, suggesting heterogeneous characteristics of the three Siewert types of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of gastroesophageal junction tumors according to Siewert classification

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of gastroesophageal junction tumors remains controversial due to confusion on whether they should be considered as primary esophageal or as gastric tumors. The incidence of these tumors with poor prognosis has increased, thus creating scientific interest on gastroesophageal cancers. Esophagogastric cancers are classified according to their location by Siewert, and the treatment of each type varies. We evaluated the prognostic factors and differences in clinicopathologic factors of patients with gastroesophageal junction tumor, who have been treated and followed-up in our clinics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 187 patients with gastroesophageal junction tumors who have been operated and treated in the Oncology Department between 2005 and 2014. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in clinicopathologic factors among Siewert groups I, II and III. Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median age of our patients was 62 years, and approximately 70% was male. Nineteen patients (10.2%) had Siewert I tumors, 40 (21.4%) II, and the remaining 128 (64.4%) had Siewert III tumors. Siewert III tumors were at more advanced pathologic and T stages. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was mostly applied to Siewert group I patients. There was no difference between the 3 groups in terms of recurrence. While the median overall survival and 2-year overall survival rate were 26.6 months and 39.6%, the median disease free survival and disease free survival rates were 16.5 months and 30.1%, respectively. The N stage, pathologic stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, surgical margin, and grade were associated with both overall survival and disease free survival, while pathologic stage and presence of recurrence were significant factors for overall survival. The median disease free survival for Siewert III tumors was 20 months, 11.3 month for Siewert I tumors, and 14 months for Siewert II tumors, but the finding was not statistically significant (p=0.08).

CONCLUSION

Although gastroesophageal junction tumors were grouped according to their location and they exerted different clinicopathologic properties, their prognosis was similar.

Changes of Esophagogastric Junctional Adenocarcinoma and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Among Surgical Patients During 1988-2012: A Single-institution, High-volume Experience in China

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the changes of esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among surgical patients from 1988 to 2012 in a Chinese high-volume hospital.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of EGJA in Western countries has rapidly increased in recent decades. However, recent data from China remain sparse.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the basis of 5053 patients who underwent surgery for gastric and distal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Total of 1723 patients with EGJA who underwent surgery were included. Changes of the prevalence of GERD and the clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of EGJA were longitudinally analyzed by a 5-year interval.

RESULTS

The proportion of EGJA was increased from 22.3% in period 1 (1988-1992) to 35.7% in period 5 (2008-2012) (P < 0.001). The proportion of Siewert type III (35.9% vs 47.0%) (P < 0.001) and type I (8.7% vs 15.8%) (P = 0.002) tumors of EGJA was also increased during the past 25 years. The prevalence of GERD had increased gradually from 6.5% in period 1 to 10.9% in period 5 for the 3 subgroups without significant difference (P = 0.459). There was an upward tendency with significant difference between the proportion of EGJA and the prevalence of GERD (r = 0.946, P = 0.000). Instead of type II and type III tumors, there was a positive correlation with change in GERD for type I tumors (r = 0.438, P = 0.029). Total gastrectomy was more preferred among patients with EGJA in period 5 than in period 1 (42.0% vs 19.6%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing trend of EGJA is observed during the past 25 years in West China Hospital. The prevalence of GERD among EGJA had showed a gradually increased trend. However, the causality between GERD and EGJA still needs to be researched further. Total gastrectomy is becoming more preferred procedure in patients with EGJA.

Comparison on Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis Between Esophagogastric Junctional Adenocarcinoma (Siewert II/III Types) and Distal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Cohort Study, a Single Institution, High Volume Experience in China

The incidence of the EGJA is rapidly increasing. The clinicopathological features have not yet been elucidated. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis between patients with esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA) and distal gastric adenocarcinoma (DGA).In this retrospective study, 1230 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2010 in West China Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on tumor location. Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis were also used to evaluate the prognostic factors of DGA and EGJA.Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were divided into 2 study groups according to tumor location: 321 EGJA (26.1%) and 909 DGA (73.9%). Tumors with larger diameter, more advanced pT and pN stage were more common in EGJA. Significant differences were revealed in 3-year overall survival rate (3-YS) between 2 groups: EGJA (57.5%) and DGA (65.5%) (P = 0.001), and further analysis indicate that there was also significant difference on 3-YS between EGJA (76.9%) and DGA (84.2%) (P = 0.012) in stage II. From our multivariate analysis, we found that there were different independent prognostic indicators for DGA and EGJA.The clinicopathological features of EGJA were strikingly different from DGA and patients with EGJA showed a worse prognosis when compared with DGA. The pT stage, pN stage, pM stage, tumor size, age, and radical degree were determined to be independent factors of prognosis for DGA, while only combined organ resection, pN stage, and pM stage were independent prognostic factors for EGJA.

Different surgical approaches for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of different surgical approaches for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

METHODS: One hundred and fifty AEG patients were randomly divided into either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group underwent surgery via a transabdominal approach, while the control group was treated via a transthoracic approach. The operation situation, postoperative pathology and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: There were significant differences in mean operative time (187.42 min ± 48.47 min vs 225.79 min ± 83.98 min), mean blood loss (128.09 mL ± 48.95 mL vs 208.01 mL ± 70.12 mL), number of paraesophageal lymph nodes (0.18 ± 0.67 vs 0.18 ± 0.67), number of cleared lymph nodes (12.71 ± 7.19 vs 8.20 ± 5.31), number of lymph nodes in the lesser curvature (6.51 ± 3.09 vs 1.72 ± 1.83), number of paraesophageal lymph nodes (12 vs 44), and number of cleared lymph nodes in the lesser curvature (330 vs 102) between the experimental group and control group (All I < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in the rate of positive margins (14.66% vs 10.66%, P > 0.05) between the two groups. The rate of positive curvature lymph nodes in the lesser curvature was significantly higher than that in the periesophagus in both groups (75.76% vs 11.11%, 66.04% vs 22.73%). No anastomotic fistula occurred in either group, although the complication rate was lower in the experimental group than in the control group (2.67% vs 14.67%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Transabdominal surgery can clear more lymph nodes than transthoracic surgery. Total gastrectomy does better in the clearance of perigastric lymph nodes, especially those in the lesser curvature.

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: experiences at a single institution in China

Background

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is increasing. This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological features of Chinese patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and to define prognostic factors.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 382 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2005 to March 2010. All patients were classified according to the Siewert’s classification and staged according to the latest edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer categories.

Results

Six of the 382 patients had type I adenocarcinoma, 220 had type II, and 156 had type III. There was no significant difference in the overall survival of different Siewert subtypes. According to the multivariate analysis, pathological lymph node stage, age, and the existence of lymphovascular invasion were the independent factors of prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction following surgery.

Conclusions

On the data, the distribution of the three types of tumor was found to be different from that reported in Western countries. Lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, and age were significant and independent factors for poor prognosis after R0 resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Management of gastroesophageal junction tumors

Tumors of the gastroesophageal junction have historically been treated as either gastric or esophageal cancer depending on institutional preferences. The Siewert classification system was designed to provide a more precise means of characterizing these tumors. In general, surgical treatment of Siewert 1 tumors is via esophagectomy. Siewert 2 and 3 tumors may be treated with either esophagectomy with proximal gastrectomy or extended total gastrectomy provided negative margins are obtained. All but the earliest stage tumors should be considered for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: operative technique and initial results

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has gained wide acceptance, and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) are now also performed for gastric cancer. We extended these techniques to treat Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Ten patients with clinical T1 AEG type II underwent laparoscopic transhiatal (LTH) resection combined with LTG reconstructed by Roux-en-Y (LTH+LTG: n=2) or LPG reconstructed by jejunal interposition (LTH+LPG: n=8). Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy was performed using a circular stapler, of which the anvil head was introduced transabdominally or transorally. The median operation time was 243 minutes, and blood loss was 25.5 g. There were no intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. No anastomotic leak was observed, but 1 diaphragmatic herniation to the left thoracic cavity occurred postoperatively. The median length of the proximal margin was 14.5 mm. This operation is technically feasible and can be safely performed after adequate experience of LTG or LPG, though esophagojejunostomy in the mediastinum is technically demanding.

Esophagus or stomach? The seventh TNM classification for Siewert type II/III junctional adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to clarify whether TNM-EC or TNM-GC is better for classifying patients with AEG types II/III.

METHODS

The patients who had AEG types II/III and received D1 or more radical lymphadenectomy were selected. The patients were staged both by seventh edition of TNM-EC and TNM-GC. The distribution of the patients, the hazard ratio (HR) of each stage, and the separation of the survival were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were enrolled in this study. TNM-EC and TNM-GC classified 25 (20 and 5) and 32 (20 and 12) patients to stage I (IA and IB), 15 (4 and 11), and 33 (11 and 22) to stage II (IIA and IIB), 88 (24, 3, and 61) and 63 (14, 26, and 23) to stage III (IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC), and 35 and 35 to stage IV, respectively. The distribution of the patients was substantially deviated to stage IIIC in TNM-EC but was almost even in TNM-GC. A stepwise increase of HR was observed in TNM-GC, but not in TNM-EC. The survival curves between stages II and III were significantly separated in TNM-GC (P = 0.019), but not in TNM-EC (P = 0.204). The 5-year survival rates of stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC were 69.0, 100, and 38.9% in TNM-EC and were 52.0, 43.4, and 33.9% in TNM-GC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TNM-GC is better for classifying patients with AEG types II/III than TNM-EC is. These results could impact the next TNM revision for AEG.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert classification: experiences at a single institution in Japan

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains controversial. The aims of this study are to evaluate results of surgery for AEG, to clarify clinicopathological differences according to the Siewert classification, and to define prognostic factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 179 consecutive patients with Siewert type I, II, and III AEG who underwent curative (R0) resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between January 1993 and December 2008.

RESULTS

Patients with AEG were divided according to tumor: 10 type I (5.6%), 107 type II (59.8%), and 62 type III (34.6%). Larger, deeper tumors and nodal metastasis were more common in type III than type II tumors. No significant differences were seen in 5-year survival rates among the three types: type I (51.4%), type II (51.8%), and type III (62.6%). Multivariate analysis showed that depth of tumor and mediastinal lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic indicators. The recurrence rate for patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis was 87.5%. The risk factors for mediastinal lymph node metastasis were length of esophageal invasion and histopathological grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Mediastinal lymph node metastasis and tumor depth were significant and independent factors for poor prognosis after R0 resection for AEG. Esophageal invasion and histopathological grade were significant and independent factors for mediastinal lymph node metastasis.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is dramatically increasing in Western countries, while it is not increasing in Eastern countries. Siewert type I tumors are observed less frequently in Eastern countries in comparison to Western countries. On the other hand, other clinicopathological features of AEG, including age, male-to-female ratio, pathological grade, tumor progression, and prognosis, are similar in Western and Eastern countries. Two surgical phase III trials have indicated that AEG type I should be treated surgically as esophageal cancer, while types II and III should be regarded as true gastric cancer. No phase III trials have demonstrated a significant interaction comparing hazard ratios for death between AEG and true gastric cancer in the subset analyses with regard to chemotherapy.

Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma according to Siewert classification in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is rapidly increasing. We evaluated the clinicopathological difference and outcomes of Taiwanese patients with AEG according to the Siewert classification.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected between December 1987 and July 2007. Two hundred thirty-one patients underwent curative resection of AEG at Taipei Veterans General Hospital and were divided into different Siewert types. The clinicopathological characteristics, operative morbidity, survival, and initial recurrence pattern were compared between the different types.

RESULTS

Fifty-one type II and 180 type III cancer patients were studied. Subtotal esophagectomy via a left thoracotomy (19.6% vs 2.8%), smaller tumor size (4.43 +/- 2.04 vs. 5.35 +/- 2.03 cm), and more combined organ resection (60% vs. 43.1%) were more common in type II than type III cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that three independent risk factors for death were gender, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion. There were long-term survivors among the patients with lesser curvature site lymph node metastasis, whereas metastasis to the lymph nodes of the distal stomach and along the greater curvature site was associated with poor prognosis. The 5-year survival was similar between type II and type III cancer (59.6% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.947).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphovascular invasion, tumor size, and gender were determined to be three independent factors of survival after curative resection for AEG, and Siewert type was not associated with differences in survival.

Unchanging trend of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in Korea: experience at a single institution based on Siewert's classification

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been increasing in Western countries. It is unclear, however, whether similar changes are occurring in Asia. We therefore investigated the incidence of AEG in Korea, and assessed the clinical characteristics of three types of AEG based on Siewert's classification. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 16 811 patients diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESC, n= 1450) or gastric noncardiac adenocarcinoma (GNCA, n= 14 751) between 1992 and 2006. The patients were divided into three 5-year cohorts (cohort A [1992-1996], n= 2734, cohort B [1997-2001], n= 5727, and cohort C [2002-2006], n= 8350), and the ratios of AEG (n= 610) to non-AEG (ESC and GNCA) in each cohort were compared. Using Siewert's classification, the tumors were categorized into one of three types, and patient demographic features and 5-year survival rates were compared. The ratio of AEG to non-AEG cases did not change over time (0.037, 0.034, and 0.039 for cohorts A, B, and C, respectively; P= 0.40). Of the 610 patients with AEG, 23 (3.7%) had type 1 tumors, 47 (7.7%) had type 2, and 540 (88.5%) had type 3. The 5-year survival rate of patients with type 1 AEG was much lower (4.8 +/- 4.7%) than that of those with type 2 (47.9 +/- 7.8%) and type 3 (47.4 +/- 2.5%) tumors. Unlike in Western countries, the ratio of AEG to non-AEG cases has not increased over time in Korea. Type 1 AEG was rarer and associated with a more unfavorable prognosis in Korea than in Western countries.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction

BACKGROUND

The border between the esophagus and stomach gives rise to many discrepancies in the current literature regarding the etiology, classification and surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising at the esophago-gastric junction. We have consequently used the AEG-criteria (adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction) for classification and have based the selection of the surgical approach on the anatomic topographic subclassification.

METHODS

In the following we report an analysis of a large and homogeneously classified population of 1602 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, with an emphasis on the surgical approach, the pattern of lymphatic spread, the outcome after surgical treatment and the prognostic factors. Demographic data, morphologic and histopathologic tumor characteristics, and long-term survival rates were compared among the three tumor subclassifiations.

RESULTS

The study confirms the marked differences in sex distribution, associated specialized intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus, tumor grading, tumor growth pattern, lymphatic spread, and stage between the three tumor entities. The degree of resection and lymph node status were the dominating independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The data show no significant differences of long-term survival after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy and extended total gastrectomy in these patients.

CONCLUSION

The classification of adenocarcinomas of the esophago-gastric junction in three types, AEG type I, type II and type III shows marked differences between the tumor entities and is recommended for selection of a proper surgical approach. Complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are associated with good long-term prognosis. Better surgical management and standardized procedures will improve the outcome also of patients who need to undergo more radical surgery, i.e. abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: surgical therapy based on 1602 consecutive resected patients

Because of the borderline location between the esophagus and stomach, many discrepancies exist in the current literature regarding the etiology, classification, and surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising at the esophagogastric junction. The classification of adenocarcinomas into three types, AGE type I, type II, and type III, shows marked differences between the tumor entities and is recommended for selection of a proper surgical approach. Complete tumor resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are recommended for a good, long-term prognosis. With better surgical management and standardized procedures, even the results in patients with more radical surgical approaches, the abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy improved.