Randomized phase II study comparing dose escalated weekly paclitaxel vs. standard dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer

Effects of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia on Overall Survival in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma to Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is an important dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy. However, evidence suggests that the occurrence of CIN may be predictive of treatment outcome. Indeed, studies have revealed that the onset of CIN is associated with a good chemotherapeutic response.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the onset of CIN and overall survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who received a combination regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC).

METHODS

Medical records from 56 patients with unresectable or metastatic UC who were treated with a combination GC regimen between December 2005 and May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the association between CIN development and survival.

RESULTS

The median duration of survival was 521 days (95% CI = 147-193 days) for patients with severe CIN and 287 days for patients without CIN. Additional multivariate analysis revealed that both the presence of severe CIN (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.399; 95% CI = 0.180-0.880, P = 0.023) and baseline hemoglobin (HR = 2.167; 95% CI = 1.170-4.014, P = 0.014) represented independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic UC receiving GC treatment. Conclusion and Relevance: CIN onset was associated with longer survival in patients receiving GC therapy for unresectable or metastatic UC, suggesting that neutropenia monitoring during GC chemotherapy may be predictive of treatment efficacy.

Cost-effectiveness and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

Introduction Weekly paclitaxel (PTX), irinotecan (CPT-11) and ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (Ram + PTX) are currently recommended as the standard second-line or later chemotherapies for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of using Ram + PTX vs. PTX or CPT-11. Furthermore, we investigated the safety and treatment continuity of Ram + PTX in Japan. Methods Expected costs were calculated based on data from patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer who were treated with PTX, CPT-11 and Ram + PTX. A literature review was performed to obtain clinical information so that the probability of the efficacy of each chemotherapy could be calculated. The cost-effectiveness ratio of each chemotherapy agent was calculated by dividing the expected cost by the median survival time (MST). Results The cost-effectiveness ratio per month was JPY 85,395.8/MST for the PTX regimen, JPY 132,735.4/MST for the CPT-11 regimen and JPY 657,175.4/MST for the Ram + PTX regimen (p < 0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per month of the Ram + PTX regimen to the PTX regimen was JPY 2,780,432.4/MST. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the Ram + PTX regimen to the CPT-11 regimen was JPY 2,185,179.0/MST. With regard to the reasons for discontinuation of treatment, the Ram + PTX regimen had only one case of being discontinued owing to adverse events, and had a profile similar to that of the PTX and CPT-11 regimens. Conclusion These findings show that the Ram + PTX regimen is less cost-effective compared to both the PTX and CPT-11 regimen, but the Ram + PTX regimen is a well-tolerated regimen with sufficient efficacy.

Safety and continuity of second- and third-line therapy with paclitaxel or irinotecan for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

In the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, the prolongation of survival depends on the use of second-line therapy, with paclitaxel (PTX) or irinotecan (CPT-11) as the key agents. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety and continuity of weekly PTX and CPT-11 monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A total of 62 patients who had received PTX or CPT-11 for gastric cancer at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 47 patients who received PTX as second-line therapy, 13 (27.7%) received third-line therapy with CPT-11. Second-line PTX and third-line CPT-11 were discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) in 27 and 7 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the performance status (PS) in 20 and 4 cases, respectively. Only 1 case of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) was reported for third-line CPT-11. Furthermore, of the 15 patients who received CPT-11 as second-line treatment, 11 (73.3%) then received PTX as third-line treatment. Second-line CPT-11 and third-line PTX were discontinued due to PD in 9 and 6 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the PS in 4 and 5 cases, respectively, whereas there was only 1 case of discontinuation due to AEs for second-line CPT-11. Severe AEs for PTX and CPT-11 were infrequent; however, the frequency of diarrhea was high when PTX was administered as third-line therapy (63.6%), whereas the frequency of malaise was high when CPT-11 was administered as second- (73.3%) and third-line (76.9%) therapy. In conclusion, severe AEs due to PTX and CPT-11 as second- and third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer are infrequent and patients are generally able to continue treatment. However, the possibility of diarrhea with third-line PTX and malaise with second- and third-line CPT-11 treatment should be considered when planning chemotherapy.

Pharmaceutical care for patients undergoing s-1 plus Cisplatin therapy for unresectable recurrent gastric cancer

We examined the adverse gastrointestinal events associated with tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) plus cisplatin therapy for unresectable recurrent gastric cancer and risk factors for discontinuing therapy due to adverse events. A total of 65 subjects who had received S-1 plus cisplatin therapy for gastric cancer at Ogaki Municipal Hospital were examined. We found that the risk factors for discontinuation of the therapy due to adverse events were serum albumin (Alb) level less than 3.5 g/dL (odds ratio [OR]: 321.14, P = .0015), creatinine clearance (CrCl) rate less than 78 mL/min (OR: 35.23, P = .0123), and performance status (PS) more than 1 (OR:12.62, P = .0243). Moreover, grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicities (including malaise and anorexia) were significantly higher in subjects with Alb less than 3.5 g/dL and CrCl less than 78 mL/min (P < .01). In conclusion, we should pay attention to the safety and continuity of S-1 plus cisplatin therapy in cases where the Alb level is <3.5 g/dL, CrCl level is <78 mL/min, and PS level is >1. Pharmacists should consider reducing the treatment dosage and providing nutritional support in such cases.

Overexpression of miR-22 reverses paclitaxel-induced chemoresistance through activation of PTEN signaling in p53-mutated colon cancer cells

Chemoresistance is a key cause of treatment failure in colon cancer. MiR-22 is a tumor-suppressing microRNA. To explore whether miR-22 is an important player in the development of chemoresistance in colon cancer, we overexpressed miR-22 and subsequently tested its role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, survival, and associated signaling in p53-mutated HT-29 and HCT-15 cells, and p53 wild-type HCT-116 cells. We further investigated the role of miR-22 on cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in both the p53-mutated and p53 wild-type colon cancer cells. Results showed that HT-29 and HCT-15 cells were resistant to paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity, which normally inhibits cell proliferation and survival, and induces apoptosis. Conversely, HCT-116 was relatively sensitive to the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel. Overexpression of miR-22 significantly decreased cell proliferation and survival, and induced cell apoptosis in the p53-mutated colon cancer cells, but played no role in the p53 wild-type cells. Importantly, miR-22 overexpression enhanced the cytotoxic role of paclitaxel in p53-mutated HT-29 and HCT-15 cells, but not in p53 wild-type HCT-116 cell. We further demonstrated that the tumor-suppressive role of miR-22 in p53-mutated colon cancer cells was mediated by upregulating PTEN expression, which negatively regulated Akt phosphorylation at Ser(473) and MTDH expression, and subsequently increased Bax and active caspase-3 levels. Our study is the first to identify the tumor-suppressive role of miR-22 and its associated signaling in the p53-mutated colon cancer cells and highlighted the chemosensitive role of miR-22.