Panitumumab in Japanese patients with unresectable colorectal cancer: a post-marketing surveillance study of 3085 patients

Management of infusion-related reactions in cancer therapy: strategies and challenges

Several anticancer therapies have the potential to cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in the form of adverse events that typically occur within minutes to hours after drug infusion. IRRs can range in severity from mild to severe anaphylaxis-like reactions. Careful monitoring at infusion initiation, prompt recognition, and appropriate clinical assessment of the IRR and its severity, followed by immediate management, are required to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. Lack of standardization in the prevention, management, and reporting of IRRs across cancer-treating institutions represents not only a quality and safety gap but also a disparity in cancer care. The present article, supported by recently published data, was developed to standardize these procedures across institutions and provide a useful tool for health care providers in clinical practice to recognize early signs and symptoms of an IRR and promptly and appropriately manage the event.

Adverse Renal Effects of Anticancer Immunotherapy: A Review

Simple Summary

The immune system has a natural ability to work against cancer cells; however, in many cases this ability is insufficient, and cancers develop methods enabling them to escape from the supervision of immune cells. Novel therapeutic methods used in neoplastic diseases are based on encouraging immune cells to fight against cancer. In some cases, boosted by this approach, the immune system may damage not only tumor cells, but also other cells, tissues and organs in the human body. Kidney involvement, for example, is directly dangerous for patients’ health and may have an impact on human body homeostasis and the excretion of xenobiotics. However, renal function impairment in patients treated with immunotherapy is thought to be relatively rare but may be severe. Knowledge of early diagnosis and proper management are essential for physicians utilizing immunotherapy in daily clinical practice.

Abstract

Modern oncological therapy utilizes various types of immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) therapy, cancer vaccines, tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies (TT-mAbs), bispecific antibodies and cytokine therapy improve patients’ outcomes. However, stimulation of the immune system, beneficial in terms of fighting against cancer, generates the risk of harm to other cells in a patient’s body. Kidney damage belongs to the relatively rare adverse events (AEs). Best described, but still, superficially, are renal AEs in patients treated with ICIs. International guidelines issued by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) cover the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during ICI therapy. There are fewer data concerning real occurrence and possible presentations of renal adverse drug reactions of other immunotherapeutic methods. This implies the need for the collection of safety data during ongoing clinical trials and in the real-life world to characterize the hazard related to the use of new immunotherapies and management of irAEs.

Cardiovascular Risks with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have changed the therapeutic landscape across a range of solid malignancies. However, there is little data regarding the cardiovascular (CV) impact of these agents. The purpose of this review is to discuss reported CV effects, pathophysiology, pre-treatment screening, diagnostic workup, and treatment recommendations in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is apparent that CV events are not class dependent, and while infrequently reported in clinical trials, unique CV toxicity may occur with EGFR inhibitors, including structural, electrical, and vascular events. There remains an unmet need to fully elucidate the spectrum of CV events associated with EGFR inhibitors. Early CV screening, close clinical monitoring, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach between medical and cardio-oncology is needed to minimize the potentially detrimental impact of cardiotoxicity in this patient population.

Cost-effectiveness of preemptive skin treatment to prevent skin-toxicity caused by panitumumab in third-line therapy for KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan

Background

Clinical management of skin-toxicity associated with the use of anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) antibodies to treat colorectal cancer maintains quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer. Results of clinical trials have recommended the efficacy of prophylactic treatment, but the cost-effectiveness is unclear. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of preventive skin care for skin-toxicity caused by panitumumab in third-line therapy for KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer from the perspective of the Japanese healthcare payer.

Methods

The data source was J-STEPP trial, which compared preemptive skin treatment with reactive treatment in third-line panitumumab therapy for KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. The costs and effectiveness of preemptive treatment was compared with reactive treatment in a 3-year time horizon using a 4-state partitioned survival analysis. The health outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The costs were 2020 revisions to the drug prices. The robustness of the model was verified by one-way sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). A 2% annual discount was applied to the expenses and QALYs. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 5 million JPY was used.

Results

Preemptive treatment had incremental effects of 0.0029 QALYs, incremental costs of 5300 JPY (48.6 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of 1,843,395 JPY (16,912 USD) per QALY. The variability of preemptive and reactive treatment costs for skin-toxicity and the disutility of skin-toxicity had a large impact on ICER. From PSA, the cost-effectiveness rate of preemptive treatment was 75.0%.

Conclusions

The cost to effectiveness of preemptive treatment to prevent skin-toxicity caused by panitumumab in third-line therapy for KRAS wild type mCRC is not high.

Phase II Trial of Trametinib and Panitumumab in RAS/RAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

MEK inhibition may overcome resistance to EGFR inhibition in patients with RAS wildtype (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluated antitumor activity of trametinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) with panitumumab (EGFR monoclonal antibody) in a phase II trial.

METHODS

Patients with KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF wt mCRC with prior 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, +/- bevacizumab and no prior anti-EGFR therapy were treated with trametinib 1.5 mg oral daily and panitumumab 4.8 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CB; CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks) by RECIST v1.1. A 2-stage minimax design was used. Serial plasma circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was collected and profiled using Oncomine Lung cfDNA assay.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled from November 2015 to April 2019. CB rate was 38% (5/13) and median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.9-7.1). Confirmed overall response rate was 38% (5/13). Treatment-related AE (trAE) included acneiform rash (85%), diarrhea (62%), maculopapular rash (54%), mucositis (46%), and others. Dose modifications and interruptions of trametinib occurred in 69% and panitumumab in 54% of patients. The trial did not progress to stage II accrual due to tolerability and short duration of response. RAS or BRAF mutations cfDNA were detected in 3/13 patients (23%) before radiographic disease progression.

CONCLUSION

The addition of trametinib to panitumumab led to a high rate of tumor shrinkage in RAS/RAF wt metastatic colorectal cancer, with poor tolerability due to a high incidence of skin toxicity. Median PFS was similar to panitumumab alone in historical control data.

[Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: approaches to diagnostics and treatment]

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (D-ILD) can be caused by various drugs, including antibiotics, amiodarone, antitumor, rheumatological and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. D-ILD includes hypersensitivity reactions, organizing and non-specific interstitial pneumonia, eosinophilic lung diseases, diffuse alveolar damage and alveolar hypoventilation. To exclude other causes of pulmonary diseases, an assessment of the medical history, physical data and examination results, which may include chest X-ray/multispiral computed tomography (MSCT), lung function tests, and bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, are necessary. Diagnosis of D-ILD is difficult due to the heterogeneity of clinical, radiological and histological data. The X-ray pathological phenotype of D-ILD is different; a specific MSCT pattern has not been identified. Treatment includes drug withdrawal and, in some cases, glucocorticoid therapy, although there are no prospective studies on their effect on the outcome of the disease. This article provides various drugs that cause ILD, approaches to their diagnosis and treatment.

[Analysis of Time-to-onset and Onset-pattern of Interstitial Lung Disease after the Administration of Monoclonal Antibody Agents]

The aim of this study has been to investigate the time-to-onset and onset-pattern of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) after the administration of monoclonal antibodies through the use of the spontaneous adverse reaction reporting system of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. DILD datasets for adalimumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, denosumab, golimumab, infliximab, nivolumab, panitumumab, pembrolizumab, tocilizumab, and trastuzumab were used to calculate the median time-to-onset of DILD, as well as the Weibull distribution parameters. The median time-to-onset of DILD for pembrolizumab and infliximab was within 1 month. The median time-to-onset of DILD for cetuximab, nivolumab, panitumumab, bevacizumab, golimumab, trastuzumab, and tocilizumab ranged from 1 to 2 months. The median time-to-onset of DILD for denosumab and adalimumab was more than 2 months. Infliximab, trastuzumab and tocilizumab, and denosumab were estimated to fit the early failure type profile of the Weibull distribution parameters. Cetuximab, nivolumab, panitumumab, bevacizumab, golimumab, and adalimumab were estimated to fit the random failure type profile. Pembrolizumab was estimated to fit the wear out failure type profile. Cluster analysis was performed to classify the time-to-onset patterns of DILD. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed 3 clusters. The findings of this study established both the most likely time period and onset-pattern of DILD that can occur in patients after the administration of monoclonal antibody agents.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis with purpura and renal failure induced by the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody panitumumab: a case report

Background

Panitumumab is the first human combinatorial antibody for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Dermatologic toxicity of all grades occurs in more than 90% of patients. However, there are few reports of purpura induced by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. Renal failure is also uncommon as an adverse event of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old Japanese man with advanced colon cancer received monotherapy with panitumumab. General malaise, bilateral edema of his legs, and bilateral purpura of his forearms developed 2 days after the second cycle of panitumumab. A skin biopsy was performed to evaluate the purpuric lesions on his left leg and leukocytoclastic vasculitis was diagnosed. Blood tests showed grade III acute renal failure with a blood urea nitrogen level of 33.8 mg/dL and a creatinine level of 3.10 mg/dL.

Conclusions

This is the first reported case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis followed by purpura and acute renal failure associated with panitumumab.

Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review

Background: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) occurs as a result of numerous agents, but the risk often only becomes apparent after the marketing authorisation of such agents. Methods: In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review, we aimed to evaluate and synthesise the current literature on DIILD. Results: Following a quality assessment, 156 full-text papers describing more than 6000 DIILD cases were included in the review. However, the majority of the papers were of low or very low quality in relation to the review question (78%). Thus, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis, and descriptive review was undertaken instead. DIILD incidence rates varied between 4.1 and 12.4 cases/million/year. DIILD accounted for 3–5% of prevalent ILD cases. Cancer drugs, followed by rheumatology drugs, amiodarone and antibiotics, were the most common causes of DIILD. The radiopathological phenotype of DIILD varied between and within agents, and no typical radiological pattern specific to DIILD was identified. Mortality rates of over 50% were reported in some studies. Severity at presentation was the most reliable predictor of mortality. Glucocorticoids (GCs) were commonly used to treat DIILD, but no prospective studies examined their effect on outcome. Conclusions: Overall high-quality evidence in DIILD is lacking, and the current review will inform larger prospective studies to investigate the diagnosis and management of DIILD.

Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study

Background

Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2–3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups.

Results

Thirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2–3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P < 0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P = 0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2–3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P = 0.61), grade 2–3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P = 1.00), grade 3–4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P = 0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223 days vs 200 days (P = 0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab.

Conclusions

Pmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessment of the cardiac safety between cetuximab and panitumumab as single therapy in Chinese chemotherapy-refractory mCRC

OBJECTIVE

The cardiac safety of cetuximab and panitumumab, particularly as single agents, has not been investigated extensively. This trial was designed to specifically evaluate the cardiac safety of cetuximab and panitumumab as single therapy in Chinese chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients received cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m² intravenously over 120 minutes on day 1 (week 1), followed by a maintenance dose of 250 mg/m² intravenously over 60 minutes on day 1 of each 7-day cycle. Forty-three patients received panitumumab at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days. Routine laboratory tests and electrocardiogram (ECG) were performed at baseline, during therapy and after the treatment (4th and 10th months). The incidence of elevation of troponin I ultra (TNI Ultra), abnormal ECGs, cardiac events and noncardiac adverse events (AEs) were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of elevation of TNI Ultra between the two groups had no significance (p=0.681), and TNI Ultra+ was observed more frequently in patients with metastases to more than three organs and they received fourth or above lines of chemotherapy. The most frequent abnormal ECG manifestations were nonspecific ST changes and QTc prolongation in the two groups. At 10 months after treatment, most of the abnormal ECG manifestations were reversed. The most common cardiac AEs of cetuximab and panitumumab included palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain and arrhythmias requiring treatment. Most of the events were mild and transient. The incidence of cardiac AEs had no significant difference between the two groups. Rash was still the most common noncardiac AE in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Cetuximab and panitumumab showed favorable cardiac safety as single agents for Chinese chemotherapy-refractory mCRC patients. But monitoring for cardiac AEs is still necessary throughout the entire treatment process.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Dilemmas

Since the approval of the first molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, in 2001, TKIs have heralded a new era in the treatment of many cancers. Among their innumerable adverse effects, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious, presenting most frequently with dyspnea, cough, fever, and hypoxemia, and often treated with steroids. Of the 28 currently approved TKIs, 16 (57 %) are reported to induce ILD with varying frequency and/or severity. The interval from drug administration to onset of ILD varies between patients and between TKIs, with no predictable time course. Its incidence is variously reported to be approximately 1.6-4.3 % in Japanese populations and 0.3-1.0 % in non-Japanese populations. The mortality rate is in the range of 20-50 %. Available evidence (primarily following the use of erlotinib and gefitinib in Japan because of the unique susceptibility of that population) has identified a number of susceptibility and prognostic risk factors (male sex, a history of smoking, and pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis being the main ones). Although the precise mechanism is not understood, collective evidence suggests that immune factors may be involved. If TKI-induced ILD is confirmed by thorough evaluation of the patient and exclusion of other causes, management is supportive, and includes discontinuation of the culprit TKI and administration of steroids. Discontinuing the culprit TKI presents a clinical dilemma because the diagnosis of TKI-induced ILD in a patient with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis can be challenging, the patient may have TKI-responsive cancer with no suitable alternative, and switching to an alternative agent, even if available, carries the risk of the patient experiencing other toxic effects. Preliminary evidence suggests that therapy with the culprit TKI may be continued under steroid cover and/or at a reduced dose. However, this approach requires careful individualized risk-benefit analysis and further clinical experience.

Interstitial pneumonia in a patient treated with TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report

Background

TAS-102, a new treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is refractory or intolerant to standard therapies, has been improving survival with acceptable tolerability and adverse events. Adverse hematological events associated with TAS-102 treatment were extensively profiled in the RECOURSE trial, but pulmonary toxicities associated with TAS-102 therapy are distinctly uncommon. In a recent early post-marketing phase vigilance on TAS-102 in Japan, seven cases of pulmonary disease were reported, but patient follow-up in this study was incomplete. Here, we present the first case of interstitial lung disease occurring in association with TAS-102 treatment.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old Japanese man who had previously received two standard treatments was admitted in 2014, at which time we administered TAS-102 (110 mg/day) as a third-line chemotherapy. He was safely treated with TAS-102 for the first planned cycle; however, approximately 4 days after receiving the second cycle of TAS-102, he complained of high fever and subsequent dyspnea with severe hypoxemia and went to the emergency room. A chest X-ray revealed diffuse coarse reticular shadows with ground-glass opacity on both lungs. Furthermore, a chest computed tomography scan showed thickening of the bronchovascular bundles with extensive ground-glass opacification and pleural effusions in both lung fields.

In addition, a peripheral blood lymphocyte stimulation test with TAS-102 showed higher values compared with control samples. Consequently, we suspected drug-induced interstitial pneumonia, and discontinued treatment. Our patient was given an initial administration of high-dose methylprednisolone (1000 mg/day) for 3 days and oxygen. Our patient was discharged with oral prednisolone (20 mg/day) and improved symptomatically and radiologically.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that interstitial pneumonia is a rare complication of TAS-102 chemotherapy, but the possibility of interstitial pneumonia should always be considered when a patient presents with a respiratory disorder while undergoing TAS-102 systemic chemotherapy.

Prompt discontinuation of TAS-102 and treatment with high-dosage corticosteroids is needed to avoid exacerbating respiratory symptoms.

Second-line panitumumab as a triweekly dose for patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

Panitumumab administered as monotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) has shown response and disease stabilization rates of approximately 30%. The current study aimed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with panitumumab every 3 weeks as a second line treatment.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 18 patients, aged more than 18 years, with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC treated with panitumumab as a second-line single agent after progression on first-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median number of courses received was 10 (range, 4-29), and the median duration of treatment was 30 weeks (range, 12-96 weeks). After a median follow-up period of 13 months, the median PFS was 6 months (range, 4.3-7.7 months) and the median OS was 11 months (range, 7.4-14.5 months). The median PFS was 4 months for patients with < grade 2 skin toxicity and 6 months (range, 4.5-7.5 months) for patients with ≥grade 2 skin rash (P=0.05). The median OS was 9 months (range, 6.4-11.5 months) and 14 months (range, 11.6-16.3 months) for the two groups of patients (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Panitumumab given every 3 weeks is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC that progressed after standard chemotherapy.

Successful Treatment with Modified FOLFOX6 and Panitumumab in a Cecal Cancer Patient Undergoing Hemodialysis

Combination chemotherapy of mFOLFOX6 (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) plus panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is one of the standard treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) without KRAS mutation. A few reports suggested no need of dose adjustment of cetuximab, a similar chimeric anti-EGFR antibody, in patients with renal impairment. However, panitumumab combined with cytotoxic drugs for hemodialysis patients has not been reported. We herein report a case of a hemodialysis mCRC patient successfully treated with mFOLFOX6 and panitumumab combination therapy.

Clinical features and risk factors of panitumumab-induced interstitial lung disease: a postmarketing all-case surveillance study

Background

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious adverse reactions associated with the molecularly targeted drugs. Panitumumab has been approved for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Although there were no adverse reaction reports of ILD in panitumumab monotherapy, 4 cases in combination chemotherapy were reported prior to its approval in Japan in 2010. Several studies also reported that the incidence of drug-induced ILD was higher in Japan than in other countries. The clinical features of ILD and the associated risk factors therefore need investigation.

Methods

We analyzed the data from 3085 unresectable, advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer patients enrolled in a postmarketing all-case surveillance study of panitumumab in Japan. ILD case reports were assessed based on the clinical and radiologic findings by a committee of external experts. Multivariate analysis using Cox’s hazard model identified the risk factors.

Results

ILD incidence (1.3 %) and mortality rates (51.3 %) were similar to those of patients receiving another anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody in Japan. No specific onset timing was determined. Although panitumumab-specific ILD findings were not observed in computed tomography images or clinical practice, panitumumab can induce ILD with diffuse alveolar damage, as do the other anti-EGFR targeting drugs. A history/complication of ILD, male sex, poor general condition, and 65 years or older were identified as ILD risk factors, and no history of previous drug treatment was an apparent risk factor.

Conclusion

Panitumumab-induced ILD can occur at any time after initiation, and close and regular monitoring is needed.

A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials on EGFR Inhibitors Such as Cetuximab and Panitumumab as Monotherapy and in Combination for Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cause of death due to cancer after those of lung, stomach, and liver. Anti epidermal growth factor receptor drugs as a targeting therapy seem to be good candidates for curing metastatic colorectal cancer. Two available anti epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies are cetuximab and panitumumab which have been approved for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment. Through the available literature on NCBI and clinical trials, 31 clinical trials in which cetuximab or panitumumab as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy were used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients in different line settings and 12 clinical trials in which bevacizumab was used for being compared with anti epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies or chemotherapy were chosen for reviewing and comparing the results of overall survival, progression free survival and adverse effects. Cetuximab and panitumumab are well accepted for the treatment of mCRC patients at all stages in different line settings. Although cetuximab administration in metastatic colorectal cancer patients is mostly associated with better overall survival and panitumumab results in better progression free survival, to confirm the superiority of each of them in the treatment protocol of epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies, more clinical trials with larger sample size are needed. Through current available data from clinical studies, it can be concluded that the best treatment outcome is achieved by a combination of anti epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies with conventional chemotherapy.