An update on Alectinib: a first line treatment for ALK-positive advanced lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is a second-generation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is able to induce significant and durable CNS responses. However, long-term use of alectinib has been clinically reported to cause some serious and even life-threatening adverse events. There are currently no effective interventions for its adverse events, and this undoubtedly leads to delays in patient treatment and limits its long-term clinical use.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the clinical trials conducted so far, we summarize the efficacy and adverse events that occurred, especially those related to cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and respiratory disorders. The factors that may influence alectinib selection are also described. Findings are based on a PubMed literature search of clinical and basic science research papers spanning 1998-2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The significant prolongation of patient survival compared with first-generation ALK inhibitor suggests its potential as a first-line treatment for the NSCLC, but the severe adverse events of alectinib limit its long-term clinical use. Future research should focus on the exact mechanisms of these toxicities, how to alleviate the adverse events caused by alectinib clinically, and the development of next-generation drugs with reduced toxicities.

Case report: Indolent drug-related pneumonitis with alectinib therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Molecular targeting therapy is becoming the standard of care for some patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. Drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) has been identified as an infrequent but potentially severe adverse effect. Herein, we report a 50-year-old woman with ALK-rearranged advanced lung adenocarcinoma who developed interstitial lung disease associated with alectinib therapy. At 102-day of treatment, chest CT revealed scattered ground glass opacities (GGOs) involving both lungs. Since she was asymptomatic and alectinib provided a beneficial tumor treatment response, alectinib therapy was continued. However, 2 months later, she presented with progressive dyspnea and diffuse GGOs on chest computed tomography. There was no evidence for infection or other etiologies for her lung complication. Alectinib was discontinued and steroid therapy was initiated which was followed by improvement in respiratory symptoms and chest CT findings; DRP was diagnosed. Although rare, alectinib therapy can cause DRP of indolent onset.

Repurposing Anticancer Drugs for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Antifibrotic Drugs for the Treatment of Cancer: State of the Art

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an aggressive pulmonary disease which shares several molecular, pathophysiological and clinical aspects with lung cancer, including high mortality rates. The antifibrotic drugs Nintedanib and Pirfenidone have recently been introduced in clinical practice for the treatment of IPF. Nintedanib is also used for the treatment of several malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with Docetaxel, while Pirfenidone showed some anti-neoplastic effects in preclinical studies. On the other hand, novel targeted agents and immunotherapies have been introduced in the last decade for the treatment of NSCLC, and some of them showed anti-fibrotic properties in recent studies. These evidences, based on the common pathophysiological backgrounds of IPF and lung cancer, make possible the mutual or combined use of anti-fibrotic and anti-neoplastic drugs to treat these highly lethal diseases. The aim of the present review is to depict the current scientific landscape regarding the repurposing of anti-neoplastic drugs in IPF and anti-fibrotic drugs in lung cancer, and to identify future research perspectives on the topic.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

The safety and serious adverse events of approved ALK inhibitors in malignancies: a meta-analysis

Background: A total of 2%–7% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. At present, three or more generations of ALK inhibitors have been used for ALK-positive NSCLC treatment, including crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, and brigatinib. Although most adverse events (AEs) of ALK inhibitors are grades 1 to 2 and generally can be well tolerated, serious adverse events (SAEs) of ALK inhibitors lack data analysis, and the lung toxicity of ALK inhibitors needs attention. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of ALK inhibitors, especially in terms of drug-related SAEs.

Methods: A total of 19 studies from 4 databases (PubMed, Science Direct, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library) were included in this meta-analysis. All statistical analyses in this meta-analysis were performed with the STATA 14.0 software. We analyzed the incidences of total AEs, total SAEs and SAEs for different ALK inhibitors.

Results: AEs of the ALK inhibitors occurred in almost all participants, and SAEs occurred in more than 20% of the participants. For ceritinib and brigatinib, SAEs occurred in more than 40% of the participants. Alectinib is most likely the safest of the two generations of ALK inhibitors. Generally, the ALK inhibitors showed significant lung toxicity.

Conclusion: In conclusion, attention should be focused on ALK inhibitor-related SAEs, especially lung toxicity. According to this meta-analysis, alxectinib seems to be the safest ALK inhibitor. Physicians should focus on the related SAEs when prescribing ALK inhibitors.

Safety issues with the ALK inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the chromosomal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were associated with superior clinical outcome. Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are known to have peculiar toxicity profile, hence, increasing awareness to the safety profile of ALK inhibitors is essential.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of literature has been conducted to include prospective trials that used the ALK inhibitors Crizotinib, Ceritinib, Alectinib, Brigatinib and Lorlatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC and have available efficacy and toxicity results.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies including 2793 patients were considered eligible for our review and included two phase IB, seven phase II and five phase III studies. The most common adverse events (AEs) observed with ALK inhibitors were gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities as nausea (up to 83%), vomiting (up to 67%) and diarrhea (up to 86%), elevation of liver enzymes occurred in up to 60% and fatigue (up to 43%). There were differences in the toxicity patterns between the different ALK inhibitors with more GI and hepatic toxicities with Ceritinib, more visual disorders with Crizotinib, more dysgeusia with crizotinib and Alectinib and possibly more respiratory complications with Brigatinib. Most of the AEs were low grade and treatment-related deaths were associated with ALK inhibitors in 0-1% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Most of adverse effects of ALKi can be managed efficiently via dose modifications or interruptions. Timely identification of each ALKi pattern of toxicity can prevent treatment-related morbidity and mortality in this palliative setting.

Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma, Harboring Both an EGFR Mutation and ALK Rearrangement, Presenting a Stable Disease to Erlotinib and a Partial Response to Alectinib

A 63-year-old woman with pulmonary adenocarcinoma (stage IIIB) that was positive for an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was treated with erlotinib as the first-line treatment, resulting in a stable disease. Due to skin rashes, fatigue and anorexia, erlotinib was suspended on erlotinib day 44. Alectinib was administered as the second-line treatment, exhibiting a partial response. On alectinib day 56, drug-induced lung injury forced suspension of alectinib, which was cured with corticosteroid therapy. ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be more effective for patients positive for both EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement than other agents.

Case report: continued treatment with alectinib is possible for patients with lung adenocarcinoma with drug-induced interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, is a key drug for ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important adverse effect of alectinib, which generally requires termination of treatment. However, we treated two patients with drug-induced ILD who continued to receive alectinib.

CASE PRESENTATION

Patient 1 was a 57-year-old male with an ALK-rearranged Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who was administered alectinib as first-line therapy. Computed tomography (CT) detected asymptomatic ground-glass opacity (GGO) on day 33 of treatment. Alectinib therapy was therefore discontinued for 7 days and then restarted. GGO disappeared, and the progression of ILD ceased. Patient 2 was a 64-year-old woman with an ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who was administered alectinib as third-line therapy. One year later, CT detected GGO; and she had a slight, nonproductive cough. Alectinib therapy was continued in the absence of other symptoms, and GGO slightly diminished after 7 days. Two months later, CT detected increased GGO, and alectinib therapy was continued. GGO diminished again after 7 days. The patient has taken alectinib for more than 2 years without progression of ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain patients with alectinib-induced ILD Grade 2 or less may continue alectinib therapy if they are closely managed.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Dilemmas

Since the approval of the first molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, in 2001, TKIs have heralded a new era in the treatment of many cancers. Among their innumerable adverse effects, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious, presenting most frequently with dyspnea, cough, fever, and hypoxemia, and often treated with steroids. Of the 28 currently approved TKIs, 16 (57 %) are reported to induce ILD with varying frequency and/or severity. The interval from drug administration to onset of ILD varies between patients and between TKIs, with no predictable time course. Its incidence is variously reported to be approximately 1.6-4.3 % in Japanese populations and 0.3-1.0 % in non-Japanese populations. The mortality rate is in the range of 20-50 %. Available evidence (primarily following the use of erlotinib and gefitinib in Japan because of the unique susceptibility of that population) has identified a number of susceptibility and prognostic risk factors (male sex, a history of smoking, and pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis being the main ones). Although the precise mechanism is not understood, collective evidence suggests that immune factors may be involved. If TKI-induced ILD is confirmed by thorough evaluation of the patient and exclusion of other causes, management is supportive, and includes discontinuation of the culprit TKI and administration of steroids. Discontinuing the culprit TKI presents a clinical dilemma because the diagnosis of TKI-induced ILD in a patient with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis can be challenging, the patient may have TKI-responsive cancer with no suitable alternative, and switching to an alternative agent, even if available, carries the risk of the patient experiencing other toxic effects. Preliminary evidence suggests that therapy with the culprit TKI may be continued under steroid cover and/or at a reduced dose. However, this approach requires careful individualized risk-benefit analysis and further clinical experience.

Alectinib for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are present in about 5% of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Despite the initial response, after a median of 1-2 years, ALK-positive patients developed an acquired resistance to the ALK-inhibitor crizotinib. Among the most promising second-generation ALK-inhibitors, alectinib is being investigated in crizotinib-naïve and -resistant ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

AREAS COVERED

The current state-of-the-art of ALK-inhibitors treatment, and in particular the role of alectinib in this setting, is reviewed and discussed. A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meetings using a focused review question was undertaken. Expert commentary: Alectinib reports promising results with a good safety profile, becoming a potentially very important option for ALK-translocated NSCLC patients. The preliminary results from the J-ALEX phase III randomized trial performed in ALK-rearranged NSCLC Japanese patients showed a better activity and tolerability of alectinib versus crizotinib.