Biomechanical imaging biomarker during chemoradiotherapy predicts treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Objective. For response-adapted adaptive radiotherapy (R-ART), promising biomarkers are needed to predict post-radiotherapy (post-RT) responses using routine clinical information obtained during RT. In this study, a patient-specific biomechanical model (BM) of the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was proposed using the pre-RT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and tumor structural changes during RT as evaluated using computed tomography (CT). In addition, we evaluated the predictive performance of BM-driven imaging biomarkers for the treatment response of patients with HNSCC who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).Approach. Patients with histologically confirmed HNSCC treated with definitive CCRT were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent CT two times as follows: before the start of RT (pre-RT) and 3 weeks after the start of RT (mid-RT). Among these patients, 67 patients who underwent positron emission tomography/CT during the pre-RT period were included in the final analysis. The locoregional control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) prediction performances of whole tumor stress change (TS) between pre- and mid-RT computed using BM were assessed using univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses, respectively. Furthermore, performance was compared with the pre and post-RT SUVmax, tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) during RT, and other clinical prognostic factors.Main results. For both univariate, multivariate, and survival curve analyses, the significant prognostic factors were as follows (p< 0.05): TS and TVRR for LC; TS and pre-RT FDG-SUVmaxfor PFS; and TS only for OS. In addition, for 2 year LC, PFS, and OS prediction, TS showed a comparable predictive performance to post-RT FDG-SUVmax.Significance. BM-driven TS is an effective prognostic factor for tumor treatment response after CCRT. The proposed method can be a feasible functional imaging biomarker that can be acquired during RT using only routine clinical data and may provide useful information for decision-making during R-ART.

HDAC1 regulates the chemosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma cells via modulation of interleukin-8 expression

Chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) have been widely used to treat laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), the second most common head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, chemoresistance seriously impairs chemotherapeutic efficacy. Our present study reveals that 5-FU and CDDP treatment increase the expression of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) in LSCC cells. Consistently, increased levels of HDAC1 are observed in chemoresistant cells. Knockdown of HDAC1 significantly restores the sensitivity of LSCC cells, as HDAC1 increases the expression of interleukin-8 (IL-8), which is essential for LSCC chemoresistance. Mechanistically, HDAC1 directly initiates the transcription of IL-8 though binding to its promoter. Simultaneously, si-HDAC1 increases the levels of miR-93, which binds to the 3'UTR of IL-8 mRNA to trigger its degradation. In summary, the HDAC1/IL-8 axis can confer chemotherapeutic resistance to LSCC cells.

Radiotherapy-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with those of conventional radiotherapy on quality of life (QoL) and severity of xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched to July 1, 2019, to identify relevant studies, using the following terms: radiotherapy, head and neck cancer, quality of life, cognition, xerostomia, two-/three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, IMRT, conformal proton beam radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and volumetric modulated arc therapy. The outcomes of interest were QoL measured by global health status; emotional, social, and cognitive function; and severity of xerostomia.

RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 761 patients (n = 369 with IMRT; n = 392 with conventional RT) were included in this study. Median patient age was 18-65 years. IMRT group patients had better global health status (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.80, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.35, P = 0.004) and cognitive function (pooled SMD = 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.54, P = 0.013) than the conventional RT group. Patients receiving IMRT also had significantly lower scores for xerostomia than those receiving conventional RT (pooled SMD = - 0.60, 95% CI - 0.97 to - 0.24, P = 0.001). No differences were found in emotional function (P = 0.531) and social function (P = 0.348) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

IMRT significantly improves QoL and reduces the severity of xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. Results of this study provide clinicians with guidelines for decisions on the use of IMRT versus conventional RT.

Hyperthermia and radiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcome of controlled clinical trials in head and neck cancers (HNCs) using hyperthermia and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 498 abstracts were screened from four databases and hand searched as per the PRISMA guidelines. Only two-arm studies treating HNCs with either radiotherapy alone, or hyperthermia and radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy or surgery were considered. The evaluated end point was complete response (CR).

RESULTS

Following a detailed screening of the titles, abstracts and full text papers, six articles fulfilling the above eligibility criteria were considered. In total 451 clinical cases from six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five of six trials were randomised. The overall CR with radiotherapy alone was 39.6% (92/232) and varied between 31.3% and 46.9% across the six trials. With thermoradiotherapy, the overall CR reported was 62.5% (137/219), (range 33.9-83.3%). The odds ratio was 2.92 (95% CI: 1.58-5.42, p = 0.001); the risk ratio was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.32-1.97, p < 0.0001) and the risk difference was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.12-0.39, p < 0.0001), all in favour of combined treatment with hyperthermia and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone. Acute and late grade III/IV toxicities were reported to be similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperthermia along with radiotherapy enhances the likelihood of CR in HNCs by around 25% compared to radiotherapy alone with no significant additional acute and late morbidities. This level I evidence should justify the integration of hyperthermia into the multimodality therapy of HNCs.