Validation of Japanese indication criteria for deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of US national registry data

AIM

The Japanese indication criteria for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been updated based on living donor LT data to include either the Milan criteria (MC) or the 5-5-500 rule, which requires a nodule size of ≤5 cm, ≤5 nodules, and an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≤500 ng/mL. We aimed to validate the 5-5-500 rule and the MC for deceased donor LT (DDLT).

METHODS

Using national registry data from the United States from 2010 to 2014, we separated DDLT patients into four groups based on the MC and the 5-5-500 rule. The AFP values were stratified into categories: ≤100, 101-300, 301-500, and >500 ng/mL.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower for patients in the groups within MC/beyond 5-5-500 (56.3%) or beyond MC/5-5-500 (60.7%) than for patients in the groups within MC/5-5-500 (76.2%) and beyond MC/within 5-5-500 (72.3%) (p < 0.01). Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence at 5 years was highest for the within MC/beyond 5-5-500 (25.4%) group, followed by the beyond MC/within 5-5-500 (13.1%), beyond MC/5-5-500 (9.6%), and within MC/5-5-500 (7.4%) groups. The stratified 5-year survival rates after DDLT were 76.5%, 72.4%, 58.4%, and 55.6% in the AFP ≤100, 101-300, 301-500, and >500 categories, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 5-5-500 rule guides the appropriate selection of patients with HCC for DDLT. Patients with AFP levels from 300 to 500 ng/mL had inferior outcomes even when they met the 5-5-500 rule, so further investigation is needed to guide their treatment.

Liver Transplantation at a Small Volume Center-The Role of Network System

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is typically performed at specialized, high-volume centers. However, some smaller centers also offer liver transplantation services, but their outcomes and safety have been a subject of debate. To overcome these difficulties, we tried to build a Catholic Medical Center (CMC) network to share our experiences and overcome the lack of volume. In this study, we reviewed the overall outcome of patients undergoing LT at a small-volume procedure center, with a focus on patient and graft survival rates.

METHODS

Between July 2014 and September 2021, 60 adults underwent LT at Bucheon Saint Mary's Hospital. The overall outcomes were analyzed in terms of perioperative outcomes, complications, and overall survival rate. In addition, the patients were divided into a benign end-stage liver disease (ESLD) group (n = 44) and a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) group (n = 16). The baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and overall survival rate were analyzed between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Of a total of 60 LT, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was 26, and deceased donor liver transplantation was 34. LDLT was 14 (31.8%) in the ESLD group and 12 (75.0%) in the HCC group. The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 86.7%, 79.7%, and 77.7%, respectively. The survival difference was not statistically significant (P = .214) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that with appropriate patient selection and adequate resources, LT can be safely performed at smaller centers with the assistance of the CMC network, thus expanding access to this life-saving procedure.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: outcome of expanded criteria in tumor size

Background

The Milan criteria are the universal standard of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Numerous expanded criteria have shown outcomes as good as the Milan criteria. In Taiwan, living donor liver transplant (LDLT) accounts for the majority of transplantations due to organ shortages.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 155 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC from July 2005 to June 2017 and were followed up for at least 2 years. Patients beyond the Milan criteria (n = 78) were grouped as recurrent or nonrecurrent, and we established new expanded criteria based on these data.

Results

Patients beyond the Milan criteria with recurrence (n = 31) had a significantly larger maximal tumor diameter (4.13 ± 1.96 cm versus 6.10 ± 3.41 cm, p = 0.006) and total tumor diameter (7.19 ± 4.13 cm versus 10.21 ± 5.01 cm, p = 0.005). Therefore, we established expanded criteria involving maximal tumor diameter ≤ 6 cm and total tumor diameter < 10 cm. The 5-year survival rate of patients who met these criteria (n = 134) was 77.3%, and the 5-year recurrence rate was 20.5%; both showed no significant differences from those of the Milan criteria. Under the expanded criteria, the pool of eligible recipients was 35% larger than that of the Milan criteria.

Conclusion

Currently, patients with HCC who undergo LDLT can achieve good outcomes even when they are beyond the Milan criteria. Under the new expanded criteria, patients can achieve outcomes as good as those with the Milan criteria and more patients can benefit.

Surgical Outcome of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients

Background

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) results in poor survival outcome. This study assessed the clinical outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy in LT recipients with pulmonary metastasis of HCC in a high-volume transplant center and analyzed factors prognostic of survival following metastasectomy.

Material/Methods

This study analyzed outcomes in 52 patients who underwent pulmonary resection due to pulmonary metastasis as the first recurrence of HCC after LT from January 2004 to December 2017 in a single center.

Results

The 52 enrolled patients included 46 men and 6 women, aged 56.0±6.6 years. Their 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after pulmonary resection were 75.0%, 43.5%, and 33.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 85.3%, 47.1%, and 34.2%, respectively, in patients with further metastases and 55.6%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively, in patients without further metastases (P=0.45). The size and number of pulmonary metastatic nodules were unrelated to survival rates (all P>0.10). A shorter recurrence-free period after LT (hazard ratio [HR]=0.553, P=0.006), elevated alpha-fetoprotein concentration at metastasectomy (HR=2.142, P=0.03), and adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy (HR=3.79, P=0.003) were independent risk factors for survival after metastasectomy.

Conclusions

Pulmonary metastasectomy for HCC recurrence in LT recipients showed favorable survival outcomes. Independent risk factors for survival after metastasectomy included recurrence-free survival after LT, alpha-fetoprotein level at metastasectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy.

Secondary non-resectable liver tumors: A single-center living-donor and deceased-donor liver transplantation case series

BACKGROUND

During the last decades, deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has gained a place in the therapeutic algorithm of well-selected patients harbouring non-resectable secondary liver tumors. Living-donor LT (LDLT) might represent a valuable means to further expand this indication for LT.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2016, twenty-two adults were transplanted because of neuroendocrine (n = 18, 82%) and colorectal metastases (n = 4, 18%); 50% received DDLT and 50% LDLT. In LDLT, 4 (36%) right and 7 (64%) left grafts were used; the median graft-to-recipient-weight ratios (GRWR) were 1.03% (IQR 0.86%-1.30%) and 0.59% (IQR 0.51%-0.91%), respectively. Median post-LT follow-up was 64 months (IQR 17-107) in the DDLT group and 40 months (IQR 35-116) in the LDLT group. DDLT and LDLT recipients were compared in terms of overall survival, graft survival, postoperative complications and recurrence.

RESULTS

The 1- and 5-year actuarial patient survivals were 82% and 55% after DDLT, 100% and 100% after LDLT, respectively (P < 0.01). One- and 5-year actuarial graft survivals were 73% and 36% after DDLT, 91% and 91% after LDLT (P < 0.01). The outcomes of right or left LDLT were comparable. Donor hepatectomy proved safe, and one donor experienced a Clavien IIIb complication. Bilirubin peak was significantly lower after left hepatectomy compared with that after right hepatectomy [1.3 (IQR 1.2-2.2) vs. 3.3 (IQR 2.3-5.2) mg/dL; P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

The more recent LDLT series compared favorably to our DDLT series in the treatment of secondary liver malignancies. The absence of portal hypertension and the use of smaller left grafts make recipient and donor surgeries safe. The safety of the procedures and lack of interference with the scarce allograft pool are expected to lead to a more frequent use of LDLT in the field of transplant oncology.

Patient Selection by Tumor Markers in Liver Transplantation for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Although far advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is generally considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), biologically favorable tumors among them could show acceptable results. However, it is still unclear which tumors can be treated with LT. Data were collected on adult patients who underwent LT for HCC beyond the Milan criteria in 8 Korean LT centers between January 2000 and June 2013. Far advanced HCC was defined as HCC with the largest tumor ≥ 10 cm, 10 or more tumor nodules, or accompanying macrovascular invasion. A total of 688 patients, including 169 with far advanced HCC, were enrolled in this study. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 60.4% and 55.1%, respectively, for all patients but only 28.7% and 24.8%, respectively, for patients with far advanced HCC (P < 0.001). Both preoperative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) were significant risk factors for HCC recurrence after LT. In particular, AFP + PIVKA-II combined was a better predictor than either marker alone. Of all far advanced HCC patients with available AFP and PIVKA-II levels, 45 (30.8%) had low AFP + PIVKA-II (≤300) and their 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rate were 47.8% and 53.4%, respectively, which were acceptable and significantly superior to those of patients with AFP (ng/mL) + PIVKA-II (nAU/mL) > 300 (21.0% and 10.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with favorable HCC had acceptable outcomes after LT even when their tumors were extremely advanced. AFP + PIVKA-II gave reliable information about the tumor biology of far advanced HCC. Liver Transplantation 00 000-000 2018 AASLD.