1
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 PMCID: PMC11335797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clinical Characteristics and Current Status of Treatment for Recurrent Bladder Cancer after Surgeries on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13051004. [PMID: 36900148 PMCID: PMC10000489 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13051004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare, but highly malignant, disease with an estimated annual incidence of 2 cases per 100,000 people. The main surgical treatment modalities for UTUC are radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection. After surgery, intravesical recurrence (IVR) can occur in up to 47% of patients, and 75% of them present with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, there are few studies focused on the diagnosis and treatment of postoperatively recurrent bladder cancer for patients with previous UTUC history (UTUC-BC), and many of the influencing factors are still controversial. In this article, we performed a narrative review of the recent literature, mainly summarizing the factors influencing postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC and discussing the subsequent prevention, monitoring, and treatment tools for it.
Collapse
|
3
|
Shimura S, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Moroo S, Koguchi D, Taoka Y, Hirayama T, Murakami Y, Utsunomiya T, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Irie A, Iwamura M. A multi-institutional retrospective study of open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy focused on the intravesical recurrence. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:71-78. [PMID: 35404494 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively frequent, occurring in about 30-50% of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of the prognosis and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery and to elucidate the risk factor of IVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 403 patients with UTUC treated with laparoscopic or open nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals between 1990 and 2015. The clinicopathological factors of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots, and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There was no difference in recurrence and cancer-specific mortality between open and laparoscopic surgery in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in IVR rate between the laparoscopic and open groups (p = .22). Among the patients with IVR, 84% of patients relapsed within 2 years. Univariate analysis of IVR showed a significant increase in patients with low-grade (p = .03, HR = 1.64) or low-stage urothelial carcinoma (pT1 or lower, p = .006, HR = 1.77) with no lymph node involvement (p = .002, HR = 10.3) or lymphovascular invasion (p = .009, HR = 1.79). Surgical modality was not an independent factor. In multivariate analysis, there was no independent predictive factor for IVR. CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery. On the other hand, our results suggested that the low malignant potential tumor may be a risk factor for IVR. This finding provides insight into IVR, which may help with the development of personalized prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Shimura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shigenori Moroo
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, Higashiyamato, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mertens LS, Sharma V, Matin SF, Boorjian SA, Houston Thompson R, van Rhijn BW, Masson-Lecomte A. Bladder Recurrence Following Upper Tract Surgery for Urothelial Carcinoma: A Contemporary Review of Risk Factors and Management Strategies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:60-66. [PMID: 36793750 PMCID: PMC9922921 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Bladder recurrences have been reported in 22-47% of patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This collaborative review focuses on risk factors for and treatment strategies to reduce bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Objective To review the current evidence on risk factors and treatment strategies for intravesical recurrence (IVR) after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Evidence acquisition This collaborative review is based on a literature search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and currently available guidelines on UTUC. Relevant papers on bladder recurrence (etiology, risk factors, and management) after upper tract surgery were selected. Special attention has been paid to (1) the genetic background of bladder recurrences, (2) bladder recurrences after ureterorenoscopy (URS) with or without a biopsy, and (3) postoperative or adjuvant intravesical instillations. The literature search was performed in September 2022. Evidence synthesis Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC are often clonally related. Clinicopathologic risk factors (patient, tumor, and treatment related) have been identified for bladder recurrences after UTUC diagnosis. Specifically, the use of diagnostic ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is associated with an increased risk of bladder recurrences. Further, a recent retrospective study suggests that performing a biopsy during ureteroscopy may further worsen IVR (no URS: 15.0%; URS without biopsy: 18.4%; URS with biopsy: 21.9%). Meanwhile, a single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy has been shown to be associated with a reduced bladder recurrence risk after RNU compared with no instillation (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.82). Currently, there are no data on the value of a single postoperative intravesical instillation after ureteroscopy. Conclusions Although based on limited retrospective data, performing URS seems to be associated with a higher risk of bladder recurrences. Future studies are warranted to assess the influence of other surgical factors as well as the role of URS biopsy or immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy after URS for UTUC. Patient summary In this paper, we review recent findings on bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 20 512 2553.
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Surena F. Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neuzillet Y, Seisen T, Traxer O, Allory Y, Audenet F, Leon P, Loriot Y, Pradère B, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Masson-Lecomte A, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1164-1194. [PMID: 36400481 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rouprêt M, Audenet F, Roumiguié M, Pignot G, Masson-Lecomte A, Compérat E, Houédé N, Larré S, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2021; 30:S52-S77. [PMID: 33349430 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30750-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION -The purpose was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS - A systematic Medline search was performed between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS - The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low risk lesion: unifocal tumor, possible complete resection and low grade and absence of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce risk of bladder recurrence. A systemic chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION - These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, Montpellier Université, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Inokuchi J, Kuroiwa K, Nishiyama H, Kojima T, Kakehi Y, Sugimoto M, Takenaka A, Fujimoto K, Yamaguchi R, Habuchi T, Hashine K, Mizusawa J, Eba J, Naito S. Significance of the timing of ureteral ligation on prognosis during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. Int J Urol 2021; 28:208-214. [PMID: 33283389 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact on intravesical recurrence and prognosis according to the ureteral ligation timing during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS We carried out a retrospective chart review of 664 patients with non-metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with ureteral ligation (supplementary analysis of JCOG1110A). We excluded patients with previous and/or synchronous bladder cancer, clinically node-positive disease, no ureteral ligation data, those without ureteral ligation and those with any missing data. We investigated the cumulative incidence of intravesical recurrence and cancer-specific mortality, and overall survival between patients with ureteral ligation before renovascular ligation (early ureteral ligation), or ureteral ligation after renovascular ligation (late ureteral ligation). RESULTS Early and late ureteral ligation was carried out in 243 patients (36.6%) and 421 patients (63.4%), respectively. Intravesical recurrence occurred in 218 patients (32.8%) during follow up (median 3.9 years). No significant difference in the intravesical recurrence was found between early and late ureteral ligation groups. Meanwhile, survival in the early ureteral ligation group was significantly worse compared with the late ureteral ligation group. Multivariable analysis showed that early ureteral ligation was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.85, P = 0.003) and cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.14-3.25, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the incidence of intravesical recurrence is not affected by the timing of ureteral ligation during radical nephroureterectomy. However, early ureteral ligation might have a negative impact on survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Inokuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Kuroiwa
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Kojima
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kakehi
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
| | | | - Raizo Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Katsuyoshi Hashine
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Eba
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiji Naito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clinical Trials in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
9
|
Lonergan PE, Porten SP. Bladder tumor recurrence after urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1891-1896. [PMID: 32944553 PMCID: PMC7475654 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon and poorly investigated malignancy, however, bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is a frequent event. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on risk prediction of bladder tumor recurrence after RNU, including surgical strategies and adjuvant intravesical treatments to reduce the risk of recurrence. Finally, we outline some of the more recent advances in genomics that will likely lead to new prognostic markers and risk stratification tools that may refine UTUC treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Lonergan
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Freifeld Y, Ghandour R, Singla N, Woldu S, Bagrodia A, Lotan Y, Rapoport LM, Gazimiev M, Delafuente K, Kulangara R, Robyak H, Petros FG, Raman JD, Matin SF, Margulis V. Intraoperative prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy to reduce bladder recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:737.e11-737.e16. [PMID: 32641241 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Single, postoperative instillation of prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy (pIVC) is effective in reducing bladder cancer recurrences following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite high level evidence, pIVC is underutilized. Intraoperative pIVC (I-pIVC) may be easier and safer to implement than postoperative pIVC (P-pIVC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of I-pIVC during RNU. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing RNU and I-pIVC or postoperative pIVC (P-pVC) with 20 to 40 mg mitomycin-C or 1 to 2 g gemcitabine. Recurrence rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test. Cox regression was used for univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis. 81% (111/137) had I-pIVC and 19% (26/137) had P-pIVC. In the I-pIVC group higher rates of HG, muscle invasive disease and gemcitabine use were observed. Overall, 74% (101/137) and 26% (36/137) had mitomycin-C and gemcitabine instillations, respectively. Within 12 months 14% (19/137) of the patients experienced bladder recurrence. Median time to bladder recurrence was 7 months (range 3-27). Twelve months bladder recurrence-free survival rates were 82% for the I-pIVC group, and 72% for the P-pIVC group ((log rank P = 0.365). CONCLUSIONS I-pIVC during RNU may reduce bladder recurrence rates. Bladder recurrence rates are comparable to those reported using postoperative instillations. Intraoperative instillations may be easier to implement and may increase usage rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Leonid M Rapoport
- Research institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Magomet Gazimiev
- Research institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Karen Delafuente
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Haley Robyak
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Research institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2019; 28 Suppl 1:R34-R47. [PMID: 31610873 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2016 and 2018, with regards to the diagnosis, the options of treatment and the follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate the different studies with levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare disease is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low-risk diseases: unifocal tumour, possible complete resection low-grade and lack of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended in order to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence. An adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment of UTUC.
Collapse
|
12
|
Harraz AM, El-Shabrawy M, El-Nahas AR, El-Kappany H, Osman Y. Single Versus Maintenance Intravesical Chemotherapy for the Prevention of Bladder Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e1108-e1115. [PMID: 31594736 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of 1-year maintenance intravesical chemotherapy (MIC) in reducing bladder recurrence (BR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared with single intravesical instillation (SIC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2015 and May 2017, patients who underwent RNU were randomized to receive SIC (epirubicin 50 mg) or MIC (once weekly for 6 weeks plus once monthly for 1 year). The primary outcome was the rate of histologically proven BR. The secondary outcomes included chemotherapy-related toxicities and disease-specific survival (DSS). Thirty-five patients in each arm were required to achieve a power of 80%. RESULTS A total of 38 (SIC) and 36 (MIC) patients were analyzed. In SIC, BR developed in 5 (13.2%) over a median follow-up of 3 months (range, 3-6 months) compared with 9 (25%) patients over 12 months (range, 3-28 months) in MIC (P = .08). The 6- and 12-month BR-free survivals were the same (86.8%) in SIC versus 88.9% and 83.3% in MIC, respectively (P = .2). Lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with BR (P = .04). Post-RNU intravesical chemotherapy regimens did not alter DSS. Blood transfusion and advanced tumor stage were independent predictors for DSS. No significant medication toxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS Following RNU, MIC did not change the natural course of BR beyond a single instillation apart from potentially delaying its occurrence. Lymphovascular invasion and blood transfusion were associated with worse BR and DSS outcomes, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed M Harraz
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | | | - Ahmed R El-Nahas
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Hamdy El-Kappany
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Yasser Osman
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rouprêt M, Xylinas E, Colin P, Houédé N, Compérat E, Audenet F, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Pignot G, Brunelle S, Roumiguié M, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S32-S45. [PMID: 30318333 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.07.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, université Paris Descartes, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59042 Lille, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie Médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ouzaid I, Xylinas E. Prevention of IVR: a need for investigation. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2018; 48:295-296. [PMID: 29329444 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after RNU for UTUC is a frequent event, occurring in 20-50% of patients, mostly in the first postoperative year. Several retrospective studies have shown that predictors of IVR include clinical characteristics, surgical features and as well pathological characteristics (previous history of bladder cancer, pathological stage, lymph node involvement, cis, endoscopic distal ureter, etc.) management. Two prospective studies provide level I evidence for the safety and efficacy of intravesical single postoperative chemotherapy for patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC in order to prevent IVR. However, some questions remain unanswered. Yamashita et al. in the current issue of the journal have shown that early ureteral ligation during RNU decreases the risk of IVR in patients with pelvycalyceal upper tract urothelial carcinoma. This study despite its limitations represent a step towards improved outcomes for our patients with UTUC, the relatively low morbidity of the procedure added to the potential benefit associated with this early ligation make it an easy implementation in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idir Ouzaid
- Department of Urology, Bichat Hospital, APHP, Paris Diderot University
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yamashita S, Ito A, Arai Y. Author’s reply to ‘Prevention of IVR: a need for investigation’. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2018; 48:297. [DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Yamashita
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoichi Arai
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|