Phase I study of ombrabulin in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose, safety, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy profiles of ombrabulin combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients with solid tumors.

METHODS

Ombrabulin (25, 30, or 35 mg/m2) combined with paclitaxel (175 or 200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC5 or AUC6) was administered by intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors, including cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers. The maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose was defined based on the dose-limiting toxicity at cycle 1. Efficacy was assessed based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).

RESULTS

In total, 18 patients were recruited for this dose escalation study. One out of six patients treated with the highest doses of combination of ombrabulin (35 mg/m2), paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), and carboplatin (AUC6) presented a dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 Escherichia urinary tract infection. This dose was defined as the maximum tolerated dose of ombrabulin. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were alopecia (83.3%), neutropenia and fatigue (72.2% each), decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia (66.7% each). The grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events included neutropenia (61.1%), Escherichia urinary tract infection, drug hypersensitivity, syncope, pulmonary embolism, and hydronephrosis (one patient each). In efficacy evaluation, seven patients achieved partial response or better (38.9%), including one complete response, and seven of 18 patients had stable disease (38.9%). Pharmacokinetic profiles in this Japanese study were comparable with those observed in the previous study without Japanese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose of ombrabulin (35 mg/m2) with taxane-platinum combination may be tolerable in Japanese patients in the first cycle, the dosages in the repeated treatment should be carefully selected for further study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01293630.

Recent advances in combretastatin A-4 codrugs for cancer therapy

CA4 is a potent microtubule polymerization inhibitor and vascular disrupting agent. However, the in vivo efficiency of CA4 is limited owing to its poor pharmacokinetics resulting from its high lipophilicity and low water solubility. To improve the water solubility, CA4 phosphate (CA4P) has been developed and shows potent antivascular and antitumor effects. CA4P had been evaluated as a vascular disrupting agent in previousc linical trials. However, it had been discontinued due to the lack of a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and unfavorable partial response data. Codrug is a drug design approach to chemically bind two or more drugs to improve therapeutic efficiency or decrease adverse effects. This review describes the progress made over the last twenty years in developing CA4-based codrugs to improve the therapeutic profile and achieve targeted delivery to cancer tissues. It also discusses the existing problems and the developmental prospects of CA4 codrugs.

Vascular Disrupting Agents in cancer treatment: Cardiovascular toxicity and implications for co-administration with other cancer chemotherapeutics

Destruction of the established tumour vasculature by a class of compound termed Vascular Disrupting Agents (VDAs) is showing considerable promise as a viable approach for the management of solid tumours. VDAs induce a rapid shutdown and collapse of tumour blood vessels, leading to ischaemia and consequent necrosis of the tumour mass. Their efficacy is hindered by the persistence of a viable rim of tumour cells, supported by the peripheral normal vasculature, necessitating their co-administration with additional chemotherapeutics for maximal therapeutic benefit. However, a major limitation for the use of many cancer therapeutics is the development of life-threatening cardiovascular toxicities, with significant consequences for treatment response and the patient's quality of life. The aim of this review is to outline VDAs as a cancer therapeutic approach and define the mechanistic basis of cardiovascular toxicities of current chemotherapeutics, with the overall objective of discussing whether VDA combinations with specific chemotherapeutic classes would be good or bad in terms of cardiovascular toxicity.