Randomized trial of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for stage I-II Hodgkin's disease

A Rare Coexistence of Seminoma and Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Hawai'i

Both Hodgkin's lymphoma and testicular cancers can present in young men; however, concurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma with seminoma is very rare. When they do coexist, careful consideration must be made to avoid missing new cancer by assuming the presence of primary metastatic disease when lymphadenopathy presents. Here we present a rare case of coexistence of seminoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma and the staging and treatment challenges associated with a 2-cancer diagnosis.

Hodgkin Lymphoma: the Changing Role of Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Disease—the Role of Functional Imaging

Early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a highly curable malignancy. Historically, extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) alone showed excellent cure rates, but the risk of radiotherapy (RT)-associated toxicities led to combined modality therapy (CMT) replacing RT alone. RT has subsequently evolved further with significant reductions of dose and field size, and is currently restricted to involved sites only (ISRT). Contemporary CMT yields cure rates in excess of 85%, and most studies do not have adequate follow-up required to evaluate the risk reduction in late effects. In an effort to avoid RT altogether, response-adapted treatment approaches utilizing results of interim [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with fused computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging have been studied. Results from two studies in favorable-risk (UK RAPID and EORTC H10F) and one in unfavorable-risk patients (EORTC H10U) suggest that omission of RT in patients with a negative interim PET/CT response (Deauville score ≤2) yields slightly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to conventional CMT, but with no difference in overall survival (OS) albeit with short-term follow-up. In order to extrapolate results to daily practice, it is critical to understand the selection of patients entered on trials since definitions of favorable and unfavorable disease vary between study groups. Currently, CMT continues to be the standard of care for the vast majority of patients with early-stage CHL and RT is an integral part of therapy in patients with bulky disease. However, for selected patients with favorable characteristics, emerging data suggest that a chemotherapy-alone approach is reasonable.

Combination chemoradiotherapy in early Hodgkin lymphoma

Combination chemoradiotherapy achieves excellent results for the treatment of localized Hodgkin lymphoma. However, late toxic effects occur, mostly related to the radiotherapy administered after the standard adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. The most serious sequelae are radiation-induced secondary cancers. Reducing radiotherapy has not yet prevented late malignancies. However, when radiotherapy was omitted, tumor control was inferior, with more relapses necessitating rescue treatment including high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Early fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography performed after a few cycles of ABVD is evaluated in several randomized trials to identify patients who might be safely treated with chemotherapy alone.

Point/counterpoint: early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma and the role of radiation therapy

The results of recent clinical trials for the management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma have led to considerable debate, especially regarding the role of radiation therapy. This review highlights those recent trials and provides perspectives regarding their interpretation from a radiation oncologist and a hematologist. The trial protocol is available at http://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1111961/suppl_file/nejmoa1111961_protocol.pdf.

Point/counterpoint: early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma and the role of radiation therapy

The results of recent clinical trials for the management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma have led to considerable debate, especially regarding the role of radiation therapy. This review highlights those recent trials and provides perspectives regarding their interpretation from a radiation oncologist and a hematologist. The trial protocol is available at http://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1111961/suppl_file/nejmoa1111961_protocol.pdf.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Hodgkin's lymphoma-unfavorable clinical stage I and II

Combined-modality therapy, consisting of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (RT), represents the standard of care for most patients with unfavorable-prognosis early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. The most widely accepted chemotherapy regimen is ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine); however, recent trials have evaluated other regimens such as BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) and Stanford V. After chemotherapy, the standard radiation field is involved-field RT, although there is increasing interest now in involved-node RT. The authors review recent trials on chemotherapy and RT for unfavorable-prognosis early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. This article presents illustrative clinical cases, with treatment recommendations from an expert panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists.

Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for early stage Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Combined modality treatment (CMT) consisting of chemotherapy followed by localised radiotherapy is standard treatment for patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, due to long term adverse effects such as secondary malignancies, the role of radiotherapy has been questioned recently and some clinical study groups advocate chemotherapy only for this indication.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy alone with CMT in patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma with respect to response rate, progression-free survival (alternatively tumour control) and overall survival (OS).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL as well as conference proceedings from January 1980 to November 2010 for randomised controlled trials comparing chemotherapy alone to the same chemotherapy regimen plus radiotherapy. 

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing chemotherapy alone with CMT in patients with early stage HL. Trials in which the chemotherapy differed between treatment arms were excluded. Trials with more than 20% of patients in advanced stage were also excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Effect measures used were hazard ratios (HR) for tumour control and OS as well as relative risks for response rates. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality of trials. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information. Since none of the trials reported progression-free survival according to our definitions, all similar outcomes were evaluated as tumour control.

MAIN RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 1245 patients were included. The HR was 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.66) for tumour control and 0.40 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.61) for OS for patients receiving CMT compared to chemotherapy alone. Complete response rates were similar between treatment groups. In sensitivity analyses another six trials were included that did not fulfil the inclusion criteria of our protocol but were considered relevant to the topic. These trials underlined the results of the main analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy improves tumour control and overall survival in patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

Declining use of radiotherapy in stage I and II Hodgkin's disease and its effect on survival and secondary malignancies

PURPOSE

Concerns regarding long-term toxicities have led some to withhold radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of Stage I and II Hodgkin's disease (HD). The present study was undertaken to assess the use of RT for HD and its effect on overall survival and the development of secondary malignancies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The present study included data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from patients aged ≥ 20 years who had been diagnosed with Stage I or II HD between 1988 and 2006. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox multivariate regression model was used to analyze trends.

RESULTS

A total of 12,247 patients were selected, and 51.5% had received RT. The median follow-up for the present cohort was 4.9 years, with 21% of the cohort having >10 years of follow-up. Between 1988 and 1991, 62.9% had undergone RT, but between 2004 and 2006, only 43.7% had undergone RT (p < .001). The 5-year overall survival rate was 76% for patients who had not received RT and 87% for those who had (p < .001). The hazard ratio adjusted for other variables in the regression model showed that patients who had not undergone RT (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-2.02) was associated with significantly worse survival compared with patients who had received RT. The actuarial rate of developing a second malignancy was 14.6% vs. 15.0% at 15 years for those who had and had not undergone RT, respectively (p = .089).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is one of the largest studies to examine the role of RT for Stage I and II HD. Our results revealed a survival benefit with the addition of RT with no increase in the development of secondary malignancies compared with patients who had not received RT. Furthermore, the present nationwide study revealed a >20% absolute decrease in the use of RT from 1988 to 2006.

The Past: What We Have Learned in the Last Decade

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become a curable malignancy for most patients during the last decades. However, many controversies still exist on the optimal strategy of how to cure our patients. The key question is how to balance the risks and toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy against the need for a definite treatment for early or advanced-stage HL patients. However, although many studies have been conducted and reported during the past decade, interpretation of their results and treatment recommendations might vary significantly in different countries. For example, early-stage HL might be divided into two different subgroups: early favorable and early unfavorable or not. Treatment of early-stage HL might include radiotherapy (“combined modality”) or not. Depending on the extent of radiotherapy, the schedule and number of chemotherapy cycles are also questioned. For advanced-stage HL, the situation is not much different. Compared with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), the more aggressive escalated BEACOPP regimen (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) is highly effective, but also raises concern due to excessive toxicity. Thus, there is a controversy about the standard of care for advanced HL patients. Because no mature results comparing these approaches with each other are currently available, it remains our duty to share the preliminary information with our patients and to figure out the most appropriate individual treatment strategy. Of course, the discussion of these issues is influenced by experiences and preferences. In contrast, in this article, we will try to focus on the available scientific evidence regarding the first-line treatment of HL. Of course, focusing on the last decade necessarily exclude the most recent results from ongoing studies. Thus, even though this article comprises treatment recommendations for HL patients, the best treatment certainly still is within properly designed prospective clinical trials.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma

Hodgkin's lymphoma is a malignant disease with an incidence of 2.2 cases/100,000. The main goals of staging are to measure the extent of disease and associated prognostic factors. Distinct recommendations were produced for initial work-up, first-line therapy of early and advanced stage disease and treatment of relapsed or resistant patients.

Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Whether it is possible to reduce the intensity of treatment in early (stage I or II) Hodgkin's lymphoma with a favorable prognosis remains unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing four treatment groups consisting of a combination chemotherapy regimen of two different intensities followed by involved-field radiation therapy at two different dose levels.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1370 patients with newly diagnosed early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma with a favorable prognosis to one of four treatment groups: four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by 30 Gy of radiation therapy (group 1), four cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of radiation therapy (group 2), two cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy of radiation therapy (group 3), or two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of radiation therapy (group 4). The primary end point was freedom from treatment failure; secondary end points included efficacy and toxicity of treatment.

RESULTS

The two chemotherapy regimens did not differ significantly with respect to freedom from treatment failure (P=0.39) or overall survival (P=0.61). At 5 years, the rates of freedom from treatment failure were 93.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.5 to 94.8) with the four-cycle ABVD regimen and 91.1% (95% CI, 88.3 to 93.2) with the two-cycle regimen. When the effects of 20-Gy and 30-Gy doses of radiation therapy were compared, there were also no significant differences in freedom from treatment failure (P=1.00) or overall survival (P=0.61). Adverse events and acute toxic effects of treatment were most common in the patients who received four cycles of ABVD and 30 Gy of radiation therapy (group 1).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and a favorable prognosis, treatment with two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of involved-field radiation therapy is as effective as, and less toxic than, four cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy of involved-field radiation therapy. Long-term effects of these treatments have not yet been fully assessed. (Funded by the Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Swiss Federal Government; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00265018.)

Combined modality treatment improves tumor control and overall survival in patients with early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review

Combined modality treatment (CMT) of chemotherapy followed by localized radiotherapy is standard treatment for patients with early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, the role of radiotherapy has been questioned recently and some clinical study groups advocate chemotherapy only for this indication. We thus performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy alone with CMT in patients with early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma with respect to response rate, tumor control and overall survival (OS). We searched Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library as well as conference proceedings from January 1980 to February 2009 for randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy alone versus the same chemotherapy regimen plus radiotherapy. Progression free survival and similar outcomes were analyzed together as tumor control. Effect measures used were hazard ratios for OS and tumor control as well as relative risks for complete response (CR). Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan5. Five randomized controlled trials involving 1,245 patients were included. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.66) for tumor control and 0.40 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.59) for OS for patients receiving CMT compared to chemotherapy alone. CR rates were similar between treatment groups. In sensitivity analyses another 6 trials were included that did not fulfill the inclusion criteria of our protocol but were considered relevant to the topic. These trials underlined the results of the main analysis. In conclusion, adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy improves tumor control and OS in patients with early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria on Hodgkin's lymphoma: favorable prognosis stage I and II

The treatment for favorable-prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin's lymphoma has evolved over the past several years. Studies have attempted to reduce long-term treatment-related side effects, such as second malignancies and cardiac toxicity, through reduced chemotherapy or reduced radiotherapy. Randomized trials have compared radiation therapy alone with combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiotherapy). Recent and ongoing trials have evaluated the optimal regimen and number of cycles of chemotherapy and the optimal radiotherapy dose and field size as part of combined-modality therapy, as well as the elimination of radiation therapy. Combined-modality therapy represents the current standard of care for most patients with favorable-prognosis early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Chemotherapy alone could also be an option for selected patients who are at low risk for relapse and high risk for late effects from radiotherapy. This article reviews recent and ongoing studies on treatment for favorable-prognosis early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Representative clinical cases are presented, with treatment recommendations from an expert panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists.

WITHDRAWN: Interventions for early stage Hodgkin's disease in children

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin's disease is one of the most curable cancers in children, particularly at the early stages. However it is not clear which combinations of treatment strategies are most effective at maintaining high cure rates and minimising long term harmful effects or sequelae of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of radiotherapy, chemotherapy or combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy on relapse free survival and overall survival rates in children with early (stage I to IIA) Hodgkin's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2001), EMBASE, Cinahl, Cancer-CD and reference lists of relevant articles. We also handsearched six journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of involved field radiotherapy, extended field radiotherapy, anthracycline based chemotherapy regimens, or alkylating chemotherapy agents in children to 19 years of age with Hodgkin's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial eligibility and quality were assessed and study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials involving 334 children were included. It was not possible to combine the outcomes as they covered different treatment regimens. The trials were of variable quality. One trial comparing radiotherapy alone showed no discernible difference in relapse free survival (relative risk 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.09) or overall survival (relative risk 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.07) between involved field and extended field radiotherapy. No discernible difference was found between involved field radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and extended field radiotherapy and chemotherapy (based on one small trial). In another trial, involved field radiotherapy plus chemotherapy appeared to increase relapse free survival compared to either involved field or extended field radiotherapy alone, although a discernible difference was found for overall survival. Extended field radiotherapy alone appeared to increase relapse free survival compared to extended radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (relative risk 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.83) but no discernible difference was apparent for overall survival (based on one trial).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence from randomised controlled trials to evaluate the consensus approach of short course chemotherapy and local radiotherapy, although no discernible difference in survival was detected between involved field and extended field radiotherapy in one randomised trial.

ABVD plus radiotherapy versus EVE plus radiotherapy in unfavorable stage IA and IIA Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from an Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi randomized study

BACKGROUND

In 1997, the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi started a randomized trial to evaluate, in unfavorable stage IA and IIA Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients, the efficacy and toxicity of the low toxic epirubicin, vinblastine and etoposide (EVE) regimen followed by involved field radiotherapy in comparison to the gold standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) regimen followed by the same radiotherapy program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients should be younger than 65 years with unfavorable stage IA and IIA HL (i.e. stage IA or IIA with bulky disease and/or subdiaphragmatic disease, erythrocyte sedimentation rate higher than 40, extranodal (E) involvement, hilar involvement and more than three involved lymph node areas).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were allocated to the ABVD arm and 89 to the EVE arm. Complete remission (CR) rates at the end of treatment program [chemotherapy (CT) + RT] were 93% and 92% for ABVD and EVE arms, respectively (P = NS). The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 95% for ABVD and 78% for EVE (P < 0.05). As a consequence of the different relapse rate, the 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) rate was significantly better for ABVD (90%) than for EVE (73%) arm (P < 0.05). No differences in terms of overall survival (OS) were observed for the two study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In unfavorable stage IA and IIA HL patients, no differences were observed between ABVD and EVE arms in terms of CR rate and OS. EVE CT, however, was significantly worse than ABVD in terms of RFS and FFS and cannot be recommended as initial treatment for HL.

Radiotherapy of hodgkin lymphoma: indications, new fields, and techniques

In recent years, radiotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma has evolved considerably because of sophisticated imaging technologies and radiation delivery techniques. Even more recently, a new radiation field concept has emerged to ensure better normal tissue protection while preserving an excellent clinical outcome. The role of radiation therapy is also rapidly changing because the concept of a risk-adapted treatment strategy, in which combined-modality treatments were the order of the day, is now expanding into a concept of response-adapted treatments.

Second malignancy risk associated with treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of the randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Despite several investigations, second malignancy risks (SMR) following radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CT) and combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) remain controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We sought individual patient data from randomised trials comparing RT versus CRT, CT versus CRT, RT versus CT or involved-field (IF) versus extended-field (EF) RT for untreated HL. Overall SMR (including effects of salvage treatment) were compared using Peto's method.

RESULTS

Data for between 53% and 69% of patients were obtained for the four comparisons. (i) RT versus CRT (15 trials, 3343 patients): SMR were lower with CRT than with RT as initial treatment (odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.98 and P = 0.03). (ii) CT versus CRT (16 trials, 2861 patients): SMR were marginally higher with CRT than with CT as initial treatment (OR = 1.38, CI 1.00-1.89 and P = 0.05). (iii) IF-RT versus EF-RT (19 trials, 3221 patients): no significant difference in SMR (P = 0.28) although more breast cancers occurred with EF-RT (P = 0.04 and OR = 3.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of CT in addition to RT as initial therapy for HL decreases overall SMR by reducing relapse and need for salvage therapy. Administration of RT additional to CT marginally increases overall SMR in advanced stages. Breast cancer risk (but not SMR in general) was substantially higher after EF-RT. Caution is needed in applying these findings to current therapies.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma: joining in or splitting up?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiotherapy is very effective in local control of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Unfortunately, long-term survivors exhibit an excess of life-threatening radiation-related late side effects. Consequently, there have been calls to cease the use of radiation in the primary treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma, although there is also support for the judicious use of combined modality treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most patients treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma are being cured with modern approaches. Recent publications confirm the superior efficacy of combined modality treatment over chemotherapy alone, but the initial gain in cure rate may be outweighed by late deaths due to various treatment-related diseases. Many patients may already be cured by chemotherapy alone. Classical risk factors can be used to distinguish favourable and unfavourable subgroups of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma, but these risk factors cannot predict outcome in individual cases. A simple test to predict the likelihood of cure in individual patients would be of great benefit. Fluoro-deoxyglucose-PET scan investigation holds this promise.

SUMMARY

The present review deals with the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Evolving role of radiation therapy for hematologic malignancies

Radiation therapy continues to play a paramount role in the therapy of hematologic malignancies, whether as definitive therapy, as consolidation after chemotherapy, as part of bone marrow transplantation protocols, or in palliation. During the past 2 decades, significant advances in radiation therapy have occurred, including the evolution of involved-field irradiation and the adoption of conformal radiation administration. It is hoped that modern techniques will reduce the long-term sequelae associated with radiation-based treatments.

The Management of Patients with Limited-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

The term limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma refers to those patients with stage I–II disease and an absence of bulky disease. Among those patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, approximately one-third of patients will fall into this category. As long-term disease control can now be anticipated in more than 90% of these patients, management strategies must increasingly address the need to reduce the long-term treatment-related risks. Current treatment options include use of combined modality therapy that includes an abbreviated course of chemotherapy and involved-field radiation or treatment with chemotherapy, currently consisting of ABVD, as a single modality. The choice of treatment between these two options involves specific trade-offs that must balance issues of disease control against long-term risk of late effects.

Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and combined modality for Hodgkin's disease, with emphasis on second cancer risk

BACKGROUND

Second malignancies (SM) are a major late effect of treatment for Hodgkin's disease (HD). Reliable comparisons of SM risk between alternative treatment strategies are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) and combined chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for newly-diagnosed Hodgkin's disease are compared with respect to SM risk, overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival. Further, involved-field (IF-)RT is compared to extended-field (EF-)RT.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, PubMed, EMBASE, CancerLit, LILACS, relevant conference proceedings, trials lists and publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs accruing 30+ patients and completing accrual before/during 2000, comparing at least two treatment modalities for newly-diagnosed HD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Individual patient data were collected and assessed for data quality. Trialists submitted additional information concerning methods and data quality. Peto Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for OS, PFS and SM-free survival. Secondary acute leukemia (AL), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and solid tumours (ST) were also analysed separately.

MAIN RESULTS

37 trials (9312 patients) were analysed: 15 (3343) for RT vs. CRT, 16 (2861) for CT vs. CRT, 3 (415) for RT vs. CT and 10 (3221) for IF-RT vs. EF-RT.CRT was superior to RT in terms of OS (OR=0.76, CI=0.66 to 0.89, p=0.0004), PFS (OR=0.49, CI=0.43 to 0.56, p<0.0001) and SM (OR=0.78. CI=0.62 to 0.98, p=0.03). The superiority of CRT also applied to early and advanced stages (mainly IIIA) separately. Excess SM with RT is due mainly to ST and is apparently caused by greater need for salvage therapy after RT.CRT was superior to CT in terms of PFS (OR=77, CI 0.68 to 0.77, p<0.0001). OS was better with CRT for early stages only (OR=0.62, CI 0.44 to 0.88, p=0.006). SM risk was higher with CRT (OR=1.38, CI 1.00 to 1.89, p=0.05), although not significant for early stages alone. This effect, also seen in AL and ST separately, was due directly to first-line treatment. Data were insufficient to compare RT to CT.EF-RT was superior to IF-RT (each additional to CT in most trials) in terms of PFS (OR=81, CI 0.68 to 0.95, p=0.009) but not OS. No significant difference in SM was observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CRT seems to be optimal for most early stage (I-II) HD patients. For advanced stages (III-IV), CRT better prevents progression/relapse but CT alone seems to cause less SM. RT alone gives a higher overall SM risk than CRT due to increased need for salvage therapy. Reduced SM risk after IF-RT instead of EF-RT could not be demonstrated. Due to the large number of studies excluded because no IPD were received, to the inclusion of many outdated treatments and to the limited amount of long-term data, one must be cautious in applying these results to current therapies.

Is there convincing evidence for the use of chemotherapy alone in patients with limited stage Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Standard practices for patients with stages I and IIA non-bulky Hodgkin's lymphoma have evolved to include combined-modality therapy consisting of two or three cycles of ABVD and radiation therapy to the involved field. Long-term disease control can be expected in more than 90% of patients. However, long-term survival will also be dependent on the occurrence of treatment-related toxicities (late-effects) that include second cancers and cardiovascular events; deaths from these causes will outnumber those due to progressive Hodgkin's lymphoma. Data from randomized trials testing the role of chemotherapy alone are now available. These trials are based on the hypothesis that avoidance of radiation therapy will result in fewer deaths from late-effects, and that long-term survival will be at least comparable and possibly superior. With intermediate periods of follow-up, the results of these randomized trials demonstrate that with chemotherapy alone, disease control is reduced by approximately 5-7%, but this difference has not translated into a survival advantage. While further follow-up is required to evaluate longer term overall survival, current data can be interpreted as showing that a trade-off exists that requires balancing the advantage of superior disease control achieved with inclusion of radiation therapy and minimization of late-effects resulting from use of chemotherapy alone. The balance associated with this trade-off makes chemotherapy alone a legitimate treatment option; patients and clinicians need to be aware of these options in when making treatment decisions.

Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by radiation therapy (RT) versus ABVD alone for stages I, II, and IIIA nonbulky Hodgkin disease

To determine whether combined modality therapy (CMT) is superior to chemotherapy (CT) alone, 152 untreated Hodgkin disease patients with clinical stages (CSs) IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA without bulk disease were prospectively randomized to 6 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) alone or 6 cycles of ABVD followed by radiation therapy (RT) (3600 cGy: involved field for 11 patients, modified extended field for the rest). Of 76 patients randomized to receive RT, 65 actually received it, and 11 did not (4 progressed, 1 had bleomycin toxicity, 6 refused). For ABVD + RT, the complete remission (CR) percentage was 94% and no major response, 6%. For ABVD alone, 94% achieved a CR; 1.5%, a partial response (PR); and 4.5%, no major response. At 60 months CR duration, freedom from progression (FFP), and overall survival (OS) for ABVD + RT versus ABVD alone are 91% versus 87% (P = .61), 86% versus 81% (P = .61), and 97% versus 90% (P = .08), respectively (log-rank). The 95% confidence intervals for CR duration, FFP, and OS differences at 5 years were –8% to 15%, –8% to 18%, and –4% to 12%, respectively. Although significant differences were not seen, it is possible that a benefit in outcome of less than 20% for CMT might be seen in a larger trial.

Progress in the Prognosis of Adult Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the Past 35 Years Through Clinical Trials in Argentina: A GATLA Experience

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trends in complete remission (CR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) through 35 years of Grupo Argentino de Tratamiento de la Leucemia Aguda (GATLA) clinical trials. A total of 1,254 adult patients with Hodgkin's Lymphoma were evaluated according to seven consecutive protocols. This 35-year study was divided into three phases. The patients in the first phase (1968-1985) were treated with CVPP (cyclophosphamide/vinblastine/procarbazine/prednisone) plus involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT). In the CVPP regimen, cyclophosphamide and vinblastine were administered intravenously on day 1 and prednisone and procarbazine were administered orally on days 1-14 every 28 days. The second phase (1986-1996) used mainly reinforced CVPP with cyclophosphamide and vinblastine on days 1-8 plus IFRT. The third phase (1997-2003) used ABVD(doxorubicin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine) plus IFRT. In clinical stage I/II, the CR rate was 86% in 252 patients treated in the first phase and DFS and OS were 57% and 78% at 5 years and 50% and 71% at 10 years. The second phase had 148 patients with clinical stage I/II disease, and the CR rate was 91%, 5-year DFS and OS were 78% and 90%, and 10-year DFS and OS were 70% and 83%. The third phase had 182 patients with clinical stage I/II disease, and the CR rate was 95%, 5-year DFS and OS were 87% and 96%, and 10-year DFS and OS were not reached. The statistical difference was P = 0.016 in terms of CR and P < 0.001 in terms of DFS and OS. In the first phase of 394 patients with clinical stage III/IV disease, the CR rate was 71%, DFS and OS at 5 years were 37% and 62%, and DFS and OS at 10 years were 32% and 53%. In the second phase of 164 patients with clinical stage III/IV disease, the CR rate was 84%, DFS and OS at 5 years were 66% and 80%, and DFS and OS at 10 years were 60% and 75%. In the third phase of 114 patients with clinical stage III/IV disease, the CR rate was 88% and DFS and OS at 5 years were 60% and 90%. The DFS and OS were not reached at 10 years. The differences among the 3 phases in CR, DFS and OS were highly significant (P < 0.001).

Localized radiation increases morbidity and mortality after TBI-containing autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma

The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) and treatment-related morbidity and mortality in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC), total body irradiation (TBI) and autologous peripheral stem cell transplant (PSCT) for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Between January 1994 and May 2002, 156 patients underwent HDC, TBI and autologous PSCT. Localized external beam radiation therapy was given to 21 patients for consolidation, or to achieve control of symptomatic or active disease prior to or after transplant. Among patients who had IFRT prior to autologous PSCT, five treatment-related deaths were observed, compared to seven deaths in 135 patients who had autologous PSCT without IFRT (P<0.01). Most deaths were attributable to sepsis and multiorgan failure. A higher incidence of pneumonitis was also noted in patients exposed to mediastinal irradiation. No adverse impact on long-term survival could be demonstrated. Involved field radiation prior to TBI is associated with higher treatment-related mortality in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplant, necessitating careful monitoring.

Current treatment strategies in early stage Hodgkin's disease

Treatment of Hodgkin's disease (HD) is strictly dependent on stage. Historically, early stage HD included the limited stages I, II, and IIIA (according to the Cotsworth modification of the Ann Arbor classification), whereas advanced HD included stage III with B symptoms and stage IV. It was observed that early stage HD with certain clinical risk factors had a significantly worse outcome. As a consequence, several studies defined these patients as suffering from early stage unfavorable (or intermediate stage) HD, demanding a more aggressive treatment.

Current therapies in Hodgkin's disease

Advances in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (HD) have resulted in cure rates of greater than 80%. This remarkable achievement has occurred in the past 50 years secondary to improvements in combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Over the last several decades, with the increase in long-term survivors of HD, it has become evident that cure is not the only issue, and late side-effects of treatment, including secondary malignancies and impaired fertility, are of major concern as well. As a result, attempts to improve response and survival rates by intensifying therapy must be countered against the potential for long-term toxicity.

Interventions for early stage Hodgkin's disease in children

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin's disease is one of the most curable cancers in children, particularly at the early stages. However it is not clear which combinations of treatment strategies are most effective at maintaining high cure rates and minimising long term harmful effects or sequelae of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of radiotherapy, chemotherapy or combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy on relapse free survival and overall survival rates in children with early (stage I to IIA) Hodgkin's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2001), EMBASE, Cinahl, Cancer-CD and reference lists of relevant articles. We also handsearched six journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of involved field radiotherapy, extended field radiotherapy, anthracycline based chemotherapy regimens, or alkylating chemotherapy agents in children to 19 years of age with Hodgkin's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial eligibility and quality were assessed and study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials involving 334 children were included. It was not possible to combine the outcomes as they covered different treatment regimens. The trials were of variable quality. One trial comparing radiotherapy alone showed no discernible difference in relapse free survival (relative risk 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.09) or overall survival (relative risk 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.07) between involved field and extended field radiotherapy. No discernible difference was found between involved field radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and extended field radiotherapy and chemotherapy (based on one small trial). In another trial, involved field radiotherapy plus chemotherapy appeared to increase relapse free survival compared to either involved field or extended field radiotherapy alone, although a discernible difference was found for overall survival. Extended field radiotherapy alone appeared to increase relapse free survival compared to extended radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (relative risk 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.83) but no discernible difference was apparent for overall survival (based on one trial).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence from randomised controlled trials to evaluate the consensus approach of short course chemotherapy and local radiotherapy, although no discernible difference in survival was detected between involved field and extended field radiotherapy in one randomised trial.

Risk-adapted therapy for clinical stage I-II Hodgkin's disease: 7-years results of radiotherapy alone for low-risk disease, and ABVD and radiotherapy for high-risk disease

Treatment outcomes were documented for 204 adult patients with clinical Stage I-II Hodgkin's disease who were treated with risk-adapted ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) and radiotherapy (RT) at the Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre between 1984 and 1994. Forty-nine patients with clinical Stage I disease (excluding bulky mediastinal presentations) and 50 patients with a combination of clinical Stage IIA disease, age 50 years or less, and favourable pathology (lymphocyte predominant or nodular sclerosing histology) were identified as low risk and treated with RT alone to 35 Gy. One hundred and five high-risk patients were treated with chemotherapy (86 with ABVD) followed by RT to 25 Gy. The 7-year cause-specific, overall and disease-free survivals were 95%, 90% and 75% respectively for the low-risk cohort, and 91%, 90% and 88% respectively for the high-risk cohort. In-field relapses accounted for 50% of the failures in both groups. Sixteen of 24 (67%) patients with RT failure and 6/14 (43%) with combined modality therapy (CMT) failure were salvaged. Twenty-eight per cent of the patients treated with RT and 21% of those treated with CMT developed hypothyroidism by 7 years. Fatal complications were recorded in 6% of the low-risk patients managed with RT and 8% of high-risk patients managed with CMT. Septic death and second malignancy accounted for the majority of treatment-related fatalities. Risk-adapted therapy emphasizing RT alone for selected patients with favourable prognostic factors and CMT based on ABVD provides excellent long-term disease control. Further treatment refinements, including the wider application of CMT with lower doses of chemotherapy and RT, will be required to reduce the rate of fatal complications to more acceptable levels.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy useful in stage I-II Hodgkin's disease: more extended disease identified

Somatostatin receptor (SS-R) scintigraphy successfully shows primary cancers and metastases in patients with a variety of SS-R-positive tumours. In vitro studies have shown that SS-Rs are present in lymph nodes from patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD). We performed a prospective study in 126 newly diagnosed patients with HD and compared the results of SS-R scintigraphy with conventional staging procedures, i.e. physical examination, computerized tomography (CT) scanning and other imaging techniques. We report positive scintigraphy in all patients. The lesion-related sensitivity was 94% and varied from 98% for supradiaphragmatic lesions to 67% for infradiaphragmatic lesions. In comparison with CT scanning and ultrasonography, SS-R scintigraphy provided superior results for the detection of Hodgkin's localizations above the diaphragm. In the intra-abdominal region, the CT scan was more sensitive than the SS-R scan. A false-positive scan was rarely seen. In stages I and II supradiaphragmatic HD patients, SS-R scintigraphy detected more advanced disease in 18% (15 out of 83) of patients, resulting in an upstaging to stage III or IV, thus directly influencing patient management. Our data would support the validity of SS-R scanning as a powerful imaging technique for the staging of patients with HD.

Current treatment of Hodgkin's disease

In spite of the fact that Hodgkin's disease (HD) remains still an enigma its management and treatment yield a cure rate of about 80% of all patients. However, this management has two limits: on one side favourable cases which should not be overtreated because of unacceptable side-effects, and on the other side very unfavourable cases which should be treated differently because of a very high rate of failure and/or relapse. Then it becomes necessary to precise as thoroughly as possible these two limits in order to choose the adequate treatment for the patient. Prognostic factors based on patient and disease characteristics allow a relatively exact classification of favourable and unfavourable cases. This distinction in two prognostic groups has therapeutic implications in terms of chemotherapy (regimen, duration) and radiotherapy (extension, doses). Other specific situations have to be considered, e.g. pediatric cases, pregnancy, old age and HIV-infected patients who need an adapted management according to very different situations.

EBVD combination chemotherapy plus low dose involved field radiation is a highly effective treatment modality for early stage Hodgkin's disease

To evaluate the efficacy of EBVD combination chemotherapy followed by low dose (LD) involved field (IF) radiation therapy (RT) in patients with clinical stage (CS) I-IIA Hodgkin's disease (HD), we analyzed 148 patients treated in our Unit from March 1988 to November 1995. EBVD consisted of Epirubicine 40 mg/m2, Bleomycin 10 mg/m2, Vinblastine 6 mg/m2 and Dacarbazine 300 mg. All drugs were administered i.v. at days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks, for a total of 4-6 cycles. LDIF RT (24-32 Gy) was scheduled for patients with complete response (CR) or >90% reduction of tumor load, after EBVD. Patients with stable or progressive disease (SD, PD) after EBVDx3 or poor compliance to the regimen received mantle or inverted Y RT at standard dose. The median follow-up of patients currently alive was 71.5 months. 129 patients achieved a CR after EBVD and 10 a >90% reduction of tumor load, for a post-CT response rate of 94%. Eight patients had SD after EBVDx3 and one had a partial response with poor compliance. All 9 patients received mantle or inverted Y RT and 8/9 achieved a CR. Nine patients relapsed at a median of 7 months from the end of treatment. At 10 years, FFS was 90% and overall survival 95%. Six patients have died so far; 5 of HD and one of stroke. One patient developed a diffuse large cell lymphoma 48 months after the diagnosis of HD. We conclude that EBVD followed by LDIF RT is a highly effective regimen for patients with CS I-IIA HD. Longer follow up is required to assess the risk of secondary malignancies, especially solid tumors.

Assessment and significance of mediastinal bulk in Hodgkin's disease: comparison between computed tomography and chest radiography

PURPOSE

In Hodgkin's disease (HD), mediastinal bulk is currently defined from chest radiograph (CXR) measurements as a ratio of the maximum transverse mass diameter to the internal thoracic diameter at T5/6 level > or = 0.33. We evaluated how computed tomographic (CT) measurements of bulk correspond to those obtained from the CXR and correlated nodal mass long axis diameter with freedom from progression.

METHODS

Ninety-five adult patients who had a CXR thoracic ratio of greater than 0.3 and a CT scan within 28 days of the CXR were included in the study, provided that both investigations were performed before the start of treatment. Measurements of the widest mediastinal diameter and internal thoracic diameter were made on both CXR and CT scan. The thoracic ratio (TR) was calculated for each modality and compared using paired t tests. The longest diameter of the largest individual nodal mass (LIM(CT)) was also measured from the CT and correlated with freedom from progression using Cox regression.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between CT and CXR for measurement of TR, with TR(CT) greater than TR(CXR) (mean difference of 2%). A TR(CT) of 0. 35 was found to be equivalent to a TR(CXR) of 0.33. No single measurement of nodal size correlated with the current definition of bulk. However LIM(CT) greater than 10 cm did correlate with increased risk of progressive HD (P =.03), even after adjustment for other prognostic variables (chemotherapy regimen and Hasenclever Prognostic Index).

CONCLUSION

Excellent correlation was observed between assessment of TR by CXR and CT scan. The longest diameter of the LIM(CT) greater than 10 cm was found to be associated with an increased risk of disease progression.

Treatment of stage I and II Hodgkin's disease with NOVP (mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, prednisone) and radiotherapy

We investigated the effectiveness of a new treatment regimen termed NOVP in early Hodgkin's disease, which reportedly has lower toxicity. Thirty-four patients were treated with three cycles of NOVP (mitoxantrone, vinblastine, vincristine, prednisone) and radiotherapy, 40% of them had unfavourable prognostic factors. All patients obtained complete remission. With a median follow up of 5 years, the overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87 to 103) and 89% (95% CI, 78 to 100), respectively. The presence of either B symptoms or pulmonary hilar involvement was associated with a significant decrease in TTF (91% VS 50% p=0.003 and 92% VS 30% p=0.02, respectively) but do not correlate with OS. The tolerance to NOVP was excellent with minimal toxicity. In conclusion, this regimen is associated with a favourable outcome and low toxicity in stage I and II Hodgkin's disease, although patients with B symptoms and pulmonary hilar involvement have a higher risk of relapse.

High incidence of treatment failure with vincristine, etoposide, epirubicin, and prednisolone chemotherapy with successful salvage in childhood Hodgkin disease

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE

In an attempt to further reduce the long-term toxicity of chemotherapy for childhood Hodgkin disease (HD), the Australian and New Zealand Children's Cancer Study Group between 1990 and 1996 enrolled 53 children with biopsy-proven and imaging-staged HD into a chemotherapy-only treatment regimen using 5-6 courses of vincristine, etoposide, epirubicin, and prednisolone (VEEP).

RESULTS

There were 23 events in these children with 3 progressive disease (PD), 8 partial remissions (PR), and 12 relapses. In the stage I patients, there were 8 events (35%). There was no association between the number of events and the stage of HD. Massive mediastinal disease at diagnosis was present in 16 patients, 11 of whom had an event with 3 PD, 3 PR, and 5 relapses. For all patients with an event at 6-24-month follow-up, all but two patients were salvaged with either alkylating agent-based chemotherapy alone or with irradiation and chemotherapy. The event-free survival for the whole group with median follow-up of 33 months was 59%, but only 31% for massive mediastinal disease. Disease-free survival was 78% and overall survival at 60 months was 92%, with one death due to drug-induced aplasia and another from acute myeloid leukemia.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that VEEP chemotherapy in childhood HD used as the only treatment modality has an unacceptably high treatment failure rate in patients with massive mediastinal disease and 35% incidence of treatment failure in stage I disease.

[the role of radiotherapy for limited stage Hodgkin's disease in 1999: limitations and perspectives]

The role of radiotherapy in limited stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) has been gradually changing in the past few decades, resulting in the almost complete disappearance of exclusive irradiation treatment. In reality, exclusive radiotherapy yielded satisfactory results in terms of long-term survival, but in 1999 it was becoming impossible not to take into account the late mortality rates observed in all large cohorts of HD patients. This increased mortality rate has been shown to be related to 1) cardiac toxicity of irradiation, and 2) secondary radiation-induced solid tumors. Thus, the search for efficient but less toxic new strategies can no longer be avoided. For clinically staged, limited HD, precisely defined according to specific prognostic factors, the association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy appears more and more as a standard, and with this therapeutic burden comes parallel efforts for its alleviation. The Previous Radiotherapy experience has shown that, after a chemotherapy-induced complete remission, irradiation of only the initially involved areas was enough. Ongoing trials are now exploring the possibility of a dose de-escalation, from the conventional 36 Gy to 20 Gy (as for children HD), and to maybe 0 Gy (no radiotherapy at all). In parallel, deescalation in the number of chemotherapy cycles is also being investigated. For unfavorable cases, the problem is slightly different, as a higher percentage of cases still appears to be refractory to treatment in this subgroup. Thus, while chemo-radiotherapy has clearly became the standard strategy, efforts are essentially being devoted to identify new--and hopefully more efficient--chemotherapy schemes. In Europe, most of these pending questions will be addressed in the recently initiated trials of the EORTC/GELA and of the GHSG (German Hodgkin Study Group), with the aim of offering to patients treatment which could be at least as efficient as the present schedules, and less toxic in the long term.

The role of radiotherapy for early stage Hodgkin's disease: limitations and perspectives

For limited stage Hodgkin's disease (HD), the role of radiotherapy has been changing during the last decades, the main point being the (almost) complete disappearance of irradiation used alone. Actually, exclusive radiotherapy yielded satisfactory results in terms of long-term survival, but in 1998, it was becoming impossible not to take into account the late overmortality observed in all large cohorts of HD patients. This overmortality has been shown to be related (1) to cardiac toxicity of irradiation and (2) to secondary radiation-induced solid tumors. So the search for new strategies, as efficient, but less toxic, could not be avoided any more. For surgically staged patients (pathological stages I and II), irradiation alone (i.e., mantle field radiotherapy) can still be proposed to patients without unfavourable prognostic factors after a negative surgical infra-diaphragmatic exploration. For clinically staged patients with limited disease and favourable prognostic indicators, the association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy appears more and more as a standard. In parallel, efforts are being made to alleviate the therapeutic burden. For radiotherapy, previous experience showed that, after a chemotherapy-induced complete remission, irradiation of the initially involved areas only was enough treatment. Ongoing trials are now exploring the possibility of a dose desescalation from the conventional 36 Gy to 20 Gy (as for children HD), and maybe to ... 0 Gy (no radiotherapy at all). Desescalation in the number of chemotherapy cycles is also being investigated. For clinically staged patients with unfavourable prognostic indicators, a higher percentage of cases still appears to be refractory to treatment. So, while chemo-radiotherapy clearly became the standard strategy, efforts are essentially being devoted to identify new--and hopefully more efficient--chemotherapy schemes. In parallel, irradiation dose desescalation is being investigated. Most of these pending questions are addressed in a number of ongoing trials, as well in the US as in Europe, with the aim of offering to patients treatments at least as efficient as the presently used schedules, and less toxic in the long term.

Radiotherapy in early stage Hodgkin's disease: principles and results of recent clinical trials

For decades, radiotherapy has been used as a single treatment modality for early stage Hodgkin's disease. In recent years, late radiation effects, such as myocardial infarctions and induced solid tumours, have become of major concern. It now seems clear that chemotherapy coupled with radiotherapy not only improves relapse-free survival, but can also replace radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for subclinical disease. This offers the opportunity of reduction of extended fields and high doses, which hopefully correlates with lower late radiation toxicity. The challenge for clinical trials on the treatment of early stages Hodgkin's disease in the coming years will be the trade-off between adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, reducing radiotherapy in volume and dose without jeopardising the 90% overall survival that can be achieved nowadays.

[Pathogenesis and therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma]

Although the pathogenesis of Hodgkin's disease is not clear, molecular analyses reveal characteristic features. EBV infection can be demonstrated in more than 50% of cases at the DNA or protein level. Recently, immunoglobulin gene rearrangements were found in single Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells. Sequence analyses revealed that the rearranged Ig genes have frequently somatic mutations, which indicate that the cells are derived from the germinal center. These rearrangements may be used as defined markers to detect residual disease after chemotherapy. Modern polychemotherapy regimen and radiotherapy are very effective, and 60-90% of patients, depending on stage of the disease and risk factors, can be cured. Salvage therapy for relapsed patients including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support frequently results in remission although duration is frequently short. New immunotherapy strategies with immunotoxins or bispecific antibodies are currently analysed in clinical studies.

Chemotherapy alone may be an efficient alternative in the treatment of early stage Hodgkin's disease if optimal radiotherapy is not available

Because radiotherapy (RT) equipment technology in some developing countries is outdated, its side effects are more frequent and severe and its efficacy suboptimal, whereas chemotherapy (CT) meeting international standards is generally more consistent. With this in mind, we treated 29 patients with stages I and II Hodgkin's disease with the MOPP or the MOPP/ABV hybrid schedule without prior staging laparotomy. The complete remission rate was 96%: five patients relapsed and of these, two died and three were rescued with CT, in one case followed by an autologous stem cell autograft. The median follow-up is 54 months (range 9 to 126), the overall survival of the group 88% at 126 months, and the relapse-free survival 72% at 110 months. Conventional CT alone has been shown to be useful in achieving acceptable long-term results. This observation could be important in circumstances where RT is unavailable or of suboptimal quality.