Feasibility of high-dose platinum delivery with combined carboplatin and oxaliplatin

Phase I and pharmacological study of an oxaliplatin and carboplatin combination in advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the recommended dose, as well as the optimal sequence of a carboplatin/oxaliplatin combination delivered every 3 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received either carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)-based individually calculated dose (starting dose AUC 4 mg.min/ml), 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] followed by oxaliplatin (110 mg/m(2), 2 h i.v. infusion), every 3 weeks, or the reverse sequence.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included and only one dose level was assessed. In group A, 10 patients received 23 cycles of carboplatin followed by oxaliplatin. In group B, 6 patients received 20 cycles with the reverse sequence. Delayed recovery from hematological toxicities was treatment-limiting, with mainly moderate thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicities for group A (5 of 10 patients for each) and thrombocytopenia for group B (3 of 6 patients). No febrile neutropenia or grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity occurred. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar mean total platinum AUCs for the two groups: 37.2 +/- 13.7 and 33.6 +/- 9.9 mg.h/l, respectively. One complete response and two partial responses (World Health Organization-International Union Against Cancer criteria, response rate 18.8%) were seen in ovarian, Fallopian and neuroendocrine carcinomas, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This platinum combination appears feasible and active at the dose of AUC 4 mg.min/ml for carboplatin (Chatelut formula) and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2); however, it does not allow a significant increase in platinum dose-intensity delivery.

Oxaliplatin: a review of preclinical and clinical studies

Of the new generation platinum compounds that have been evaluated, those with the 1,2-diaminocyclohexane carrier ligand-including oxaliplatin--have been focused upon in recent years. Molecular biology studies and the National Cancer Institute in vitro cytotoxic screening showed that diaminocyclohexane platinums such as oxaliplatin belong to a distinct cytotoxic family, differing from cisplatin and carboplatin, with specific intracellular target(s), mechanism(s) of action and/or mechanism(s) of resistance. In phase I trials, the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin was characterized by transient acute dysesthesias and cumulative distal neurotoxicity, which was reversible within a few months after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, oxaliplatin did not display any, auditory, renal and hematologic dose-limiting toxicity at the recommended dose of 130 mg/m2 q three weeks or 85 mg/m2 q two weeks given as a two-hour i.v. infusion. Clinical phase II experiences on the antitumoral activity of oxaliplatin have been conducted in hundreds of patients with advanced colorectal cancers (ACRC). Single agent activity reported as objective response rate in ACRC patients is 10% and 20% overall in ACRC patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pretreated/refractory and previously untreated ACRC, respectively. Synergistic cytotoxic effects in preclinical studies with thymidylate synthase inhibitors, cisplatin/carboplatin and topoisomerase I inhibitors, and the absence of hematologic dose-limiting toxicity have made oxaliplatin an attractive compound for combinations. Phase II trials combining oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid ACRC patients previously treated/refractory to 5-FU showed overall response rates ranging from 21% to 58%, and survivals ranging from 12 to 17 months. In patients with previously untreated ACRC, combinations of oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid showed response rates ranging from 34% to 67% and median survivals ranging from 15 to 19 months. Two randomized trials totaling 620 previously untreated patients with ACRC, comparing 5-FU and folinic acid to the same regimen with oxaliplatin, have shown a 34% overall response rate in the oxaliplatin group versus 12% in the 5-FU/folinic acid group for the first trial; and 51.2% vs. 22.6% in the second one. These statistically significant differences were confirmed in time to progression advantage for the oxaliplatin arm (8.7 vs. 6.1 months, and 8.7 vs. 6.1 months, respectively). A small but consistent number of histological complete responses have been reported in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with the combination of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/folinic acid, and secondary metastasectomy is increasingly done by oncologists familiar with the combination. Based on preclinical and clinical reports showing additive or synergistic effects between oxaliplatin and several anticancer drugs including cisplatin, irinotecan, topotecan, and paclitaxel, clinical trials of combinations with other compounds have been performed or are still ongoing in tumor types in which oxaliplatin alone showed antitumoral activity such as ovarian, non-small-cell lung, breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its single agent and combination therapy data in ovarian cancer confirm its non-cross resistance with cisplatin/carboplatin. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.

Comparative cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in non-seminomatous germ cell cancer cell lines

Approximately 70-80% of patients with metastatic testicular cancer will become disease free with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and most of these patients will be long-term survivors. Despite these impressive results, the two limitations of cisplatin are its severe and potentially long-term side-effects, and the emergence of drug resistance which prevents a small proportion of these patients from achieving long-term remission. Oxaliplatin has an improved toxicity profile compared to cisplatin and contains the diaminocyclohexane (DACH) substituent known to be correlated with a lack of cross-resistance with cisplatin. A phase II study has shown interesting activity when used in combination with cisplatin in cisplatin-refractory testicular cancer patients. Here we report the results of the first in vitro study investigating whether oxaliplatin as a single agent exhibits cross-resistance to cisplatin in a panel of non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) cell lines using short and long-term drug exposures in a five-day sulfhodamine B in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Oxaliplatin cytotoxicity was significantly superior to cisplatin in cell lines with both acquired (H12DDP) and intrinsic (1777NRp Cl-A) intermediate level resistance to cisplatin. Following 24 h or 96 h drug exposure the fold resistance in H12DDP and 1777NRp Cl-A was 1.7-2.2 with oxaliplatin compared to 3.9-6.1 with cisplatin. The cytotoxic activity of oxaliplatin was not significantly different from that of cisplatin in cisplatin-sensitive cell lines or in cell lines with a high level (10-20 fold) of cisplatin resistance. The results of this study suggest that further preclinical studies in NSGCT are of interest, particularly in combination with cisplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide. Furthermore, the in vitro results support the use of an oxaliplatin administration schedule giving prolonged drug exposure, such as the flat or circadian rhythm-modulated schedule already under investigation for oxaliplatin.