Re: Long-term feeding of sodium saccharin to nonhuman primates: implications for urinary tract cancer

Artificial sweeteners--do they bear a carcinogenic risk?

Artificial sweeteners are added to a wide variety of food, drinks, drugs and hygiene products. Since their introduction, the mass media have reported about potential cancer risks, which has contributed to undermine the public's sense of security. It can be assumed that every citizen of Western countries uses artificial sweeteners, knowingly or not. A cancer-inducing activity of one of these substances would mean a health risk to an entire population. We performed several PubMed searches of the National Library of Medicine for articles in English about artificial sweeteners. These articles included 'first generation' sweeteners such as saccharin, cyclamate and aspartame, as well as 'new generation' sweeteners such as acesulfame-K, sucralose, alitame and neotame. Epidemiological studies in humans did not find the bladder cancer-inducing effects of saccharin and cyclamate that had been reported from animal studies in rats. Despite some rather unscientific assumptions, there is no evidence that aspartame is carcinogenic. Case-control studies showed an elevated relative risk of 1.3 for heavy artificial sweetener use (no specific substances specified) of >1.7 g/day. For new generation sweeteners, it is too early to establish any epidemiological evidence about possible carcinogenic risks. As many artificial sweeteners are combined in today's products, the carcinogenic risk of a single substance is difficult to assess. However, according to the current literature, the possible risk of artificial sweeteners to induce cancer seems to be negligible.

Lifestyle issues and genitourinary tumours

A variety of lifestyle factors, including physical activity, artificial sweeteners, alcohol consumption and smoking, have been reported to contribute to the risk of developing urological malignancies. A great number of epidemiological studies suggest that sports and physical activity may have a preventive influence on genitourinary tumours, especially on the incidence of prostate cancer. Smoking appears to be the most relevant lifestyle factor significantly increasing both incidence and mortality from bladder cancer. Furthermore, there is evidence implicating an association between tobacco use and kidney cancer. In contrast, prostate and testicular cancers are unlikely to be linked to tobacco use. As far as alcohol is concerned, most studies indicate that neither amount nor type of alcohol seems to be clearly associated with a risk of developing urological malignancies. However, some more recent cohort studies suggest a moderately increased risk for prostate and bladder cancer for specific types of alcohol. On the other hand, there is evidence that moderate alcohol consumption may even protect women from developing renal cancer. Since the introduction of artificial sweeteners, reports of potential cancer risks have circulated periodically through the mass media. The wide distribution of these agents and the fact that mostly combinations of the different compounds are added to a broad variety of food, drinks, drugs, and hygiene products complicates a systematic analysis of their potential impact on the development of urological malignancies. Nevertheless, so far not a single study has convincingly demonstrated a statistically significant risk of bladder cancer due to the consumption of artificial sweeteners. This survey demonstrates that the individual assessment of lifestyle factors not only may identify groups with an increased risk for urological malignancies but also clearly displays a potential for tumour prevention.