Are Homologous Recombination Deficiency Mutations Relevant in Colorectal Cancer?

A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized Trial of Durvalumab With Olaparib or Cediranib in Patients With Mismatch Repair-Proficient Colorectal or Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of immunotherapy in mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (pMMR-CRC) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with limited efficacy. DAPPER (NCT03851614) is a phase 2, basket study randomizing patients with pMMR CRC or PDAC to durvalumab with olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib) or durvalumab with cediranib (durvalumab + cediranib).

METHODS

PDAC or pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to either durvalumab+olaparib (arm A), or durvalumab + cediranib (arm B). Co-primary endpoints included pharmacodynamic immune changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and safety. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined. Paired tumor samples were analyzed by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and RNA-sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 31 metastatic pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to arm A (n = 16) or B (n = 15). In 28 evaluable patients, 3 patients had stable disease (SD) (2 patients treated with durvalumab + olaparib and 1 patient treated with durvalumab + cediranib) while 25 had progressive disease (PD). Among patients with PDAC (n = 19), 9 patients were randomized to arm A and 10 patients were randomized to arm B. In 18 evaluable patients, 1 patient had a partial response (unconfirmed) with durvalumab + cediranib, 1 patient had SD with durvalumab + olaparib while 16 had PD. Safety profile was manageable and no grade 4-5 treatment-related adverse events were observed in either arm A or B. No significant changes were observed for CD3+/CD8+ immune infiltration in on-treatment biopsies as compared to baseline for pMMR-CRC and PDAC independent of treatment arms. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at baseline, low baseline CD68+ cells and different immune gene expression signatures at baseline were associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pMMR-CRC or PDAC, durvalumab + olaparib and durvalumab + cediranib showed limited antitumor activity. Different immune components of the TME were associated with treatment outcomes.

PARP Inhibitors in Colorectal Malignancies: A 2023 Update

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the Western world, and metastatic disease is associated with a dismal prognosis. Poly-ADpribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors gain increasing attention in the field of medical oncology, as they lead to synthetic lethality in malignancies with preexisting alterations in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway. As those alterations are frequently seen in CRC, a targeted approach through PARP inhibitors is expected to benefit these patients, both alone and in combination with other agents like chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics, and radiation.

OBJECTIVE

This review article aims to better clarify the role of PARP inhibitors as a treatment option in patients with metastatic CRC with alterations in the DDR pathway.

METHODS

We used the PubMed database to retrieve journal articles and the inclusion criteria were all human studies that illustrated the effective role of PARP inhibitors in patients with metastatic CRC with homologous repair deficiency (HRD) and the correct line of therapy.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports the utilization of PARP inhibitors in CRC subgroups, as monotherapy and in combination with other agents. Up to now, data are insufficient to support a formal indication, and further research is needed.

CONCLUSION

Efforts to precisely define the homologous repair deficiency (HRD) in CRC - and eventually the subgroup of patients that are expected to benefit the most - are also underway.

A DNA damage response-like phenotype defines a third of colon cancers at onset

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) has a limited range of diversified, personalized therapeutic opportunities, besides DNA hypermutating cases; thus, both new targets or broadening existing strategies for personalized intervention are of interest. Routinely processed material from 246 untreated COADs with clinical follow-up was probed for evidence of DNA damage response (DDR), that is, the gathering of DDR-associated molecules at discrete nuclear spots, by multiplex immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical staining for DDR complex proteins (γH2AX, pCHK2, and pNBS1). We also tested the cases for type I interferon response, T-lymphocyte infiltration (TILs), and mutation mismatch repair defects (MMRd), known to be associated with defects of DNA repair. FISH analysis for chromosome 20q copy number variations was obtained. A total of 33.7% of COAD display a coordinated DDR on quiescent, non-senescent, non-apoptotic glands, irrespective of TP53 status, chromosome 20q abnormalities, and type I IFN response. Clinicopathological parameters did not differentiate DDR+ cases from the other cases. TILs were equally present in DDR and non-DDR cases. DDR+ MMRd cases were preferentially retaining wild-type MLH1. The outcome after 5FU-based chemotherapy was not different in the two groups. DDR+ COAD represents a subgroup not aligned with known diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic categories, with potential new targeted treatment opportunities, exploiting the DNA damage repair pathways.

HRD-MILN: Accurately estimate tumor homologous recombination deficiency status from targeted panel sequencing data

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a critical feature guiding drug and treatment selection, mainly for ovarian and breast cancers. As it cannot be directly observed, HRD status is estimated on a small set of genomic instability features from sequencing data. The existing methods often perform poorly when handling targeted panel sequencing data; however, the targeted panel is the most popular sequencing strategy in clinical practices. Thus, we proposed HRD-MILN to overcome the computational challenges from targeted panel sequencing. HRD-MILN incorporated a multi-instance learning framework to discover as many loss of heterozygosity (LOH) associated with HRD status to cluster as possible. Then the HRD score is obtained based on the association between the LOHs and the cluster in the sample to be estimated, and finally, the HRD status is estimated based on the score.

In comparison experiments on targeted panel sequencing data, the Precision of HRD-MILN could achieve 87%, significantly improved from 63% reported by the existing methods, where the highest margin of improvement reached 14%. It also presented advantages on whole exome sequencing data. Based on our best knowledge, HRD-MILN is the first practical tool for estimating HRD status from targeted panel sequencing data and could benefit clinical applications.

Platinum sensitivity in patients with IDH1/2 mutated versus wild-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based study

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 mutations are the most frequent druggable alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), reported in ~20% of cases. Preclinical evidence indicates that these mutations are associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which could be exploited as a target for platinum chemotherapy (ChT) and PARP inhibitors. However, the role of IDH1/2 mutations as surrogate biomarkers for platinum efficacy is unknown. We conducted a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis to investigate the impact of IDH1/2 mutations on progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in patients with iCCA treated with platinum-based ChT. An exploratory comparison of complex HRD estimates between IDH1/2 mutated and wild-type tumors from TCGA was also performed. A total of 120 cases were matched in a 1:1 ratio (60 IDH1/2 mutant and 60 wild-type). No differences were observed for platinum-based PFS (7.7 vs 7.3 months, p = 0.970), DCR (66.1% vs 74.1%, p = 0.361), ORR (27.8% vs 25.0%, p = 0.741). IDH1/2 mutations showed mutual exclusivity with genomic alterations in ATM, BRCA2, MST1R, NF1, FGFR2 and CDKN2A/B losses, respectively, with no clear survival and response differences. Among TCGA tumors, IDH1/2 mutated CCA did not show higher HRD compared to wild-type cases. IDH1/2 mutations are not associated with increased sensitivity to platinum-based ChT in iCCA patients. Deeper genomic sequencing is needed to elucidate the HRD phenotype in IDH1/2 mutant iCCA and exploit its therapeutic vulnerabilities.