Early Posttherapy Opioid Prescription, Potential Misuse, and Substance Use Disorder Among Pediatric Cancer Survivors

A Narrative Review of Pain in Pediatric Oncology: The Opioid Option

Opioid therapy is the mainstay for managing pain in pediatric oncology. This narrative review describes the current literature regarding opioids for pediatric cancer pain. The review explores the multifaceted landscape of opioid utilization in this population, including the role of opioids in certain clinical circumstances, modalities of opioid delivery, unique opioids, outpatient and at-home pain management strategies, and other key concepts such as breakthrough pain. This review highlights the importance of individualized dosing and multimodal approaches to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Drawing from a wide range of evidence, this review offers insights to optimize pediatric oncology pain management.

Mental Health Care Utilization Among Parents of Children With Cancer

Importance

Caring for children diagnosed with cancer may adversely affect the mental health (MH) of parents.

Objective

To characterize utilization of MH services among parents of children with vs without cancer using nationwide commercial claims data.

Design, Setting, and Participants

For this cross-sectional study, the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims Database was used to identify continuously insured families of children treated for cancer (aged ≤21 years at diagnosis) during 2010 to 2018, compared with families who matched eligibility criteria but did not have a child with a cancer history. Parents were assessed from 18 months before to 12 months after their child's cancer diagnosis. Analyses were conducted from February 2022 to September 2023.

Exposures

Children's cancer diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes included parents' MH-related visits during the first year following their child's cancer diagnosis. Logistic regressions compared outcomes between families of children with vs without cancer, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Results

This study included 4837 families of children with cancer (4210 mothers and 4016 fathers) and 24 185 families of children without cancer (21 444 mothers and 19 591 fathers) with continuous insurance enrollment. Most household leads were aged 35 to 54 years (3700 [76.5%] in families of children with cancer vs 17 812 [73.6%] in families of children without cancer) and resided in urban areas (4252 [87.9%] vs 21 156 [87.5%]). The probabilities of parents having anxiety-related visits (10.6% vs 7.0%), depression-related visits (8.4% vs 6.1%), and any MH-related visits (18.1% vs 13.3%) were higher in families of children with vs without cancer. Adjusted analyses showed absolute increases of 3.2 percentage points (95% CI, 2.3 to 4.0; 45.7% relative increase), 2.2 percentage points (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.0; 36.1% relative increase), and 4.2 percentage points (95% CI, 3.1 to 5.3; 31.3% relative increase) in the probabilities of 1 or both parents having anxiety-related visits, depression-related visits, and any MH-related visits, respectively, among families of children with vs without cancer. Such differences were greater in magnitude among mothers than fathers.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of privately insured parents, those caring for children with cancer had a higher likelihood of utilizing MH care than other parents. These findings underline the importance of interventions toward targeted counseling and support to better meet MH care needs among parents and caregivers of children with cancer.

Utilization of cardiac tests in anthracycline-treated cancer survivors differs between young adults and children: A claims-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The Children's Oncology Group Guidelines recommend a cardiacechocardiogram, or comparable functional imaging, following therapy completion in survivors of childhood/adolescent cancers exposed to anthracyclines.

METHODS

Using the 2009-2019 Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database, we examined real-world utilization of cardiac testing among 1609 anthracycline-treated survivors of childhood/adolescent cancers.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of receiving an initial cardiac test by 5.25 years from the index date (six months after end-of-therapy) was 62.3% (95% CI = 57.5%-66.7%), with median time to initial test being 2.7 years (95% CI = 2.5%-3.1%). Young adults (18-28 years) were less likely than children (≤17 years) to receive cardiac testing (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.3%-0.49%). More likely to receive cardiac testing were survivors receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy only (HR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.63%-3.03%), and survivors with bone or soft tissue versus hematologic cancer (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.30%-2.07%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 40% of anthracycline-treated survivors of childhood/adolescent cancers had not received cardiac testing within 5.25 years post-index date, with young adults least likely to receive a test.

Changes in Opioid Prescriptions and Potential Misuse and Substance Use Disorders Among Childhood Cancer Survivors Following the 2016 Opioid Prescribing Guideline

Importance

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released an opioid-prescribing guideline in March 2016. Little is known about the guideline's potential effects on childhood cancer survivors, a population at high risk for pain.

Objective

To examine changes in opioid prescriptions and potential misuse/substance use disorders (SUD) among childhood cancer survivors and peers without cancer following the guideline release.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 8969 survivors who completed treatment for hematologic, central nervous system, bone, or gonadal cancers (aged ≤21 years at diagnosis) from 2009 to 2018 and 44 845 age-matched, sex-matched, and region-matched individuals without cancer were identified. With data aggregated based on the quarter-year of survivors' treatment completion, interrupted time series analyses were conducted in this cohort study to estimate the immediate (level) change and change in time trend (trend change) for each outcome after the guideline release, accounting for autocorrelation. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to April 2022.

Exposures

Release of the CDC opioid-prescribing guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes included any opioid prescription and any indicator for potential misuse/SUD within 1 year following completion of treatment.

Results

This study included 8969 childhood cancer survivors (mean [SD] age, 13.7 [6.2] years old; 3814 [42.5%] female patients) and 44 845 peers without cancer (mean [SD] age, 13.7 [6.2] years old; 19 070 [42.5%] female patients). Before the guideline release, the opioid prescription rate (21.1% vs 7.2%) and rate of potential misuse/SUD (5.6% vs 1.9%) were higher among survivors than peers without cancer. After the guideline release, the trend in opioid prescription rate declined among survivors (trend change, -1.1 percentage points [ppt]; P < .001; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.7). Survivors also experienced an immediate level decrease (-2.1 ppt; P = .04; 95% CI, -4.2 to -0.1) and a decreasing trend (trend change, -0.4 ppt; P = .009; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1) in rate of potential misuse/SUD. Peers without cancer experienced decreasing trends in opioid prescription rate (trend change, -0.3 ppt; P < .001; 95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1) and rate of potential misuse/SUD (trend change, -0.1 ppt; P = .03; 95% CI, -0.1 to -0.01). By 2 years after the guideline release, relative reductions in opioid prescription rate and rate of potential misuse/SUD among survivors were 36.7% and 65.4%, respectively, with peers without cancer experiencing smaller reductions (15.9% and 29.9%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, the opioid prescription rate and rate of potential misuse/SUD declined among both survivors and peers without cancer following the CDC guideline release, with survivors experiencing greater reductions. More research is needed to understand the guideline's potential effects on access to opioids required for pain control among childhood cancer survivors.