1
|
Morganti S, Gibson CJ, Jin Q, Santos K, Patel A, Wilson A, Merrill M, Vincuilla J, Stokes S, Lipsyc-Sharf M, Parker T, King TA, Mittendorf EA, Curigliano G, Hughes ME, Stover DG, Tolaney SM, Weeks LD, Tayob N, Lin NU, Garber JE, Miller PG, Parsons HA. Prevalence, Dynamics, and Prognostic Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301071. [PMID: 38190580 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is frequent in patients with solid tumors. Prospective data about CHIP prevalence at breast cancer diagnosis and its dynamic evolution under treatment selective pressure are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed targeted error-corrected sequencing on 614 samples from 380 patients with breast cancer. We investigated the dynamics of CHIP on prospectively collected paired samples from patients with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET). We assessed the correlation of CHIP with survival in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We estimated the risk of progression to treatment-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) according to the clonal hematopoiesis risk score (CHRS). In exploratory analyses, we considered clonal hematopoiesis (CH) with variant allele fraction (VAF) ≥0.005. RESULTS CHIP was identified in 15% of patients before treatment. Few CHIP emerged after treatment, and the risk of developing new mutations was similar for patients receiving CT versus ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P = .820). However, CT increased the risk of developing new CH with VAF ≥0.005 (OR, 3.45; P = .002). Five TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged among patients receiving CT. Most patients had low risk of t-MN according to the CHRS score. CHIP did not correlate with survival in mTNBC. CONCLUSION CHIP is frequent in patients with breast cancer. In this study, CT did not lead to emergence of new CHIP, and most patients had low risk of developing t-MN. This finding is reassuring, given long life expectancy of patients with eBC and the association of CHIP with morbidity and mortality. However, TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged with CT, which carries high risk of t-MN. Evolution of these small clones and their clinical significance warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Morganti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Christopher J Gibson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Qingchun Jin
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Katheryn Santos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ashka Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Clinical Operations Department, Natera Inc, Austin, TX
| | - Alex Wilson
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Margaret Merrill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Julie Vincuilla
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Tonia Parker
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel G Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lachelle D Weeks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Peter G Miller
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Center for Cancer Research and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Heather A Parsons
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ranghiero A, Frascarelli C, Cursano G, Pescia C, Ivanova M, Vacirca D, Rappa A, Taormina SV, Barberis M, Fusco N, Rocco EG, Venetis K. Circulating tumour DNA testing in metastatic breast cancer: Integration with tissue testing. Cytopathology 2023; 34:519-529. [PMID: 37640801 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer biomarker profiling predominantly relies on tissue testing (surgical and/or biopsy samples). However, the field of liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), has witnessed remarkable progress and continues to evolve rapidly. The incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice is creating new opportunities for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ctDNA offers advantages over conventional tissue analyses, as it reflects tumour heterogeneity and enables multiple serial biopsies in a minimally invasive manner. Thus, it serves as a valuable complement to standard tumour tissues and, in certain instances, may even present a potential alternative approach. In the context of MBC, ctDNA testing proves highly informative in the detection of disease progression, monitoring treatment response, assessing actionable biomarkers, and identifying mechanisms of resistance. Nevertheless, ctDNA does exhibit inherent limitations, including its generally low abundance, necessitating timely blood samplings and rigorous management of the pre-analytical phase. The development of highly sensitive assays and robust bioinformatic tools has paved the way for reliable ctDNA analyses. The time has now come to establish how ctDNA and tissue analyses can be effectively integrated into the diagnostic workflow of MBC to provide patients with the most comprehensive and accurate profiling. In this manuscript, we comprehensively analyse the current methodologies employed in ctDNA analysis and explore the potential benefits arising from the integration of tissue and ctDNA testing for patients diagnosed with MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Ranghiero
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Frascarelli
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Cursano
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Pescia
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariia Ivanova
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Vacirca
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Rappa
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Barberis
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini Rocco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Machado HE, Øbro NF, Williams N, Tan S, Boukerrou AZ, Davies M, Belmonte M, Mitchell E, Baxter EJ, Mende N, Clay A, Ancliff P, Köglmeier J, Killick SB, Kulasekararaj A, Meyer S, Laurenti E, Campbell PJ, Kent DG, Nangalia J, Warren AJ. Convergent somatic evolution commences in utero in a germline ribosomopathy. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5092. [PMID: 37608017 PMCID: PMC10444798 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40896-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Clonal tracking of cells using somatic mutations permits exploration of clonal dynamics in human disease. Here, we perform whole genome sequencing of 323 haematopoietic colonies from 10 individuals with the inherited ribosomopathy Shwachman-Diamond syndrome to reconstruct haematopoietic phylogenies. In ~30% of colonies, we identify mutually exclusive mutations in TP53, EIF6, RPL5, RPL22, PRPF8, plus chromosome 7 and 15 aberrations that increase SBDS and EFL1 gene dosage, respectively. Target gene mutations commence in utero, resulting in a profusion of clonal expansions, with only a few haematopoietic stem cell lineages (mean 8, range 1-24) contributing ~50% of haematopoietic colonies across 8 individuals (range 4-100% clonality) by young adulthood. Rapid clonal expansion during disease transformation is associated with biallelic TP53 mutations and increased mutation burden. Our study highlights how convergent somatic mutation of the p53-dependent nucleolar surveillance pathway offsets the deleterious effects of germline ribosomopathy but increases opportunity for TP53-mutated cancer evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nina F Øbro
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Shengjiang Tan
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ahmed Z Boukerrou
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge, UK
| | - Megan Davies
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miriam Belmonte
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily Mitchell
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - E Joanna Baxter
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicole Mende
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anna Clay
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip Ancliff
- Department of Haematology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jutta Köglmeier
- Department of Haematology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sally B Killick
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Austin Kulasekararaj
- Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan Meyer
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Teenage and Adolescent Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Elisa Laurenti
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David G Kent
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- York Biomedical Research Institute, Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Jyoti Nangalia
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Alan J Warren
- Wellcome MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|