Moving Molecular Profiling to Routine Clinical Practice: A Way Forward?

Cytomorphologic features of SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung carcinoma and correlation with immunohistochemical and molecular features

BACKGROUND

SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient tumors and those that have loss of SMARCA/BRG1 have been described as various aggressive carcinomas and sarcomas, including a subset of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Cytomorphologic features of NSCLCs are yet to be described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cytomorphologic features, immunohistochemical profile, and molecular profile of SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient NSCLC (SMARCA4-dNSCLC).

METHODS

The authors retrospectively searched for cases with SMARCA4/BRG1 functional loss alterations, which were identified in molecular studies and further confirmed by immunocytochemistry, and they reviewed the cytomorphologic features. Tumors with BRG1 loss were also stained with an extensive antibody panel. Molecular profiling and clinical information of the identified cases were scrutinized.

RESULTS

In total, 12 cytopathology cases from different anatomic sites were included. All cases showed variable expression of cytokeratin irrespective of type. One-half of cases had glandular features, followed by squamoid features, and poorly differentiated features. The most common cytologic features included sheets or papillary architecture, round or oval cell shapes, nuclear enlargement, moderate-to-marked pleomorphism, and coarse chromatin. Two cases with poorly differentiated cytomorphology had a predominance of single cells, scant cytoplasm, and macronucleoli. Variable expression of epithelial markers was noted in all cases. TP53 was the most frequently co-mutated gene in SMARCA4-dNSLCs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SMARCA4-dNSCLCs can have a wide spectrum of cytomorphologic features, ranging from a relatively well differentiated adenocarcinoma to a poorly differentiated/undifferentiated carcinoma, with the majority of cases exhibiting some high-grade features, such as mitosis, apoptosis, necrosis, and marked pleomorphism.

Results of the Seventh Scientific Workshop of ECCO: Precision Medicine in IBD-Disease Outcome and Response to Therapy

Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] are a heterogeneous spectrum with two extreme phenotypes, Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], which both represent numerous phenotypical variations. Hence, we should no longer approach all IBD patients similarly, but rather aim to rethink clinical classifications and modify treatment algorithms to usher in a new era of precision medicine in IBD. This scientific ECCO workshop aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview on prognostic and predictive markers, shed light on key questions in biomarker development, propose best practices in IBD biomarker development [including trial design], and discuss the potential for multi-omic data integration to help drive further advances to make precision medicine a reality in IBD.

Molecular Profiling-Based Assignment of Cancer Therapy (NCI-MPACT): A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial

This trial assessed the utility of applying tumor DNA sequencing to treatment selection for patients with advanced, refractory cancer and somatic mutations in one of four signaling pathways by comparing the efficacy of four study regimens that were either matched to the patient's aberrant pathway (experimental arm) or not matched to that pathway (control arm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with an actionable mutation of interest were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either (1) a study regimen identified to target the aberrant pathway found in their tumor (veliparib with temozolomide or adavosertib with carboplatin [DNA repair pathway], everolimus [PI3K pathway], or trametinib [RAS/RAF/MEK pathway]), or (2) one of the same four regimens, but chosen from among those not targeting that pathway.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients treated in the experimental arm, the objective response rate was 2% (95% CI, 0% to 10.9%). One of 20 patients (5%) in the experimental trametinib cohort had a partial response. There were no responses in the other cohorts. Although patients and physicians were blinded to the sequencing and random assignment results, a higher pretreatment dropout rate was observed in the control arm (22%) compared with the experimental arm (6%; P = .038), suggesting that some patients may have had prior tumor mutation profiling performed that led to a lack of participation in the control arm.

CONCLUSION

Further investigation, better annotation of predictive biomarkers, and the development of more effective agents are necessary to inform treatment decisions in an era of precision cancer medicine. Increasing prevalence of tumor mutation profiling and preference for targeted therapy make it difficult to use a randomized phase II design to evaluate targeted therapy efficacy in an advanced disease setting.