1
|
Tan CY, Francis-Levin N, Stelmak D, Iannarino NT, Zhang A, Herrel L, Ellman E, Walling E, Moravek MB, Chugh R, Zebrack B. Differentiating gender-based reproductive concerns among adolescent and young adult cancer patients: A mixed methods study. J Psychosoc Oncol 2024; 42:526-542. [PMID: 38164962 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2291798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies have examined the distinct reproductive concerns (RC) of men and women in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patient population. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore and differentiate the RC of AYAs. METHODS Participants completed the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale and participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were deductively coded based on an analytic schema derived from the RCAC. RESULTS After identifying participants through the electronic health record, 27 younger AYAs, ages 12-25, enrolled in the study. Four inductive themes emerged and differed by gender. These include differential temporality, acceptance, and openness to alternatives, partner influence, and parental/guardian influence. AYA men reported fewer RC (M = 49.4, SD = 9.6) compared to AYA women (M = 56.8, SD = 8.4). CONCLUSIONS Oncofertility care providers are advised to account for short- and long-ranging concerns based on AYAs' gender. Future evaluations of patient-reported outcome measures specific to AYA RC are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiu Yi Tan
- School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nina Francis-Levin
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Daria Stelmak
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicholas T Iannarino
- Department of Language, Culture, and the Arts, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan, USA
| | - Anao Zhang
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lindsey Herrel
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin Ellman
- Rogel Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Emily Walling
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Molly B Moravek
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rashmi Chugh
- Rogel Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Brad Zebrack
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nahata L, Liles SM, Gerhardt CA, Housten AJ, Jalili D, O'Brien SH, Vadaparampil ST, Quinn GP. Clinicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to sperm banking in adolescent males with cancer: a mixed-methods study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:2809-2817. [PMID: 37730946 PMCID: PMC10656382 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02944-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine processes, barriers, and facilitators to sperm banking counseling and decision-making for adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer from the perspective of clinicians who completed Oncofertility communication training. We also identify opportunities for improvement to inform future interventions and implementation. METHODS A survey (N=104) and subsequent focus groups (N=15) were conducted with non-physician clinicians practicing in pediatric oncology who completed Oncofertility communication training. RESULTS Most survey participants were confident in communicating about the impact of cancer on fertility (n=87, 83.7%) and fertility preservation options (n=80, 76.9%). Most participants reported never/rarely using a sperm banking decision tool (n=70, 67.3%), although 98.1% (n=102) said a decision tool with a family-centered approach would be beneficial. Primary themes in the subsequent focus groups included variable processes/workflows (inconsistent approaches to consult initiation; involvement of adolescents, caregivers, and various clinician types; assessment of puberty/sexual experience), structural and psychosocial barriers (cost and logistics, developmental, cultural, clinical acuity/prognosis), and facilitators (educational materials, alternative options for banking). Opportunities and strategies for improvement (including fertility preservation in existing research protocols; additional staffing/resources; oncologist education and buy-in; and development of decision tools) were informed by challenges identified in the other themes. CONCLUSION Barriers to adolescent sperm banking remain, even among clinicians who have completed Oncofertility training. Although training is one factor necessary to facilitate banking, structural and psychosocial barriers persist. Given the complexities of offering sperm banking to pediatric populations, continued efforts are needed to mitigate structural barriers and develop strategies to facilitate decision-making before childhood cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Nahata
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 431 S 18th St, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Sophia M Liles
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 431 S 18th St, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA
| | - Cynthia A Gerhardt
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 431 S 18th St, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ashley J Housten
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dona Jalili
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah H O'Brien
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 431 S 18th St, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berrigan D, Dean D, Senft Everson N, D’Angelo H, Boyd P, Klein WMP, Han PKJ. Uncertainty: a neglected determinant of health behavior? Front Psychol 2023; 14:1145879. [PMID: 37251060 PMCID: PMC10213393 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Health behaviors are critical determinants of the well-being of individuals and populations, and understanding the determinants of these behaviors has been a major focus of research. One important determinant that has received little direct attention in past health research is uncertainty: a complex phenomenon that pertains not only to scientific issues regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, and treatment of health problems, but also to personal issues regarding other important health-related concerns. Here, we make the case for greater attention to uncertainty in health behavior theory and research, and especially to personal uncertainties. We discuss three exemplary types of personal uncertainty-value uncertainty, capacity uncertainty, and motive uncertainty-which relate, respectively, to moral values, capacities to enact or change behaviors, and the motives and intentions of other persons or institutions. We argue that that personal uncertainties such as these influence health behaviors, but their influence has historically been obscured by a focus on other constructs such as self-efficacy and trust. Reconceptualizing and investigating health behavior as a problem of uncertainty can advance both our understanding of the determinants of healthy behaviors and our ability to promote them.
Collapse
|
4
|
El Alaoui-Lasmaili K, Nguyen-Thi PL, Demogeot N, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, Gross MJ, Mansuy L, Chastagner P, Koscinski I. Fertility discussions and concerns in childhood cancer survivors, a systematic review for updated practice. Cancer Med 2023; 12:6023-6039. [PMID: 36224740 PMCID: PMC10028046 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide ways to improve the clinical practice of fertility preservation (FP) for children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer. DESIGN A systematic research of online databases was undertaken in March 2020 following the PRISMA criteria, including Medline and Web of Science. RESULTS Fifty-nine articles were included. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were used to collect data from patients, parents, and health care providers (HCPs). Four themes worth exploring emerged: (a) what do patients and professionals think of and know about FP? (b) what makes the fertility discussion happen or not? (c) what, retrospectively, led to FP being pursued or not? and (d) how do patients and HCPs feel about fertility issues? CONCLUSION A minority of AYAs preserve their fertility (banking assay for 45% of boys and 23% of girls). Yet fertility concerns have a significant impact on the quality of life of young cancer survivors. Although recommendations and guidelines regarding FP are available internationally, there are no specific guidelines as to how to conduct fertility counseling for children and adolescents. Some barriers are not removable, such as a poor prognosis of an obvious severe disease, time constraints for starting treatment, and cultural and religious beliefs. In response to aspects hindering patients and families to be receptive to any discussion at the time of diagnosis, psychological support could reduce the level of emotional distress and help restore a degree of open-mindedness to open a window for discussion. Moreover, as the lack of knowledge of professionals about fertility is frequently pointed out as a limiting factor for fertility discussion, reinforcing professional training regarding FP could be proposed to promote fertility discussion and eventually referral for FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phi Linh Nguyen-Thi
- Unité d'évaluation médicale, Unité de Méthodologie, Data management et Statistique - UMDS, CHRU de Nancy
| | - Nadine Demogeot
- Interpsy Laboratory (UR4432), University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Ludovic Mansuy
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pascal Chastagner
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Isabelle Koscinski
- Laboratory of Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Lorraine, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stanek C, Theroux CI, Olsavsky AL, Hill KN, Rausch JR, O’Brien SH, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA, Nahata L. Study protocol for fertility preservation discussions and decisions: A family-centered psychoeducational intervention for male adolescents and emerging adults newly diagnosed with cancer and their families. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0263886. [PMID: 35171948 PMCID: PMC8849538 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Many childhood cancer survivors desire biological children but are at risk for infertility after treatment. One option for mitigating risk is the use of fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy. Adolescents and emerging adults may rely on their parents to help them decide whether to use fertility preservation. While this is often a collaborative process, it is currently unknown how parents can optimally support adolescents and emerging adults through this decision. To address this gap, we developed a family-centered, psychoeducational intervention to prompt adolescents and emerging adults to reflect on their future parenthood goals and attitudes towards fertility preservation, as well as to prompt their parents (or other caregivers) to reflect on their own and their child's perspectives on the topic. In this randomized controlled trial, families will be randomized to either the standard of care control group (fertility consult) or the intervention group. After their fertility consult, adolescents and emerging adults and parents in the intervention group will complete a fertility preservation values clarification tool and then participate in a guided conversation about their responses and the fertility preservation decision. The primary expected outcome of this study is that participation in the intervention will increase the use of fertility preservation. The secondary expected outcome is an improvement in decision quality. Chi-square analyses and t-tests will evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. The goal of this intervention is to optimize family-centered fertility preservation decision-making in the context of a new cancer diagnosis to help male adolescents and emerging adults achieve their future parenthood goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis Stanek
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Charleen I. Theroux
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Anna L. Olsavsky
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Kylie N. Hill
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Joseph R. Rausch
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Sarah H. O’Brien
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Cynthia A. Gerhardt
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Leena Nahata
- The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28:747-762. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
7
|
Brookshire-Gay KA, Byrd M. Commentary: The Importance and Complexities of Understanding Parent-Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives Prior to Cancer Treatment. J Pediatr Psychol 2021; 46:1159-1161. [PMID: 34510206 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Byrd
- Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|