Oral Management for Pediatric Lyme Meningitis

Isolated Intracranial Hypertension as a Presentation of Pediatric Lyme Borreliosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

It is extremely rare for Lyme borreliosis to present solely with features of increased intracranial pressure. The treatment of pediatric Lyme neuroborreliosis with oral versus intravenous antibiotics remains controversial.

METHODS

Case report and literature review.

RESULTS

A 13-year-old male presented with five days of binocular diplopia, several weeks of headache, and a history of multiple tick bites six weeks prior. His examination showed a left eye abduction deficit and bilateral optic disc edema. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain with contrast showed tortuosity of the optic nerves, prominence of the optic nerve sheaths, and enhancement of the left fifth and bilateral sixth cranial nerves. Lumbar puncture showed an elevated opening pressure and a lymphocytic pleocytosis. Lyme IgM and IgG antibodies were positive in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid. The patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone for two days empirically followed by doxycycline by mouth for 19 days. Symptoms began improving after 48 hours. The strabismus resolved after two weeks, and the papilledema improved slowly with complete resolution at six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lyme neuroborreliosis can present as isolated intracranial hypertension in the pediatric population; it can be differentiated from idiopathic intracranial hypertension on MRI, and lumbar puncture and can be confirmed with serum antibody testing. Oral doxycycline can be considered for Lyme neuroborreliosis in children.

Doxycycline for the Treatment of Lyme Disease in Young Children

BACKGROUND

Doxycycline is considered the first-line treatment of Lyme disease in adolescents and adults, but largely disproven concerns of permanent tooth staining prevented its use and evaluation in children <8 years old. We sought to describe short-term adverse effects and treatment failures among young children receiving oral doxycycline for Lyme disease.

METHODS

We completed a 2-pronged evaluation of children with Lyme disease treated with doxycycline. We performed a retrospective case series of patients <8 years old who were diagnosed with Lyme disease and treated with doxycycline. We then performed a telephone follow-up survey study of the patients' parents to gather additional details regarding clinical outcomes and adverse reactions to doxycycline. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were identified through the retrospective case series and 18 participated in the follow-up survey. The most common clinical diagnosis (22/32; 69%) was single erythema migrans. Seven (22%) had neurological Lyme disease. Three patients (9%) stopped doxycycline treatment prematurely due to adverse effects. During telephone follow-up, 2 children were reported to have dental staining. No patients were identified with treatment failure during the retrospective case series. On telephone follow-up, 3 patients had residual symptoms after treatment, though none were convincing of treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that doxycycline is generally well-tolerated and an effective treatment of Lyme disease in young children. Prospective, observational studies with long-term assessment of dental staining and clinical outcomes are needed. Alternative antibiotics, principally amoxicillin, remain the preferred treatment of non-neurological Lyme disease manifestations in young children, but doxycycline is likely a safe and effective alternative when needed.

Comparative effectiveness and complications of intravenous ceftriaxone compared with oral doxycycline in Lyme meningitis in children: a multicentre prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Lyme disease is the most common vectorborne disease in the Northern hemisphere with more than 400 000 new cases in the USA annually. Lyme meningitis is an uncommon but potentially serious clinical manifestation of Lyme disease. Intravenous ceftriaxone had been the first-line treatment for Lyme meningitis, but is associated with a high rate of complications. Although efficacy and effectiveness (or real-world evidence) data for oral doxycycline are limited, practice guidelines were recently expanded to recommend either oral doxycycline or ceftriaxone as first-line treatments for Lyme meningitis. Our goal is to compare oral doxycycline with intravenous ceftriaxone for the treatment of Lyme meningitis on short-term recovery and long-term quality of life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We are performing a prospective cohort study at 20 US paediatric centres located in diverse geographical range where Lyme disease is endemic. The clinical care team will make all antibiotic treatment decisions for children with Lyme meningitis, as per usual practice. We will follow enrolled children for 6 months to determine time of acute symptom recovery and impact on quality of life.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Boston Children's Hospital, the single Institutional Review Board (sIRB), has approved the study protocol with the other 19 enrolling sites as well as the Utah data coordinating centre relying on the Boston Children's Hospital sIRB. Once the study is completed, we will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

Effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in children with Lyme neuroborreliosis - a retrospective study

Background

Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is a tick-borne infection caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex with various neurological manifestations. The recommended treatment for LNB in Swedish children has been intravenous ceftriaxone 50–100 mg/kg × 1 (< 8 years of age) or oral doxycycline 4 mg/kg × 1 (≥ 8 years of age) for 10–14 days. Studies on adult LNB patients have shown equal efficacy for ceftriaxone and doxycycline, but no such studies have been conducted on pediatric LNB patients. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcome in children with LNB who have received intravenous ceftriaxone or oral doxycycline.

Results

Clinical and laboratory data from three previously conducted prospective studies on children with LNB (1998–2014) were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 321 children (1–19 years of age), who received antibiotic treatment for definite LNB or possible LNB, were included. Clinical outcome at the 2-month follow-up (recovery/non-recovery) was evaluated using Chi² test and logistic multivariate regression analysis. Out of 321 LNB patients, 194 children (60%) had received ceftriaxone and 127 children (40%) had received doxycycline. When comparing clinical outcome between treatment groups, no difference was found (p = 0,217). Results did not change when incorporating relevant clinical and laboratory data into the logistic multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion

In this large retrospective study, no difference in clinical outcome was found, independent of age, when comparing children who received ceftriaxone with those who received doxycycline, supporting an equal effectiveness for treatment of LNB pediatric patients. However, future randomized comparative treatment studies are warranted for evaluation of efficacy of antibiotic treatment in pediatric LNB patients.

Changes in Antibiotic Treatment for Children With Lyme Meningitis 2015-2020

OBJECTIVES

Although ceftriaxone has been the first-line treatment of Lyme meningitis, the 2020 Infectious Disease Society of America, American College of Rheumatology, and American Academy of Neurology guideline recommends either doxycycline or ceftriaxone. Our objective was to explore recent trends in enteral antibiotic treatment of children with Lyme meningitis.

METHODS

Using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for case identification, we performed a multicenter retrospective study of patients ≤21 years of age presenting to a pediatric hospital contributing to the Pediatric Health Information System who were diagnosed with Lyme meningitis from 2015 to 2020. Our primary outcome was treatment with parenteral antibiotics, defined by either a procedure code for indwelling catheter placement or >7 days of inpatient parenteral Lyme disease-specific therapy. To examine trends over the study period, we used a generalized estimating equation, with parenteral antibiotics as the dependent variable and study year as the independent variable, adjusted for patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance status clustered by hospital.

RESULTS

We identified 239 patients with Lyme meningitis treated at 24 participating centers. Overall, 48 (20.0%) were treated with parenteral antibiotics, with a declining rate over the study period (43.8% in 2015 to 8.9% in 2020). After adjustment, the odds of treatment with a parenteral antibiotic decreased over the study period (adjusted odds ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral antibiotic treatment of children with Lyme meningitis has been on the decline in advance of the published clinical guideline. Carefully designed comparative effectiveness studies are needed to examine the effect of oral versus parenteral treatment regimens on clinical outcomes.