Clinical experience of pelvic radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for postoperative uterine cervical cancer using intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Efficacy and safety of intensity Modulated Radiation therapy combined with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the clinical value of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. Eighty patients with recurrent cervical cancer were recruited and randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from April, 2017 to April, 2022. Patients in the control group were only given IMRT, while those in the experimental group were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin based on IMRT. All patients were evaluated for clinical efficacy, adverse drug reactions, and differences in the levels of SCC-Ag, CEA and CA724 and other tumor markers before and after treatment.

Results

The total effective rate in the experimental group was significantly better than in the control group (p=0.02). The incidence of adverse reactions was 40% in the experimental group and 32.5% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.48). After treatment, the levels of tumor markers in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.00). The three years survival rate was 80% in the experimental group and 55% in the control group (p=0.03). The five years survival rate was 65% in the experimental group and 42.5% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.04).

Conclusion

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a safe and effective regimen for recurrent cervical cancer, boasting significant clinical efficacy, reduced tumor markers, no significant increase in adverse reactions, and significantly improved three-years and five years survival rate.

The impacts of minimally invasive surgery on intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer patients received adjuvant radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence for patients with risk factors after radical hysterectomy (RH). Early initiated CRT could result in superior oncological outcomes. Here, we aimed to compare the survival outcome of intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer (CC) patients who, received adjuvant CRT between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery.

METHODS

Data on stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent RH and postoperative CRT in our institution, from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively collected. Patients with high or intermediate-risk factors who met the Sedlis criteria received sequential chemoradiation (SCRT). According to the surgical approaches, the enrolled patients were divided into MIS and open surgery groups. Then, the disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 129 enrolled CC patients, 68 received open surgery and 61 received MIS. The median time interval from surgery to chemotherapy and to radiotherapy was shorter in the MIS group (7 days vs. 8 days, P=0.014; 28 days vs. 35, P<0.001). Three-year DFS and OS were similar in both groups (85.2% vs. 89.7%, P=0.274; 89.9% vs. 98.5%, P=0.499). Further, sub-analysis indicated that the DFS and OS in intermediate/high-risk groups had no significant difference. Cox-multivariate analyses found that tumor size >4 cm and time interval from surgery to radiotherapy beyond 7 weeks were adverse independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

Based on the population we studied, for early-stage (IB1-IIA2) CC patients with intermediate- or high-risk factors who received postoperative SCRT, although the difference was not significant, the DFS and OS in the MIS group were slightly lower than the ORH group, and tumor size >4 cm and delayed adjuvant radiotherapy beyond 7 weeks were risk factors for recurrence.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for cervical cancer in South Korea: a radiation oncology survey of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG 20-06)

OBJECTIVE

Radiation therapy plays an important role in adjuvant treatment for surgically treated cervical cancer with adverse pathological findings. This was the first study to evaluate current practices of adjuvant radiation therapy among centres affiliated with the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.

METHODS

A survey containing specific questions on the demographics in 2019, indications of adjuvant treatment, radiation therapy field, prescription radiation therapy dose, boost radiation therapy and chemotherapy was sent out by e-mail to 93 centres.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 62.4%. Regarding radiation therapy techniques, intensity-modulated radiation therapy was adopted in most institutions (41/58, 70.7%). Various risk group criteria were selected for adjuvant radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy. One or two risk factors among tumour size, depth of invasion and lymphovascular invasion were considered for adjuvant radiation therapy by 20.7 and 60.3% of the respondents, respectively. The following criteria for concurrent chemoradiation therapy were considered by 60.3% of the respondents: parametrial extension, positive resection margin or lymph node metastasis. Various upper borders were preferred for pelvic radiation therapy by the institutions, and a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was the most prescribed dose scheme (37/58, 63.8%). Lymph node bed boost radiation therapy and vaginal cuff brachytherapy were considered for selected patients by 22.4% (13/58) and 60.3% (35/58) of the institutions.

CONCLUSION

This survey demonstrated the practice patterns of adjuvant treatment that are prevalent in the field of radiation oncology among members of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. These findings warrant further consensus on radiation therapy guidelines in the context of adjuvant treatment for cervical cancer.

Tumor Volume Predicts High-Risk Patients and Guides Initial Chemoradiotherapy for Early Cervical Cancer

We evaluated the relationship between the minimum tumor-free margin, tumor volume, and adverse pathological risk factors in early cervical cancer and explored the predictive value of these parameters for different types of risk patients to guide individualized therapeutic strategies. Patients who received the initial treatment of radical operation of cervical cancer and their postoperative pathological reports in our hospital from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, were reviewed. Their minimum tumor-free margin and tumor volume were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Student's t-test and the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used for data analysis. A total of 240 patients were included. Adverse pathological risk factors were as follows: deep cervical infiltration, 95 (39.6%) cases; lymph vascular space invasion, 91 (37.9%); lymph node metastasis, 20 (8.3%); parametrial infiltration, 8 (3.3%); tumor diameter ≥4 cm, 7 (2.9%); and positive surgical margin, 1 (0.4%). According to the adverse pathological factors, there were 20 (8.3%) high-risk patients, 50 (20.8%) medium-risk patients, and 170 (70.8%) low-risk patients. The ranges of the minimum tumor-free margin and tumor volume were 0.01-13.5 mm and 105-27,990 mm³, respectively. The minimum tumor-free margin with lymph node metastasis was significantly smaller than that without (P <0.05). The tumor volume with parametrial infiltration, deep cervical infiltration, or lymph vascular space invasion was significantly greater than that without (P < 0.05). The tumor volume was significantly different among low-, medium-, and high-risk patients (P <0.05). Tumor volume was of predictive value for high-risk patients (P < 0.05). With 3,505 mm³ as the cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of high-risk patients were 88.9% and 84.8%, respectively. Tumor volume can be used as a great predictor of high-risk patients (cutoff value, 3,505 mm³), which could be an indication of initial chemoradiotherapy for early cervical cancer.