Fully automated rigid image registration versus human registration in postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: a multicenter non-inferiority study

Re-irradiation spine stereotactic body radiotherapy following high-dose conventional radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

 We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) following high-dose conventional radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Twenty-one patients met the following eligibility criteria: with an irradiation history of 50 Gy2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) or more, diagnosed MESCC in the cervical or thoracic spines, and treated with re-irradiation SBRT of 24 Gy in 2 fractions between April 2018 and March 2023. Prior treatment was radiotherapy alone, not including surgery. The primary endpoint was a 1-year local failure rate. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events were assessed as the secondary endpoints. Since our cohort includes one treatment-related death (TRD) of esophageal perforation, the cumulative esophageal dose was evaluated to find the dose constraints related to severe toxicities.

RESULTS

 The median age was 68, and 14 males were included. The primary tumor sites (esophagus/lung/head and neck/others) were 6/6/7/2, and the median initial radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy2 EQD2 (range: 50-105 Gy2, 60-70/ > 70 Gy2 were 11/4). Ten patients underwent surgery followed by SBRT and 11 SBRT alone. At the median follow-up time of 10.4 months, 17 patients died of systemic disease progression including one TRD. No radiation-induced myelopathy or nerve root injuries occurred. Local failure occurred in six patients, with a 1-year local failure rate of 29.3% and a 1-year OS of 55.0%. Other toxicities included five cases of vertebral compression fractures (23.8%) and one radiation pneumonitis. The cumulative esophageal dose was recommended as follows: Dmax < 203, D0.035 cc < 187, and D1cc < 167 (Gy3 in biological effective dose).

CONCLUSION

 Re-irradiation spine SBRT may be effective for selected patients with cervical or thoracic MESCC, even with high-dose irradiation histories. The cumulative dose assessment across the original and re-irradiated esophagus was recommended to decrease the risk of severe esophageal toxicities.

Dosimetric analysis on computed tomography myelography based treatment planning in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the influence of enhanced contrast on the CT myelography image of the spinal cord and/or cauda equina in addition to the target volume in spine SBRT treatment planning. In total, 19 patients who had previously undergone spine SBRT were randomly selected. The rigid image registration accuracy of CT myelography that aligned with the treatment planning CT was evaluated by calculating the normalized mutual information (NMI) and Pearson's correlation coefficient for the vertebral landmarks. At postregistration, the contrast-enhanced region of the CT myelography image was replaced with water-mass density, and the original treatment plan was recalculated on this image. For comparison, the dose was also recalculated on the contrast-enhanced CT myelography images. The NMI and Pearson's correlation coefficients for landmarks were 0.39 ± 0.12 and 0.97 ± 0.04, respectively. The mean D_0.035cc of the spinal cord and/or cauda equina on the CT myelography image with the contrast-enhanced region replaced by water-mass density showed -0.37% ± 0.64% changes compared with that of the treatment planning CT. Conversely, the mean D_0.035cc in contrast-enhanced CT myelography changed by -1.39% ± 0.51%. The percentage change in D_98% for the planning target volume was confirmed to be small by replacing the contrast-enhanced region with water-mass density (p < 0.01). The dose calculation of the target volume, spinal cord, and/or cauda equina using the CT myelography image that replaced the contrast-enhanced region with water-mass density could be a more appropriate procedure with less dose calculation uncertainty.