Comparing the toxicity and disease control rate of radiotherapy for prostate cancer between salvage settings after high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy and initial settings

Salvage local treatment for recurrent prostate cancer after focal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of salvage local treatment in managing recurrent PCa following FT, focusing on oncological and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA framework. A comprehensive literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed until July 2023. Eligible studies included patients with clinically localised PCa initially treated with FT, who experienced relapse during surveillance and subsequently underwent salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP), salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) or salvage focal therapy (sFT). The primary endpoint was the biochemical recurrence rate post-salvage treatment. The secondary endpoints were functional outcomes, including urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction rates.

RESULTS

In 26 retrospective studies including 990 patients, the overall pooled biochemical recurrence rate postsalvage treatment was 26%. The subgroup analysis revealed a biochemical recurrence rate of 20%, 22%, and 42% after sRP, sEBRT, and sFT, respectively. The overall pooled rate of urinary incontinence was 20%. Salvage FT had the lowest prevalence of urinary incontinence, followed by sRP and sEBRT. The overall pooled rate of erectile dysfunction was 43%. Salvage RP had the highest prevalence of erectile dysfunction, followed by sFT and sEBRT. Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the studies, primarily due to different sample sizes. Meta-regression analysis revealed no to low contributions of salvage treatment modalities, extent of ablation, age, prostatic specific antigen level before salvage treatment, proportion of patients with Gleason score ≥7 at recurrence, and time between the primary and salvage therapies to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Salvage local treatment for recurrent PCa after FT is feasible, and it provides acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. Among all treatment modalities, sRP and sEBRT appeared to have the lowest biochemical recurrence rates, whereas sFT was associated with improved functional outcomes.

An in-vivo study of the combined therapeutic effects of pulsed non-thermal focused ultrasound and radiation for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo combined effects of pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) and radiation (RT) for prostate cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An animal prostate tumor model was developed by implanting human LNCaP tumor cells in the prostates of nude mice. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with pFUS, RT or both (pFUS + RT) and compared with a control group. Non-thermal pFUS treatment was delivered by keeping the body temperature below 42 °C as measured real-time by MR thermometry and using a pFUS protocol (1 MHz, 25 W focused ultrasound; 1 Hz pulse rate with a 10% duty cycle for 60 sec for each sonication). Each tumor was covered entirely using 4-8 sonication spots. RT treatment with a dose of 2 Gy was delivered using an external beam (6 MV photon energy with dose rate 300MU/min). Following the treatment, mice were scanned weekly with MRI for tumor volume measurement.

RESULTS

The results showed that the tumor volume in the control group increased exponentially to 142 ± 6%, 205 ± 12%, 286 ± 22% and 410 ± 33% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after treatment, respectively. In contrast, the pFUS group was 29% (p < 0.05), 24% (p < 0.05), 8% and 9% smaller, the RT group was 7%, 10%, 12% and 18% smaller, and the pFUS + RT group was 32%, 39%, 41% and 44% (all with p < 0.05) smaller than the control group at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks post treatment, respectively. Tumors treated by pFUS showed an early response (i.e. the first 2 weeks), while the RT group showed a late response. The combined pFUS + RT treatment showed consistent response throughout the post-treatment weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that RT combined with non-thermal pFUS can significantly delay the tumor growth. The mechanism of tumor cell killing between pFUS and RT may be different. Pulsed FUS shows early tumor growth delay, while RT contributes to the late effect on tumor growth delay. The addition of pFUS to RT significantly enhanced the therapeutic effect for prostate cancer treatment.