Evaluation of deep learning-based deliverable VMAT plan generated by prototype software for automated planning for prostate cancer patients

Efficiency and Clinical Utility of AI-Assisted Radiotherapy Planning Using RatoGuide for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Case Report

This study evaluates the efficiency and dosimetric performance of RatoGuide, an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted radiotherapy planning tool, by comparing AI-generated and manually created treatment plans for a 50-year-old male with right-sided oropharyngeal cancer (cT2N2bM0, cStage IVA) who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Treatment plans were created using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) following the approach used by the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) protocol. RatoGuide generated two plans: one prioritizing the planning target volume (PTV) and the other focusing on organs at risk (OAR), while an experienced radiation oncologist manually developed a plan using a treatment planning system (TPS). Dosimetric comparisons focused on target coverage, OAR sparing, and dose homogeneity. Results showed that both AI-generated and TPS plans achieved comparable PTV coverage, with nearly identical values for Dmin, Dmean, and Dmax. The TPS plan exhibited slightly better dose homogeneity, whereas the AI-generated plan provided superior OAR sparing, particularly for the spinal cord and parotid glands, reducing the spinal cord's intermediate-dose volume (V30) by approximately 40%. However, the AI plan yielded slightly higher mean doses to both submandibular glands, though still within clinically acceptable thresholds. Additionally, the AI planning workflow was completed in just 30 minutes, significantly reducing the time required for manual planning. RatoGuide demonstrated efficiency in generating high-quality treatment plans, achieving comparable PTV coverage, and improving OAR sparing in certain areas. However, minor refinements are needed to optimize dose homogeneity and further minimize submandibular gland exposure. These findings suggest that AI-assisted planning has the potential to enhance radiotherapy efficiency and consistency.

Evaluation of deep learning based dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients using two different types of input contours

PURPOSE

This study evaluates deep learning (DL) based dose prediction methods in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using two types of input contours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five HNC patients undergoing two-step volumetric-modulated arc therapy were included. Dose prediction was performed using the AIVOT prototype (AiRato.Inc, Sendai, Japan), a commercial software with an HD U-net-based dose distribution prediction system. Models were developed for the initial plan (46 Gy/23Fr) and boost plan (24 Gy/12Fr), trained with 65 cases and tested with 10 cases. The 8-channel model used one target (PTV) and seven organs at risk (OARs), while the 10-channel model added two dummy contours (PTV ring and spinal cord PRV). Predicted and deliverable doses, obtained through dose mimicking on another radiation treatment planning system, were evaluated using dose-volume indices for PTV and OARs.

RESULTS

For the initial plan, both models achieved approximately 2% prediction accuracy for the target dose and maintained accuracy within 3.2 Gy for OARs. The 10-channel model outperformed the 8-channel model for certain dose indices. For the boost plan, both models exhibited prediction accuracies of approximately 2% for the target dose and 1 Gy for OARs. The 10-channel model showed significantly closer predictions to the ground truth for D50% and Dmean. Deliverable plans based on prediction doses showed little significant difference compared to the ground truth, especially for the boost plan.

CONCLUSION

DL-based dose prediction using the AIVOT prototype software in HNC patients yielded promising results. While additional contours may enhance prediction accuracy, their impact on dose mimicking is relatively small.

Clinical implementation of deep learning robust IMPT planning in oropharyngeal cancer patients: A blinded clinical study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the plan quality of our deep learning-based automated treatment planning method for robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). The assessment was conducted through a retrospective and prospective study, blindly comparing manual plans with deep learning plans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A set of 95 OPC patients was split into training (n = 60), configuration (n = 10), test retrospective study (n = 10), and test prospective study (n = 15). Our deep learning optimization (DLO) method combines IMPT dose prediction using a deep learning model with a robust mimicking optimization algorithm. Dosimetrists manually adjusted the DLO plan for individual patients. In both studies, manual plans and manually adjusted deep learning (mDLO) plans were blindly assessed by a radiation oncologist, a dosimetrist, and a physicist, through visual inspection, clinical goal evaluation, and comparison of normal tissue complication probability values. mDLO plans were completed within an average time of 2.5 h. In comparison, the manual planning process typically took around 2 days.

RESULTS

In the retrospective study, in 10/10 (100%) patients, the mDLO plans were preferred, while in the prospective study, 9 out of 15 (60%) mDLO plans were preferred. In 4 out of the remaining 6 cases, the manual and mDLO plans were considered comparable in quality. Differences between manual and mDLO plans were limited.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a high preference for mDLO plans over manual IMPT plans, with 92% of cases considering mDLO plans comparable or superior in quality for OPC patients.

Clinical implementation and evaluation of deep learning-assisted automatic radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical application of deep learning (DL)-assisted automatic radiotherapy planning for lung cancer.

METHODS

A DL model was developed for predicting patient-specific doses, trained and validated on a dataset of 235 patients with diverse target volumes and prescriptions. The model was integrated into clinical workflow with DL-predicted objective functions. The automatic plans were retrospectively designed for additional 50 treated manual volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. A comparison was made between automatic and manual plans in terms of dosimetric indexes, monitor units (MUs) and planning time. Plan quality metric (PQM) encompassing these indexes was evaluated, with higher PQM values indicating superior plan quality. Qualitative evaluations of two plans were conducted by four reviewers.

RESULTS

The PQM score was 40.7 ± 13.1 for manual plans and 40.8 ± 13.5 for automatic plans (P = 0.75). Compared to manual plans, the targets coverage and homogeneity of automatic plans demonstrated no significant difference. Manual plans exhibited better sparing for lung in V5 (difference: 1.8 ± 4.2 %, P = 0.02), whereas automatic plans showed enhanced sparing for heart in V30 (difference: 1.4 ± 4.7 %, P = 0.02) and for spinal cord in Dmax (difference: 0.7 ± 4.7 Gy, P = 0.04). The planning time and MUs of automatic plans were significantly reduced by 70.5 ± 20.0 min and 97.4 ± 82.1. Automatic plans were deemed acceptable in 88 % of the reviews (176/200).

CONCLUSIONS

The DL-assisted approach for lung cancer notably decreased planning time and MUs, while demonstrating comparable or superior quality relative to manual plans. It has the potential to provide benefit to lung cancer patients.

Predicting voxel-level dose distributions of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for multiple brain metastases

Purpose

Brain metastasis is a common, life-threatening neurological problem for patients with cancer. Single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been popularly used due to its highly conformal dose and short treatment time. Accurate prediction of its dose distribution can provide a general standard for evaluating the quality of treatment plan. In this study, a deep learning model is applied to the dose prediction of a single-isocenter VMAT treatment plan for radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases.

Method

A U-net with residual networks (U-ResNet) is employed for the task of dose prediction. The deep learning model is first trained from a database consisting of hundreds of historical treatment plans. The 3D dose distribution is then predicted with the input of the CT image and contours of regions of interest (ROIs). A total of 150 single-isocenter VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases are used for training and testing. The model performance is evaluated based on mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute differences of multiple dosimetric indexes (DIs), including (D max and D mean) for OARs, (D 98, D 95, D 50, and D 2) for PTVs, homogeneity index, and conformity index. The similarity between the predicted and clinically approved plan dose distribution is also evaluated.

Result

For 20 tested patients, the largest and smallest MAEs are 3.3% ± 3.6% and 1.3% ± 1.5%, respectively. The mean MAE for the 20 tested patients is 2.2% ± 0.7%. The mean absolute differences of D 98, D 95, D 50, and D2 for PTV60, PTV52, PTV50, and PTV40 are less than 2.5%, 3.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0%, respectively. The prediction accuracy of OARs for D max and D mean is within 3.2% and 1.2%, respectively. The average DSC ranges from 0.86 to 1 for all tested patients.

Conclusion

U-ResNet is viable to produce accurate dose distribution that is comparable to those of the clinically approved treatment plans. The predicted results can be used to improve current treatment planning design, plan quality, efficiency, etc.