1
|
Van Damme A, Tummers P, De Visschere P, Van Dorpe J, Van de Vijver K, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, Denys H, Naert E, Makar A, De Neve W, Vandecasteele K. Exclusion of non-Involved uterus from the target volume (EXIT-trial): An individualized treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer using modern radiotherapy and imaging techniques followed by completion surgery. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100793. [PMID: 38798749 PMCID: PMC11126536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). In this study, we postulate that omitting an iconographical unaffected uterus (+12 mm distance from the tumour) from the treatment volume is safe and that no tumour will be found in the non-targeted uterus (NTU) leading to reduction of high-dose volumes of surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Material and Methods In this single-arm phase 2 study, two sets of target volumes were delineated: one standard-volume (whole uterus) and an EXIT-volume (exclusion of non-tumour-bearing parts of the uterus with a minimum 12 mm margin from the tumour). All patients underwent chemoradiotherapy targeting the EXIT-volume, followed by completion hysterectomy. In 15 patients, a plan comparison between two treatment plans (PTV vs PTV_EXIT) was performed. The primary endpoint was the pathological absence of tumour involvement in the non-targeted uterus (NTU). Secondary endpoints included dosimetric impact of target volume reduction on OARs, acute and chronic toxicity, overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results In all 21 (FIGO stage I: 2; II: 14;III: 3; IV: 2) patients the NTU was pathologically negative. Ssignificant reductions in Dmean in bladder, sigmoid and rectum; V15Gy in sigmoid and rectum, V30Gy in bladder, sigmoid and rectum; V40Gy and V45Gy in bladder, bowel bag, sigmoid and rectum; V50Gy in rectum were achieved. Median follow-up was 54 months (range 7-79 months). Acute toxicity was mainly grade 2 and 5 % grade 3 urinary. The 3y- OS, PFS and LRFS were respectively 76,2%, 64,9% and 81 %. Conclusion MRI-based exclusion of the non-tumour-bearing parts of the uterus at a minimum distance of 12 mm from the tumour out of the target volume in LACC can be done without risk of residual disease in the NTU, leading to a significant reduction of the volume of surrounding OARS treated to high doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Van Damme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Tummers
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Departement of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Vercauteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Werner De Gersem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Amin Makar
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Boer P, Spijkerboer AM, Bleeker MCG, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Monraats MA, Nederveen AJ, van de Vijver MJ, Kenter GG, Bel A, Rasch CRN, Stoker J, Stalpers LJA. Prospective validation of craniocaudal tumour size on MR imaging compared to histoPAthology in patients with uterine cervical cancer: The MPAC study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:9-15. [PMID: 31341971 PMCID: PMC6610701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumour extension on MRI was compared with histopathology using three methods. MRI visualises tumour extension within a margin of 10 mm compared to microscopy. The major source of measurement uncertainty is post-surgical change of organ.
Purpose To determine the accuracy of MRI in detecting craniocaudal tumour extension, compared to histopathology, of the hysterectomy specimen in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer. Three complementary methods were investigated. Materials and methods Thirty-four patients with early-stage cervical cancer had pre-operative MRI, followed by radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. 1) craniocaudal tumour extension was measured on MRI by two radiologists and compared to microscopy by a pathologist, 2) to compensate for changes in uterine shape between pre-operative MRI and the surgical specimen, craniocaudal tumour extensions were directly compared and appreciated as being a part of a 3-dimensional tumour by a radiation oncologist and resident, and 3) tumour size on MRI was compared macroscopically after digital non-rigid registration of the uterus, uterine cavity and tumour of both modalities. Results The craniocaudal tumour extension measured on histopathology minus MRI gives: 1) on average +3 mm difference when measured by a radiologist compared to the microscopic extension (range −13 to +15 mm), 2) −0.2 mm (range −11 to +6.0 mm) when evaluated on MRI by a radiation oncologist compared to the macroscopic tumour; 3) after non-rigid organ registration, a margin of 10 mm around the tumour on MRI would be needed to cover 95% of the tumour in 90% of the patients. Conclusions Results indicate that microscopic tumour extension towards the uterine fundus is within a margin of 10 mm around the visible tumour on MRI. The major source of measurement uncertainty is post-surgical change of organ shape and form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anje M Spijkerboer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike C G Bleeker
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mélanie A Monraats
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart J Nederveen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gemma G Kenter
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Boer P, van de Schoot AJAJ, Westerveld H, Smit M, Buist MR, Bel A, Rasch CRN, Stalpers LJA. Target tailoring and proton beam therapy to reduce small bowel dose in cervical cancer radiotherapy : A comparison of benefits. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:255-263. [PMID: 29101415 PMCID: PMC5847034 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to investigate the potential clinical benefit from both target tailoring by excluding the tumour-free proximal part of the uterus during image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) and improved dose conformity based on intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). METHODS The study included planning CTs from 11 previously treated patients with cervical cancer with a >4-cm tumour-free part of the proximal uterus on diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). IGART and robustly optimised IMPT plans were generated for both conventional target volumes and for MRI-based target tailoring (where the non-invaded proximal part of the uterus was excluded), yielding four treatment plans per patient. For each plan, the V15Gy, V30Gy, V45Gy and Dmean for bladder, sigmoid, rectum and bowel bag were compared, and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for ≥grade 2 acute small bowel toxicity was calculated. RESULTS Both IMPT and MRI-based target tailoring resulted in significant reductions in V15Gy, V30Gy, V45Gy and Dmean for bladder and small bowel. IMPT reduced the NTCP for small bowel toxicity from 25% to 18%; this was further reduced to 9% when combined with MRI-based target tailoring. In four of the 11 patients (36%), NTCP reductions of >10% were estimated by IMPT, and in six of the 11 patients (55%) when combined with MRI-based target tailoring. This >10% NTCP reduction was expected if the V45Gy for bowel bag was >275 cm3 and >200 cm3, respectively, during standard IGART alone. CONCLUSIONS In patients with cervical cancer, both proton therapy and MRI-based target tailoring lead to a significant reduction in the dose to surrounding organs at risk and small bowel toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Agustinus J A J van de Schoot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrike Westerveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Smit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marrije R Buist
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie WJ, Wu X, Xue RL, Lin XY, Kidd EA, Yan SM, Zhang YH, Zhai TT, Lu JY, Wu LL, Zhang H, Huang HH, Chen ZJ, Li DR, Xie LX. More accurate definition of clinical target volume based on the measurement of microscopic extensions of the primary tumor toward the uterus body in international federation of gynecology and obstetrics Ib-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 91:206-12. [PMID: 25442332 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Revised: 09/05/2014] [Accepted: 09/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To more accurately define clinical target volume for cervical cancer radiation treatment planning by evaluating tumor microscopic extension toward the uterus body (METU) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ib-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter study, surgical resection specimens from 318 cases of stage Ib-IIa SCCC that underwent radical hysterectomy were included. Patients who had undergone preoperative chemotherapy, radiation, or both were excluded from this study. Microscopic extension of primary tumor toward the uterus body was measured. The association between other pathologic factors and METU was analyzed. RESULTS Microscopic extension toward the uterus body was not common, with only 12.3% of patients (39 of 318) demonstrating METU. The mean (±SD) distance of METU was 0.32 ± 1.079 mm (range, 0-10 mm). Lymphovascular space invasion was associated with METU distance and occurrence rate. A margin of 5 mm added to gross tumor would adequately cover 99.4% and 99% of the METU in the whole group and in patients with lymphovascular space invasion, respectively. CONCLUSION According to our analysis of 318 SCCC specimens for METU, using a 5-mm gross tumor volume to clinical target volume margin in the direction of the uterus should be adequate for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ib-IIa SCCC. Considering the discrepancy between imaging and pathologic methods in determining gross tumor volume extent, we recommend a safer 10-mm margin in the uterine direction as the standard for clinical practice when using MRI for contouring tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jia Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiao Wu
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ren-Liang Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiang-Ying Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Elizabeth A Kidd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Shu-Mei Yan
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yao-Hong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chaozhou Hospital of Chaozhou City, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Tian-Tian Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Yang Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Li-Li Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hai-Hua Huang
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zhi-Jian Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - De-Rui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Liang-Xi Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Boer P, Bleeker MCG, Spijkerboer AM, van de Schoot AJAJ, Bipat S, Buist MR, Rasch CRN, Stoker J, Stalpers LJA. Craniocaudal tumour extension in uterine cervical cancer on MRI compared to histopathology. Eur J Radiol Open 2015; 2:111-7. [PMID: 26937443 PMCID: PMC4750554 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2015.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Median craniocaudal extension of uterine cervical cancer on MRI is systematically slightly smaller compared to histopathology (2.1 vs. 2.5 cm). Pearson’s correlation: 0.83 (p < 0.001). Regarding the craniocaudal extension on MRI, 91% (19/21) of the extension would have been covered by a clinical uncertainty margin of 1.2 cm. Comparison of tumour measurements on MRI and surgical specimen is hampered by organ deformation. However, this methodological limitation might be solved by use of deformable image registration.
Purpose To assess the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of craniocaudal tumour extension by comparing the craniocaudal tumour extension on the pre-operative MRI and post-operative hysterectomy specimen in patients with early stage uterine cervical cancer. Materials and methods After approval of the institutional review board was acquired, pre-operative MRI and hysterectomy specimen of 21 women with early stage cervical cancer were re-evaluated. The craniocaudal extension on MRI was measured separately by two experienced radiologists and compared with corresponding measurements from the hysterectomy specimen, which were re-evaluated by an experienced pathologist. Results Median craniocaudal extension of uterine cervical cancer on MRI was slightly smaller compared to histopathology (2.1 cm vs. 2.5 cm). The median underestimation was 0.4 cm (range −0.6 cm to 2.2 cm, mean 0.4 cm, standard deviation (SD) ±0.7 cm); Pearson’s correlation was 0.83 (p < 0.001). In two patients (9%) MRI underestimated tumour craniocaudal extension by more than 1.8 cm. Conclusion MRI represents the histopathological craniocaudal tumour extension in the majority of patients with early stage uterine cervical cancer, but with a systematic small underestimation of the real craniocaudal tumour extension.
Collapse
Key Words
- Accuracy
- CI, confidence interval
- CRF, case record form
- CTV, clinical target volume
- Craniocaudal
- EBRT, external beam radiation therapy
- ESTRO, European society of therapeutic radiology and oncology
- Extension
- FIGO, international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics
- ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient
- JCOG, Japan clinical oncology group
- LLETZ, large loop excision of the transformation zone
- MRI
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- NCIC, national cancer institute of Canada
- PTV, planning target volume
- RT, radiation therapy
- SD, standard deviation
- Uterine cervical cancer
- VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike C G Bleeker
- Department of Pathology, AMC, UvA, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anje M Spijkerboer
- Department of Radiology, AMC, UvA, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agustinus J A J van de Schoot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shandra Bipat
- Department of Radiology, AMC, UvA, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marrije R Buist
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, AMC, UvA, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology, AMC, UvA, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|