Significance of low-dose radiation distribution in development of radiation pneumonitis after helical-tomotherapy-based hypofractionated radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases

Proton therapy for breast cancer: Reducing toxicity

Radiotherapy is a crucial component in the holistic management of breast cancer, with approximately 60% of individuals diagnosed with breast cancer requiring this treatment. As the survival rate of individuals with breast cancer has significantly increased, there is a growing focus on the long-term well-being of patients. Proton therapy (PT) is a new and rapidly developing radiotherapy method. In comparison with conventional photon therapy, PT offers the benefits of decreased radiation toxicity and increased dosage in the designated region. This can extend patients' lifespan and enhance their overall well-being. The present analysis examines the function of PT in diminishing the harmful effects of radiation in cases of breast cancer, while also providing a brief overview of the future potential and obstacles associated with PT for breast cancer.

Radiation pneumonia predictive model for radiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

The machine learning models with dose factors and the deep learning models with dose distribution matrix have been used to building lung toxics models for radiotherapy and achieve promising results. However, few studies have integrated clinical features into deep learning models. This study aimed to explore the role of three-dimension dose distribution and clinical features in predicting radiation pneumonitis (RP) in esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy and designed a new hybrid deep learning network to predict the incidence of RP.

METHODS

A total of 105 esophageal cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. The three-dimension (3D) dose distributions within the lung were extracted from the treatment planning system, converted into 3D matrixes and used as inputs to predict RP with ResNet. In total, 15 clinical factors were normalized and converted into one-dimension (1D) matrixes. A new prediction model (HybridNet) was then built based on a hybrid deep learning network, which combined 3D ResNet18 and 1D convolution layers. Machine learning-based prediction models, which use the traditional dosiomic factors with and without the clinical factors as inputs, were also constructed and their predictive performance compared with that of HybridNet using tenfold cross validation. Accuracy and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the model effect. DeLong test was used to compare the prediction results of the models.

RESULTS

The deep learning-based model achieved superior prediction results compared with machine learning-based models. ResNet performed best in the group that only considered dose factors (accuracy, 0.78 ± 0.05; AUC, 0.82 ± 0.25), whereas HybridNet performed best in the group that considered both dose factors and clinical factors (accuracy, 0.85 ± 0.13; AUC, 0.91 ± 0.09). HybridNet had higher accuracy than that of Resnet (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Based on prediction results, the proposed HybridNet model could predict RP in esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy with significantly higher accuracy, suggesting its potential as a useful tool for clinical decision-making. This study demonstrated that the information in dose distribution is worth further exploration, and combining multiple types of features contributes to predict radiotherapy response.

External validation of NTCP-models for radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models can be used to estimate the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP). The aim of this study was to externally validate the most frequently used prediction models for RP, i.e., the QUANTEC and APPELT models, in a large cohort of lung cancer patients treated with IMRT or VMAT. [1-2] METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective cohort study, included lung cancer patients treated between 2013 and 2018. A closed testing procedure was performed to test the need for model updating. To improve model performance, modification or removal of variables was considered. Performance measures included tests for goodness of fit, discrimination, and calibration.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 612 patients, the incidence of RP ≥ grade 2 was 14.5%. For the QUANTEC-model, recalibration was recommended which resulted in a revised intercept and adjusted regression coefficient (from 0.126 to 0.224) of the mean lung dose (MLD),. The APPELT-model needed revision including model updating with modification and elimination of variables. After revision, the New RP-model included the following predictors (and regression coefficients): MLD (B = 0.250), age (B = 0.049, and smoking status (B = 0.902). The discrimination of the updated APPELT-model was higher compared to the recalibrated QUANTEC-model (AUC: 0.79 vs. 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that both the QUANTEC- and APPELT-model needed revision. Next to changes of the intercept and regression coefficients, the APPELT model improved further by model updating and performed better than the recalibrated QUANTEC model. This New RP-model is widely applicable containing non-tumour site specific variables, which can easily be collected.

Analysis of clinical and physical dosimetric factors that determine the outcome of severe acute radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a retrospective statistical analysis of clinical and physical dosimetric factors of lung cancer patients who had previously undergone lung and/or mediastinal radiotherapy and died of or survived severe acute radiation pneumonitis (SARP). Our study was the first to reveal the heterogeneity in clinical factors, physical dosimetric factors, and SARP onset time that determined the clinical outcomes of lung cancer patients who developed SARP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical characteristics, physical dosimetry factors, and SARP onset time of deceased and surviving patients were retrospectively analyzed. SPSS 20.0 was used for data analysis. Student's t-test was used for intergroup comparison, and a Mann-Whitney U test was used for data with skewed distribution. Qualitative data were represented using frequencies (%), and Fisher's exact test or χ2 test was used for intergroup comparison of nonparametric data. Binary logistic analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Differences with a P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that the potential predictors of SARP death were as follows: ipsilateral lung V5 and V30, contralateral lung V5, V10, and V30, total lung V5, V10, and V30, mean lung dose, mean heart dose, and maximum spinal cord dose. Multivariate analysis showed that ipsilateral lung V5 and total lung V5 were predictors that determined the final outcome of SARP patients. In addition, we analyzed the time from the completion of radiotherapy to SARP onset, and found significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no decisive correlation between clinical characteristics and SARP outcome (i.e., death or survival) in lung radiotherapy patients. Ipsilateral lung V5 and total lung V5 were independent predictors of death in SARP patients.

Higher Lung and Heart Doses Decrease Early and Long-Term Survival, Respectively, in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation

Purpose

Cardiopulmonary toxic effects may reduce the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have examined whether the heart and lung doses affect overall survival (OS). We investigated the correlation of heart and lung doses with OS in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective analysis included 307 patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. The total dose was 50 Gy. Landmark analyses were performed at 36 months, with hazard ratios (HRs) calculated separately for events occurring up to 36 months (early survival) and after 36 months (long-term survival). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was performed to balance the characteristics of the high- and low-dose groups. We performed sensitivity analyses at 24 and 48 months.

Results

The median follow-up period was 67.42 months. Heart doses were significantly correlated with long-term survival (HR, 1.14; P = .015) but not with early survival (HR, 0.97; P = .41) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .58). Lung doses were marginally significantly correlated with early survival (HR, 1.03; P = .07) but not with long-term survival (HR, 1.00; P = .85) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .12). Higher heart and lung doses were associated with decreased long-term and early survival, respectively, before and after sIPTW. Landmark analyses at 24 and 48 months showed consistent results.

Conclusions

For patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT, a higher heart dose was associated with decreased long-term survival, whereas a higher lung dose was associated with decreased early survival.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) comparison to 3D-conformal technique in lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can be a curative option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and oligometastatic lung disease. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has offered further advancements in terms of radiation dose shaping without compromising treatment times however there is potential for greater low-dose exposure to the lung. This study was to assess whether VMAT lung SABR would result in any increase to the dosimetry parameters compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) that could confer increased risk of radiation pneumonitis.

METHODS

A total of 53 and 30 3D-CRT treatment plans of patients treated with 48 Gy in 4 fractions were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in planning target volumes between the VMAT 29.9 cc (range 12.4-58.5 cc) and 3D-CRT 31.2 cc (range 12.3-58.3 cc) P = 0.79. The mean of total lung V5, ipsilateral lung V5 and contralateral lung V5 all showed a trend of being smaller in the VMAT treatment group- 14% versus 15.8%, 25.6% versus 30.4% and 1.6% versus 2.2%, respectively, but all were not statistically significant differences. Mean of the mean lung dose MLD, again showed a trend of being lower in the VMAT treatments but was also non-significant, 2.6 Gy versus 3.0 Gy, P = 1.0. Mean V20 was the same in both cohorts, 3.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetry for 3D-CRT and VMAT plans were not significantly different including V5, and therefore we conclude that VMAT treatment is unlikely to be associated with an increased risk of radiation pneumonitis.

Dosimetric comparison of different intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for whole-breast irradiation of right-breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study compared the dosimetric parameters of field-in-field forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIF-IMRT) and fixed-field inversely optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FFIO-IMRT) for the whole-breast irradiation of patients undergoing right-breast lumpectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 30 patients with pT1-2N0M0 right-breast invasive ductal carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Two different treatment plans, i.e., FIF-IMRT and FFIO-IMRT, were designed for each patient. The dosimetric parameters of the two treatment plans were compared including ipsilateral lung and heart, conformity index (CI), and the homogeneity index (HI) of the planning target volume (PTV).

RESULTS

Fixed-field inversely optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy was found to significantly improve CI (83.302% vs. 60.146%) and HI (11.837% vs. 19.280%), and significantly reduced V₂₅ (18.038% vs. 19.653%) and V₃₀ (15.790% vs. 18.492%) of the ipsilateral lung. It also significantly increased V₅ (69.791% vs. 32.615%) of the ipsilateral lung and V₅ (61.579% vs. 3.829%), V₁₀ (14.130% vs. 0.381%), V₂₀ (1.843% vs. 0.051%), and D_mean (5.211Gy vs. 1.870Gy) of the heart.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of improving the conformity and homogeneity of PTV and reducing the ipsilateral lung irradiation volume at high doses, FFIO-IMRT significantly raised the ipsilateral lung irradiated volume at low doses, as well as the irradiation volume and mean radiation doses to the heart. This limits its use in patients with early-stage right breast cancer.

Integrating 18 F-FDG PET/CT with lung dose-volume for assessing lung inflammatory changes after arc-based radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has a highly linear relationship with low-dose lung volume. We previously established a volume-based algorithm (VBA) method to improve low-dose lung volume in radiotherapy (RT). This study assessed lung inflammatory changes by integrating fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT) with VBA for esophageal cancer patients undergoing arc-based RT.

METHODS

Thirty esophageal cancer patients received ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT imaging pre-RT and post-RT were included in a retrospective pilot study. We fused lung doses and parameters of PET/CT in RT planning. Based on VBA, we used the 5Gy isodose curve to define high-dose (HD) and low-dose (LD) regions in the lung volume. We divided patients into non-RP (nRP) and RP groups. The maximum, mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean), global lung glycolysis (GLG), mean lung dose (MLD) and V_5-30 in lungs were analyzed. Area under the curve values were utilized to identify optimal cut-off values for RP.

RESULTS

Eleven patients in the nRP group and 19 patients in the RP group were identified. In 30 RP lungs, post-RT SUVmax, SUVmean and GLG of HD regions showed significant increases compared to values for pre-RT lungs. There were no significant differences in values of 22 nRP lungs. Post-RT SUVmax and SUVmean of HD regions, MLD, and lung V₅ and V₁₀ in RP lungs were significantly higher than in nRP lungs. For detecting RP, the optimal cut-off values were post-RT SUVmax > 2.28 and lung V₅  > 47.14%.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully integrated ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT with VBA to assess RP in esophageal cancer patients undergoing RT. Post-RT SUVmax > 2.28 and lung V₅  > 47.14% might be potential indicators of RP.

Pulmonary toxicity of craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy

Craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy (HT-CSI) has advantages in aspects of homogeneous dose distribution. Physicians, however, still have concerns of pulmonary toxicity due to HT-CSI’s relatively large, low-dose irradiated volume from continuous and 360° rotation delivery. In this study, we investigated the pulmonary toxicity of HT-CSI. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who received HT-CSI between January 2014 and December 2019. Grade 2 + pulmonary toxicities were evaluated. Intensive systemic treatment was defined as systemic treatment administration before, during, and after HT-CSI. V_{X Gy} was defined as % volume receiving ≥ X Gy. Thirteen patients (12.4%) presented with grade 2 + pulmonary toxicities after HT-CSI. Of these patients, only one experienced grade 2 radiation pneumonitis combined with pembrolizumab-induced pneumonitis. Conversely, pneumonia was observed in 12 patients. Intensive systemic treatment (p = 0.004), immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.031), and bilateral lung V_{5 Gy} ≥ 65% (p = 0.031) were identified as independent risk factors for pneumonia. The risk factor for pneumonia in pediatric patients were immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.035) and bilateral lung V_{5 Gy} ≥ 65% (p = 0.047). HT-CSI can be a safe treatment modality with tolerable pulmonary toxicities. Intensive systemic treatment, immunosuppressive drugs, and bilateral lung V_{5 Gy} ≥ 65% were significantly associated with pneumonia. In these patients, close follow-up should be considered for proper management of pneumonia.

Comparison of Radiation Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with HT versus IMRT and Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets as Predicting Risk Factors

Purpose

We sought to compare the symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy (HT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and examine the predictive value of circulating lymphocyte subsets affecting the occurrence of RP.

Patients and Methods

Circulating lymphocyte subsets, clinical characteristics, dosimetric parameters and pulmonary function were collected from 130 lung cancer patients treated with HT (n = 53) or IMRT (n = 77) from 2016 through 2020. Symptomatic RP was compared between groups. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of RP.

Results

The IMRT group had larger planning target volume (319.9 vs 240.8 cc, P = 0.041); more ECOG performance status 0–1 (96.1% vs 79.2%, P = 0.002); more stage III–IV disease (94.8% vs 37.6%, P = 0.028); and more combined systemic therapy (85.7% vs 69.8%, P = 0.022). Grade ≥2 RP were comparable between IMRT and HT groups (16.9% vs 15.1%, P = 0.785). For stage III–IV disease, IMRT was associated with lower lung V10 (31.9% vs 35.8%, P = 0.047) and lower incidence of grade 5 RP (0% vs 9.1%, P = 0.018). All lymphocyte subsets reduced after radiotherapy. The decrease degree of total T cell count and CD4⁺ T cell count were larger after IMRT than HT (P = 0.043, P = 0.021). In univariate analysis, the smoking status, lower baseline FEV1, and higher total T cell count, higher CD8⁺ T cell count, lower total B cell count, lower CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio after radiotherapy were associated with the development of grade ≥2 RP. The higher CD8⁺T cell count after radiotherapy was the only risk factor associated with grade ≥2 RP in multivariable analysis (OR 1.003; 95% CI: 1.000–1.005; P = 0.044).

Conclusion

IMRT was associated with lower lung V10 and less grade 5 RP than HT for stage III–IV lung cancer. Higher CD8⁺ T cell count after radiotherapy was associated with an increased risk of RP. HT may better preserve total T cell and CD4⁺ T cell than IMRT.

Construction and Verification of a Radiation Pneumonia Prediction Model Based on Multiple Parameters

Objective:

Patients with lung cancer are at risk of radiation pneumonia (RP) after receiving radiotherapy. We established a prediction model according to the critical indicators extracted from radiation pneumonia patients.

Materials and Methods:

74 radiation pneumonia patients were involved in the training set. Firstly, the clinical data, hematological and radiation dose parameters of the 74 patients were screened by Logistics regression univariate analysis according to the level of radiation pneumonia. Next, Stepwise regression analysis was utilized to construct the regression model. Then, the influence of continuous variables on RP was tested by smoothing function. Finally, the model was externally verified by 30 patients in validation set and visualized by R code.

Results:

In the training set, there was 40 patients suffered≥ level 2 acute radiation pneumonia. Clinical data (diabetes), blood indexes (lymphocyte percentage, basophil percentage, platelet count) and radiation dose (V15 > 40%, V20 > 30%, V35 >18%, V40 > 15%) were related to radiation pneumonia (P < 0.05). Particularly, stepwise regression analysis indicated that the history of diabetes, the basophils percentage, platelet count and V20 could be the best combination used for predicting radiation pneumonia. The column chart was obtained by fitting the regression model with the combined indicator. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the AUC in the development term was 0.853, the AUC was 0.656 in the validation term. And calibration curves of both groups showed the high stability in efficiently diagnostic. Furthermore, the DCA curve showed that the model had a satisfactory positive net benefit.

Conclusion:

The combination of the basophils percentage, platelet count and V20 is available to build a predictive model of radiation pneumonia for patients with advanced lung cancer.

Risk factor of pneumonitis on dose-volume relationship for chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab: Multi-institutional research in Japan

Objectives

To estimate appropriate dose-volume parameters for avoidance of pneumonitis in use of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab for treatment of lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab at 9 centers were enrolled in the study. Three-dimensional radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and proton beam therapy were used. The frequency and severity of pneumonitis and the dose-volume relationship for normal lung were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify risk factors. A covariate adjusted hazard ratio was then estimated for the percentages of normal lung volume irradiated at ≥ X Gy (Vx) (X = 5-40) and lung volume non-irradiated at ≥ X Gy (X = 5-40), with the covariates selected in the variable selection. Cumulative incidence functions and covariate adjusted hazard ratios were also estimated for dichotomized variables, with estimated cut-off points.

Results

A total of 91 patients were enrolled in the study. The median time from the start of radiotherapy to development of pneumonitis was 4.1 months. Pneumonitis was observed in 80 patients (88%), including grade 2 or severe pneumonitis in 31 (34%) and ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in 11 (12%). Pneumonitis was inside the irradiation field in 73 of the 80 patients (91%). The selected factors for ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were V₂₀, and primary site (upper lobe) in multivariable analysis. The cut off value of V₂₀ was 18.99%, and there was a significant difference between V₂₀ of < 18.77 and ≥ 18.77.

Conclusion

Though there are some limitation of this study, the basic concept of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with an emphasis on V₂₀ remains unchanged in use of durvalumab. However, we recommend reduction of V₂₀ to as small a value as possible in use of this therapy.

Radiation-induced lung injury: current evidence

Chemo-radiotherapy and systemic therapies have proven satisfactory outcomes as standard treatments for various thoracic malignancies; however, adverse pulmonary effects, like pneumonitis, can be life-threatening. Pneumonitis is caused by direct cytotoxic effect, oxidative stress, and immune-mediated injury. Radiotherapy Induced Lung Injury (RILI) encompasses two phases: an early phase known as Radiation Pneumonitis (RP), characterized by acute lung tissue inflammation as a result of exposure to radiation; and a late phase called Radiation Fibrosis (RF), a clinical syndrome that results from chronic pulmonary tissue damage. Currently, diagnoses are made by exclusion using clinical assessment and radiological findings. Pulmonary function tests have constituted a significant step in evaluating lung function status during radiotherapy and useful predictive tools to avoid complications or limit toxicity. Systemic corticosteroids are widely used to treat pneumonitis complications, but its use must be standardized, and consider in the prophylaxis setting given the fatal outcome of this adverse event. This review aims to discuss the clinicopathological features of pneumonitis and provide practical clinical recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and management.

Proton versus Photon Breath-Hold Radiation for Left-Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Dosimetric Comparison

PURPOSE

Radiation to breast, chest wall, and/or regional nodes is an integral component of breast cancer management in many situations. Irradiating left-sided breast and/or regional nodes may be technically challenging because of cardiac tolerance and subsequent risk of long-term cardiac complications. Deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) technique physically separates cardiac structures away from radiation target volume, thus reducing cardiac dose with either photon (Ph) or proton beam therapy (PBT). The utility of combining PBT with DIBH is less well understood.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We compared photon-DIBH (Ph-DIBH) versus proton DIBH (Pr-DIBH) for different planning parameters, including target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Necessary ethical permission was obtained from the institutional review board. Ten previous patients with irradiated, intact, left-sided breast and Ph-DIBH were replanned with PBT for dosimetric comparison. Clinically relevant normal OARs were contoured, and Ph plans were generated with parallel, opposed tangent beams and direct fields for supraclavicular and/or axillae whenever required. For proton planning, all targets were delineated individually and best possible coverage of planning target volume was achieved. Dose-volume histogram was analyzed to determine the difference in doses received by different OARs. Minimum and maximum dose (Dmin and Dmax ) as well as dose received by a specific volume of OAR were compared. Each patient's initial plan (Ph-DIBH) was used as a control for comparing newly devised PBT plan (Pr-DIBH). Matched, paired t tests were applied to determine any significant differences between the 2 plans.

RESULTS

Both the plans were adequate in target coverage. Dose to cardiac structure subunits and ipsilateral lung were significantly reduced with the proton breath-hold technique. Significant dose reduction with Pr-DIBH was observed in comparison to Ph-DIBH for mean dose (D mean) to the heart (0.23 Gy versus 1.19 Gy; P < .001); D mean to the left ventricle (0.25 Gy versus 1.7 Gy; P < .001); D mean, D max, and the half-maximal dose to the left anterior descending artery (1.15 Gy versus 5.54 Gy; P < .003; 7.7 Gy versus 22.15 Gy; P < .007; 1.61 Gy versus 4.42 Gy, P < .049); D max of the left circumflex coronary artery (0.13 Gy versus 1.35 Gy; P < .001) and D mean, the volume to the ipsilateral lung receiving 20 Gy and 5 Gy (2.28 Gy versus 8.04 Gy; P < .001; 2.36 Gy versus 15.54 Gy, P < .001; 13.9 Gy versus 30.28 Gy; P = .002). However, skin dose and contralateral breast dose were not significantly improved with proton.

CONCLUSION

This comparative dosimetric study showed significant benefit of Pr-DIBH technique compared with Ph-DIBH in terms of cardiopulmonary sparing and may be the area of future clinical research.

Noncoplanar Radiation using Tomotherapy: A Phantom Study

Background:

There are very few studies on noncoplanar radiation in tomotherapy because deformable image registration is not implemented in the TomoTherapy Planning Station, a treatment planning device used in tomotherapy. This study examined whether noncoplanar radiation can be performed on the head using a tilt-type head and neck fixture and deformable image registration.

Methods:

Planning target volume spheres with diameters of 2, 3, and 4 cm were set on a head phantom, and computed tomography images were taken at 0° and 40° using a tilt-type head and neck fixture. Irradiation plans were created in the Tomotherapy Planning Station. Noncoplanar radiation was simulated, and the dose volume was evaluated by adding the 0° dose distribution and 40° dose distribution using the deformable image registration of the RayStation treatment planning system.

Results:

The ratio of the phantom volume to the irradiation dose for 20% to 30% of the planning target volume in noncoplanar radiation was smaller than that for 40% to 90% of the planning target volume in single-section irradiation at 0° or 40°.

Conclusions:

Noncoplanar radiation on the head region using tomotherapy was possible by using a tilt-type head and neck fixture, and the dose distribution could be evaluated using deformable image registration. This method helps reduce the dose of the organ-at-risk region located slightly away from the planning target volume.

Outcomes of Hypofractional Tomotherapy in Patients with Stage III Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Not Eligible for Surgery or Concurrent Chemoradiation

Purpose

We assessed the clinical outcomes and toxicities following hypofractionation with helical tomographic intensity-modulated radiotherapy technology (tomotherapy) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were not candidates for surgery or concurrent chemoradiation.

Methods

Forty-three patients with stage III NSCLC who were treated between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled. The prescription doses for gross target volume and clinical target volume were 70 Gy and 60 Gy (respectively) delivered in 15–25 fractions over 3–5 weeks.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) time was 34.23 (range 11.33–99.33) months. The estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 97.7%, 74.4%, and 55.9%, respectively; the corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 79.1%, 53.5%, and 36.1%, respectively. The local disease recurrence, regional disease recurrence, and distant metastasis rates at 3 years were 4.7%, 11.62%, and 55.81%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, dose regimen (<19 f vs. ≥19 f) was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS, PFS, and DM (p < 0.05). Seven patients developed grade 1-2 acute radiation pneumonia (RP), 5 patients developed grade 1-2 late RP, while 3 patients developed grade 3 late RP. None of the patients developed grade 4-5 radiation lung injury.

Conclusion

Tomotherapy may be an effective treatment option for patients with stage III NSCLC. It may be a viable alternative to surgery with lower incidence of side effects.

Interaction between lymphopenia, radiotherapy technique, dosimetry, and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy

AIM

Immune function (e.g. absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)) and modifiable predictors thereof (e.g. volume of the heart/lungs receiving low-dose radiation) impact outcomes of cancer patients, but this has not been well-studied in the immunotherapy era. This investigation of metastatic lung cancer assessed the interaction of dosimetric parameters (e.g. lung/heart V5), radiotherapy technique (e.g. stereotactic (SBRT) or traditional radiotherapy), lymphopenia, and survival outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were collected from three institutional phase I/II trials of combined immunotherapy and lung irradiation. SBRT referred to 50 Gy/4 fractions or 60 Gy/10 fractions, and traditional RT as 45 Gy/15 fractions. Blood collections were standardized on the first and last day of radiotherapy and each cycle of immunotherapy. Statistics included multivariable linear regression to identify variables associated with ALC decline, Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall and progression-free survival (PFS), and Cox multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of the 165 patients was 21 months. The only factor independently predictive of ALC decline was traditional RT (p < 0.001). Therefore, the analysis was repeated for traditional RT and SBRT separately; lung V5 was associated with lymphopenia for traditional RT (p < 0.001) but not SBRT (p = 0.12). Pre-radiotherapy ALC was independently associated with PFS in both cohorts (p < 0.05 for both); post-RT ALC predicted for PFS in the traditional RT (p = 0.048) but not the SBRT (p = 0.90) group. Neither heart nor lung V5 was independently associated with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with immunotherapy, SBRT may better preserve lymphocytes (and hence improve outcomes) than traditional RT. When administering traditional RT, constraining the lung V5 may indirectly impact outcomes by means of ALC preservation.

Pulmonary function in stereotactic body radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for primary and metastatic lung lesions

AIMS

This retrospective study reports outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as delivered by helical tomotherapy (HT) for lung lesions. It promotes a dose escalation program.

METHODS

Histological and/or radiological findings and/or case histories identified 41 primary and 15 metastatic lesions. Thirty patients received 40 Gy in 5 fractions (BED 72 Gy_10Gy) and 26 50 Gy in 5 fractions (BED 100Gy_10Gy). Primary end point was lung toxicity. Secondary end points were respiratory function, local control and local progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity developed in 18/56 patients and late toxicity in 8/54. Median FEV-1 variations versus baseline were - 0.5% (range - 16 to + 43%) at 6 months and - 4.00% (range - 42 to + 18%) at 24 months. Median DLCO variations versus baseline were - 1% (range - 38 to + 36%) at 6 months and - 12.2% (range - 48 to + 11%) at 24 months. At 6 months, a significant positive correlation emerged between FEV-1 change and KPS (p = 0.047). At 24 months, a significant negative correlation emerged between FEV-1 change and the ipsilateral lung V5 (p = 0.006). A low baseline DLCO correlated with more marked DLCO worsening at 6 months (p = 0.012). At 24 months, DLCO worsening correlated significantly with the median contralateral lung dose (p = 0.003). At the last checkup, 23 patients were in complete remission, 16 were in partial remission, 5 had stable disease, and 7 were in relapse. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 5-56).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with lung disease, SBRT, as delivered by HT, was well tolerated and provided good local control.

Tomotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer might increase bone marrow toxicity in comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy

This study compares dosimetric parameters in these following 3 neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) methods in treating locally advanced esophagus cancer: helical tomotherapy (TOMO), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). It is aimed to ascertain the efficient technique that kept high target coverage and availed the dose sparing of bone marrow (BM). This research collected data on 11 patients from October 2014 to June 2017 who received NCRT for pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer. The prescription doses to the planning target volume (PTV) were all given as 60 Gy (2 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week). Three physicists via Varian Eclipse Treatment Planning System and Accuray planning stations redesigned 5 radiotherapy plans (fixed 5-field IMRT, fixed 7-field IMRT, 2-arc VMAT, 3-arc VMAT, and TOMO) for each of the patients. At the end of the planning, we then appraised the dosimetric quality based on the PTV parameters and the doses to organs at risk (OARs). In the study VMAT reached the highest conformity index (CI; 2 arcs VMAT: 0.74 ± 0.10; 3 arcs VMAT: 0.78 ± 0.07; p< 0.05), and IMRT the lowest homogeneity index (HI; fivefields IMRT: 0.12 ± 0.03; sevenfields IMRT: 0.10 ± 0.02; p< 0.05). Besides, 7 fields IMRT (0.10 ± 0.02) achieved superior HI to that of 5 fields IMRT (0.12 ± 0.03, p< 0.01). TOMO (p< 0.05) and VMAT (p< 0.05) were both significantly superior to IMRT in terms of the dose to lung (V₅, V₁₀, V₁₅, V₂₀, and V₃₀). These 5 radiation techniques were similar regarding the dose to heart (V₅, V₂₀, and V₃₀), but IMRT (5 fields IMRT: 19.27 ± 5.33; 7 fields IMRT: 20.05 ± 4.19) significantly raised the dose to the V₅₀ of the heart when compared to VMAT (2 arcs VMAT: 16.6 ± 5.68; 3 arcs VMAT: 15.04 ± 5.75; p< 0.05) and TOMO (15.05 ± 4.7, p< 0.05). VMAT reduced the dose to BM (V₅, V₁₀, V₂₀, and V₃₀) as compared to TOMO (p< 0.05) and IMRT (p< 0.05). The CI of VMAT was the supreme one in those of the techniques in this study, so was the HI of IMRT. VMAT also provided another advantage that it reduced the dose to the BM. TOMO ameliorated the dose sparing of the lung, but the dose that the BM absorbed from TOMO was of some concern about BM toxicity.

Evaluation of organ-at-risk dose reduction with jaw tracking technique in flattening filter-free beams in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

(i) to investigate the capability of organ-at-risk (OAR) dose reduction with the jaw tracking (JT) technique in flattening filter-free (FFF) beams in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), (ii) to propose a novel metric to quantify the jaw movements during JT, and (iii) to examine the relationships between the quantified jaw movements and reduction rate of OAR doses.

METHODS

The individual SBRT plans with volumetric modulated arc therapy using the JT technique (JT-VMAT) and VMAT plans with a fixed jaw (FJ-VMAT) were created for 15 patients, and dosimetric parameters were compared. A jaw tracking complexity score (JTCS) was defined and compared with the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) modulation complexity score (MCS). The correlations between the JTCS and reduction rate of OAR doses were examined.

RESULTS

The decrease of OARs doses was statistically significant in the JT-VMAT plans (1.2% in V20 of the lung and <1% in all other OARs). The correlations between the JTCS and MCS were not significant. There were significant correlations between the JTCS and the reduction rates in V₂₀, V_2.5, and D_mean of the lung, D_1% of the spinal cord, and D_90% of the body.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant decrease of dosimetric parameters of OARs was found with JT-VMAT in FFF beams. This reduction is very small and probably not clinically relevant. JTCS, a novel metric to quantify the jaw movements during JT, was proposed, and the complexity of jaw movements did not correlate with that of the movements of MLC leaves. There were significant correlations between the JTCS and some dosimetric parameters of OARs.

The Dosimetric Comparisons of CRT, IMRT, ARC, CRT+IMRT, and CRT+ARC of Postoperative Radiotherapy in IIIA-N2 Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Currently, studies about PORT in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients in recent years have mostly adopted the conformal radiation therapy (CRT) technique, while other modern techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT, hereinafter referred to as ARC), helical tomotherapy (HT), and so forth are also developing quickly. In this paper, we intended to compare the dosimetric characteristics of CRT, IMRT, ARC, CRT+IMRT, and CRT+ARC of PORT in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. Ten patients with stage IIIA-N2 completely resected NSCLC, whom were treated by PORT in the radiotherapy department of our hospital from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2018, were randomly selected in this study. For each patient, the CRT plan, IMRT plan, ARC plan, CRT+IMRT plan, and CRT+ARC plan were designed separately on the same set of CT images. The isodose distribution and dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the five plans were compared to determine the dosimetric parameters of the targets, OAR (organs at risk), and the normal tissue (defined as body subtracted to PTV (planning target volume), B-P). No plan had absolute dosimetry advantages than any other plans. In clinical practice, the plans could be chosen according to their dosimetry characteristics.

Radiation Pneumonitis after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Institutional Data and a Systematic Review

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a serious complication that can occur after thoracic radiotherapy. The goal of this study is to investigate the incidence of RP after radiochemotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with esophageal cancer and correlate this with dose volume histogram (DVH) related parameters. For this purpose, the clinical course of 73 patients was evaluated and irradiation doses to the lungs were extracted from radiotherapy treatment plans. Furthermore, a systematic review on this topic was conducted across PubMed. In our institutional cohort, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade II or higher RP occurred in four patients (5.5%). The systematic review identified 493 titles of which 19 studies reporting 874 patients qualified for the final analysis. No grade IV or V RP after radiochemotherapy with IMRT for esophageal cancer was reported in the screened literature. Grade II or higher RP is reported in 6.6% of the patients. A higher incidence can be seen with increasing values for lung V20. In conclusion, our institutional data and the literature consistently show a low incidence of symptomatic RP after radiochemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer treated with IMRT. However, efforts should be made to keep the lung V20 below 23% and specific caution is warranted in patients with pre-existing lung conditions.

Dosimetric effects of the kV based image-guided radiation therapy of prone breast external beam radiation: Towards the optimized imaging frequency

PURPOSE

For prone breast treatment, daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allows couch shifting to correct breast position relative to the treatment field. This work investigates the dosimetric effect of reducing kV imaging frequencies and the feasibility of optimizing the frequency using patient anatomy or their first 3-day shifts.

METHOD

Thirty-seven prone breast patients who had been treated with skin marker alignment followed by daily kV were retrospectively analyzed. Three IGRT schemes (daily-kV, weekly-kV, no-kV) were simulated, assuming that fractions with kV imaging deliver a dose distribution equivalent to that in computed tomography (CT) planning, whereas other fractions yield a dose distribution as recreated by shifting the CT plan isocenter back to its position before the couch shift was applied. Treatment dose to targets (breast and lumpectomy cavity [LPC]) and organs at risks (OAR)s (heart, ipsilateral lung) in different schemes were calculated. Patient anatomy information on CT plans and first 3-day couch shift data were analyzed to investigate whether these factors could guide imaging scheme optimization.

RESULTS

When kV imaging frequency was reduced, the percentage dose changes (δD) for breast and LPC objectives (average <1%) were smaller than those for heart and lung (average 28%-31% for D_mean ). In general, the δD of no-kV imaging was approximately that of weekly kV imaging × a factor of 1.2-1.4. Although most dose objectives were not affected, the potential higher heart dose may be of concern. No strong correlation was found between δD for different kV frequencies and patient anatomy size/distance or the first 3-day couch shift data.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite resulting in lower imaging dose, time, cost, and similar target coverage, a reduction in kV imaging frequency may introduce higher heart complication risk. Daily kVs are needed more in left-sided breast patients. A less frequent imaging schedule, if considered, cannot be individually optimized using CT anatomic features or early shift data.

Early outcomes of breast cancer patients treated with post-mastectomy uniform scanning proton therapy

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy proton radiotherapy improves normal tissue sparing in comparison to photon-based approaches. Several studies have reported dosimetry comparison and tolerable acute toxicity profile with limited follow-up. We report our institutional experience of postmastectomy proton radiation including clinical efficacy and toxicities.

METHODS

From December 2013 to February 2015, 42 consecutive patients who received mastectomy for non-metastatic breast cancer were treated with adjuvant chest wall and regional nodal proton therapy at a single proton center. 3D conformal uniform scanning with en face matching fields was used.

RESULTS

The median follow-up among patients was 35 months (range 1-55 months). There was one local failure, zero regional nodal failure, and six distant failures. The 3-year rate of locoregional disease-free survival was 96.3%, metastasis-free survival was 84.1%, and overall survival was 97.2%. The only local failure event occurred on the chest wall within the radiation field, approximately 2.5 years after the completion of radiation. Skin dermatitis, fatigue, and esophagitis were the most common acute toxicity. All patients developed grade 1 or 2 acute skin toxicity and there was no grade 3 or 4 acute skin toxicity. Proton radiation is able to achieve excellent target coverage with median PTV V95 over 95% and heart sparing with median mean heart dose less than 1 Gy (RBE).

CONCLUSION

With close to three years of median follow-up, post-mastectomy proton radiation has shown excellent locoregional control rates and favorable toxicity profile. Long-term adverse effect of heart-sparing radiation will require longer follow-up time and randomized clinical trials.

Impact of Tumor Size on Local Control and Pneumonitis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Tumors

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly used to treat primary or oligometastatic malignancies in the lung, but most of the available data that describe the safety and efficacy of SBRT are for smaller tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor size, among other factors, on local control (LC) and radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients who received lung SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included 144 patients with 100 primary (57.1%) and 75 metastatic (42.9%) lung tumors treated with SBRT between 2012 and 2018. Measurements of tumor size, treatment volume, histology, and radiation dose were evaluated for association with LC. Additional factors evaluated for association with the development of symptomatic RP included volume of the lung, heart, and central airway exposed to relevant doses of radiation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 15.0 months (interquartile range, 8.0-26.0 months). LC rates at 12 and 24 months posttreatment were 95.1% and 92.7%, respectively. LC at 1 year was higher for tumors <5 cm in diameter than for tumors >5 cm in diameter (98.2% vs 79.8%, respectively; P < .01). On univariate analysis, LC was associated with a smaller gross tumor volume (GTV) diameter (P < .01), GTV volume (P < .01), planning target volume (PTV) diameter (P < .01), PTV volume (P < .01), and larger PTV-to-GTV ratio (P = .04). Tumor histology and treatment intent were not correlated with LC. RP was associated with a higher ipsilateral lung mean lung dose (P = .02), V_2.5 (P = .03), V₅ (P = .02), V₁₃ (P = .03), V₂₀ (P = .05), V₃₀ (P = .02), V₄₀ (P = .02), and V₅₀ (P = .03), and several similar total lung dose parameters and heart maximum point dose (P = .02). The optimal mean ipsilateral lung dose cutoff predictive of RP was 8.6 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

A larger tumor size and smaller PTV-to-GTV ratio was associated with local recurrence of lung tumors treated with SBRT, but ipsilateral lung doses were most associated with symptomatic RP.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide Is Useful in Symptomatic Radioactive Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study

The aim was to defect the exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) prediction value of symptomatic radioactive pneumonia (SRP). 64 cases of lung cancer or esophagus cancer, who had the primary radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiation therapy), were included from 2015 June to 2016 January. During the following, the patients were divided: the symptomatic radiation pneumonia group (SRP, with the CTCAE v4.0 score > 2) and the asymptomatic radiation pneumonia group (ASRP, with CTCAE v4.0 score ≤ 1). All the patients were measured eNO before and at the end of thoracic radiotherapy and gain the posttherapy eNO value and the eNO ratio (posttherapy eNO value/pretherapy eNO value), then the predictive values of eNO toward SRP were measured using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). 17 cases were included in the SRP group and the other 47 were included in the ASRP group. The posttherapy eNO was 29.35 (19~60) bbp versus 20.646 (11~37) (P < 0.001), and the ratio was 1.669 (0.61~3.5) versus 0.920 (0.35~1.5) (P < 0.01) (symptomatic versus asymptomatic). ROC showed that the cutoff value of SRP was 19.5 bbp (posttherapy eNO, area under concentration-time curve (AUC) = 0.879) and 1.305 (eNO ratio, AUC = 0.774), which meant that posttherapy eNO and eNO ratio were useful in finding SRP.

Dosimetric comparison of three intensity-modulated radiation therapies for left breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate dosimetric differences of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in target and normal tissues after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS

IMRT five-field plan I, IMRT six-field plan II, and field-in-field-direct machine parameter optimization-IMRT plan III were designed for each of the 50 patients. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare differences, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Homogeneity index of plan III is lower than those of plans I and II. No difference was identified in conformity index of targets. Plan I exhibited difference in mean dose (D_mean ) for the heart (P < 0.05). Plan I featured smaller irradiation dose volumes in V₅ , V₂₀ (P < 0.05) of the left lung than II. Plan I exhibited significantly higher V₅ in the right lung than plans II and III (P < 0.05). Under plan I, irradiation dose at V₅ in the right breast is higher than that in plans II and III. Patients in plan III presented less total monitor unit and total treatment time than those in plans I and II (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IMRT six-field plans II, and field-in-field-direct machine parameter optimization-IMRT plans III can reduce doses and volumes to the lungs and heart better while maintaining satisfying conformity index and homogeneity index of target. Nevertheless, plan II neglects target movements caused by respiration. In the same manner, plan III can substantially reduce MU and shorten patient treatment time. Therefore, plan III, which considers target movement caused by respiration, is a more practical radiation mode.

Hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for lung malignancies by means of helical tomotherapy: report of feasibility by a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Several experiences in the literature report SBRT as an effective treatment option for medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and oligometastatic disease. The optimal fractionation schedules and total dose remain controversial. In this study, we evaluated the safety in terms of toxicity and efficacy of using of 8-10 fractions schedules with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) for primary and metastatic lung lesions.

METHODS

Between March 2014 and May 2016, a total of 39 patients (median age 72 years, range 26-91) were treated with HT-SBRT for malignant lung lesions: 22 patients with early stage NSCLC, 17 with oligometastases. Patients received 8-10 fractions with lower daily dose for central and ultracentral lesions. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated using CTCAE v 4.0 scale. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity rates were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

Median duration of RT was 15 days (range 10-26 days) and no interruption occurred. With a median follow-up of 13 months (range 3-29), we reported one G2 pneumonitis (2.6%) and one G2 chest pain (2.6%); no ≥ G2 esophagitis was registered. Actuarial local control rate was 95.5% both at 12 and 24 months for early stage NSCLC and 92.9% both at 12 and 24 months for metastatic patients. OS rate was 94.4 and 92.3% at 1 year, and 94.4 and 83.9% at 2 years in primary and metastatic group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 8-10 fractions schedule HT-SBRT for lung malignancies results in high LC and OS rates with minimal toxicities reported.

Whole breast and regional nodal irradiation in prone versus supine position in left sided breast cancer

Background

Prone whole breast irradiation (WBI) leads to reduced heart and lung doses in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. In this feasibility trial, we investigated the prone position for whole breast + lymph node irradiation (WB + LNI).

Methods

A new support device was developed for optimal target coverage, on which patients are positioned in a position resembling a phase from the crawl swimming technique (prone crawl position). Five left sided breast cancer patients were included and simulated in supine and prone position. For each patient, a treatment plan was made in prone and supine position for WB + LNI to the whole axilla and the unoperated part of the axilla. Patients served as their own controls for comparing dosimetry of target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) in prone versus in supine position.

Results

Target volume coverage differed only slightly between prone and supine position. Doses were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in prone position for ipsilateral lung (Dmean, D2, V5, V10, V20, V30), contralateral lung (Dmean, D2), contralateral breast (Dmean, D2 and for total axillary WB + LNI also V5), thyroid (Dmean, D2, V5, V10, V20, V30), oesophagus (Dmean and for partial axillary WB + LNI also D2 and V5), skin (D2 and for partial axillary WB + LNI V105 and V107). There were no significant differences for heart and humeral head doses.

Conclusions

Prone crawl position in WB + LNI allows for good breast and nodal target coverage with better sparing of ipsilateral lung, thyroid, contralateral breast, contralateral lung and oesophagus when compared to supine position. There is no difference in heart and humeral head doses.

Trial registration

No trial registration was performed because there were no therapeutic interventions.

Constraints for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis of helical tomotherapy hypofractionated simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy for pulmonary metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was aimed to identify the clinical and dosimetric parameters that predict symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (SRP, radiation pneumonitis≥2 grade) in patients with pulmonary metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after helical tomotherapy (HT) hypofractionated simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

62 patients with 407 pulmonary metastases from HCC were consecutively treated with HT. The median radiation dose was a 49.7Gy in 4.0Gy/fraction to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). The associations between the clinical and dosimetric data and incidences of SRP were analyzed. The dose-pneumonitis relationship was analyzed based on Biologically Effective Dose (BED).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that the gross tumor volume (GTV), PTV, median lung dose (MLD), the number of pulmonary metastatic lesions (NPML), and the percentage of non-target normal lung (NTNL) volume receiving more than a BED of 3-50Gy (V_BED3-50) were associated with SRP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that V_BED20 and NPML were significant parameters (both P<0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that SRP can be predicted with NPML>5 and V_BED20≥30.4% with the α/β ratio of 3Gy.

Treatment outcomes and patterns of radiologic appearance after hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy (HHT) for lung tumours

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes and patterns of CT lung injury after hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy (HHT) in a series of inoperable lung lesions.

METHODS

68 patients who were medically inoperable (69 lesions) without evidence of viable extrathoracic disease were included. Dose prescription was driven by tumour location (hilar/pericentral vs peripheral) and/or target volume. 52% of the lesions received a biological equivalent dose (BED10) ≥100 Gy. Assessment of tumour response was based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria coupled with fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography-CT. Toxicity monitoring was focused on treatment-related pulmonary adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.0. Acute and late events were classified as radiation pneumonitis (RP) and radiation fibrosis (RF), respectively. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-31 months), no instances of ≥Grade 4 RP was documented, and clinically severe (Grade 3) RP occurred in 5.8% of the patients. 2 (3%) patients developed a late severe (≥Grade 3) symptomatic RF. No specific pattern of CT lung injury was demonstrated, in both acute and late settings. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire population were 30.8 and 14.1 months, respectively. At multivariate analysis (MVA), BED10 ≥ 100 Gy and KPS ≥ 90 emerged as significant prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively), and BED10 ≥ 100 Gy for PFS (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that HHT adjusted for tumour location and/or target volume is an effective treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients who are medically inoperable with lung tumours and is not associated with a specific pattern of lung injury. Therefore, it can represent a viable option when conventional stereotactic ablative radiotherapy facilities are not available. Advances in knowledge: The present study is among the largest series addressing the role of HHT for inoperable lung tumours. This technique is safe and effective and is not associated with a specific pattern of lung injury, at least at early and average time points.

Patterns of CT lung injury and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy in early stage medically inoperable NSCLC

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate toxicity and patterns of radiologic lung injury on CT images after hypofractionated image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) in medically early stage inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

28 elderly patients (31 lesions) with compromised pulmonary reserve were deemed inoperable and enrolled to undergo SBRT. Patterns of lung injury based on CT appearance were assessed at baseline and during follow up. Acute (6 months or less) and late (more than 6 months) events were classified as radiation pneumonitis and radiation fibrosis (RF), respectively.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 4-20 months), 31 and 25 lesions were examined for acute and late injuries, respectively. Among the former group, 25 (80.6%) patients showed no radiological changes. The CT appearance of RF revealed modified conventional, mass-like and scar-like patterns in three, four and three lesions, respectively. No evidence of late lung injury was demonstrated in 15 lesions. Five patients developed clinical pneumonitis (four patients, grade 2 and one patient, grade 3, respectively), and none of whom had CT findings at 3 months post-treatment. No instance of symptomatic RF was detected. The tumour response rate was 84% (complete response + partial response). Local control was 83% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that HT-SBRT can be considered an effective treatment with a mild toxicity profile in medically inoperable patients with early stage NSCLC. No specific pattern of lung injury was demonstrated.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Our study is among the few showing that HT-SBRT represents a safe and effective option in patients with early stage medically inoperable NSCLC, and that it is not associated with a specific pattern of lung injury.

Early toxicity in patients treated with postoperative proton therapy for locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

To report dosimetry and early toxicity data in breast cancer patients treated with postoperative proton radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 2013 to April 2014, 30 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer and no history of prior radiation were treated with proton therapy at a single proton center. Patient characteristics and dosimetry were obtained through chart review. Patients were seen weekly while on treatment, at 1 month after radiation therapy completion, and at 3- to 6-month intervals thereafter. Toxicity was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Frequencies of toxicities were tabulated.

RESULTS

Median dose delivered was 50.4 Gy (relative biological equivalent [RBE]) in 5 weeks. Target volumes included the breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes including the internal mammary lymph nodes (in 93%). No patients required a treatment break. Among patients with >3 months of follow-up (n=28), grade 2 dermatitis occurred in 20 patients (71.4%), with 8 (28.6%) experiencing moist desquamation. Grade 2 esophagitis occurred in 8 patients (28.6%). Grade 3 reconstructive complications occurred in 1 patient. The median planning target volume V95 was 96.43% (range, 79.39%-99.60%). The median mean heart dose was 0.88 Gy (RBE) [range, 0.01-3.20 Gy (RBE)] for all patients, and 1.00 Gy (RBE) among patients with left-sided tumors. The median V20 of the ipsilateral lung was 16.50% (range, 6.1%-30.3%). The median contralateral lung V5 was 0.34% (range, 0%-5.30%). The median maximal point dose to the esophagus was 45.65 Gy (RBE) [range, 0-65.4 Gy (RBE)]. The median contralateral breast mean dose was 0.29 Gy (RBE) [range, 0.03-3.50 Gy (RBE)].

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative proton therapy is well tolerated, with acceptable rates of skin toxicity. Proton therapy favorably spares normal tissue without compromising target coverage. Further follow-up is necessary to assess for clinical outcomes and cardiopulmonary toxicities.