Morbidity among Israeli paediatric travellers

Infections diagnosed in children and young people screened for malaria in UK emergency departments: a retrospective multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Data on imported infections in children and young people (CYP) are sparse.

AIMS

To describe imported infections in CYP arriving from malaria-endemic areas and presenting to UK emergency departments (ED) who were screened for malaria.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multi-centre, observational study nested in a diagnostic accuracy study for malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Any CYP < 16 years presenting to a participating ED with a history of fever and travel to a malaria-endemic area between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 and who had a malaria screen as a part of standard care were included. Geographical risk was calculated for the most common tropical infections.

RESULTS

Of the 1414 CYP screened for malaria, 44.0% (n = 622) arrived from South Asia and 33.3% (n = 471) from sub-Saharan Africa. Half (50.0%) had infections common in both tropical and non-tropical settings such as viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI); 21.0% of infections were coded as tropical if gastro-enteritis is included, with a total of 4.2% (60) cases of malaria. CYP diagnosed with malaria were 7.44 times more likely to have arrived from sub-Saharan Africa than from South Asia (OR 7.44, 3.78-16.41).

CONCLUSION

A fifth of CYP presenting to participating UK EDs with fever and a history of travel to a malaria-endemic area and who were screened for malaria had a tropical infection if diarrhoea is included. A third of CYP had no diagnosis. CYP arriving from sub-Saharan Africa had the greatest risk of malaria.Abbreviations: CYP: children and young people; ED: emergency department; PERUKI: Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland; RDT: rapid diagnostic test; VFR: visiting friends and relatives.

Implementation strategies for the first licensed dengue vaccine: A meeting report

Dengue vaccination would enhance the control of dengue, one of the most frequent vector-borne viral diseases globally. CYD-TDV is the first dengue vaccine to be licensed, but global uptake has been hampered due to its use being limited to seropositive persons aged 9 years and above, and the need for a 3-dose schedule. The Partnership for Dengue Control (PDC) organized a meeting with key opinion leaders and stakeholders to deliberate on implementation strategies for the use of CYD-TDV. New data have emerged that support the shortening of the primary schedule from a 3 to 2 dose schedule, extending the age range below 9 to 6 years of age, and expanding the indication from endemic populations to also include travelers to endemic areas. Cost-effectiveness may improve with the modified 2-dose regimen and with multiple testing. Strategies to implement a dengue vaccination program have been developed, in particular school-based strategies. A range of delivery scenarios can then be considered, using various settings for each step of the intervention. However, several challenges remain, including communication about limiting the use of this vaccine to seropositive individuals only. Affordability will vary from country to country, as will government commitment and community acceptance. Well-tailored communication strategies that target key stakeholders are expected to make up a significant part of any future dengue vaccination program.

Dengue vaccine development by the year 2020: challenges and prospects

The first licensed dengue vaccine led to considerable controversy, and to date, no dengue vaccine is in widespread use. All three leading dengue vaccine candidates are live attenuated vaccines, with the main difference between them being the type of backbone and the extent of chimerization. While CYD-TDV (the first licensed dengue vaccine) does not include non-structural proteins of dengue, TAK-003 contains the dengue virus serotype 2 backbone, and the Butantan/Merck vaccine contains three full-genomes of the four dengue virus serotypes. While dengue-primed individuals can already benefit from vaccination against all four serotypes with the first licensed dengue vaccine CYD-TDV, the need for dengue-naive population has not yet been met. To improve tetravalent protection, sequential vaccination should be considered in addition to a heterologous prime-boost approach.

Conduite à tenir devant un enfant fébrile au retour de voyage☆

Les pathologies le plus fréquentes au retour de voyage à l’étranger sont les infections gastro-intestinales, les maladies fébriles et les problèmes dermatologiques. L’évaluation d’un enfant fébrile de retour de voyage est clinique : vérification des antécédents et des vaccinations, recherche d’autres cas au contact, signes fonctionnels et physiques, caractéristiques du voyage. Un bilan paraclinique de débrouillage complète souvent l’évaluation pour une orientation syndromique. Si les causes de fièvre sont surtout cosmopolites, la gravité des pathologies exotiques doit les faire rechercher en priorité. Le paludisme doit être évoqué devant toute fièvre en provenance d’Afrique subsaharienne. Le diagnostic repose sur l’association d’un frottis sanguin et d’un test sensible (goutte épaisse, polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) ou d’un test de diagnostic rapide (pour Plasmodium [P ]. falciparum ). Les critères clinicobiologiques de gravité sont essentiels pour orienter et traiter le patient. En cas d’accès non compliqué à P. falciparum , le traitement repose sur une thérapie combinée à base d’artémisinine (ACT), artéméther-luméfantrine ou arténimol-pipéraquine. Les accès graves sont traités par l’artésunate intraveineux, puis un ACT oral. Dengue, chikungunya et infection à virus Zika ont des caractéristiques cliniques communes (association fièvre-éruption-arthralgies, traitement symptomatique). En cas de dengue, il faut surveiller l’apparition de signes d’alerte qui pourraient faire craindre une évolution péjorative. Le chikungunya est grave en cas de transmission per partum, avec un risque d’encéphalite néonatale. Chez l’enfant, le Zika est a- ou peu symptomatique. Mais en cas d’infection pendant une grossesse, le risque est celui d’une embryofœtopathie. Le diagnostic de ces arboviroses repose sur la PCR à la phase aiguë et la sérologie secondairement. La symptomatologie de la typhoïde est peu spécifique, justifiant la pratique d’hémocultures systématiques devant une fièvre du retour. Son traitement repose sur les céphalosporines de troisième génération ou la ciprofloxacine, mais les résistances augmentent. Au total, la diversité des étiologies d’une fièvre de retour et la gravité potentielle des infections importées imposent une réflexion sur le parcours de soins de ces patients, en particulier vis-à-vis du risque de fièvre hémorragique.

A Prospective Study on the Impact and Out-of-Pocket Costs of Dengue Illness in International Travelers

Although the costs of dengue illness to patients and households have been extensively studied in endemic populations, international travelers have not been the focus of costing studies. As globalization and human travel activities intensify, travelers are increasingly at risk for emerging and reemerging infectious diseases, such as dengue. This exploratory study aims to investigate the impact and out-of-pocket costs of dengue illness among travelers. We conducted a prospective study in adult travelers with laboratory-confirmed dengue and recruited patients at travel medicine clinics in eight different countries from December 2013 to December 2015. Using a structured questionnaire, we collected information on patients and their health-care utilization and out-of-pocket expenditures, as well as income and other financial losses they incurred because of dengue illness. A total of 90 patients participated in the study, most of whom traveled for tourism (74%) and visited countries in Asia (82%). Although 22% reported hospitalization and 32% receiving ambulatory care while traveling, these percentages were higher at 39% and 71%, respectively, after returning home. The out-of-pocket direct and indirect costs of dengue illness were US$421 (SD 744) and US$571 (SD 1,913) per episode, respectively, averaging to a total out-of-pocket cost of US$992 (SD 2,052) per episode. The study findings suggest that international travelers incur important direct and indirect costs because of dengue-related illness. This study is the first to date to investigate the impact and out-of-pocket costs of travel-related dengue illness from the patient's perspective and paves the way for future economic burden studies in this population.

Dengue vaccine development: status and future

Dengue, the most common arbovirus, represents an increasingly significant cause of morbidity worldwide, including in travelers. After decades of research, the first dengue vaccine was licensed in 2015: CYD-TDV, a tetravalent live attenuated vaccine with a yellow fever vaccine backbone. Recent analyses have shown that vaccine performance is dependent on serostatus. In those who have had a previous dengue infection, i.e., who are seropositive, the efficacy is high and the vaccine is safe. However, in seronegative vaccinees, approximately 3 years after vaccination the vaccine increases the risk of developing severe dengue when the individual experiences a natural dengue infection.

The World Health Organization recommends that this vaccine be administered only to seropositive individuals. Current efforts are underway to develop rapid diagnostic tests to facilitate prevaccination screening. Two second-generation dengue vaccine candidates, both also live attenuated recombinant vaccines in late-stage development, may not present the same limitations because of differences in the backbone used, but results of phase 3 trials need to be available before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Dengue is increasingly frequent in travelers, but the only licensed dengue vaccine to date can be used only in seropositive individuals. However, the vast majority of travelers are seronegative. Furthermore, the primary series of three doses given 6 months apart renders this vaccine difficult in the travel medicine context.

Traveler's diarrhea in children: New insights and existing gaps

The number of children accompanying their parents in international travel is increasing steadily, and with the rising global migration, children more frequently accompany their parents or caregivers for visiting friends or relatives (VFR). As compared to travel for tourism, VFR children are at higher risk of acquiring local diseases, as they more often stay in rural areas in resource-poor locations, have longer periods of visit, are less likely to attend pre-travel consultations, and less frequently adhere to recommended precautions. Travelers's diarrhea (TD) is the most common travel-associated illnesses in children. This review updates the existing knowledge on TD in children, regarding its distinctive epidemiology, risk factors, preventive measures, clinical manifestations, complications, causative microorganisms and management. Despite the limited focused research on pediatric TD, which challenges the formulation of children-oriented evidence-based guidelines, practical recommendations are suggested.

Pediatric Travelers and Immigrant Children

Children comprise a special group of international travelers. Immigrant and refugee children, along with children traveling to visit friends and relatives abroad or on leisure trips, require special attention by clinicians to prevent and treat travel-related conditions. [Pediatr Ann. 2019;48(9):e360-e369.].

Pre-vaccination screening strategies for the use of the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine: A meeting report

The first licensed dengue vaccine, CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia) is efficacious in seropositive individuals, but increases the risk for severe dengue in seronegative persons about two years after administration of the first dose. For countries considering the introduction of Dengvaxia, WHO recommends a pre-vaccination screening strategy whereby only persons with evidence of a past dengue infection would be vaccinated. Policy-makers need to consider the risk-benefit of vaccination strategies based on such screening tests, the optimal age to introduce the vaccine, communication and implementation strategies. To address these questions, the Global Dengue and Aedes-transmitted diseases Consortium (GDAC) organized a 3-day workshop in January 2019 with country representatives from Asia and Latin America. The meeting discussions highlighted many challenges in introducing Dengvaxia, in terms of screening test characteristics, costs of such tests combined with a 3-dose schedule, logistics, achieving high coverage rates, vaccine confidence and communication; more challenges than for any other vaccine introduction programme. A screening test would require a high specificity to minimize individual risk, and at the same time high sensitivity to maximize individual and population benefit. The underlying seroprevalence dependent positive predictive value is the best indicator for an acceptable safety profile of a pre-vaccination screening strategy. The working groups discussed many possible implementation strategies. Addressing the bottlenecks in school-based vaccine introduction for Dengvaxia will also benefit other vaccines such as HPV and booster doses for tetanus and pertussis. Levels of public trust are highly variable and context specific, and understanding of population perceptions and concerns is essential to tailor interventions, monitor and mitigate risks.

Conducta práctica ante un niño febril al regresar de un viaje

Las enfermedades más frecuentes al regresar de un viaje al extranjero son las infecciones gastrointestinales, las enfermedades febriles y los problemas dermatológicos. La evaluación de un niño febril al regreso de un viaje es clínica: verificación de los antecedentes y las vacunaciones, búsqueda de otros casos en contacto, signos funcionales y físicos, y características del viaje. Unas pruebas complementarias de rutina completan a menudo la evaluación para una orientación sindrómica. Si bien las causas de fiebre son, sobre todo, cosmopolitas, la gravedad de la enfermedad exótica obliga a buscarlas prioritariamente. El paludismo debe sospecharse ante una fiebre procedente de África subsahariana. El diagnóstico se basa en la asociación de un frotis sanguíneo y una prueba sensible (gota gruesa, reacción en cadena de la polimerasa [PCR]) o una prueba de diagnóstico rápido (para Plasmodium falciparum ). Los criterios clínico-biológicos de gravedad son esenciales para orientar y tratar al paciente. En caso de acceso no complicado por P. falciparum, el tratamiento se basa en un tratamiento combinado a base de artemisinina (ACT), arteméter-lumefantrina o artenimol-piperaquina. Los accesos graves se tratan con artesunato intravenoso, seguido de ACT oral. Dengue, chikungunya e infección por virus Zika tienen características clínicas comunes (fiebre-erupción-artralgias, tratamiento sintomático). En caso de dengue, conviene controlar la aparición de signos de alerta, que podrían hacer temer una evolución negativa. El chikungunya es grave en caso de transmisión en el parto, con un riesgo de encefalitis neonatal. En el niño, el Zika es asintomático o poco sintomático. Pero, en caso de infección durante el embarazo, el riesgo es el de una embriofetopatía. El diagnóstico de estas arbovirosis se basa en la PCR en la fase aguda y en la serología secundariamente. La sintomatología de la fiebre tifoidea es poco específica, lo cual justifica la práctica de hemocultivos sistemáticos ante una fiebre tras un viaje. Su tratamiento se basa en las cefalosporinas de tercera generación o el ciprofloxacino, pero las resistencias aumentan. En suma, la diversidad de las etiologías de una fiebre al regreso de un viaje y la potencial gravedad de las infecciones importadas imponen una reflexión sobre el proceso de tratamiento de estos pacientes, en especial en lo referente al riesgo de fiebre hemorrágica.

What do we know about travel for children with special health care needs? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Children travel with their families, including children with chronic illness. We know that adults with chronic illness who travel are more likely than their healthy peers to become sick while traveling. A review of the literature was undertaken to identify what is known about traveling with children with special health care needs and to identify gaps in our knowledge.

METHODS

An Online search of the PubMed, CINAHL and Google databases of English language literature was conducted June 2016, October 2017, June 2018 and April 2019 using the terms children and travel, air travel, travel health, disabled child, children with special healthcare needs, parents of disabled children, vacations, recreation, international, wheelchairs, planning techniques, asthma, diabetes, altitude, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, sickle cell disease, depression, food allergies, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and seizures. The search was limited to years 2000-2019. A secondary search of relevant articles was conducted using the reference sections of articles identified in the primary search.

RESULTS

185 papers were examined for travel health related outcomes for children and adults with chronic diseases. Articles were excluded if they addressed the educational needs of students with disabilities traveling abroad, did not directly address travel health (e.g travel skills, travel itineraries), contained outdated policy statements, or were case reports of a single patient. The remaining 84 papers were organized and reviewed by organ systems. The articles were primarily descriptive and did not lend themselves to a systematic review.

CONCLUSION

Children traveling with chronic and complex health conditions are a heterogeneous group of vulnerable travelers. Closing the knowledge gap about how to best help these travelers requires a multipronged approach. Research is urgently needed to identify best practices for five of the most common chronic childhood diseases: asthma, depression, ADHD, food allergies and autism. For less common illnesses, ones typically cared for in specialty clinics, expert consensus opinion and multi-center studies are needed. Families and disease advocacy societies should be included in the research as they may have already identified the most pressing travel-related health concerns and solutions for these problems.