OUP accepted manuscript

Point-of-care testing for early-stage liver cancer diagnosis and personalized medicine: Biomarkers, current technologies and perspectives

Liver cancer is a highly prevalent and lethal form of cancer worldwide. In the absence of early diagnosis, treatment options for this disease are severely restricted. Recent advancements in genomics and bioinformatics have facilitated the discovery of a multitude of novel biomarkers that accurately depict an individual's disease diagnosis, progression, and treatment response. Leveraging these breakthroughs, personalized medicine employs an individual's biomarker profile to enable early detection of liver cancer and inform decisions regarding treatment selection, dosage determination, and prognosis assessment. The current lack of readily applicable, timely, and economically viable tools for biomarker analysis has hindered the incorporation of personalized medicine into regular clinical procedures. Over the past decade, significant advancements have been achieved in the field of molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) and amplification techniques, leading to substantial improvements in the diagnosis of liver cancer and the implementation of precision medicine. Instrument-free PCR technology or plasma PCR technology can shorten the complex procedure of in vitro detection of nucleic acid-based biomarkers. Also, compared to traditional ELISA, various nanomaterials modified with monoclonal antibodies to target proteins for recognition, capture, and detection have improved the efficiency of protein-based biomarker detection. These advances have reduced the time and cost of clinical detection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma and improved the efficiency of timely diagnosis and survival of suspected patients while reducing unnecessary testing costs and procedures. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current and emerging biomarkers employed in the early detection of liver cancer, as well as the advancements in point-of-care molecular testing technology and platforms. The primary objective is to assess their potential in facilitating the implementation of personalized medicine. This review ultimately revealed that the diagnosis of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma not only requires sensitive biomarkers, but its various modifications and changes during the progression of cirrhosis to early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma will be a greater focus of our attention in the future. The rapid development of POCT has facilitated the opportunity to readily detect liver cancer in the general population in the future, and the integration of multi-pathway multiplexing and intelligent algorithms has improved the sensitivity and accuracy of early liver cancer biomarker detection. It is expected that the integration of point-of-care technology will be instrumental in the widespread adoption of personalized medicine in the foreseeable future.

Clinical significance of ribosome production factor 2 homolog in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Dysregulation of ribosome biogenesis increases the risk of cancer. RPF2 (ribosome production factor 2 homolog), a member of the BRIX family, is involved in ribosome biogenesis. However, the biological functions of RPF2 in HCC remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the function of RPF2 and its clinical significance in HCC. We collected 45 pairs of HCC/adjacent samples and 291 HCC samples. These samples were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis and western blot. Six cell lines were used to perform western blot, and two of cell lines, SMCC-7721 and SNU449, were subjected to CCK-8, wound healing and transwell assays. Immunofluorescence staining was executed in SMCC-7721 cells. The protein levels of RPF2 were higher in HCC tissues than in adjacent tissues. Immunofluorescence staining showed that the RPF2 protein was located in the nucleuses, especially the nucleolus. Furthermore, the immunohistochemical analysis showed that high expression levels of nuclear RPF2 correlated with poor prognosis, vascular invasion, liver cirrhosis and tumor size. Cell experiments showed that overexpression of RPF2 promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion, while knockdown of RPF2 tended to show the opposite effect. This is the first report that RPF2 is involved in HCC progression. The levels of RPF2 were significantly high in HCC tumors and had a side effect on prognosis in HCC patients. RPF2 has the potential to be a useful marker for HCC.

Protein Induced by Vitamin K Absence or Antagonist-II Versus Alpha-Fetoprotein in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Background

Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) are promising tumor markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, their diagnostic performance differs throughout HCC investigations. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of HCC.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant studies from eight databases, which were published up to February 2023, in order to compare the diagnostic performance of PIVKA-II and AFP for HCC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker.

Results

Fifty-three studies were identified. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.71 (0.70 - 0.72) and 0.64 (0.63 - 0.65), respectively in diagnosis of HCC, and the corresponding pooled specificity (95% CI) was 0.90 (0.89 - 0.90) and 0.87 (0.87 - 0.88), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.89 (0.88 - 0.90) and 0.78 (0.77 - 0.79), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PIVKA-II presented higher AUC values compared to AFP in terms of ethnic group (African, European, Asian, and American patients), etiology (mixed-type HCC, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related, and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related) and sample size of cases (≤ 100 and > 100).

Conclusion

This study reveals that PIVKA-II is a promising biomarker for identifying and tracking HCC, exhibiting greater accuracy than AFP. Our findings indicate that PIVKA-II outperforms AFP in detecting HCC across diverse racial groups and sample sizes, as well as in cases of HBV-related, HCV-related, or mixed-etiology HCC.