Additive Manufacturing for Fabrication of Point-of-Care Therapies in Austere Environments

INTRODUCTION

Known as the "golden hour," survival of most critically injured patients is highly dependent on providing the required treatment within the first hour of injury. Recent technological advances in additive manufacturing (also known as three-dimensional [3D] printing) allow for austere deployment and point-of-care rapid fabrication of a variety of medical supplies, including human tissues and bioactive bandages, in prolonged field care scenarios. In this pilot project, our aim was to investigate the ability to 3D print a range of potential biomedical supplies and solutions in an austere field environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We specifically designed and fabricated novel surgical tools, bioactive bandages, objects (screw and anatomic models), and human meniscal tissue in an austere African desert environment. A total of seven packages were sent using a commercial carrier directly to the end destination. A multi-tool ruggedized 3D printer was used as the manufacturing platform for all objects fabricated downrange. Human mesenchymal stem cells were shipped for 3D bioprinting of human menisci and bioactive bandages. Design and fabrication for all 3D-printed products utilized computer-aided design (CAD) tools.

RESULTS

Initial shipment from a single U.S. site to the sub-Saharan Africa location was relatively prompt, taking an average of 4.7 days to deliver three test packages. However, the actual delivery of the seven packages from Orlando, FL, to the same sub-Saharan Africa site took an average of 16 days (range 7-23 days). The ruggedized printer successfully fabricated relevant medical supplies using biocompatible filament, bioink hydrogels, and stem cell-loaded bioinks. This prototype did not, however, have the capacity to provide a sterile environment. A multi-material complete bandage was 3D printed using polyamide polyolefin and cellulose, live cells, neomycin salve, and adhesive. The bandage, wound covering backing, and adhesive backing print took under 2 min to 3D print. Surgical instrument CAD files were based on commercially available medical-grade stainless-steel instruments. The screw CAD file was downloaded from the NIH 3D Print Exchange website. The prints of the two surgical tools and screw using thermoplastic material were successful. Menisci, relatively complex forms of the cartilage, were 3D bioprinted with a gel that held their form well after printing and were then solidified slightly using a cross-linking solution. After 2 min of solidification, it was possible to remove and handle the menisci.

CONCLUSION

The current and future challenges of prolonged field care need to be addressed with new techniques, training, and technology. Ruggedized, deployable 3D printers allow for the direct fabrication of medical tools, supplies, and biological solutions for austere use. Delivery of packages can vary, and attention to routes and location is key, especially for transit of time-sensitive perishable supplies such as live cells. The significance of this study provides the real possibility to 3D print "just-in-time" medical solutions tailored to the need of an individual service member in any environment. This is a potentially exciting opportunity to bring critical products to the war front.

Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications

The fast-developing field of 3D bio-printing has been extensively used to improve the usability and performance of scaffolds filled with cells. Over the last few decades, a variety of tissues and organs including skin, blood vessels, and hearts, etc., have all been produced in large quantities via 3D bio-printing. These tissues and organs are not only able to serve as building blocks for the ultimate goal of repair and regeneration, but they can also be utilized as in vitro models for pharmacokinetics, drug screening, and other purposes. To further 3D-printing uses in tissue engineering, research on novel, suitable biomaterials with quick cross-linking capabilities is a prerequisite. A wider variety of acceptable 3D-printed materials are still needed, as well as better printing resolution (particularly at the nanoscale range), speed, and biomaterial compatibility. The aim of this study is to provide expertise in the most prevalent and new biomaterials used in 3D bio-printing as well as an introduction to the associated approaches that are frequently considered by researchers. Furthermore, an effort has been made to convey the most pertinent implementations of 3D bio-printing processes, such as tissue regeneration, etc., by providing the most significant research together with a comprehensive list of material selection guidelines, constraints, and future prospects.

3D Bio-printing For Skin Tissue Regeneration: Hopes and Hurdles

Abstract:

For many years, discovering the appropriate methods for the treatment of skin irritation has been challenging for specialists and researchers. Bio-printing can be extensively applied to address the demand for proper skin substitutes to improve skin damage. Nowadays, to make more effective bio-mimicking of natural skin, many research teams have developed cell-seeded bio-inks for bioprinting of skin substitutes. These loaded cells can be single or co-cultured in these structures. The present review gives a comprehensive overview of the methods, substantial parameters of skin bioprinting, examples of in vitro and in vivo studies, and current advances and challenges for skin tissue engineering.

The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities

Bioprinting is a relatively new yet evolving technique predominantly used in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. 3D bioprinting techniques combine the advantages of creating Extracellular Matrix (ECM)like environments for cells and computer-aided tailoring of predetermined tissue shapes and structures. The essential application of bioprinting is for the regeneration or restoration of damaged and injured tissues by producing implantable tissues and organs. The capability of bioprinting is yet to be fully scrutinized in sectors like the patient-specific spatial distribution of cells, bio-robotics, etc. In this review, currently developed experimental systems and strategies for the bioprinting of different types of tissues as well as for drug delivery and cancer research are explored for potential applications. This review also digs into the most recent opportunities and future possibilities for the efficient implementation of bioprinting to restructure medical and technological practices.