1
|
Hitchcock MM, Gomez CA, Pozdol J, Banaei N. Effective Approaches to Diagnostic Stewardship of Syndromic Molecular Panels. J Appl Lab Med 2024; 9:104-115. [PMID: 38167764 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfad063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Syndromic molecular panels for the diagnosis of gastroenteritis, meningitis/encephalitis, and pneumonia are becoming routinely used for patient care throughout the world. CONTENT These rapid, sample-to-answer assays have great potential to improve patient care, infection control, and antimicrobial stewardship. However, diagnostic stewardship is essential for their optimal use and accuracy, and interventions can be applied at all phases of the diagnostic process. SUMMARY The aim of this review article is to describe effective approaches to diagnostic stewardship for syndromic molecular panels to ensure appropriate test utilization and quality assured results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Hitchcock
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Central Virginia VA Health Care System, Richmond, VA, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Carlos A Gomez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Joseph Pozdol
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Niaz Banaei
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lewinski MA, Alby K, Babady NE, Butler-Wu SM, Bard JD, Greninger AL, Hanson K, Naccache SN, Newton D, Temple-Smolkin RL, Nolte F. Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:857-875. [PMID: 37757952 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of clinical molecular diagnostic methods for detecting microbial pathogens continues to expand and, in some cases, supplant conventional identification methods in various scenarios. Analytical and clinical benefits of multiplex molecular panels for the detection of respiratory pathogens have been demonstrated in various studies. The use of these panels in managing different patient populations has been incorporated into clinical guidance documents. The Association for Molecular Pathology's Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group conducted a review of the current benefits and challenges to using multiplex PCR for the detection of pathogens from gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system, lower respiratory tract, and joint specimens. The Working Group also discusses future directions and novel approaches to detection of pathogens in alternate specimen types, and outlines challenges associated with implementation of these multiplex PCR panels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Lewinski
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Roche Molecular Systems, San Clemente, California.
| | - Kevin Alby
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - N Esther Babady
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Clinical Microbiology Service, Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan M Butler-Wu
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Clinical Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Dien Bard
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alexander L Greninger
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kimberly Hanson
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; University of Utah School of Medicine and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Samia N Naccache
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Microbiology, LabCorp Seattle, Seattle, Washington
| | - Duane Newton
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Irvine, California
| | | | - Frederick Nolte
- Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morsli M, Boudet A, Kerharo Q, Stephan R, Salipante F, Dunyach-Remy C, Houhamdi L, Fournier PE, Lavigne JP, Drancourt M. Real-time metagenomics-based diagnosis of community-acquired meningitis: A prospective series, southern France. EBioMedicine 2022; 84:104247. [PMID: 36087524 PMCID: PMC9463524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Point-Of-Care (POC) diagnosis of life-threatening community-acquired meningitis currently relies on multiplexed RT-PCR assays, that lack genotyping and antibiotic susceptibility profiling. We assessed the usefulness of real-time metagenomics (RTM) directly applied to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the identification, typing and susceptibility profiling of pathogens responsible for community-acquired meningitis. METHODS A series of 52 CSF samples from patients suspected of having community-acquired meningitis, were investigated at POC by direct RTM in parallel to routine real-time multiplex PCR (RT-PCR) and bacterial culture, for the detection of pathogens. RTM-generated sequences were blasted in real-time against an in-house database incorporating the panel of 12 most prevalent pathogens and against NCBI using EPI2ME online software, for pathogen identification. In-silico antibiogram and genotype prediction were determined using the ResFinder bio-tool and MLST online software. FINDINGS Over eight months, routine multiplex RT-PCR yielded 49/52 positive CSFs, including 21 Streptococcus pneumoniae, nine Neisseria meningitidis, eight Haemophilus influenzae, three Streptococcus agalactiae, three Herpesvirus-1, two Listeria monocytogenes, and one each of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Varicella-Zoster Virus. Parallel RTM agreed with the results of 47/52 CSFs and revealed two discordant multiplex RT-PCR false positives, one H. influenzae and one S. pneumoniae. Both multiplex RT-PCR and RTM agreed on the negativity of three CSFs. While multiplex RT-PCR routinely took 90 min, RTM took 120 min, although the pipeline analysis detected the pathogen genome after 20 min of sequencing in 33 CSF samples; and after two hours in 14 additional CSFs; yielding > 50% genome coverage in 19 CSFs. RTM identified 14 pathogen genotypes, including a majority of H. influenzae b, N. meningitidis B and S. pneumoniae 11A and 3A. In all 16 susceptible cultured bacteria, the in-silico antibiogram agreed with the in-vitro antibiogram in 10 cases, available within 48 h in routine bacteriology. INTERPRETATION In addition to pathogen detection, RTM applied to CSF samples offered supplementary information on bacterial profiling and genotyping. These data provide the proof-of-concept that RTM could be implemented in a POC laboratory for one-shot diagnostic and genomic surveillance of pathogens responsible for life-threatening meningitis. FUNDING This work was supported by the French Government under the Investments in the Future programme managed by the National Agency for Research reference: Méditerranée Infection 10-IAHU-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madjid Morsli
- IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Aix-Marseille-Université, France
| | - Agathe Boudet
- VBIC, INSERM U 1047, Université de Montpellier, France; Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Quentin Kerharo
- IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, IHU, Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
| | - Robin Stephan
- Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Florian Salipante
- Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Service de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie, Santé Publique, Innovation en Méthodologie, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Catherine Dunyach-Remy
- VBIC, INSERM U 1047, Université de Montpellier, France; Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | | | - Pierre-Edouard Fournier
- IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Philippe Lavigne
- VBIC, INSERM U 1047, Université de Montpellier, France; Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Michel Drancourt
- IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Aix-Marseille-Université, France; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, IHU, Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
How do we reduce acyclovir overuse? Impact of FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel tests for pediatric patients. J Infect Chemother 2022; 28:1261-1265. [PMID: 35581120 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few Japanese hospitals can perform in-house cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to screen for herpes simplex virus, leading to patients being administered acyclovir (ACV) for several days. The FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (ME Panel) is a multiplex PCR test that can identify 14 major pathogens within 1 h. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of the ME Panel in children admitted with central nervous system infections in Japan. METHODS We conducted a single-center, quasi-experimental study. The ME panel was introduced in April 2020. We outsourced the CSF samples to a laboratory during the pre-intervention period (April 2016 to March 2020) and performed the ME panel at our hospital during the post-intervention period (April 2020 to December 2021). Duration and dose of ACV and antibiotic use, length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and total LOS after testing were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The number of cases in the pre- and post-intervention periods was 67 and 22 cases, respectively. The median duration of ACV decreased significantly from 6 days to 0 day (p < 0.001), and the median dose of ACV use decreased significantly from 14 vials to 0 vial (p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the total duration and dose of antibiotic use, LOS in PICU, and the total LOS after testing. CONCLUSION The introduction of ME panel may contribute to appropriate ACV use; however, there was no significant change in the duration and dose of antibiotic use or LOS.
Collapse
|
5
|
Vila J, Bosch J, Muñoz-Almagro C. Molecular diagnosis of the central nervous system (CNS) infections. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 39:403-410. [PMID: 34620475 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2020.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) infections such as meningitis and encephalitis are medical emergencies that require rapid diagnosis of the causative pathogen to guide early and adequate treatment since a delay in implementing an adequate antimicrobial therapy can lead to death. The current microbiological diagnostic methods based on culture or antigen detection have important limitations in their capacity to accurately identify the different potential pathogens causing CNS and, in the time, to obtaining results. Rapid syndromic molecular arrays have been developed. The main advantage of using a meningoencephalitis panel based in a multiplex test is that includes bacteria, viruses and fungi, covering the most prevalent microorganisms causing meningitis and encephalitis and the turn-around time is circa 1h. The use of these multiplex-PCR based tools is reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Vila
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Global Health of Barcelona (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, REIPI, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jordi Bosch
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Global Health of Barcelona (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, REIPI, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Muñoz-Almagro
- Department of Molecular Microbiology, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain; School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Network of Epidemiology and Public Health, CIBERESP, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rader TS, Stevens MP, Bearman G. Syndromic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Current Practice and Future Directions. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021; 23:5. [PMID: 33679252 PMCID: PMC7909367 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-021-00748-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Syndromic multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) panels offer the antimicrobial steward a rapid tool for optimizing and de-escalating antimicrobials. In this review, we analyze the role of syndromic mPCR in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system infections within the context of antimicrobial stewardship efforts. RECENT FINDINGS For all mPCR syndromic panels, multiple studies analyzed the pre-and-post implementation impact of mPCR on antimicrobial utilization. Prospective studies and trials of respiratory mPCR stewardship interventions, including diagnostic algorithms, educational efforts, co-testing with procalcitonin, and targeted provider feedback currently exist. For gastrointestinal and cerebrospinal fluid mPCR, fewer peer-reviewed reports exist for the use of mPCR in antimicrobial stewardship. These studies demonstrated an inconsistent trend towards decreasing antibiotic use with mPCR. This is further limited by a lack of statistical significance, the absence of controlled, prospective trials, and issues with data generalizability. SUMMARY Antibiotic overuse may improve when mPCR is coupled with electronic medical record algorithm-based approaches and direct provider feedback by an antimicrobial stewardship professional. mPCR may prove a useful tool for antimicrobial stewardship but future studies are needed to define the best practice for its utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore S. Rader
- Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1250 E MARSHALL ST # 980509, Richmond, VA 23298-0019 USA
| | - Michael P. Stevens
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Gonzalo Bearman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stark A, Peterson J, Weimer K, Hornik C. Postnatally acquired CMV meningitis diagnosed via BioFire FilmArray: A case report. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2020; 14:445-450. [PMID: 33325402 DOI: 10.3233/npm-200524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Postnatally acquired cytomegalovirus (CMV) is commonly acquired via breast milk, with premature infants more frequently developing symptoms of CMV infection in comparison to term infants. Meningitis is a rare clinical manifestation of CMV infection. The diagnosis of meningitis is difficult to make in infants, particularly those who are preterm. Consequentially, broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobial coverage is often administered for several days while waiting for current gold standard CSF testing to result. The BioFire FilmArray (BFA) simultaneously tests for 14 different pathogens, including CMV, allowing for quicker diagnosis and shorter time to definitive treatment. Here, we report a very low birth weight infant with postnatally acquired CMV meningitis, the first to our knowledge to be diagnosed using the BioFire FilmArray.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Stark
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Peterson
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - K Weimer
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C Hornik
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Clinical Impact of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel on Antimicrobial Utilization in a Tertiary Hospital Setting. Am J Med Sci 2020; 361:550-552. [PMID: 33051025 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Emerging Microbiology Diagnostics for Transplant Infections: On the Cusp of a Paradigm Shift. Transplantation 2020; 104:1358-1384. [PMID: 31972701 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
In light of the heightened risk for infection associated with solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, rapid and accurate microbiology diagnostics are essential to the practice of transplant clinicians, including infectious diseases specialists. In the last decade, diagnostic microbiology has seen a shift toward culture-independent techniques including single-target and multiplexed molecular testing, mass-spectrometry, and magnetic resonance-based methods which have together greatly expanded the array of pathogens identified, increased processing speed and throughput, allowed for detection of resistance determinants, and ultimately improved the outcomes of infected transplant recipients. More recently, a newer generation of diagnostics with immense potential has emerged, including multiplexed molecular panels directly applicable to blood and blood culture specimens, next-generation metagenomics, and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Though these methods have some recognized drawbacks, many have already demonstrated improved sensitivity and a positive impact on clinical outcomes in transplant and immunocompromised patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Meningitis and encephalitis (ME) are important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients suspected of having ME are often hospitalized and started on empiric antimicrobial treatment, because of the potential adverse consequences of delaying the diagnosis or treatment. Multiplexed polymerase chain reaction panels are one of several rapid diagnostic technologies that have the potential to overcome some of the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods for ME. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel was the first Food and Drug Administration-cleared multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid samples, able to identify 14 organisms in a single test reaction. This newer rapid diagnostic tool has an overall high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ME with a fast turnaround time and has the potential to improve resource utilization for patients presenting with suspicion of ME. However, further research is needed to determine its optimal use in the evaluation of patients with suspected ME.
Collapse
|
11
|
Impact of the Film Array Meningitis/Encephalitis panel in adults with meningitis and encephalitis in Colombia. Epidemiol Infect 2020; 148:e173. [PMID: 32713368 PMCID: PMC7439290 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268820001648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The Biofire® Film Array Meningitis Encephalitis (FAME) panel can rapidly diagnose common aetiologies but its impact in Colombia is unknown. A retrospective study of adults with CNS infections in one tertiary hospital in Colombia. The cohort was divided into two time periods: before and after the implementation of the Biofire® FAME panel in May 2016. A total of 98 patients were enrolled, 52 and 46 were enrolled in the Standard of Care (SOC) group and in the FAME group, respectively. The most common comorbidity was human immunodeficiency virus infection (47.4%). The median time to a change in therapy was significantly shorter in the FAME group than in the SOC group (3 vs. 137.3 h, P < 0.001). This difference was driven by the timing to appropriate therapy (2.1 vs. 195 h, P < 0.001) by identifying viral aetiologies. Overall outcomes and length of stay were no different between both groups (P > 0.2). The FAME panel detected six aetiologies that had negative cultures but missed identifying one patient with Cryptococcus neoformans. The introduction of the Biofire FAME panel in Colombia has facilitated the identification of viral pathogens and has significantly reduced the time to the adjustment of empirical antimicrobial therapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Posnakoglou L, Siahanidou T, Syriopoulou V, Michos A. Impact of cerebrospinal fluid syndromic testing in the management of children with suspected central nervous system infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 39:2379-2386. [PMID: 32683594 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03986-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the use of BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis(FA-ME) panel which enables rapid automated CSF testing for 14 common viral, bacterial, and yeast pathogens that cause CNS infections, in the management of children with suspected CNS infection. A prospective cohort study was performed on children admitted to a tertiary pediatric hospital, over a period of 1 year, with possible CNS infection and CSF pleocytosis (> 15 cells/mm3). Children were randomized 1:1, either to use FA-ME or separate molecular CSF microbiological tests according to usual pediatric practice in the hospital. Length of hospital stay, duration of antimicrobials, and total cost of hospitalization were compared between groups. A total of 142 children were included in the study (71 cases). A pathogen was detected in 37/71(52.1%) children with the use of FA-ME and in 16/71(22.5%) in the control group (P value < 0.001). In aseptic meningitis cases a virus was detected in 27/61(44.2%) and in 11/66(16.7%) controls (P value < 0.001). Median (IQR) length of stay in cases and controls with aseptic meningitis was 5(4-8) and 8(6-10) days, respectively (P value < 0. 001). The median (IQR) duration of antimicrobials in cases and controls was 4(2-5.7) and 7(5-10) days, respectively (P value < 0.001). The hospitalization cost was calculated in cases and controls 1042€ (932-1372) and 1522€ (1302-1742), respectively (P value < 0.001). The use of FA-ME was able to reduce significantly the use of antimicrobials, the hospitalization days, and the total cost comparing to the control group in children with suspected CNS infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamprini Posnakoglou
- First Department of Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases and Chemotherapy Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Thivon and Papadiamantopoulou, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Tania Siahanidou
- First Department of Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases and Chemotherapy Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Thivon and Papadiamantopoulou, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Syriopoulou
- First Department of Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases and Chemotherapy Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Thivon and Papadiamantopoulou, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Michos
- First Department of Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases and Chemotherapy Research Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Thivon and Papadiamantopoulou, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Impact of a Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay on the Clinical Management of Adults Undergoing a Lumbar Puncture for Suspected Community-Onset Central Nervous System Infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:antibiotics9060282. [PMID: 32466378 PMCID: PMC7344633 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9060282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients admitted from the community with a suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection require prompt diagnostic evaluation and correct antimicrobial treatment. A retrospective, multicenter, pre/post intervention study was performed to evaluate the impact that the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel run in-house had on the clinical management of adult patients admitted from the community with a lumbar puncture (LP) performed for a suspected CNS infection. The primary outcome was the effect that this intervention had on herpes simplex virus (HSV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) turnaround time (TAT). Secondary outcomes included the effect that this intervention had on antiviral days of therapy (DOT), total antimicrobial DOT, and hospital length of stay (LOS). A total of 81 and 79 patients were included in the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. The median HSV PCR TAT was significantly longer in the pre-intervention group (85 vs. 4.1 h, p < 0.001). Total antiviral DOT was significantly greater in the pre-intervention group (3 vs. 1, p < 0.001), as was total antimicrobial DOT (7 vs. 5, p < 0.001). Pre-intervention hospital LOS was also significantly longer (6.6 vs. 4.4 days, p = 0.02). Implementing the ME panel in-house for adults undergoing an LP for a suspected community-onset CNS infection significantly reduced the HSV PCR TAT, antiviral DOT, total antimicrobial DOT, and hospital LOS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Point-of-care multiplexed diagnosis of meningitis using the FilmArray® ME panel technology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 39:1573-1580. [DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03859-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
15
|
Vila J, Bosch J, Muñoz-Almagro C. Molecular diagnosis of the central nervous system (CNS) infections. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2020; 39:S0213-005X(20)30168-3. [PMID: 32345489 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) infections such as meningitis and encephalitis are medical emergencies that require rapid diagnosis of the causative pathogen to guide early and adequate treatment since a delay in implementing an adequate antimicrobial therapy can lead to death. The current microbiological diagnostic methods based on culture or antigen detection have important limitations in their capacity to accurately identify the different potential pathogens causing CNS and, in the time, to obtaining results. Rapid syndromic molecular arrays have been developed. The main advantage of using a meningoencephalitis panel based in a multiplex test is that includes bacteria, viruses and fungi, covering the most prevalent microorganisms causing meningitis and encephalitis and the turn-around time is circa 1h. The use of these multiplex-PCR based tools is reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Vila
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Global Health of Barcelona (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, REIPI, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jordi Bosch
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Global Health of Barcelona (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, REIPI, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Muñoz-Almagro
- Department of Molecular Microbiology, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain; School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Network of Epidemiology and Public Health, CIBERESP, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dittrich T, Marsch S, Egli A, Rüegg S, De Marchis GM, Tschudin-Sutter S, Sutter R. Predictors of infectious meningitis or encephalitis: the yield of cerebrospinal fluid in a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:304. [PMID: 32326881 PMCID: PMC7181581 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05022-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses are recommended in patients with meningitis and/or encephalitis, but evidence regarding its diagnostic yield is low. We aimed to determine predictors of infectious pathogens in the CSF of adult patients presenting with meningitis, and/or encephalitis. Methods Consecutive patients with meningitis and/or encephalitis form 2011–17 at a Swiss academic medical care center were included in this cross-sectional study. Clinical, neuroradiologic, and laboratory data were collected as exposure variables. Infectious meningitis and/or encephalitis were defined as the composite outcome. For diagnosis of bacterial meningitis the recommendations of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases were followed. Viral meningitis was diagnosed by detection of viral ribonucleic or deoxyribonucleic acid in the CSF. Infectious encephalitis was defined according to the International Encephalitis Consortium (IEC). Meningoencephalitis was diagnosed if the criteria for meningitis and encephalitis were fulfilled. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of the composite outcome. To quantify discriminative power, the c statistic analogous the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) was calculated. An AUROC between 0.7–0.8 was defined as “good”, 08–0.9 as “excellent”, and > 0.9 as “outstanding”. Calibration was defined as “good” if the goodness of fit tests revealed insignificant p-values. Results Among 372 patients, infections were diagnosed in 42.7% presenting as meningitis (51%), encephalitis (32%), and meningoencephalitis (17%). Most frequent infectious pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Varicella zoster, and Herpes simplex 1&2. While in multivariable analysis lactate concentrations and decreased glucose ratios were the only independent predictors of bacterial infection (AUROCs 0.780, 0.870, and 0.834 respectively), increased CSF mononuclear cells were the only predictors of viral infections (AUROC 0.669). All predictors revealed good calibration. Conclusions Prior to microbiologic workup, CSF data may guide clinicians when infection is suspected while other laboratory and neuroradiologic characteristics seem less useful. While increased CSF lactate and decreased glucose ratio are is the most reliable predictors of bacterial infections in patients with meningitis and/or encephalitis, only mononuclear cell counts predicted viral infections. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03856528. Registered on February 26th 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolga Dittrich
- Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Marsch
- Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Medical faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Egli
- Medical faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Applied Microbiology Research, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Rüegg
- Medical faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gian Marco De Marchis
- Medical faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Tschudin-Sutter
- Medical faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Infection Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Raoul Sutter
- Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. .,Medical faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. .,Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dittrich T, Marsch S, Rüegg S, De Marchis GM, Tschudin-Sutter S, Sutter R. Delirium in Meningitis and Encephalitis: Emergence and Prediction in a 6-Year Cohort. J Intensive Care Med 2020; 36:566-575. [PMID: 32193987 DOI: 10.1177/0885066620913004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Data regarding delirium in patients presenting with infections of the central nervous system, such as meningitis and/or encephalitis (ME), are scarce. We aimed to determine the frequency and early predictors of delirium in the acute phase of ME. METHODS We assessed clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data of patients with ME at a Swiss academic medical center from 2011 to 2017. The highest Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score was assessed within 24 hours around lumbar puncture. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of delirium (ICDSC ≥4). RESULTS Among 330 patients with ME, infectious pathogens were identified in 41%. An ICDSC >1 was found in 28% with and 19% without identified infectious pathogens. Delirium was diagnosed in 18% with and 14% without infectious pathogens and significantly associated with prolonged in-hospital treatment and mechanical ventilation, more frequent administration of neuroleptics and anesthetics (in 96% with delirium vs 35% without), complications, and less recovery to premorbid functional baseline. Low serum albumin at presentation was the only independent predictor of delirium (area under the receiver-operating curve [AUROC] = 0.792) in patients with pathogens. In patients with infections, the AUROC was smallest for encephalitis (AUROC = 0.641) and larger for patients with meningeal infections (meningitis AUROC = 0.807; meningoencephalitis AUROC = 0.896). CONCLUSIONS Delirium in the context of ME is seen in almost every fifth patient and linked to prolonged treatment, complications, and incomplete recovery. Among clinical, radiologic, and laboratory parameters, the good calibration and discrimination of low albumin serum concentrations for the prediction of delirium in patients with ME seem promising, especially if meninges are affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolga Dittrich
- Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Marsch
- Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, 30262University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Rüegg
- Faculty of Medicine, 30262University of Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gian Marco De Marchis
- Faculty of Medicine, 30262University of Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Tschudin-Sutter
- Faculty of Medicine, 30262University of Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Infection Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Raoul Sutter
- Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, 30262University of Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, 30262University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2019; 26:281-290. [PMID: 31760115 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel is a multiplex PCR assay which can detect the most commonly identified pathogens in central nervous system infections. It significantly decreases the time to diagnosis of ME and data has yielded several positive outcomes. However, in part, reports of both false positive and false negative detections have resulted in concerns about adoption. OBJECTIVES The aim was to evaluate the ME panel in a diagnostic test accuracy review. DATA SOURCES The PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched through May 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible studies were those providing sensitivity and specificity data for the ME panel compared with a reference standard. Studies providing details on false positive and false negative results of the panel as well as further investigation (adjudication) of the discordant results between the panel and comparator assays were included and assessed separately. PARTICIPANTS Patients with suspected ME for whom a panel was ordered were included. METHODS The ME panel was compared to reference standard methods for diagnosing community-acquired ME. We performed a meta-analysis and calculated the summary sensitivity and specificity of the ME panel. Moreover, we evaluated the false positive and false negative results of the panel. RESULTS Thirteen studies (3764 patients) were included in the review and 8 of them (3059 patients) were pooled in a meta-analysis. The summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was 90% (95% CI 86-93%) and 97% (95% CI 94-99%), respectively. When we looked specifically at studies that assessed further the false positive and false negative results, false positive detections were 11.4% and 4% before and after adjudication, respectively. The highest proportion of false positive was observed for Streptococcus pneumoniae followed by Streptococcus agalactiae. False negative isolates were 2.2% and 1.5% before and after adjudication, respectively. Herpes simplex virus 1 and 2, enterovirus and Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii had the highest proportions of false negative determinations. False negative C. neoformans/gattii were mostly patients with positive antigen titres, on treatment or cleared disease. CONCLUSIONS The currently available literature suggests that the ME panel has high diagnostic accuracy. However, the decision for implementation should be individualized based on the needs of the patient population, the capabilities of the laboratory, and the knowledge of the healthcare providers that will utilize the test.
Collapse
|
19
|
A review of a 13-month period of FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel implementation as a first-line diagnosis tool at a university hospital. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223887. [PMID: 31647847 PMCID: PMC6812749 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis and treatment of meningitis and encephalitis is essential for reducing both their morbidity and mortality. The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (FA-M/E) panel is a recently available molecular tool allowing the simultaneous detection of 14 pathogens in about one hour. We evaluated its routine use over a 13-month period at Nîmes University Hospital, France. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens were prospectively analyzed, independently of cell count; results were retrospectively analyzed and positive results compared to clinical and microbiological data. Among the 708 patients included (734 CSF samples), 89 (12.6%) had a positive FA-M/E panel, 71 (80%) for a viral pathogen and 18 (20%) for a bacterial pathogen. Enterovirus and HHV-6 were the main detected pathogens. Mean time-to-results was 1h46mn. Four non-clinically relevant results were detected (3 HHV-6 and 1 Haemophilus influenzae) on the basis of inconsistent clinical and/or biological data, and/or after visualization of melting curves. No CSF pleocytosis was observed in 11% of the patients with a positive FA-M/E panel. For the 18 patients with a positive FA-M/E panel for a bacterial pathogen, five (28%) had CSF samples showing a positive Gram stain allowing an early diagnosis of bacterial infection and 67% had CSF displaying a positive culture. Altogether the panel detected 5 cases of bacterial M/E (29%) not diagnosed by culture. Despite undeniable advantages, mainly ease of use, quick result availability, and an extremely low rate of invalid results, measures should be implemented to limit false-positive results due to contamination and a careful interpretation based on the overall data for each patient is required.
Collapse
|