Age, Race, and At-Risk Drinking in an HIV-infected U.S. Military Cohort

Health behavior profiles and association with mental health status among US active-duty service members

Introduction

This study investigated the clustering of health behaviors among US active duty servicemembers (ADSM) into risk profiles and explored the association between these profiles with ADSM sociodemographic characteristics and mental health status.

Methods

This study utilized secondary data from the 2018 Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS), a Department of Defense (DoD) self-administered online survey. Health behaviors included physical activity, screen use, sleep habits, tobacco/substance use, alcohol drinking, preventive health care seeking and condom use at last sex/having multiple sexual partners. Past-year mental health status was measured using the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6). Latent class analysis (LCA) on health behaviors was used to cluster ADSMs into risk profiles. Multivariable logistic model was used to examine whether ADSM characteristics and mental health status were associated with ADSMs' risk profiles.

Results

The LCA identified a four-class model that clustered ADSMs into the following sub-groups: (1) Risk Inclined (14.4%), (2) High Screen Users (51.1%), (3) Poor Sleepers (23.9%) and (4) Risk Averse (10.6). Over a tenth (16.4%) of ADSMs were categorized as having serious psychological distress. Being male, younger, less educated, in the Army, Marine Corps or Navy were associated with higher odds of being Risk Inclined (AOR ranging from 1.26 to 2.42). Compared to the reference group of Risk Adverse ADSMs, those categorized as Risk Inclined (AOR: 8.30; 95% CI: 5.16-13.36), High Screen Users (AOR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.56-3.82) and Poor Sleepers (AOR: 5.26; 95% CI: 3.38-8.19) had significantly higher odds of having serious psychological distress.

Discussion

Study findings suggest opportunities to tailor behavioral and health promotion interventions for each of the distinct risk profiles. For example, ADSM described as Risk Inclined may benefit from preventive mental health services. Solutions for ADSM described as Poor Sleepers may include education on sleep hygiene; instituting duty schedules; and shifting military cultural norms to promote sleep hygiene as a pathway to optimal performance and thus military readiness. ADSM with low-risk behavior profiles such as those described as Risk Averse may prove beneficial in the roll-out of interventions as they act as peer-educators or mentors.

Clinical factors and outcomes associated with immune non-response among virally suppressed adults with HIV from Africa and the United States

A significant minority of people living with HIV (PLWH) achieve viral suppression (VS) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) but do not regain healthy CD4 counts. Clinical factors affecting this immune non-response (INR) and its effect on incident serious non-AIDS events (SNAEs) have been challenging to understand due to confounders that are difficult to control in many study settings. The U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study (NHS) and African Cohort Study (AFRICOS). PLWH with sustained VS (< 400 copies/ml for at least two years) were evaluated for INR (CD4 < 350 cells/µl at the time of sustained VS). Logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with INR. Cox proportional hazards regression produced adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for factors associated with incident SNAE after sustained VS. INR prevalence was 10.8% and 25.8% in NHS and AFRICOS, respectively. Higher CD4 nadir was associated with decreased odds of INR (aOR = 0.34 [95% CI 0.29, 0.40] and aOR = 0.48 [95% CI 0.40, 0.57] per 100 cells/µl in NHS and AFRICOS, respectively). After adjustment, INR was associated with a 61% increase in relative risk of SNAE [95% CI 1.12, 2.33]. Probability of "SNAE-free" survival at 15 years since sustained VS was approximately 20% lower comparing those with and without INR; nearly equal to the differences observed by 15-year age groups. CD4 monitoring before and after VS is achieved can help identify PLWH at risk for INR. INR may be a useful clinical indicator of future risk for SNAEs.

Risk Factors Associated With Chronic Liver Enzyme Elevation in Persons With HIV Without Hepatitis B or C Coinfection in the Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Era

Background

As morbidity due to viral coinfections declines among HIV-infected persons, changes in liver-related morbidity are anticipated. We examined data from the US Military HIV Natural History Study (NHS), a cohort of military beneficiaries, to evaluate incidence and risk factors associated with chronic liver enzyme elevation (cLEE) in HIV-monoinfected patients in the combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) era.

Methods

Participants who were hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus seronegative with follow-up after 1996 were included. We defined chronic liver enzyme elevation (cLEE) as alanine aminotransferase elevations ≥1.25 times the upper limit of normal on at least 2 visits, for a duration of ≥6 months within 2 years. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to examine risk factors for cLEE.

Results

Of 2779 participants, 309 (11%) met criteria for cLEE for an incidence of 1.28/100 PYFU (1.28–1.29/100 PYFU). In an adjusted model, cLEE was associated with Hispanic/other ethnicity (reference Caucasian: hazard ratio [HR], 1.744; 95% CI, 1.270–2.395), non–nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–based cART (reference boosted protease inhibitors: HR, 2.232; 95% CI, 1.378–3.616), being cART naïve (HR, 6.046; 95% CI, 3.686–9.915), or having cART interruptions (HR, 8.671; 95% CI, 4.651–16.164). African American race (HR, 0.669; 95% CI, 0.510–0.877) and integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)–based cART (HR, 0.222; 95% CI, 0.104–0.474) were protective.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that initiation and continued use of cART are protective against cLEE and support the hypothesis that HIV infection directly impacts the liver. INSTI-based regimens were protective and could be considered in persons with cLEE.