Biomedical Response to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the US Military

Common Patterns and Unique Threats in Antimicrobial Resistance as Demonstrated by Global Gonococcal Surveillance

The rapid emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae threatens treatment options and control efforts. The Uniformed Services University Gonococcal Reference Laboratory and Repository of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Program receives isolates from several geographically distinct regions worldwide. We analyzed 962 isolates collected during 2014-2022 for genomic and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance. Resistance to antimicrobial drugs previously used for gonococcal infections was high, but of most concern were increases of resistance to currently used antibiotic drugs, such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins and the alternative antibiotic treatment gentamicin. The percentage of isolates with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone was 3.6%, to cefixime was 2.5%, and to gentamicin was 15.0%. Although isolates were collected from populations of limited diversity, 706 (73.4%) of isolates demonstrated novel multiantigen sequence types, and 225 (23.4%) had novel multilocus sequence types. Continued surveillance of N. gonorrhoeae is essential to monitoring the prevalence and spread of resistant organisms worldwide.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Adult Patients Seeking Care at Military Hospitals in Thailand From 2014 to 2020

INTRODUCTION

The effective dual antibiotics ceftriaxone (CRO) and azithromycin (AZM) have successfully treated Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infection, however, the CRO- and AZM-resistant strains have been sporadically detected globally and in Thailand. Furthermore, there are no currently antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the GC isolates obtained from soldiers reported in Thailand. Hence, this is the first study to describe the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of GC isolates obtained from predominately soldiers who seeking care at Military Camp Hospitals, in Thailand from 2014 to 2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 624 symptomatic gonococcal samples were received from 10 military hospitals during 2014-2020. They were collected from urethral swabs and inoculated into selective media. The suspected GC isolates were subcultured and presumptively identified using conventional microbiology techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed by Etest to determine minimal inhibitory concentration (μg/mL) against AZM, benzylpenicillin, cefepime, cefixime, ceftriaxone (CRO), ciprofloxacin, spectinomycin, and tetracycline using the criteria outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. This study was approved by Institutional Review Board, Royal Thai Army Medical Department under protocol number S036b/56 and Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, and Silver Spring, MD under protocol number WR #2039.

RESULTS

A total of 624 samples were collected from symptomatic gonococcal infectious patients with 91.5% (571/624) of samples obtained from soldiers. Of those, 78% (488/624) were identified as GC and 92% (449/488) of them were isolated from soldiers. All GC samples collected were susceptible to CRO (first-line treatment) with only one GC isolate identified as non-susceptible to cefepime and three isolates identified as non-susceptible to AZM.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dual treatment of GC infections with CRO and AZM is currently an effective empirical treatment for patients who are seeking care at military hospitals in Thailand. Nevertheless, cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with documented high activity against GC strains equal to other "third-generation" cephalosporins such as CRO. Due to the active duty of military personnel, they concerned about the confidentiality and frequently seek treatment at civilian clinics. Additionally, due to the availability of antibiotics over the counter in Thailand, many choose the option to self-medicate without a physician's prescription. These could be subsequently driven the gradual increase of multidrug-resistant gonococcal strains throughout the country. Thus, the GC surveillance would be needed for further Force Health Protection and public health authorities in response to the drug-resistant GC threats.

Emerging Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance (EIDAR)

Introduction

The Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program’s (IDCRP) Emerging Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance (EIDAR) Research Area is a Department of Defense (DoD) clinical research capability that is responsive and adaptive to emerging infectious disease (EID) threats to US military readiness. Among active-duty and other Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries, EIDAR research is largely focused on evaluating the incidence, risk factors, and acute- and long-term health effects of military-relevant EIDs, especially those caused by high-consequence pathogens or are responsible for outbreaks among US military populations. The EIDAR efforts also address Force Health Protection concerns associated with antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship practices within the MHS.

Methods

The EIDAR studies utilize the approach of: (1) Preparing for emergent conditions to systematically collect clinical specimens and data and conduct clinical trials to assist the military with a scientifically appropriate response; and (2) Evaluating burden of emergent military-relevant infectious diseases and assessing risks for exposure and development of post-infectious complications and overall impact on military readiness.

Results

In response to the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa, the IDCRP partnered with the National Institutes of Health in developing a multicenter, randomized safety and efficacy study of investigational therapeutics in Ebola patients. Subsequently, the EIDAR team developed a protocol to serve as a contingency plan (EpICC-EID) to allow clinical research activities to occur during future outbreaks of viral hemorrhagic fever and severe acute respiratory infections among MHS patients. The EIDAR portfolio recently expanded to include studies to understand exposure risks and impact on military readiness for a diversity of EIDs, such as seroincidence of non-Lyme disease borreliosis and Coccidioides fungal infections among high-risk military populations. The team also launched a new prospective study in response to the recent Zika epidemic to conduct surveillance for Zika and other related viruses among MHS beneficiaries in Puerto Rico. Another new study will prospectively follow U.S. Marines via an online health assessment survey to assess long-term health effects following the largest DoD Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli outbreak at the U.S. Marine Corps Recruit Depot-San Diego. In cooperation with the Trauma-Related Infections Research Area, the EIDAR Research Area is also involved with the Multidrug-Resistant and Virulent Organisms Trauma Infections Initiative, which is a collaborative effort across DoD laboratories to characterize bacterial and fungal isolates infecting combat-related extremity wounds and link lab findings to clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the EIDAR team has developed an Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship Collaborative Clinical Research Consortium, comprised of Infectious Disease and Pharmacy specialists.

Conclusions

The EIDAR Research Area is responsive to military-relevant infectious disease threats that are also frequently global public health concerns. Several new EIDAR efforts are underway that will provide Combatant Command Surgeons, Infectious Diseases Service Chiefs, and other Force Health Protection stakeholders with epidemiological information to mitigate the impact of EIDs and antimicrobial resistance on the health of U.S. military service members and their dependents.