Arthroscopy for Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in the Military Health System: A 10-Year Epidemiological Overview of Cases with 2-year Follow-up

The Impact of Anterior Pelvic Tilt on Return to Duty/Return to Run in Active Duty Personnel After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

INTRODUCTION

Annually, 300,000 soldiers are rendered medically nondeployable because of musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs). Of this population, nearly 10,000 (3.3%) involve injuries to the hip. Factors related to these injuries impose significant healthcare, financial, and readiness burdens on the Army system, degrading overall mission readiness. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess for correlation between increased anterior pelvic tilt and a lower likelihood for return to duty/return to run (RTD/RTR) in active duty personnel who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), thus identifying increased anterior pelvic tilt as a potential prognostic indicator for RTD/RTR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two active duty U.S. Army service members aged 18 years or older who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI at the William Beaumont Army Medical Center from September 1, 2014, to September 1, 2019, were included. Utilizing a retrospective review of existing data, the amount of anterior pelvic tilt, as estimated on a presurgical weight-bearing anterior-posterior pelvis radiograph using the distance from the pubic symphysis to the transischial line, was measured and compared to postoperative RTD/RTR statuses, assessing for correlation.

RESULTS

The overall RTD rate was 39.1% with a 22.8% RTR rate. Only 6.5% (6/92) of subjects returned to full, unrestricted duty and running. Logistic regression analyses showed that individuals with increased anterior pelvic tilt (≥7°) were 2.6 times less likely to RTD and 2.9 times less likely to RTR compared to those with minimal or no anterior pelvic tilt (<7°) (respectively, odds ratio (OR) 2.619; 95% CI, 1.107-6.195; P = .029 and OR 2.897; 95% CI, 1.041-8.059; P = .042). Results support the study teams' hypothesis that increased anterior pelvic tilt is associated with a lower odds of RTD/RTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistical analysis confirmed the correlation between an increased amount of anterior pelvic tilt and a lower odds of RTD and RTR after hip arthroscopy for FAI in active duty U.S. Army personnel. This information can be used in patient counseling to better inform shared decision-making, provide more thorough informed consent, and help determine the optimal timing for surgical intervention, thus contributing to better stewardship of medical resources and decreasing the ever-growing financial healthcare burden. These findings will spur future research to consider the causes and optimal treatment of anterior pelvic tilt, positively impacting the culture of Army medicine by focusing on preventive and targeted treatments in order to preserve and grow the force.

Incidence of heterotopic ossification following hip arthroscopy is low: considerations for routine prophylaxis

PURPOSE

This scoping review aims to map and summarise the available literature on heterotopic ossification (HO) following hip arthroscopy, with particular focus on incidence, distribution as per Brooker classification, efficacy of prophylactic measures and factors that may influence the likelihood of production of HO.

METHODS

A computer-based search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cinahl, ISI web of science and Scopus using the terms 'heterotopic ossification' and 'hip arthroscopy'. Articles reporting heterotopic ossification following hip arthroscopy for any condition were included after two-stage title/abstract and full-text screening.

RESULTS

Of the 663 articles retrieved, 45 studies were included. The proportion of patients with HO ranged from 0 to 44%. The majority of the cases were either Brooker grade I or II. Of the six studies investigating the effect of NSAID prophylaxis, five reported a significantly lower incidence of heterotopic ossification associated with its use. Weak evidence suggests that an outside-in arthroscopic approach, no capsular closure, male sex and mixed cam and pincer resection may be associated with an increased risk of HO.

CONCLUSION

Although there is a large variation in rates of HO following hip arthroscopy in the current literature, the majority of studies report a low incidence. Evidence exists advocating the administration of post-operative NSAIDs to reduce the incidence of HO following hip arthroscopy. This, combined with the low risk of complications, means there is a favourable risk-benefit ratio for prophylactic NSAID used in HA. Future research should work to identify patient clinical and demographic factors which may increase the risk of development of HO, allowing clinicians to risk stratify and select only specific patients who would benefit from receiving NSAID prophylaxis.

Are We Able to Determine Differences in Outcomes Between Male and Female Servicemembers Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy? A Systematic Review

Background:

Female servicemembers sustain higher rates of lower extremity injuries as compared with their male counterparts. This can include intra-articular pathology in the hip. Female patients are considered to have worse outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and for hip labral repair.

Purpose:

To (1) compare published rates of hip arthroscopy between male and female military servicemembers and (2) determine if there are any sex-based differences in outcomes after hip arthroscopy in the military.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We reviewed the literature published from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2020, to identify studies in which hip arthroscopy was performed in military personnel. Clinical trials and cohort studies were included. The proportion of women within each cohort was identified, and results of any between-sex analyses were reported.

Results:

Identified were 11 studies that met established criteria. Studies included 2481 patients, 970 (39.1%) of whom were women. Surgery occurred between January 1998 and March 2018. Despite women accounting for approximately 15% of the active-duty military force, they represented 39.1% (range, 25.7%-57.6%) of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. In most cases, there were no differences in self-reported outcomes (pain, disability, and physical function), return to duty, or medical disability status based on sex.

Conclusion:

Women account for approximately 15% of the military, but they made up 40% of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Outcomes were not different between the sexes; however, definitive conclusions were limited by the heterogeneity of outcomes, missing data, lack of sex-specific subgroup analyses, and zero studies with sex differences as the primary outcome. A proper understanding of sex-specific outcomes after hip arthroscopy will require a paradigm shift in the design and reporting of trials in the military health system.