Vision Outcomes of Long-Term Immunomodulatory and Steroid Therapy in Sympathetic Ophthalmia

PURPOSE

To compare vision acuity outcomes of long-term steroid therapy compared with immunomodulatory therapy for treatment of sympathetic ophthalmia.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective, comparative clinical study.

METHODS

Patients with sympathetic ophthalmia treated from March 2005 to October 2022 with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. Visual acuity outcomes were compared by steroid and immunomodulatory treatment modality.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with sympathetic ophthalmia were included in the study, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 17 years. Higher rates of vision loss correlated with longer periods of active uveitis and steroid treatment. Lower rates of vision loss correlated with longer periods of uveitis remission on immunomodulatory therapy alone and drug-free remission. Treatment with alkylating agents or combination therapy with an antimetabolite, a biologic-response modifier, and cyclosporine are more likely to result in sympathetic ophthalmia remission.

CONCLUSION

Immunomodulatory therapy leads to superior vision outcomes in cases of steroid-resistant or recurrent sympathetic ophthalmia. Steroid therapy may be useful for acute or recalcitrant sympathetic uveitis but is insufficient for long-term inflammatory control. PRéCIS: This manuscript describes a retrospective analysis of vision outcomes in patients with sympathetic ophthalmia. Results indicate that long-term immunomodulatory therapy is associated with better vision outcomes than long-term steroid therapy for sympathetic ophthalmia treatment.

The Incidence of Sympathetic Ophthalmia After Trauma: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare, bilateral panuveitis that occurs following open globe injury (OGI), with a variable incidence reported in the literature. Our objective was to determine the incidence proportion and incidence rate of SO following OGI to help guide shared physician-patient decision making.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 2020 for population-based studies on OGI and SO in adults and children. Two reviewers independently screened search results. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate the incidence proportion and incidence rate. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The study was registered on PROSPERO CRD42020198920.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were utilized in the meta-analyses. After OGI, the estimated overall incidence proportion of SO was 0.19% (95% CI 0.14%-0.24%) and the incidence rate of SO was 33 per 100,000 person-years, (95% CI 19.61-56.64) with I² of 13% and 72%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SO after OGI is rare. The estimated incidence proportion and incidence rate are useful when counselling patients regarding management options after OGI. Further studies are needed to examine the influence of age, the extent and location of trauma, timing of repair, and prophylactic eye removal on the incidence of SO.

The Ruptured Globe, Sympathetic Ophthalmia, and the 14-Day Rule

PURPOSE

Prophylactic enucleation of a ruptured globe with no light perception within 14 days of injury to prevent sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) has been an established dictum in academic teaching for more than 100 years. This treatment strategy was originally based on observation, speculation, and careful thought, but there was never any scientific proof. This review summarizes and updates the current state of our knowledge about globe rupture and SO, examines the origin and validity of the 14-day rule, and emphasizes the importance of trying to save the traumatized eye whenever possible.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of SO and globe rupture was performed.

RESULTS

SO is a rare disorder that may potentially occur following traumatic globe rupture as well as following a variety of other intraocular surgeries. Vitreoretinal surgery may be a more common cause than trauma according to some studies. SO may still occur despite having the eye removed within 14 days of the trauma. A variety of new medications including biologic agents are now available to treat SO with improved efficacy in suppressing the associated ocular inflammation and allowing retention of some useful vision. Removing the traumatized, blind eye may have other important psychological consequences associated with it that require consideration before eye removal is carried out. Retaining the blind, phthisical, disfigured eye avoids phantom vision and phantom pain associated with enucleation as well as providing a good platform to support and move an overlying prosthetic eye. Data on the occurrence of SO following evisceration and enucleation with and without predisposing factors confirms the exceedingly low risk.

CONCLUSION

Most civilian open globe injuries can be successfully repaired with modern, advanced microsurgical techniques currently available. Because of the exceedingly low risk of SO, even with the severity of open globe trauma during military conflicts being more devastating as a result of the blast and explosive injuries, today every attempt is made to primarily close the eye rather than primarily enucleate it, providing there is enough viable tissue to repair. The 14-day rule for eye removal after severe globe ruptures is not scientifically supported and does not always protect against SO, but the safe time period for prophylactic eye removal is not definitively known. In the exceptional cases where SO does occur, several new medications are now available that may help treat SO. We advocate saving the ruptured globe whenever possible and avoiding prophylactic enucleation to prevent the rare occurrence of SO. When an eye requires removal, evisceration is an acceptable alternative to enucleation in cases that do not harbor intraocular malignancy.

Finding the missing bullet: A case report of an unusual trajectory from the left scapula into the left orbit

Evaluating a traumatically injured patient requires a systematic evaluation that can rapidly detect life threatening injuries. When there is a discrepancy in the number of expected retained bullets, one must re-evaluate the initial work-up. This case consists of an extremely unusual trajectory course of a scapular wound where the ballistic then traversed off the scapula through the neck entering the para-pharyngeal space, travelling through the facial bones, and coming to rest within the left eye, itself. This case herein reinforces the importance for the evaluating provider to quickly recognize when the work-up is inconsistent with the initial assessment. Failure to recognize this discrepancy may lead to an inappropriate work-up with subsequent devastating life-threatening consequences.

•

Trajectory delineates anatomic injury.

•

To rapidly detect all injuries, follow the entire pathway of the penetrating object.

•

Aerodigestive & carotid injuries are associated with a high morbidity & mortality.

Two 11-Years Periods Statistics and Trends of Enucleation and Evisceration

Purpose:

The indications for evisceration and enucleation are still evolving and controversial. The study aims to describe trends of enucleation versus evisceration in one center.

Methods:

In period 1998–2019 were 353 patients were included in the study. Statistical results and Chi-square test for pair-wise comparisons for the statistical significance in comparing two subgroups (years periods 1998–2008 and 2009–2019) per category have been evaluated.

Results:

The enucleation was performed in 306 patients, and the evisceration was performed in 47 patients. In 221 patients with the tumor exclusively enucleation was indicated. For the operation technique, the authors got a chi-square value of 0.027, and the associated P value is at 0.8695, then the number of evisceration and enucleation in subgroups have not confirmed independency. For the tumor presence, the authors got a chi-square value of 5.4, and the associated P value is at 0.02, then the number of validated/nonvalidated tumor presence in subgroups confirmed independency.

Conclusions:

The performed enucleations had 98% cases uveal melanoma, 1% of cases of another type of malignancy (lymphoma non-Hodgkin type), and 1% cases with benign tumor. Enucleation is also today most frequently due to malignant intraocular tumors, whereas evisceration if most frequently for the phthisis eye after a trauma or a previous intraocular surgery. In our study in 22 years interval also in the second period, there was an increased trend of enucleation due to intraocular malignancy. It can have many reasons, especially, that patients are sent to oncology centers late in the advanced stage of tumor.

Conjunctival Epithelial Inclusion Cyst following Evisceration with Primary Orbital Implantation

A 29-years-old Turkish man who had undergone evisceration with primary orbital implantation 20 months prior complained of difficulty wearing his artificial eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed a conjunctival cyst in the center of the anophthalmic socket, with no evidence of scleral or orbital implant exposure. The cyst was completely excised under general anesthesia and did not require use of any sclerosing substance or dye. At 6 months postoperatively, there was no recurrence of the cyst or exposure of the sclera or orbital implant. As the upper and lower fornices were sufficiently deep, the patient could wear his artificial eye.

Traumatic enucleation of the left globe after a road traffic accident - A case report of an uncommon occurrence in maxillofacial trauma

•

Sometimes the orbital mechanisms to protect the globe fail.

•

Although rare, globe avulsion can occur after maxillofacial blunt trauma.

•

Despite all efforts, permanent major sequels can occur after facial trauma.

Introduction

Serious injuries of the globe are uncommon in closed maxillofacial trauma, as the anatomical configuration of the orbit offers important protective mechanisms against external trauma. Thus, the objective of this work is to report a case of a rare traumatic enucleation of the globe resulting from maxillofacial blunt trauma.

Presentation of case

A 42-year-old man was hit by a car with a major complaint of facial pain. The patient had several facial fractures including: Le Fort I, naso-orbit-ethmoidal, anterior sinus wall and an exposed fracture of the orbit-zygomatic complex (OZC). The patient underwent to open reduction and internal fixation of facial fractures and enucleation of the left globe, however, evolved with postoperative infection and complications associated with, a so far unknown, type 2 diabetes. After secondary surgeries for removal infected bones and diabetes control, all injuries were fully healed, and the patient remained with major sequels.

Discussion

In this case, we hypothesized a high-energy trauma resulting in multiple facial fractures, especially involving the OZC, dislocated the thick lateral wall of the orbit within the orbital cavity and reduced the orbital volume. This resulted in an exaggerated increase in intraorbital pressure, which exceeded the capacity of all anatomical protective mechanisms of the globe, and pushed the globe outwards, causing a complete avulsion.

Conclusion

Besides all anatomical structures to protect the globe, rarely high energy maxillofacial trauma can cause severe damage to the globe resulting in loss of vision and globe avulsion.