The current state of Clinical Mycology in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe

Elevating fungal care: bridging Brazil's healthcare practices to global standards

Brazil faces unique challenges in managing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) due to diverse ecosystems, a rural workforce, and prevalent health conditions. In Europe, IFIs are primarily associated with transplantation, intensive care, and chronic diseases. Inspired by initiatives in the Caribbean and Latin America in 2019, efforts to map global diagnostic and treatment resources expanded to Africa, Europe, and Asia/Pacific. This study conducts a comparative analysis, mainly drawing data from Brazil and Europe, to investigate IFI epidemiology and management. Data were collected through online surveys distributed to Brazilian and European institutions, with collaborations from scientific organizations. Surveys covered institutional profiles, IFI diagnoses, accessibility to diagnostic techniques, and antifungal drugs. A comparative survey involving 96 Brazilian and 388 European institutions revealed variations in the perception and practices related to fungal pathogens. Differences in ranking and prevalence were observed, along with variations in diagnostic procedures, fluorescence dye usage, culture practices, antifungal medication availability, and technological approaches. Europe exhibited higher utilization rates for molecular diagnostic approaches, including PCR tests, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was more widespread in Europe compared with Brazil, indicating substantial differences in understanding and managing fungal infections. Customized IFI management is crucial, considering regional differences and addressing technological gaps like underutilized PCR. The study advocates for increased international collaboration, targeted training, and enhanced resources to foster a unified global approach in preventing, diagnosing, and treating IFI.

IMPORTANCE

This work is significant as it highlights the unique challenges Brazil faces in managing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) due to its diverse ecosystems and public health landscape. By comparing Brazil's situation with Europe-where IFIs are mainly linked to transplantation and intensive care-this study identifies key disparities in diagnostic and treatment practices. The findings reveal substantial differences in the availability and use of molecular diagnostics, antifungal drugs, and therapeutic drug monitoring, with Europe demonstrating more advanced practices. By mapping these variations, the study underscores the importance of tailored approaches to IFI management that consider regional differences and technological gaps. Ultimately, it calls for enhanced international collaboration, targeted training, and resource allocation to improve IFI outcomes globally, particularly in regions with limited access to advanced diagnostic tools and treatments.

Benefits of early antifungal therapy in hematology patients

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a serious threat to patients with hematological diseases. These infections are characterized by high mortality and lead to significant financial costs for treatment. The most common pathogens of IFIs are Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp., but in recent years, cases of infections caused by rare pathogens have become more frequent. Diagnosis of IFIs and choice of treatment remain challenging due to the nonspecificity of symptoms and the diversity of clinical cases. In this regard, the problem of start time and choice of antifungal therapy remains of current interest. This review briefly describes diagnostic criteria, challenges associated with IFIs diagnosing, provides evidence for empiric and preventive strategies as two early treatment approaches, and examines the impact of therapy initiation on patient outcomes. Treatment of IFIs in hematologic patients should be individualized. At the same time, early administration of therapy with broad-spectrum drugs for febrile neutropenia and parallel diagnostic measures can improve treatment outcomes. There is a lack of current data on the benefits of specific treatment strategies, highlighting the need for further research.

COVID-19-associated fungal infections

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated invasive fungal infections are an important complication in a substantial number of critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Three groups of fungal pathogens cause co-infections in COVID-19: Aspergillus, Mucorales and Candida species, including Candida auris. Here we review the incidence of COVID-19-associated invasive fungal infections caused by these fungi in low-, middle- and high-income countries. By evaluating the epidemiology, clinical risk factors, predisposing features of the host environment and immunological mechanisms that underlie the pathogenesis of these co-infections, we set the scene for future research and development of clinical guidance.

Hoenigl and colleagues review the epidemiology, immunology and clinical risk factors contributing to COVID-19-associated fungal infections.