TIAMMAt: Leveraging biodiversity to revise protein domain models, evidence from innate immunity

Dollo Parsimony Overestimates Ancestral Gene Content Reconstructions

Ancestral reconstruction is a widely used technique that has been applied to understand the evolutionary history of gain and loss of gene families. Ancestral gene content can be reconstructed via different phylogenetic methods, but many current and previous studies employ Dollo parsimony. We hypothesize that Dollo parsimony is not appropriate for ancestral gene content reconstruction inferences based on sequence homology, as Dollo parsimony is derived from the assumption that a complex character cannot be regained. This premise does not accurately model molecular sequence evolution, in which false orthology can result from sequence convergence or lateral gene transfer. The aim of this study is to test Dollo parsimony's suitability for ancestral gene content reconstruction and to compare its inferences with a maximum likelihood-based approach that allows a gene family to be gained more than once within a tree. We first compared the performance of the two approaches on a series of artificial data sets each of 5,000 genes that were simulated according to a spectrum of evolutionary rates without gene gain or loss, so that inferred deviations from the true gene count would arise only from errors in orthology inference and ancestral reconstruction. Next, we reconstructed protein domain evolution on a phylogeny representing known eukaryotic diversity. We observed that Dollo parsimony produced numerous ancestral gene content overestimations, especially at nodes closer to the root of the tree. These observations led us to the conclusion that, confirming our hypothesis, Dollo parsimony is not an appropriate method for ancestral reconstruction studies based on sequence homology.

Incongruence in the phylogenomics era

Genome-scale data and the development of novel statistical phylogenetic approaches have greatly aided the reconstruction of a broad sketch of the tree of life and resolved many of its branches. However, incongruence - the inference of conflicting evolutionary histories - remains pervasive in phylogenomic data, hampering our ability to reconstruct and interpret the tree of life. Biological factors, such as incomplete lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, hybridization, introgression, recombination and convergent molecular evolution, can lead to gene phylogenies that differ from the species tree. In addition, analytical factors, including stochastic, systematic and treatment errors, can drive incongruence. Here, we review these factors, discuss methodological advances to identify and handle incongruence, and highlight avenues for future research.

Functional characterization of the MyD88 homologs in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

Toll-like receptor signaling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway to induce the expression of immune mediators in response to encounters with pathogens. MyD88 is a central adapter connecting the intracellular domain of the receptors to downstream kinases. Here, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of the MyD88 family in an echinoderm, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Of five SpMyD88s only two closely related proteins, SpMyD88A and SpMyD88B, are functional in mammalian cell lines as their overexpression facilitates the activation of the downstream transcription factor NF-κB. This requires the presence of the endogenous mammalian MyD88s, and domain swapping indicated that the death domains of S. purpuratus MyD88 are unable to efficiently connect to the respective domains of the vertebrate IRAK kinases. This suggests that the interaction surfaces between the signaling mediators in this conserved signaling pathway are not as conserved as previously thought but were likely shaped and evolved by pathogenic selection over evolutionary timescales.