Lower statistical support with larger datasets: insights from the Ochrophyta radiation

Phylogenomic analyses of ochrophytes (stramenopiles) with an emphasis on neglected lineages

Ochrophyta is a photosynthetic lineage that crowns the phylogenetic tree of stramenopiles, one of the major eukaryotic supergroups. Due to their ecological impact as a major primary producer, ochrophytes are relatively well-studied compared to the rest of the stramenopiles, yet their evolutionary relationships remain poorly understood. This is in part due to a number of missing lineages in large-scale multigene analyses, and an apparently rapid radiation leading to many short internodes between ochrophyte subgroups in the tree. These short internodes are also found across deep-branching lineages of stramenopiles with limited phylogenetic signal, leaving many relationships controversial overall. We have addressed this issue with other deep-branching stramenopiles recently, and now examine whether contentious relationships within the ochrophytes may be resolved with the help of filling in missing lineages in an updated phylogenomic dataset of ochrophytes, along with exploring various gene filtering criteria to identify the most phylogenetically informative genes. We generated ten new transcriptomes from various culture collections and a single-cell isolation from an environmental sample, added these to an existing phylogenomic dataset, and examined the effects of selecting genes with high phylogenetic signal or low phylogenetic noise. For some previously contentious relationships, we find a variety of analyses and gene filtering criteria consistently unite previously unstable groupings with strong statistical support. For example, we recovered a robust grouping of Eustigmatophyceae with Raphidophyceae-Phaeophyceae-Xanthophyceae while Olisthodiscophyceae formed a sister-lineage to Pinguiophyceae. Selecting genes with high phylogenetic signal or data quality recovered more stable topologies. Overall, we find that adding under-represented groups across different lineages is still crucial in resolving phylogenetic relationships, and discrete gene properties affect lineages of stramenopiles differently. This is something which may be explored to further our understanding of the molecular evolution of stramenopiles.

A chlorophyll c synthase widely co-opted by phytoplankton

Marine and terrestrial photosynthesis exhibit a schism in the accessory chlorophyll (Chl) that complements the function of Chl a: Chl b for green plants versus Chl c for most eukaryotic phytoplankton. The enzymes that mediate Chl c biosynthesis have long remained elusive. In this work, we identified the CHLC dioxygenase (Phatr3_J43737) from the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum as the Chl c synthase. The chlc mutants lacked Chl c, instead accumulating its precursors, and exhibited growth defects. In vitro, recombinant CHLC protein converted these precursors into Chl c, thereby confirming its identity. Phylogenetic evidence demonstrates conserved use of CHLC across phyla but also the existence of distinct Chl c synthases in different algal groups. Our study addresses a long-outstanding question with implications for both contemporary and ancient marine photosynthesis.

Improving Orthologous Signal and Model Fit in Datasets Addressing the Root of the Animal Phylogeny

There is conflicting evidence as to whether Porifera (sponges) or Ctenophora (comb jellies) comprise the root of the animal phylogeny. Support for either a Porifera-sister or Ctenophore-sister tree has been extensively examined in the context of model selection, taxon sampling, and outgroup selection. The influence of dataset construction is comparatively understudied. We re-examine five animal phylogeny datasets that have supported either root hypothesis using an approach designed to enrich orthologous signal in phylogenomic datasets. We find that many component orthogroups in animal datasets fail to recover major lineages as monophyletic with the exception of Ctenophora, regardless of the supported root. Enriching these datasets to retain orthogroups recovering ≥3 major lineages reduces dataset size by up to 50% while retaining underlying phylogenetic information and taxon sampling. Site-heterogeneous phylogenomic analysis of these enriched datasets recovers both Porifera-sister and Ctenophora-sister positions, even with additional constraints on outgroup sampling. Two datasets which previously supported Ctenophora-sister support Porifera-sister upon enrichment. All enriched datasets display improved model fitness under posterior predictive analysis. While not conclusively rooting animals at either Porifera or Ctenophora, we do see an increase in signal for Porifera-sister and a decrease in signal for Ctenophore-sister when data are filtered for orthologous signal. Our results indicate that dataset size and construction as well as model fit influence animal root inference.

An enigmatic stramenopile sheds light on early evolution in Ochrophyta plastid organellogenesis

Ochrophyta is an algal group belonging to the Stramenopiles and comprises diverse lineages of algae which contribute significantly to the oceanic ecosystems as primary producers. However, early evolution of the plastid organelle in Ochrophyta is not fully understood. In this study, we provide a well-supported tree of the Stramenopiles inferred by the large-scale phylogenomic analysis that unveils the eukaryvorous (nonphotosynthetic) protist Actinophrys sol (Actinophryidae) is closely related to Ochrophyta. We used genomic and transcriptomic data generated from A. sol to detect molecular traits of its plastid and we found no evidence of plastid genome and plastid-mediated biosynthesis, consistent with previous ultrastructural studies that did not identify any plastids in Actinophryidae. Moreover, our phylogenetic analyses of particular biosynthetic pathways provide no evidence of a current and past plastid in A. sol. However, we found more than a dozen organellar aminoacyl-tRNA synthases (aaRSs) that are of algal origin. Close relationships between aaRS from A. sol and their ochrophyte homologs document gene transfer of algal genes that happened before the divergence of Actinophryidae and Ochrophyta lineages. We further showed experimentally that organellar aaRSs of A. sol are targeted exclusively to mitochondria, although organellar aaRSs in Ochrophyta are dually targeted to mitochondria and plastids. Together, our findings suggested that the last common ancestor of Actinophryidae and Ochrophyta had not yet completed the establishment of host–plastid partnership as seen in the current Ochrophyta species, but acquired at least certain nuclear-encoded genes for the plastid functions.