1
|
Gupta MK, Vadde R. Next-generation development and application of codon model in evolution. Front Genet 2023; 14:1091575. [PMID: 36777719 PMCID: PMC9911445 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1091575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
To date, numerous nucleotide, amino acid, and codon substitution models have been developed to estimate the evolutionary history of any sequence/organism in a more comprehensive way. Out of these three, the codon substitution model is the most powerful. These models have been utilized extensively to detect selective pressure on a protein, codon usage bias, ancestral reconstruction and phylogenetic reconstruction. However, due to more computational demanding, in comparison to nucleotide and amino acid substitution models, only a few studies have employed the codon substitution model to understand the heterogeneity of the evolutionary process in a genome-scale analysis. Hence, there is always a question of how to develop more robust but less computationally demanding codon substitution models to get more accurate results. In this review article, the authors attempted to understand the basis of the development of different types of codon-substitution models and how this information can be utilized to develop more robust but less computationally demanding codon substitution models. The codon substitution model enables to detect selection regime under which any gene or gene region is evolving, codon usage bias in any organism or tissue-specific region and phylogenetic relationship between different lineages more accurately than nucleotide and amino acid substitution models. Thus, in the near future, these codon models can be utilized in the field of conservation, breeding and medicine.
Collapse
|
2
|
Stark TL, Liberles DA. Characterizing Amino Acid Substitution with Complete Linkage of Sites on a Lineage. Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:6377338. [PMID: 34581792 PMCID: PMC8557849 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Amino acid substitution models are commonly used for phylogenetic inference, for ancestral sequence reconstruction, and for the inference of positive selection. All commonly used models explicitly assume that each site evolves independently, an assumption that is violated by both linkage and protein structural and functional constraints. We introduce two new models for amino acid substitution which incorporate linkage between sites, each based on the (population-genetic) Moran model. The first model is a generalized population process tracking arbitrarily many sites which undergo mutation, with individuals replaced according to their fitnesses. This model provides a reasonably complete framework for simulations but is numerically and analytically intractable. We also introduce a second model which includes several simplifying assumptions but for which some theoretical results can be derived. We analyze the simplified model to determine conditions where linkage is likely to have meaningful effects on sitewise substitution probabilities, as well as conditions under which the effects are likely to be negligible. These findings are an important step in the generation of tractable phylogenetic models that parameterize selective coefficients for amino acid substitution while accounting for linkage of sites leading to both hitchhiking and background selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan L Stark
- Department of Biology and Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Liberles
- Department of Biology and Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Youssef N, Susko E, Roger AJ, Bielawski JP. Shifts in amino acid preferences as proteins evolve: A synthesis of experimental and theoretical work. Protein Sci 2021; 30:2009-2028. [PMID: 34322924 PMCID: PMC8442975 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Amino acid preferences vary across sites and time. While variation across sites is widely accepted, the extent and frequency of temporal shifts are contentious. Our understanding of the drivers of amino acid preference change is incomplete: To what extent are temporal shifts driven by adaptive versus nonadaptive evolutionary processes? We review phenomena that cause preferences to vary (e.g., evolutionary Stokes shift, contingency, and entrenchment) and clarify how they differ. To determine the extent and prevalence of shifted preferences, we review experimental and theoretical studies. Analyses of natural sequence alignments often detect decreases in homoplasy (convergence and reversions) rates, and variation in replacement rates with time-signals that are consistent with temporally changing preferences. While approaches inferring shifts in preferences from patterns in natural alignments are valuable, they are indirect since multiple mechanisms (both adaptive and nonadaptive) could lead to the observed signal. Alternatively, site-directed mutagenesis experiments allow for a more direct assessment of shifted preferences. They corroborate evidence from multiple sequence alignments, revealing that the preference for an amino acid at a site varies depending on the background sequence. However, shifts in preferences are usually minor in magnitude and sites with significantly shifted preferences are low in frequency. The small yet consistent perturbations in preferences could, nevertheless, jeopardize the accuracy of inference procedures, which assume constant preferences. We conclude by discussing if and how such shifts in preferences might influence widely used time-homogenous inference procedures and potential ways to mitigate such effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Youssef
- Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Edward Susko
- Department of Mathematics and StatisticsDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Andrew J. Roger
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Joseph P. Bielawski
- Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
- Department of Mathematics and StatisticsDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spielman SJ. Relative Model Fit Does Not Predict Topological Accuracy in Single-Gene Protein Phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 37:2110-2123. [PMID: 32191313 PMCID: PMC7306691 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
It is regarded as best practice in phylogenetic reconstruction to perform relative model selection to determine an appropriate evolutionary model for the data. This procedure ranks a set of candidate models according to their goodness of fit to the data, commonly using an information theoretic criterion. Users then specify the best-ranking model for inference. Although it is often assumed that better-fitting models translate to increase accuracy, recent studies have shown that the specific model employed may not substantially affect inferences. We examine whether there is a systematic relationship between relative model fit and topological inference accuracy in protein phylogenetics, using simulations and real sequences. Simulations employed site-heterogeneous mechanistic codon models that are distinct from protein-level phylogenetic inference models, allowing us to investigate how protein models performs when they are misspecified to the data, as will be the case for any real sequence analysis. We broadly find that phylogenies inferred across models with vastly different fits to the data produce highly consistent topologies. We additionally find that all models infer similar proportions of false-positive splits, raising the possibility that all available models of protein evolution are similarly misspecified. Moreover, we find that the parameter-rich GTR (general time reversible) model, whose amino acid exchangeabilities are free parameters, performs similarly to models with fixed exchangeabilities, although the inference precision associated with GTR models was not examined. We conclude that, although relative model selection may not hinder phylogenetic analysis on protein data, it may not offer specific predictable improvements and is not a reliable proxy for accuracy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ritchie AM, Stark TL, Liberles DA. Inferring the number and position of changes in selective regime in a non-equilibrium mutation-selection framework. BMC Ecol Evol 2021; 21:39. [PMID: 33691618 PMCID: PMC7944921 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01770-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovering the historical patterns of selection acting on a protein coding sequence is a major goal of evolutionary biology. Mutation-selection models address this problem by explicitly modelling fixation rates as a function of site-specific amino acid fitness values.However, they are restricted in their utility for investigating directional evolution because they require prior knowledge of the locations of fitness changes in the lineages of a phylogeny. RESULTS We apply a modified mutation-selection methodology that relaxes assumptions of equlibrium and time-reversibility. Our implementation allows us to identify branches where adaptive or compensatory shifts in the fitness landscape have taken place, signalled by a change in amino acid fitness profiles. Through simulation and analysis of an empirical data set of [Formula: see text]-lactamase genes, we test our ability to recover the position of adaptive events within the tree and successfully reconstruct initial codon frequencies and fitness profile parameters generated under the non-stationary model. CONCLUSION We demonstrate successful detection of selective shifts and identification of the affected branch on partitions of 300 codons or more. We successfully reconstruct fitness parameters and initial codon frequencies in simulated data and demonstrate that failing to account for non-equilibrium evolution can increase the error in fitness profile estimation. We also demonstrate reconstruction of plausible shifts in amino acid fitnesses in the bacterial [Formula: see text]-lactamase family and discuss some caveats for interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Ritchie
- Department of Biology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tristan L Stark
- Department of Biology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Liberles
- Department of Biology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yusuf L, Heatley MC, Palmer JPG, Barton HJ, Cooney CR, Gossmann TI. Noncoding regions underpin avian bill shape diversification at macroevolutionary scales. Genome Res 2020; 30:553-565. [PMID: 32269134 PMCID: PMC7197477 DOI: 10.1101/gr.255752.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Recent progress has been made in identifying genomic regions implicated in trait evolution on a microevolutionary scale in many species, but whether these are relevant over macroevolutionary time remains unclear. Here, we directly address this fundamental question using bird beak shape, a key evolutionary innovation linked to patterns of resource use, divergence, and speciation, as a model trait. We integrate class-wide geometric-morphometric analyses with evolutionary sequence analyses of 10,322 protein-coding genes as well as 229,001 genomic regions spanning 72 species. We identify 1434 protein-coding genes and 39,806 noncoding regions for which molecular rates were significantly related to rates of bill shape evolution. We show that homologs of the identified protein-coding genes as well as genes in close proximity to the identified noncoding regions are involved in craniofacial embryo development in mammals. They are associated with embryonic stem cell pathways, including BMP and Wnt signaling, both of which have repeatedly been implicated in the morphological development of avian beaks. This suggests that identifying genotype-phenotype association on a genome-wide scale over macroevolutionary time is feasible. Although the coding and noncoding gene sets are associated with similar pathways, the actual genes are highly distinct, with significantly reduced overlap between them and bill-related phenotype associations specific to noncoding loci. Evidence for signatures of recent diversifying selection on our identified noncoding loci in Darwin finch populations further suggests that regulatory rather than coding changes are major drivers of morphological diversification over macroevolutionary times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leeban Yusuf
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.,Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew C Heatley
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.,Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph P G Palmer
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.,School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
| | - Henry J Barton
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.,Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Viikinkaari 9 (PL 56), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland
| | - Christopher R Cooney
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Toni I Gossmann
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.,Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, DE-33501, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dunn KA, Kenney T, Gu H, Bielawski JP. Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates. BMC Evol Biol 2019; 19:22. [PMID: 30642241 PMCID: PMC6332903 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1326-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An excess of nonsynonymous substitutions, over neutrality, is considered evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Inference for proteins often relies on estimation of the nonsynonymous to synonymous ratio (ω = dN/dS) within a codon model. However, to ease computational difficulties, ω is typically estimated assuming an idealized substitution process where (i) all nonsynonymous substitutions have the same rate (regardless of impact on organism fitness) and (ii) instantaneous double and triple (DT) nucleotide mutations have zero probability (despite evidence that they can occur). It follows that estimates of ω represent an imperfect summary of the intensity of selection, and that tests based on the ω > 1 threshold could be negatively impacted. RESULTS We developed a general-purpose parametric (GPP) modelling framework for codons. This novel approach allows specification of all possible instantaneous codon substitutions, including multiple nonsynonymous rates (MNRs) and instantaneous DT nucleotide changes. Existing codon models are specified as special cases of the GPP model. We use GPP models to implement likelihood ratio tests for ω > 1 that accommodate MNRs and DT mutations. Through both simulation and real data analysis, we find that failure to model MNRs and DT mutations reduces power in some cases and inflates false positives in others. False positives under traditional M2a and M8 models were very sensitive to DT changes. This was exacerbated by the choice of frequency parameterization (GY vs. MG), with rates sometimes > 90% under MG. By including MNRs and DT mutations, accuracy and power was greatly improved under the GPP framework. However, we also find that over-parameterized models can perform less well, and this can contribute to degraded performance of LRTs. CONCLUSIONS We suggest GPP models should be used alongside traditional codon models. Further, all codon models should be deployed within an experimental design that includes (i) assessing robustness to model assumptions, and (ii) investigation of non-standard behaviour of MLEs. As the goal of every analysis is to avoid false conclusions, more work is needed on model selection methods that consider both the increase in fit engendered by a model parameter and the degree to which that parameter is affected by un-modelled evolutionary processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A. Dunn
- Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1 Canada
| | - Toby Kenney
- Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1 Canada
| | - Hong Gu
- Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1 Canada
| | - Joseph P. Bielawski
- Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1 Canada
- Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1 Canada
- Centre Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics (CGEB) at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Platt A, Weber CC, Liberles DA. Protein evolution depends on multiple distinct population size parameters. BMC Evol Biol 2018; 18:17. [PMID: 29422024 PMCID: PMC5806465 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1085-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
That population size affects the fate of new mutations arising in genomes, modulating both how frequently they arise and how efficiently natural selection is able to filter them, is well established. It is therefore clear that these distinct roles for population size that characterize different processes should affect the evolution of proteins and need to be carefully defined. Empirical evidence is consistent with a role for demography in influencing protein evolution, supporting the idea that functional constraints alone do not determine the composition of coding sequences. Given that the relationship between population size, mutant fitness and fixation probability has been well characterized, estimating fitness from observed substitutions is well within reach with well-formulated models. Molecular evolution research has, therefore, increasingly begun to leverage concepts from population genetics to quantify the selective effects associated with different classes of mutation. However, in order for this type of analysis to provide meaningful information about the intra- and inter-specific evolution of coding sequences, a clear definition of concepts of population size, what they influence, and how they are best parameterized is essential. Here, we present an overview of the many distinct concepts that “population size” and “effective population size” may refer to, what they represent for studying proteins, and how this knowledge can be harnessed to produce better specified models of protein evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Platt
- Department of Biology and Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics, Temple University, Philadelphia, 19121, USA
| | - Claudia C Weber
- Department of Biology and Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics, Temple University, Philadelphia, 19121, USA
| | - David A Liberles
- Department of Biology and Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics, Temple University, Philadelphia, 19121, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sydykova DK, Jack BR, Spielman SJ, Wilke CO. Measuring evolutionary rates of proteins in a structural context. F1000Res 2017; 6:1845. [PMID: 29167739 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12874.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe how to measure site-specific rates of evolution in protein-coding genes and how to correlate these rates with structural features of the expressed protein, such as relative solvent accessibility, secondary structure, or weighted contact number. We present two alternative approaches to rate calculations: One based on relative amino-acid rates, and the other based on site-specific codon rates measured as dN/ dS. We additionally provide a code repository containing scripts to facilitate the specific analysis protocols we recommend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariya K Sydykova
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Benjamin R Jack
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Stephanie J Spielman
- Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Claus O Wilke
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sydykova DK, Jack BR, Spielman SJ, Wilke CO. Measuring evolutionary rates of proteins in a structural context. F1000Res 2017; 6:1845. [PMID: 29167739 PMCID: PMC5676193 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12874.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe how to measure site-specific rates of evolution in protein-coding genes and how to correlate these rates with structural features of the expressed protein, such as relative solvent accessibility, secondary structure, or weighted contact number. We present two alternative approaches to rate calculations: One based on relative amino-acid rates, and the other based on site-specific codon rates measured as
dN/
dS. We additionally provide a code repository containing scripts to facilitate the specific analysis protocols we recommend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariya K Sydykova
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Benjamin R Jack
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Stephanie J Spielman
- Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Claus O Wilke
- Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|