Follow-up genotoxicity assessment of Ames-positive/equivocal chemicals using the improved thymidine kinase gene mutation assay in DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells

Use of in silico and in vitro methods as a potential new approach methodologies (NAMs) for (photo)mutagenicity and phototoxicity risk assessment of agrochemicals

The increased use of agrochemicals raises concerns about environmental, animal, and mainly human toxicology. The development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for toxicological risk assessment including new in vitro tests and in silico protocols is encouraged. Although agrochemical mutagenicity testing is well established, a complementary alternative approach may contribute to increasing reliability, with the consequent reduction of false-positive results that lead to unnecessary use of animals in follow-up in vivo testing. Additionally, it is unreasonable to underestimate the phototoxic effects of an accidental dermal exposure to agrochemicals during agricultural work or domestic application in the absence of adequate personal protection equipment, especially in terms of photomutagenicity. In this scenario, we addressed the integration of in vitro and in silico techniques as NAMs to assess the mutagenic and phototoxic potential of agrochemicals. In the present study we used the yno1 S. cerevisiae strain as a biomodel for in vitro assessment of agrochemical mutagenicity, both in the absence and in the presence of simulated sunlight. In parallel, in silico predictions were performed using a combination of expert rule-based and statistical-based models to assess gene mutations and phototoxicity. None of the tested agrochemicals showed mutagenic potential in the two proposed approaches. The Gly and 2,4D herbicides were photomutagenic in the in vitro yeast test despite the negative in silico prediction of phototoxicity. Herein, we demonstrated a novel experimental approach combining both in silico and in vitro experiments to address the complementary investigation of the phototoxicity and (photo)mutagenicity of agrochemicals. These findings shed light on the importance of investigating and reconsidering the photosafety assessment of these products, using not only photocytotoxicity assays but also photomutagenicity assays, which should be encouraged.

Potent mutagenicity of an azide, 3-azido-1,2-propanediol, in human TK6 cells

Sodium azide is a strong mutagen that has been successfully employed in mutation breeding of crop plants. In biological systems, it is metabolically converted to the proximate mutagen azidoalanine, which requires further bioactivation to a putative ultimate mutagen that remains elusive. The nature of the DNA modifications induced by azides leading to mutations is also unknown. Other mutagenic organic azido compounds seem to share the same bioactivation pathway to the ultimate mutagenic species as they induce point mutations dependent on the same DNA repair pathways. We investigated mutations induced by the representative mutagen 3-azido-1,2-propanediol (azidoglycerol, AZG) in the human TK6 cell line. Until now, azides have been considered to be non-mutagens and non-carcinogens in mammals, including humans, as judged only by the conventional clastogenicity chromosomal aberration types of bioassays. Here, we show the potent mutagenicity of AZG in cultured human cells, comparable to alkylating agents such as methyl methanesulfonate at concentrations with similar lethality. The potent ability of an organic azide to induce base substitutions in a mammalian system raises an alert with respect to human exposure to organic and inorganic azido compounds.