G2 checkpoint control and G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in cancer survivors and their families

Incorporation of Low Concentrations of Gold Nanoparticles: Complex Effects on Radiation Response and Fate of Cancer Cells

(1) Background: In oncology research, a long-standing discussion exists about pros and cons of metal nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy and real mechanisms behind the tumor cell response to irradiation (IR) in presence of gold nanoparticles (GNPs). A better understanding of this response is, however, necessary to develop more efficient and safety nanoparticle (NP) types designed to disturb specific processes in tumor cells. (2) Aims and Methods: We combined 3D confocal microscopy and super-resolution single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) to analyze, at the multiscale, the early and late effects of 10 nm-GNPs on DNA double strand break (DSB) induction and repair in tumor cells exposed to different doses of photonic low-LET (linear energy transfer) radiation. The results were correlated to different aspects of short and long-term cell viability. SkBr3 breast cancer cells (selected for the highest incidence of this cancer type among all cancers in women, and because most breast tumors are treated with IR) were incubated with low concentrations of GNPs and irradiated with ⁶⁰Co γ-rays or 6 MV X-rays. In numerous post-irradiation (PI) times, ranging from 0.5 to 24 h PI, the cells were spatially (3D) fixed and labeled with specific antibodies against γH2AX, 53BP1 and H3K9me3. The extent of DSB induction, multi-parametric micro- and nano-morphology of γH2AX and 53BP1 repair foci, DSB repair kinetics, persistence of unrepaired DSBs, nanoscale clustering of γH2AX and nanoscale (hetero)chromatin re-organization were measured by means of the mentioned microscopy techniques in dependence of radiation dose and GNP concentration. (3) Results: The number of γH2AX/53BP1 signals increased after IR and an additional increase was observed in GNP-treated (GNP(+)) cells compared to untreated controls. However, this phenomenon reflected slight expansion of the G2-phase cell subpopulation in irradiated GNP(+) specimens instead of enhanced DNA damage induction by GNPs. This statement is further supported by some micro- and nano-morphological parameters of γH2AX/53BP1 foci, which slightly differed for cells irradiated in absence or presence of GNPs. At the nanoscale, Ripley’s distance frequency analysis of SMLM signal coordinate matrices also revealed relaxation of heterochromatin (H3K9me3) clusters upon IR. These changes were more prominent in presence of GNPs. The slight expansion of radiosensitive G2 cells correlated with mostly insignificant but systematic decrease in post-irradiation survival of GNP(+) cells. Interestingly, low GNP concentrations accelerated DSB repair kinetics; however, the numbers of persistent γH2AX/53BP1 repair foci were slightly increased in GNP(+) cells. (4) Conclusions: Low concentrations of 10-nm GNPs enhanced the G2/M cell cycle arrest and the proportion of radiosensitive G2 cells, but not the extent of DNA damage induction. GNPs also accelerated DSB repair kinetics and slightly increased presence of unrepaired γH2AX/53BP1 foci at 24 h PI. GNP-mediated cell effects correlated with slight radiosensitization of GNP(+) specimens, significant only for the highest radiation dose tested (4 Gy).

Prediction of the Acute or Late Radiation Toxicity Effects in Radiotherapy Patients Using Ex Vivo Induced Biodosimetric Markers: A Review

A search for effective methods for the assessment of patients' individual response to radiation is one of the important tasks of clinical radiobiology. This review summarizes available data on the use of ex vivo cytogenetic markers, typically used for biodosimetry, for the prediction of individual clinical radiosensitivity (normal tissue toxicity, NTT) in cells of cancer patients undergoing therapeutic irradiation. In approximately 50% of the relevant reports, selected for the analysis in peer-reviewed international journals, the average ex vivo induced yield of these biodosimetric markers was higher in patients with severe reactions than in patients with a lower grade of NTT. Also, a significant correlation was sometimes found between the biodosimetric marker yield and the severity of acute or late NTT reactions at an individual level, but this observation was not unequivocally proven. A similar controversy of published results was found regarding the attempts to apply G2- and γH2AX foci assays for NTT prediction. A correlation between ex vivo cytogenetic biomarker yields and NTT occurred most frequently when chromosome aberrations (not micronuclei) were measured in lymphocytes (not fibroblasts) irradiated to relatively high doses (4-6 Gy, not 2 Gy) in patients with various grades of late (not early) radiotherapy (RT) morbidity. The limitations of existing approaches are discussed, and recommendations on the improvement of the ex vivo cytogenetic testing for NTT prediction are provided. However, the efficiency of these methods still needs to be validated in properly organized clinical trials involving large and verified patient cohorts.

A method for the cell-cycle-specific analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations and breaks

The classical G₂-assay is widely used to assess cell-radiosensitivity and cancer phenotype: Cells are exposed to low doses of ionizing-radiation (IR) and collected for cytogenetic- analysis ˜1.5 h later. In this way, chromosome-damage is measured in cells irradiated in G₂-phase, without retrieving information regarding kinetics of chromosome-break-repair. Modification of the assay to include analysis at multiple time-points after IR, has enabled kinetic-analysis of chromatid-break-repair and assessment of damage in a larger proportion of G₂-phase cells. This modification, however, increases the probability that at later time points not only cells irradiated in G₂-phase, but also cells irradiated in S-phase will reach metaphase. However, the response of cells irradiated in G₂-phase can be mechanistically different from that of cells irradiated in S-phase. Therefore, indiscriminate analysis may confound the interpretation of experiments designed to elucidate mechanisms of chromosome-break-repair and the contributions of the different DSB-repair-pathways in this response. Here we report an EdU based modification of the assay that enables S- and G₂-phase specific analysis of chromatid break repair. Our results show that the majority of metaphases captured during the first 2 h after IR originate from cells irradiated in G₂-phase (EdU^- metaphases) in both rodent and human cells. Metaphases originating from cells irradiated in S-phase (EdU⁺ metaphases) start appearing at 2 h and 4 h after IR in rodent and human cells, respectively. The kinetics of chromatid-break-repair are similar in cells irradiated in G₂- and S-phase of the cell-cycle, both in rodent and human cells. The protocol is applicable to classical-cytogenetic experiments and allows the cell-cycle specific analysis of chromosomal-aberrations. Finally, the protocol can be applied to the kinetic analysis of chromosome-breaks in prematurely-condensed-chromosomes of G₂-phase cells. In summary, the developed protocol provides means to enhance the analysis of IR-induced-cytogenetic-damage by providing information on the cell-cycle phase where DNA damage is inflicted.

A 24-color metaphase-based radiation assay discriminates heterozygous BRCA2 mutation carriers from controls by chromosomal radiosensitivity

Numerous allelic variants identified in the familial breast cancer and DNA repair genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are of unknown impact on protein function or clinical relevance, referred to as unclassified variants (UCV). Lymphocytes from pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation carriers exhibit an increased level of chromosomal damage after irradiation. We established a radiation assay for the discrimination of pathogenic BRCA2 variants versus controls based on the level of chromosomal damage upon irradiation (p < 0.001). As a consequence, lymphocytes from UCV carriers could be separated into two distinct groups with normal or diminished DNA double strand break repair capacity. Our results suggested that all five UCV tested were benign and that one family carried a putative mutation in an as yet undetected DNA-repair gene. Thus, our test may serve as a valuable tool that aids the classification of BRCA2 UCV, but very likely also of BRCA1 UCV or aberrations in other genes involved in the DNA-repair system.