Conformation of the HMG 14 nucleosome core complex from flow birefringence

Large flow birefringence of nematogenic bent-core liquid crystals

We have found that bent-core liquid crystalline materials show exceptionally large intrinsic flow birefringence in their isotropic liquid phase. This effect is more than 100 times larger than typical values measured for low molecular weight liquid crystals. The specific flow birefringence (i.e., normalized by the flow viscosity) is an order of magnitude larger than in both side-chain polymeric as well as low molecular weight liquid crystals. We propose that this large enhancement for bent-core compounds may be attributed to nanoscale smecticlike clusters that persist above the nematic-isotropic transition temperature, and shear align under shear flow; however, this mechanism has not yet been definitively confirmed.

Binding of HMG14 non-histone protein to histones H2A, H2B, H1 and DNA in reconstituted chromatin

The interaction between calf thymus HMG14 and rat liver chromatin components has been studied via reconstitution and chemical cross-linking. Selective labeling of HMG14 with photoactivable reversible heterobifunctional reagents has allowed a clear identification of the histones interacting with it (histones H2A, H2B and H1). These results are not dependent on whether the chromatin samples used were bulk chromatin, mononucleosomes, or core particles (for H2A and H2B). In addition to histone proteins, DNA also seems to be involved in HMG14 attachment to nucleosome.

Primary organization of nucleosomes. Interaction of non-histone high mobility group proteins 14 and 17 with nucleosomes, as revealed by DNA-protein crosslinking and immunoaffinity isolation

The binding sites for histones and high mobility group proteins (HMG) 14 and 17 have been located on DNA in the nucleosomal cores and H1/H5-containing nucleosomes. The nucleosomes were specifically associated with two molecules of the non-histone proteins HMG 14 and/or HMG 17 when followed by DNA-protein crosslinking and immunoaffinity isolation of the crosslinked HMG-DNA complexes. HMGs 14 and 17 were shown to be crosslinked in a similar manner to each core DNA strand at four sites: to both 3' and 5' DNA ends and also at distances of about 25 and 125 nucleotides from the 5' termini of the DNA. These sites are designated as HMG(143), (0), (25) and (125). The site HMG(125) is located at the place where no significant histone-DNA crosslinking was observed. The HMG(125) and HMG(25) sites lie opposite one another on the complementary DNA strands across the minor DNA groove and are placed, similarly to histones, on the inner side of the DNA superhelix in the nucleosome. The crosslinking of HMG 17 to the 3' ends of the DNA is much weaker than that of HMG 14. These data indicate that each of two molecules of HMG 14 and/or HMG 17 is bound to the double-stranded core DNA at two discrete sites: to the 3' and 5' ends of the DNA and at a distance of 20 to 25 base-pairs from each DNA terminus inside the nucleosome on a histone-free DNA region. Binding of HMG 14 or 17 does not induce any detectable rearrangement of histones on DNA and both HMGs seem to choose the same sites for attachment in nucleosomal cores and H1/H5-containing nucleosomes.

Optical model studies of the salt-induced 10-30-nm fiber transition in chromatin

Fractionated chicken erythrocyte chromatin fibers consisting of 10-mer and 75-mer polynucleosomes have been studied by flow birefringence and viscosity over a range of Na+ and Mg2+ ion concentrations sufficient to span the 10-30-nm fiber transition. Negative intrinsic flow bifringence was observed under all solvent conditions investigated. The intrinsic birefringence, obtained from the reduced birefringence to intrinsic viscosity ratio, was used to evaluate various optical models for the DNA conformation in the fiber. Results are consistent with an extended chromatosome-linker "necklace" model for the unfolded, low-salt fiber and with a solenoidal model of edge-stacked chromatosomes for the condensed fiber at high salts. These results are consistent with and independently corroborative of similar models based upon electric dichroism and neutron scattering reported by others.

Conformation of the HMG17-nucleosome complex

The nucleosome core binds more than two molecules of HMG17 at low ionic strength (8.9 mM Tris-HCl/8.9 mM boric acid/0.25 mM Na2EDTA, pH 8.3). Circular dichroism of the complexes showed only minor conformational changes of the nucleosome core DNA on binding of HMG17, with no detectable change in the histone secondary structure. The fluorescence of N-(3-pyrene) maleimide bound to -SH groups at Cys-110 of H3 histones in the core particle suggested that the structure of the histone octamer assembly changed little upon binding of HMG17 to the nucleosome. These observations support the idea that even a high level of HMG17 binding, e.g., four HMGs per nucleosome, alone, does not open up the core particle.

Transcriptionally active chromatin

Eukaryotic chromatin has a dynamic, complex hierarchical structure. Active gene transcription takes place on only a small proportion of it at a time. While many workers have tried to characterize active chromatin, we are still far from understanding all the biochemical, morphological and compositional features that distinguish it from inactive nuclear material. Active genes are apparently packaged in an altered nucleosome structure and are associated with domains of chromatin that are less condensed or more open than inactive domains. Active genes are more sensitive to nuclease digestions and probably contain specific nonhistone proteins which may establish and/or maintain the active state. Variant or modified histones as well as altered configurations or modifications of the DNA itself may likewise be involved. Practically nothing is known about the mechanisms that control these nuclear characteristics. However, controlled accessibility to regions of chromatin and specific sequences of DNA may be one of the primary regulatory mechanisms by which higher cells establish potentially active chromatin domains. Another control mechanism may be compartmentalization of active chromatin to certain regions within the nucleus, perhaps to the nuclear matrix. Topological constraints and DNA supercoiling may influence the active regions of chromatin and be involved in eukaryotic genomic functions. Further, the chromatin structure of various DNA regulatory sequences, such as promoters, terminators and enhancers, appears to partially regulate transcriptional activity.