Transcription of the uvrD gene of Escherichia coli is controlled by the lexA repressor and by attenuation

A Peek Inside the Machines of Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Double stranded DNA (dsDNA), the repository of genetic information in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, exhibits a surprising instability in the intracellular environment; this fragility is exacerbated by exogenous agents, such as ultraviolet radiation. To protect themselves against the severe consequences of DNA damage, cells have evolved at least six distinct DNA repair pathways. Here, we review recent key findings of studies aimed at understanding one of these pathways: bacterial nucleotide excision repair (NER). This pathway operates in two modes: a global genome repair (GGR) pathway and a pathway that closely interfaces with transcription by RNA polymerase called transcription-coupled repair (TCR). Below, we discuss the architecture of key proteins in bacterial NER and recent biochemical, structural and single-molecule studies that shed light on the lesion recognition steps of both the GGR and the TCR sub-pathways. Although a great deal has been learned about both of these sub-pathways, several important questions, including damage discrimination, roles of ATP and the orchestration of protein binding and conformation switching, remain to be addressed.

Mechanistic insights into transcription coupled DNA repair

Transcription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) acts on lesions in the transcribed strand of active genes. Helix distorting adducts and other forms of DNA damage often interfere with the progression of the transcription apparatus. Prolonged stalling of RNA polymerase can promote genome instability and also induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. These generally unfavorable events are counteracted by RNA polymerase-mediated recruitment of specific proteins to the sites of DNA damage to perform TCR and eventually restore transcription. In this perspective we discuss the decision-making process to employ TCR and we elucidate the intricate biochemical pathways leading to TCR in E. coli and human cells.

From Mfd to TRCF and Back Again-A Perspective on Bacterial Transcription-coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair

Photochemical and other reactions on DNA cause damage and corrupt genetic information. To counteract this damage, organisms have evolved intricate repair mechanisms that often crosstalk with other DNA-based processes such as transcription. Intriguing observations in the late 1980s and early 1990s led to the discovery of transcription-coupled repair (TCR), a subpathway of nucleotide excision repair. TCR, found in all domains of life, prioritizes for repair lesions located in the transcribed DNA strand, directly read by RNA polymerase. Here, we give a historical overview of developments in the field of bacterial TCR, starting from the pioneering work of Evelyn Witkin and Aziz Sancar, which led to the identification of the first transcription-repair coupling factor (the Mfd protein), to recent studies that have uncovered alternative TCR pathways and regulators.

UvrD helicase: an old dog with a new trick: how one step backward leads to many steps forward

Transcription-coupled repair (TCR) is a phenomenon that exists in a wide variety of organisms from bacteria to humans. This mechanism allows cells to repair the actively transcribed DNA strand much faster than the non-transcribed one. At the sites of bulky DNA damage RNA polymerase stalls, initiating recruitment of the repair machinery. It is a commonly accepted paradigm that bacterial cells utilize a sole coupling factor, called Mfd to initiate TCR. According to that model, Mfd removes transcription complexes stalled at the lesion site and simultaneously recruits repair machinery. However, this model was recently put in doubt by various discrepancies between the proposed universal role of Mfd in the TCR and its biochemical and phenotypical properties. Here, I present a second pathway of bacterial TCR recently discovered in my laboratory, which does not involve Mfd but implicates a common repair factor, UvrD, in a central position in the process.

The role of the bacterial mismatch repair system in SOS-induced mutagenesis: a theoretical background

A theoretical study is performed of the possible role of the methyl-directed mismatch repair system in the ultraviolet-induced mutagenesis of Escherichia coli bacterial cells. For this purpose, mathematical models of the SOS network, translesion synthesis and mismatch repair are developed. Within the proposed models, the key pathways of these repair systems were simulated on the basis of modern experimental data related to their mechanisms. Our model approach shows a possible mechanistic explanation of the hypothesis that the bacterial mismatch repair system is responsible for attenuation of mutation frequency during ultraviolet-induced SOS response via removal of the nucleotides misincorporated by DNA polymerase V (the UmuD'2C complex).

DNA Mismatch Repair

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) corrects replication errors in newly synthesized DNA. It also has an antirecombination action on heteroduplexes that contain similar but not identical sequences. This review focuses on the genetics and development of MMR and not on the latest biochemical mechanisms. The main focus is on MMR in Escherichia coli, but examples from Streptococcuspneumoniae and Bacillussubtilis have also been included. In most organisms, only MutS (detects mismatches) and MutL (an endonuclease) and a single exonucleaseare present. How this system discriminates between newlysynthesized and parental DNA strands is not clear. In E. coli and its relatives, however, Dam methylation is an integral part of MMR and is the basis for strand discrimination. A dedicated site-specific endonuclease, MutH, is present, andMutL has no endonuclease activity; four exonucleases can participate in MMR. Although it might seem that the accumulated wealth of genetic and biochemical data has given us a detailed picture of the mechanism of MMR in E. coli, the existence of three competing models to explain the initiation phase indicates the complexity of the system. The mechanism of the antirecombination action of MMR is largely unknown, but only MutS and MutL appear to be necessary. A primary site of action appears to be on RecA, although subsequent steps of the recombination process can also be inhibited. In this review, the genetics of Very Short Patch (VSP) repair of T/G mismatches arising from deamination of 5-methylcytosineresidues is also discussed.

UvrD helicase of Plasmodium falciparum

Malaria caused by the mosquito-transmitted parasite Plasmodium is the cause of enormous number of deaths every year in the tropical and subtropical areas of the world. Among four species of Plasmodium, Plasmodium falciparum causes most fatal form of malaria. With time, the parasite has developed insecticide and drug resistance. Newer strategies and advent of novel drug targets are required so as to combat the deadly form of malaria. Helicases is one such class of enzymes which has previously been suggested as potential antiviral and anticancer targets. These enzymes play an essential role in nearly all the nucleic acid metabolic processes, catalyzing the transient opening of the duplex nucleic acids in an NTP-dependent manner. DNA helicases from the PcrA/UvrD/Rep subfamily are important for the survival of the various organisms. Members from this subfamily can be targeted and inhibited by a variety of synthetic compounds. UvrD from this subfamily is the only member present in the P. falciparum genome, which shows no homology with UvrD from human and thus can be considered as a strong potential drug target. In this manuscript we provide an overview of UvrD family of helicases and bioinformatics analysis of UvrD from P. falciparum.

The Escherichia coli UvrD helicase is essential for Tus removal during recombination-dependent replication restart from Ter sites

Blocking replication forks in the Escherichia coli chromosome by ectopic Ter sites renders the RecBCD pathway of homologous recombination and SOS induction essential for viability. In this work, we show that the E. coli helicase II (UvrD) is also essential for the growth of cells where replication forks are arrested at ectopic Ter sites. We propose that UvrD is required for Tus removal from Ter sites. The viability of a SOS non-inducible Ter-blocked strain is fully restored by the expression of the two SOS-induced proteins UvrD and RecA at high level, indicating that these are the only two SOS-induced proteins required for replication across Ter/Tus complexes. Several observations suggest that UvrD acts in concert with homologous recombination and we propose that UvrD is associated with recombination-initiated replication forks and that it removes Tus when a PriA-dependent, restarted replication fork goes across the Ter/Tus complex. Finally, expression of the UvrD homologue from Bacilus subtilis PcrA restores the growth of uvrD-deficient Ter-blocked cells, indicating that the capacity to dislodge Tus is conserved in this distant bacterial species.

The SOS-dependent upregulation of uvrD is not required for efficient nucleotide excision repair of ultraviolet light induced DNA photoproducts in Escherichia coli

We have shown previously that induction of the SOS response is required for efficient nucleotide excision repair (NER) of the major ultraviolet light (UV) induced DNA lesion, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD), but not for repair of 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PP) or for transcription-coupled repair of CPDs [1]. We have proposed that the upregulation of cellular NER capacity occurs in the early stages of the SOS response and enhances the rate of repair of the abundant yet poorly recognized genomic CPDs. The expression of three NER genes, uvrA, uvrB, and uvrD, is upregulated as part of the SOS response. UvrD differs from the others in that it is not involved in lesion recognition but rather in promoting the post-incision steps of NER, including turnover of the UvrBC incision complex. Since uvrC is not induced during the SOS response, its turnover would seem to be of great importance in promoting efficient NER. Here we show that the constitutive level of UvrD is adequate for carrying out efficient NER of both CPDs and 6-4PPs. Thus, the upregulation of uvrA and uvrB genes during the SOS response is sufficient for inducible NER of CPDs. We also show that cells with a limited NER capacity, in this case due to deletion of the uvrD gene, repair 6-4PPs but cannot perform transcription-coupled repair of CPDs, indicating that the 6-4PP is a better substrate for NER than is a CPD targeted for transcription-coupled repair.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

Cloning and characterization of the Haemophilus influenzae mutB gene

The Haemophilus influenzae mutB+ gene complements Escherichia coli uvrD mutants. The E. coli uvrD+ gene complements H. influenzae mutB1 mutants.

Compilation of E. coli mRNA promoter sequences

An updated compilation of 300 E. coli mRNA promoter sequences is presented. For each sequence the most recent relevant paper was checked, to verify the location of the transcriptional start position as identified experimentally. We comment on the reliability of the sequence databanks and analyze the conservation of known promoter features in the current compilation. This database is available by E-mail.

Expression of the psbDII gene in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 requires sequences downstream of the transcription start site

The psbDI and psbDII genes in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 encode the D2 polypeptide, an essential component of the photosystem II reaction center. Previous studies have demonstrated that transcripts from psbDII, but not psbDI, increase in response to high light intensity. Soluble proteins from Synechococcus cells shifted to high light were found to have affinity for DNA sequences upstream from the psbDII coding region. DNA mobility-shift and copper-phenanthroline footprinting assays of a 258-bp fragment revealed three distinct DNA-protein complexes that mapped to the untranslated leader region between +11 and +84. Deletion of the upstream flanking region to -42 had no effect on the expression of a psbDII-lacZ reporter gene or its induction by light, whereas a promoterless construct supported only minimal background levels of beta-galactosidase. A 4-bp deletion within the first protected region of the footprint decreased the beta-galactosidase activity to approximately 2% of that of the undeleted control, but gene expression remained responsive to light. Deletion of the three protected regions completely abolished both gene expression and light induction. These results suggest that the psbDII gene requires elements within the untranslated leader region for efficient gene expression, one of which may be involved in regulation by light.

Control site location and transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli

The regulatory regions for 119 Escherichia coli promoters have been analyzed, and the locations of the regulatory sites have been cataloged. The following observations emerge. (i) More than 95% of promoters are coregulated with at least one other promoter. (ii) Virtually all sigma 70 promoters contain at least one regulatory site in a proximal position, touching at least position -65 with respect to the start point of transcription. There are not yet clear examples of upstream regulation in the absence of a proximal site. (iii) Operators within regulons appear in very variable proximal positions. By contrast, the proximal activation sites of regulons are much more fixed. (iv) There is a forbidden zone for activation elements downstream from approximately position -20 with respect to the start of transcription. By contrast, operators can occur throughout the proximal region. When activation elements appear in the forbidden zone, they repress. These latter examples usually involve autoregulation. (v) Approximately 40% of repressible promoters contain operator duplications. These occur either in certain regulons where duplication appears to be a requirement for repressor action or in promoters subject to complex regulation. (vi) Remote operator duplications occur in approximately 10% of repressible promoters. They generally appear when a multiple promoter region is coregulated by cyclic AMP receptor protein. (vii) Sigma 54 promoters do not require proximal or precisely positioned activator elements and are not generally subject to negative regulation. Rationales are presented for all of the above observations.

DNA binding properties of the LexA repressor

The LexA repressor from Escherichia coli negatively regulates the transcription of about 20 different genes upon binding with variable affinity to single-, double- or even triple-operators as in the case of the recN gene. Binding of LexA to multiple operators is cooperative if the spacing between these operators is favorable. LexA recognizes DNA via its amino-terminal domain. The three-dimensional structure of this domain has been determined by NMR measurements. It contains three alpha-helices spanning residues 8-20, 28-35 and 41-54. In view of this structure, but also according to homology considerations and the unusual contact pattern with the DNA backbone, the LexA repressor is not a normal helix-turn-helix DNA binding protein like for example phage lambda repressor. LexA is at best a distant relative of this class of transcription factors and should probably be considered as a protein that contains a new DNA binding motif. A cluster of LexA mutant repressors deficient in DNA binding falling into the third helix (residues 41-54 bp) suggests that this helix is involved in DNA recognition.

DNA helicases of Escherichia coli

A great deal has been learned in the last 15 years with regard to how helicase enzymes participate in DNA metabolism and how they interact with their DNA substrates. However, many questions remain unanswered. Of critical importance is an understanding of how NTP hydrolysis and hydrogen-bond disruption are coupled. Several models exist and are being tested; none has been proven. In addition, an understanding of how a helicase disrupts the hydrogen bonds holding duplex DNA together is lacking. Recently, helicase enzymes that unwind duplex RNA and DNA.RNA hybrids have been described. In some cases, these are old enzymes with new activities. In other cases, these are new enzymes only recently discovered. The significance of these reactions in the cell remains to be clarified. However, with the availability of significant amounts of these enzymes in a highly purified state, and mutant alleles in most of the genes encoding them, the answers to these questions should be forthcoming. The variety of helicases found in E. coli, and the myriad processes these enzymes are involved in, were perhaps unexpected. It seems likely that an equally large number of helicases will be discovered in eukaryotic cells. In fact, several helicases have been identified and purified from eukaryotic sources ranging from viruses to mouse cells (4-13, 227-234). Many of these helicases have been suggested to have roles in DNA replication, although this remains to be shown conclusively. Helicases with roles in DNA repair, recombination, and other aspects of DNA metabolism are likely to be forthcoming as we learn more about these processes in eukaryotic cells.

Recombination at ColE1 cer requires the Escherichia coli xerC gene product, a member of the lambda integrase family of site-specific recombinases

Site-specific recombination at the plasmid ColE1 cer site requires the Escherichia coli chromosomal gene xerC. The xerC gene has been localized to the 85-min region of the E. coli chromosome, between cya and uvrD. The nucleotide sequences of the xerC gene and flanking regions have been determined. The xerC gene encodes a protein with a calculated molecular mass of 33.8 kDa. This protein has substantial sequence similarity to the lambda integrase family of site-specific recombinases and is probably the cer recombinase. The xerC gene is expressed as part of a multicistronic unit that includes the dapF gene and two other open reading frames.

The molecular genetics of the incision step in the DNA excision repair process

This review describes the evolution of research into the genetic basis of how different organisms use the process of excision repair to recognize and remove lesions from their cellular DNA. One particular aspect of excision repair, DNA incision, and how it is controlled at the genetic level in bacteriophage, bacteria, S. cerevisae, D. melanogaster, rodent cells and humans is examined. In phage T4, DNA is incised by a DNA glycosylase-AP endonuclease that is coded for by the denV gene. In E. coli, the products of three genes, uvrA, uvrB and uvrC, are required to form the UVRABC excinuclease that cleaves DNA and releases a fragment 12-13 nucleotides long containing the site of damage. In S. cerevisiae, genes complementing five mutants of the RAD3 epistasis group, rad1, rad2, rad3, rad4 and rad10 have been cloned and analyzed. Rodent cells sensitive to a variety of mutagenic agents and deficient in excision repair are being used in molecular studies to identify and clone human repair genes (e.g. ERCC1) capable of complementing mammalian repair defects. Most studies of the human system, however, have been done with cells isolated from patients suffering from the repair defective, cancer-prone disorder, xeroderma pigmentosum, and these cells are now beginning to be characterized at the molecular level. Studies such as these that provide a greater understanding of the genetic basis of DNA repair should also offer new insights into other cellular processes, including genetic recombination, differentiation, mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and aging.

Intragenic suppression in the uvrD gene of Escherichia coli. I. Temperature-sensitive uvrD mutations

A temperature-sensitive uvrD mutant, HD323 uvrD4, was isolated from the uvrD mutant HD4 uvrD3. The temperature sensitivity of the uvrD4 gene product was reversible. The suppressor mutation uvrD44 which rendered the uvrD3 mutant temperature-sensitive could be separated from the uvrD3 mutation by replacing the PstI fragment, which encodes the C-terminal half of the UvrD protein. The uvrD44 mutation was found to make host bacteria lethal at non-permissive temperatures only when cloned on a low copy vector pMF3. The nucleotide sequence of the uvrD3 and uvrD4 mutant genes was determined. The nucleotide change found in the uvrD3 at +1235, GAA to AAA, only alters the amino acid sequence from Glu at 387 to Lys. The uvrD44 has another nucleotide change at +1859, GAA to AAA (Glu at 595 to Lys), which is considered to be the suppressor mutation uvrD44.

Induction of phr gene expression by irradiation of ultraviolet light in Escherichia coli

To measure the degree of phr gene induction by DNA-damaging agents, the promoter region was fused to the coding region of the lacZ gene in plasmid pMC1403. The new plasmids were introduced into Escherichia coli cells having different repair capabilities. More efficient induction of phr gene expression was detected in a uvrA- strain as compared with the wild-type strain. In addition, obvious induction was detected in uvrA- cells treated by 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide and mitomycin C. Nalidixic acid, an inhibitor of DNA gyrase, also induced phr gene expression. In contrast, little induced gene expression was noted in UV-irradiated lexA- and recA- strains. It is suggested from these results that induction of the phr gene is one of the SOS responses. Possible nucleotide sequences which could be considered to constitute an SOS box were found at the regulator region of the phr gene.

Regulation of the Escherichia coli uvrD gene in vivo

The roles of two putative promoter sequences, P1 and P2, and a potential antiterminator sequence found in the uvrD control region were examined in vivo. Constitutive and SOS-induced levels of uvrD mRNA were determined by S1 mapping, and it was shown that the majority of uvrD transcripts are from P1, while P2 plays only a minor role. A series of increasing deletions from the 5' end of the uvrD gene was used to assay transcription in the promoterless vector pKO-1. Loss of just the -35 region of P1 was sufficient to switch off detectable transcription from both P1 and P2. Disruption of the antiterminator by site-specific mutagenesis had no effect on constitutive levels of transcription, but led to a significant increase over wild-type levels following SOS induction. This suggests that the attenuator comes into play following DNA damage to moderate the increase in UvrD protein synthesis.

Molecular cloning, characterization, and chromosomal localization of dapF, the Escherichia coli gene for diaminopimelate epimerase

The Escherichia coli dapF gene was isolated from a cosmid library as a result of screening for clones overproducing diaminopimelate epimerase. Insertional mutagenesis was performed on the cloned dapF gene with a mini-Mu transposon, leading to chloramphenicol resistance. One of these insertions was transferred onto the chromosome by a double-recombination event, allowing us to obtain a dapF mutant. This mutant accumulated large amounts of LL-diaminopimelate, confirming the blockage in the step catalyzed by the dapF product, but did not require meso-diaminopimelate for growth. The dapF gene was localized in the 85-min region of the E. coli chromosome between cya and uvrD.

Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences

We have compiled and analyzed 263 promoters with known transcriptional start points for E. coli genes. Promoter elements (-35 hexamer, -10 hexamer, and spacing between these regions) were aligned by a program which selects the arrangement consistent with the start point and statistically most homologous to a reference list of promoters. The initial reference list was that of Hawley and McClure (Nucl. Acids Res. 11, 2237-2255, 1983). Alignment of the complete list was used for reference until successive analyses did not alter the structure of the list. In the final compilation, all bases in the -35 (TTGACA) and -10 (TATAAT) hexamers were highly conserved, 92% of promoters had inter-region spacing of 17 +/- 1 bp, and 75% of the uniquely defined start points initiated 7 +/- 1 bases downstream of the -10 region. The consensus sequence of promoters with inter-region spacing of 16, 17 or 18 bp did not differ. This compilation and analysis should be useful for studies of promoter structure and function and for programs which identify potential promoter sequences.

Specificity of N-acetoxy-N-2-acetylaminofluorene-induced frameshift mutation spectrum in mismatch repair deficient Escherichia coli strains mutH, L, S and U

The mismatch repair system of Escherichia coli is known to contribute to the fidelity of the replicational process. This system involves the functions of mutH, mutL, mutS and mutU (uvrD) loci which recognize mispaired bases as a consequence of errors due to the polymerase itself. Chemical modifications of DNA have also been suspected to create mispaired bases which, if the mispaired bases are removed, will lead to mutations by frameshift. Using the pBR322 plasmid DNA modified by the ultimate carcinogen N-acetoxy-N-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-Aco-AAF) we have investigated this possibility in a forward mutational assay (tetracycline sensitivity). This fluorene derivative has been shown to induce predominantly frameshift mutations. Our results show that: The sensitivity of the deficient strains mutH, mutL and mutS to the AAF adducts is similar to that of the corresponding wild-type strain. However, the mutU strain appears much more sensitive to those adducts although less than a uvrA, B or C-deficient strain. This suggests that the mutU gene product is involved in the repair of AAF adducts. For the four mut deficient strains, and as it was shown with the wild-type strain, AAF adducts induced mutations to tetracycline sensitivity are only observed when the SOS system of the host bacteria is induced by irradiation of the cells prior to transformation with the modified plasmid. The mutation frequencies depend upon the ultraviolet light doses and similar maxima were found for the four mut strains and the corresponding wild-type strain. In agreement with the results obtained with wild-type or uvrA strains we observe that AAF adducts induce mostly frameshift mutations in the mut strains. Two types of hot spots of mutagenesis were described in wild-type and uvrA strains occurring either at repetitive sequences or at sequences of the type 5' G-G-C-G-C-C 3' (NarI restriction enzyme recognition sequence). While the second type of mutational hot spot does exist in the mismatch repair-deficient strains, we observe that the repetitive sequences are no longer hot spots of mutations in these strains, suggesting that the mismatch repair protein complex is involved in the establishment of AAF-induced frameshift mutations at repetitive sequences.

Multiple control elements for the uvrC gene unit of Escherichia coli

We have sequenced the control region of the uvrC protein including two open reading frames (ORF) encoding polypeptides of 28 kd and 23 kd molecular weight. The uvrC gene is preceded by five promoters. The P1, P2a and P2b promoter sequences are 5' to the 28 kd and the 23 kd proteins respectively. The P3 and P4 promoters are located within the structural gene for the 23 kd protein. The P3 promoter is required for adequate in vivo expression. There are three putative lexA protein binding sites, detected at the 3' end of the 28 kd protein (lexA1), within the coding sequences for the 23 kd protein (lexA2) and within the P3 promoter (lexA3). Promoter P2 is responsible for transcription of the uvrC gene, producing transcripts of 2.8 and 1.6 kb. The upstream region including the 28 kd protein is required for enhanced expression under non-induced conditions. These results show that the uvrC gene is controlled by multiple promoters and is transcribed as part of a multigene unit.

Terminators of transcription with RNA polymerase from Escherichia coli: what they look like and how to find them

We present here a compilation of prokaryotic transcription terminator sequences (ref. 1-152). The compilation includes 49 independent terminators, 52 speculated independent terminators, 27 sites shown to function in vivo, and some 20 proven or speculated rho-dependent terminators. In addition to the well-known features of independent terminators (dyad symmetry and T-run), two consensus are found: CGGG(C/G) upstream and TCTG downstream of the termination point. A subset of the collection of sequence has been used to construct a computer algorithm to locate independent terminators by sequence analysis.

A comprehensive package for DNA sequence analysis in FORTRAN IV for the PDP-11

A computer package written in Fortran-IV for the PDP-11 minicomputer is described. The package's novel features are: software for voice-entry of sequence data; a less memory intensive algorithm for optimal sequence alignment; and programs that fit statistical models to nucleic acid and protein sequences.

Escherichia coli rep gene: identification of the promoter and N terminus of the rep protein

The functional Escherichia coli rep gene, which encodes the Mr 67,000 Rep helicase, has been localized within a 2.55-kilobase sequence. Its regulatory region has been characterized by the use of rep-lacZ fusions. The direction of transcription of the rep gene is clockwise on the E. coli chromosome, as are the nearby ilvC and rho genes. The sequence of the rep control region was determined, and putative regulatory sequences were identified; no evidence for autoregulation of expression was obtained. Transcription of the gene was not enhanced during the SOS response. The location of the promoter and the beginning of the protein were confirmed by S1 nuclease mapping of the 5' end of rep mRNA and determination of the NH2-terminal sequence of the rep protein.

Structural analysis of the umu operon required for inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The nucleotide sequence of a 2.8-kilobase fragment of the Escherichia coli chromosome containing the umuDC genes has been determined. The DNA sequence specifies two open reading frames of 417 and 1266 nucleotides encoding proteins with calculated molecular weights of 15,063 and 47,677, respectively. From these and the previous results of genetic and biochemical studies on the cloned genes, we conclude that the former is the umuD and the latter is the umuC gene. In vitro transcription of the regulatory region of the umu operon revealed that (i) upstream of the coding region there is a promoter-operator complex having the consensus sequence, CTGTATATAAAAACAG, of an SOS box, (ii) transcription of the umu operon begins at an adenine residue in the SOS box, and (iii) the LexA protein binds to the operator region, with an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 0.2, thereby repressing the transcription of the umuDC genes. These results indicate that the expression of the umu operon is under the coordinated control of the recA lexA gene products.

Expression of the RAD1 and RAD3 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not affected by DNA damage or during the cell division cycle

The RAD1 and RAD3 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are required for excision repair of UV damaged DNA. In addition, the RAD3 gene is essential since rad3 deletions are recessive lethals. We have examined the induction of the RAD1 and RAD3 genes by DNA damage and during the cell division cycle. We have made fusions of the RAD1 and RAD3 genes with the Escherichia coli lacZ gene encoding beta-galactosidase. Beta-galactosidase activity was measured in a Rad+ yeast strain containing the RAD1-lacZ or the RAD3-lacZ fusion, either in a multicopy replicating plasmid or as a single copy integrant resulting from transformation with an integrating plasmid which transforms yeast by homologous recombination in the yeast genome. No induction of beta-galactosidase activity occurred after ultraviolet light (UV) or 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (NQO) treatment. Haploid cells of mating type a were synchronized by treatment with alpha factor and beta-galactosidase activity was determined during different cell cycle stages. No change in beta-galactosidase activity was observed in the strain containing the RAD1-lacZ or the RAD3-lacZ fusion integrated in the yeast genome.

Analysis of a cloned colicin Ib gene: complete nucleotide sequence and implications for regulation of expression

The complete nucleotide sequence of a 2,971 base pair EcoRI fragment carrying the structural gene for colicin Ib has been determined. The length of the gene is 1,881 nucleotides which is predicted to produce a protein of 626 amino acids and of molecular weight 71,364. The structural gene is flanked by likely promoter and terminator signals and in between the promoter and the ribosome binding site is an inverted repeat sequence which resembles other sequences known to bind the LexA protein. Further analysis of the 5' flanking sequences revealed a second region which may act either as a second LexA binding site and/or in the binding of cyclic AMP receptor protein. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of colicin Ib with that of colicins A and E1 reveals localised homology. The implications of these similarities in the proteins and of regulation of the colicin Ib structural gene are discussed.

Sequences of the E. coli uvrC gene and protein

We have determined the sequence of a 2400 bp region of E. coli chromosomal DNA containing the uvrC gene. The coding region of uvrc is 2267 bp in length, encodes a polypeptide with a calculated molecular weight of 66,038 daltons, and is preceded by a typical E. coli ribosome binding site. By constructing deletion derivatives we have established that a uvrC promoter lies within the 113 bp region preceding the translational start of uvrC. The codon usage in uvrC is strongly biased in favor of codons used infrequently in E. coli, which may contribute to the relatively low intracellular concentration of uvrC protein.