Conserved features of coordinately regulated E. coli promoters

Uncovering a delicate balance between endonuclease RNase III and ribosomal protein S15 in E. coli ribosome assembly

The bacterial ribosomal protein S15 is located in the platform, a functional region of the 30S ribosomal subunit. While S15 is critical for in vitro formation of E. coli small subunits (SSUs), it is dispensable for in vivo biogenesis and growth. In this work, a novel synergistic interaction between rpsO, the gene that encodes S15, and rnc (the gene that encodes RNase III), was uncovered in E. coli. RNase III catalyzes processing of precursor ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcripts and thus is involved in functional ribosome subunit maturation. Strains lacking S15 (ΔrpsO), RNase III (Δrnc) or both genes were examined to understand the relationship between these two factors and the impact of this double deletion on rRNA processing and SSU maturation. The double deletion of rpsO and rnc partially alleviates the observed cold sensitivity of ΔrpsO alone. A novel 16S rRNA precursor (17S∗ rRNA) that is detected in free 30S subunits of Δrnc is incorporated in 70S-like ribosomes in the double deletion. The stable accumulation of 17S∗ rRNA suggests that timing of processing events is closely coupled with SSU formation events in vivo. The double deletion has a suppressive effect on the cell elongation phenotype of ΔrpsO. The alteration of the phenotypes associated with S15 loss, due to the absence of RNase III, indicates that pre-rRNA processing and improvement of growth, relative to that observed for ΔrpsO, are connected. The characterization of the functional link between the two factors illustrates that there are redundancies and compensatory pathways for SSU maturation.

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional events trigger de novo infB expression in cold stressed Escherichia coli

After a 37 to 10°C temperature downshift the level of translation initiation factor IF2, like that of IF1 and IF3, increases at least 3-fold with respect to the ribosomes. To clarify the mechanisms and conditions leading to cold-stress induction of infB expression, the consequences of this temperature shift on infB (IF2) transcription, infB mRNA stability and translation were analysed. The Escherichia coli gene encoding IF2 is part of the metY-nusA-infB operon that contains three known promoters (P-1, P0 and P2) in addition to two promoters P3 and P4 identified in this study, the latter committed to the synthesis of a monocistronic mRNA encoding exclusively IF2. The results obtained indicate that the increased level of IF2 following cold stress depends on three mechanisms: (i) activation of all the promoters of the operon, P-1 being the most cold-responsive, as a likely consequence of the reduction of the ppGpp level that follows cold stress; (ii) a large increase in infB mRNA half-life and (iii) the cold-shock induced translational bias that ensures efficient translation of infB mRNA by the translational apparatus of cold shocked cells. A comparison of the mechanisms responsible for the cold shock induction of the three initiation factors is also presented.

Coexpression of Escherichia coli obgE, Encoding the Evolutionarily Conserved Obg GTPase, with Ribosomal Proteins L21 and L27

Multiple essential small GTPases are involved in the assembly of the ribosome or in the control of its activity. Among them, ObgE (CgtA) has been shown recently to act as a ribosome antiassociation factor that binds to ppGpp, a regulator whose best-known target is RNA polymerase. The present study was aimed at elucidating the expression of obgE in Escherichia coli We show that obgE is cotranscribed with ribosomal protein genes rplU and rpmA and with a gene of unknown function, yhbE We show here that about 75% of the transcripts terminate before obgE, because there is a transcriptional terminator between rpmA and yhbE As expected for ribosomal protein operons, expression was highest during exponential growth, decreased during entry into stationary phase, and became almost undetectable thereafter. Expression of the operon was derepressed in mutants lacking ppGpp or DksA. However, regulation by these factors appears to occur post-transcription initiation, since no effects of ppGpp and DksA on rplU promoter activity were observed in vitro

IMPORTANCE

The conserved and essential ObgE GTPase binds to the ribosome and affects its assembly. ObgE has also been reported to impact chromosome segregation, cell division, resistance to DNA damage, and, perhaps most interestingly, persister formation and antibiotic tolerance. However, it is unclear whether these effects are related to its role in ribosome formation. Despite its importance, no studies on ObgE expression have been reported. We demonstrate here that obgE is expressed from an operon encoding two ribosomal proteins, that the operon's expression varies with the growth phase, and that it is dependent on the transcription regulators ppGpp and DksA. Our results thus demonstrate that obgE expression is coupled to ribosomal gene expression.

Regulation of the rplY gene encoding 5S rRNA binding protein L25 in Escherichia coli and related bacteria

Ribosomal protein (r-protein) L25 is one of the three r-proteins (L25, L5, L18) that interact with 5S rRNA in eubacteria. Specific binding of L25 with a certain domain of 5S r-RNA, a so-called loop E, has been studied in detail, but information about regulation of L25 synthesis has remained totally lacking. In contrast to the rplE (L5) and rplR (L18) genes that belong to the polycistronic spc-operon and are regulated at the translation level by r-protein S8, the rplY (L25) gene forms an independent transcription unit. The main goal of this work was to study the regulation of the rplY expression in vivo. We show that the rplY promoter is down-regulated by ppGpp and its cofactor DksA in response to amino acid starvation. At the level of translation, the rplY expression is subjected to the negative feedback control. The 5'-untranslated region of the rplY mRNA comprises specific sequence/structure features, including an atypical SD-like sequence, which are highly conserved in a subset of gamma-proteobacterial families. Despite the lack of a canonical SD element, the rplY'-'lacZ single-copy reporter showed unusually high translation efficiency. Expression of the rplY gene in trans decreased the translation yield, indicating the mechanism of autogenous repression. Site-directed mutagenesis of the rplY 5' UTR revealed an important role of the conserved elements in the translation control. Thus, the rplY expression regulation represents one more example of regulatory pathways that control ribosome biogenesis in Escherichia coli and related bacteria.

Dissecting the extended "-10" Escherichia coli rpsB promoter activity and regulation in vivo

As we have shown previously, transcription of the rpsB-tsf operon encoding essential components of the translation machinery, a ribosomal protein S2 and an elongation factor Ts, is driven by a single promoter PrpsB, which is highly conserved among γ-proteobacteria. PrpsB belongs to the extended "-10" promoter class; it comprises a TGTG-extension upstream of the "-10" hexamer TATAAA, a suboptimal "-35" region TTGGTG, and a GC-rich discriminator GCGCGC that separates the "-10" element from the transcription start site. In this work, we examined an impact of site-directed mutations in the rpsB promoter region on expression of the reporter gene PrpsB-lacZ within the E. coli chromosome as well as promoter regulation by transcription factors ppGpp and DksA upon amino acid starvation. The results show that the transcription level largely depends on both the TGTG-extension and the TTG-element in the "-35" region, as mutations in these sequences dramatically decrease the activity of the promoter. Upon induction of amino acid starvation, the rpsB promoter is negatively regulated by ppGpp due to the presence of the GC-rich discriminator, whose substitution for the AT-rich element abolished stringent control. These and other data obtained demonstrate the necessity of a natural combination of all the conserved promoter elements for efficient and regulated transcription of the essential rpsB-tsf operon.

A proximal promoter element required for positive transcriptional control by guanosine tetraphosphate and DksA protein during the stringent response

The alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) acts as both a positive and a negative regulator of gene expression in the presence of DksA, but the underlying mechanisms of this differential control are unclear. Here, using uspA hybrid promoters, we show that an AT-rich discriminator region is crucial for positive control by ppGpp/DksA. The AT-rich discriminator makes the RNA polymerase-promoter complex extremely stable and therefore easily saturated with RNA polymerase. A more efficient transcription is achieved when the RNA polymerase-promoter complex is destabilized with ppGpp/DksA. We found that exchanging the AT-rich discriminator of uspA with the GC-rich rrnB-P1 discriminator made the uspA promoter negatively regulated by ppGpp/DksA both in vivo and in vitro. In addition, the GC-rich discriminator destabilized the RNA polymerase-promoter complex, and the effect of ppGpp/DksA on the kinetic properties of the promoter was reversed. We propose that the transcription initiation rate from promoters with GC-rich discriminators, in contrast to the uspA-promoter, is not limited by the stability of the open complex. The findings are discussed in view of models for both direct and indirect effects of ppGpp/DksA on transcriptional trade-offs.

Promoter-specific transcription inhibition in Staphylococcus aureus by a phage protein

Phage G1 gp67 is a 23 kDa protein that binds to the Staphylococcus aureus (Sau) RNA polymerase (RNAP) σ(A) subunit and blocks cell growth by inhibiting transcription. We show that gp67 has little to no effect on transcription from most promoters but is a potent inhibitor of ribosomal RNA transcription. A 2.0-Å-resolution crystal structure of the complex between gp67 and Sau σ(A) domain 4 (σ(A)(4)) explains how gp67 joins the RNAP promoter complex through σ(A)(4) without significantly affecting σ(A)(4) function. Our results indicate that gp67 forms a complex with RNAP at most, if not all, σ(A)-dependent promoters, but selectively inhibits promoters that depend on an interaction between upstream DNA and the RNAP α-subunit C-terminal domain (αCTD). Thus, we reveal a promoter-specific transcription inhibition mechanism by which gp67 interacts with the RNAP promoter complex through one subunit (σ(A)), and selectively affects the function of another subunit (αCTD) depending on promoter usage.

A hyper-mutant of the unusual sigma70-Pr promoter bypasses synergistic ppGpp/DksA co-stimulation

The activities of promoters can be temporally and conditionally regulated by mechanisms other than classical DNA-binding repressors and activators. One example is the inherently weak σ⁷⁰-dependent Pr promoter that ultimately controls catabolism of phenolic compounds. The activity of Pr is up-regulated through the joint action of ppGpp and DksA that enhance the performance of RNA polymerase at this promoter. Here, we report a mutagenesis analysis that revealed substantial differences between Pr and other ppGpp/DksA co-stimulated promoters. In vitro transcription and RNA polymerase binding assays show that it is the T at the −11 position of the extremely suboptimal −10 element of Pr that underlies both poor binding of σ⁷⁰-RNAP and a slow rate of open complex formation—the process that is accelerated by ppGpp and DksA. Our findings support the idea that collaborative action of ppGpp and DksA lowers the rate-limiting transition energy required for conversion between intermediates on the road to open complex formation.

General organisational principles of the transcriptional regulation system: a tree or a circle?

Recent advances of systemic approaches to gene expression and cellular metabolism provide unforeseen opportunities for relating and integrating extensive datasets describing the transcriptional regulation system as a whole. However, due to the multifaceted nature of the phenomenon, these datasets often contain logically distinct types of information determined by underlying approach and adopted methodology of data analysis. Consequently, to integrate the datasets comprising information on the states of chromatin structure, transcriptional regulatory network and cellular metabolism, a novel methodology enabling interconversion of logically distinct types of information is required. Here we provide a holistic conceptual framework for analysis of global transcriptional regulation as a system coordinated by structural coupling between the transcription machinery and DNA topology, acting as interdependent sensors and determinants of metabolic functions. In this operationally closed system any transition in physiological state represents an emergent property determined by shifts in structural coupling, whereas genetic regulation acts as a genuine device converting one logical type of information into the other.

Comparison of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene expression signals

There are barriers to cross-expression of genes between Bacteroides spp. and Escherichia coli. In this study, a lux-based reporter system was developed for Bacteroides and used to compare the promoter structure and function of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 4001 (BT4001) 16S rRNA promoter with those of E. coli in vivo. Analysis of the BT4001 sequences upstream of the 16S rRNA gene revealed the same overall structure known for E. coli 16S rRNA promoters in that there were two promoters separated by approximately 150 bp. However, the BT4001 16S rRNA promoter contains the proposed Bacteroides -7 and -33 consensus sequences instead of the E. coli -10 and -35 consensus sequences. The biological activity of various configurations of the BT4001 16S rRNA promoter was analysed. Experiments pairing the BT4001 16S rRNA promoter with an E. coli RBS, and vice-versa, confirmed that gene expression between the two species is restricted at the level of transcription. In Bacteroides, a difference in translation initiation also appears to limit expression of foreign genes.

ppGpp regulation of RpoS degradation via anti-adaptor protein IraP

IraP is a small protein that interferes with the delivery of sigma(S) (RpoS) to the ClpXP protease by blocking the action of RssB, an adaptor protein for sigma(S) degradation. IraP was previously shown to mediate stabilization of sigma(S) during phosphate starvation. Here, we show that iraP is transcribed in response to phosphate starvation; this response is mediated by ppGpp. The iraP promoter is positively regulated by ppGpp, dependent on the discriminator region of the iraP promoter. Sensing of phosphate starvation requires SpoT but not RelA. The results demonstrate a target for positive regulation by ppGpp and suggest that the cell use of ppGpp to mediate a variety of starvation responses operates in part by modulating sigma(S) levels.

Physiological analysis of the stringent response elicited in an extreme thermophilic bacterium, Thermus thermophilus

Guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) is a key mediator of stringent control, an adaptive response of bacteria to amino acid starvation, and has thus been termed a bacterial alarmone. Previous X-ray crystallographic analysis has provided a structural basis for the transcriptional regulation of RNA polymerase activity by ppGpp in the thermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus. Here we investigated the physiological basis of the stringent response by comparing the changes in intracellular ppGpp levels and the rate of RNA synthesis in stringent (rel(+); wild type) and relaxed (relA and relC; mutant) strains of T. thermophilus. We found that in wild-type T. thermophilus, as in other bacteria, serine hydroxamate, an amino acid analogue that inhibits tRNA(Ser) aminoacylation, elicited a stringent response characterized in part by intracellular accumulation of ppGpp and that this response was completely blocked in a relA-null mutant and partially blocked in a relC mutant harboring a mutation in the ribosomal protein L11. Subsequent in vitro assays using ribosomes isolated from wild-type and relA and relC mutant strains confirmed that (p)ppGpp is synthesized by ribosomes and that mutation of RelA or L11 blocks that activity. This conclusion was further confirmed in vitro by demonstrating that thiostrepton or tetracycline inhibits (p)ppGpp synthesis. In an in vitro system, (p)ppGpp acted by inhibiting RNA polymerase-catalyzed 23S/5S rRNA gene transcription but at a concentration much higher than that of the observed intracellular ppGpp pool size. On the other hand, changes in the rRNA gene promoter activity tightly correlated with changes in the GTP but not ATP concentration. Also, (p)ppGpp exerted a potent inhibitory effect on IMP dehydrogenase activity. The present data thus complement the earlier structural analysis by providing physiological evidence that T. thermophilus does produce ppGpp in response to amino acid starvation in a ribosome-dependent (i.e., RelA-dependent) manner. However, it appears that in T. thermophilus, rRNA promoter activity is controlled directly by the GTP pool size, which is modulated by ppGpp via inhibition of IMP dehydrogenase activity. Thus, unlike the case of Escherichia coli, ppGpp may not inhibit T. thermophilus RNA polymerase activity directly in vivo, as recently proposed for Bacillus subtilis rRNA transcription (L. Krasny and R. L. Gourse, EMBO J. 23:4473-4483, 2004).

Structural perspective on mutations affecting the function of multisubunit RNA polymerases

High-resolution crystallographic structures of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) have increased our understanding of transcriptional mechanisms. Based on a thorough review of the literature, we have compiled the mutations affecting the function of multisubunit RNA polymerases, many of which having been generated and studied prior to the publication of the first high-resolution structure, and highlighted the positions of the altered amino acids in the structures of both the prokaryotic and eukaryotic enzymes. The observations support many previous hypotheses on the transcriptional process, including the implication of the bridge helix and the trigger loop in the processivity of RNAP, the importance of contacts between the RNAP jaw-lobe module and the downstream DNA in the establishment of a transcription bubble and selection of the transcription start site, the destabilizing effects of ppGpp on the open promoter complex, and the link between RNAP processivity and termination. This study also revealed novel, remarkable features of the RNA polymerase catalytic mechanisms that will require additional investigation, including the putative roles of fork loop 2 in the establishment of a transcription bubble, the trigger loop in start site selection, and the uncharacterized funnel domain in RNAP processivity.

rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli

Ribosomal RNA transcription is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria and has been investigated intensely for over half a century. Multiple mechanisms ensure that rRNA synthesis rates are appropriate for the cell's particular growth condition. Recently, important advances have been made in our understanding of rRNA transcription initiation in Escherichia coli. These include (a) a model at the atomic level of the network of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that recruit RNA polymerase to rRNA promoters, accounting for their extraordinary strength; (b) discovery of the nonredundant roles of two small molecule effectors, ppGpp and the initiating NTP, in regulation of rRNA transcription initiation; and (c) identification of a new component of the transcription machinery, DksA, that is absolutely required for regulation of rRNA promoter activity. Together, these advances provide clues important for our molecular understanding not only of rRNA transcription, but also of transcription in general.

An alternative strategy for bacterial ribosome synthesis: Bacillus subtilis rRNA transcription regulation

As an approach to the study of rRNA synthesis in Gram-positive bacteria, we characterized the regulation of the Bacillus subtilis rrnB and rrnO rRNA promoters. We conclude that B. subtilis and Escherichia coli use different strategies to control rRNA synthesis. In contrast to E. coli, it appears that the initiating NTP for transcription from B. subtilis rRNA promoters is GTP, promoter strength is determined primarily by the core promoter (-10/-35 region), and changes in promoter activity always correlate with changes in the intracellular GTP concentration. rRNA promoters in B. subtilis appear to be regulated by changes in the initiating NTP pools, but in some growth transitions, changes in rRNA promoter activity are also dependent on relA, which codes for ppGpp synthetase. In contrast to the situation for E. coli where ppGpp decreases rRNA promoter activity by directly inhibiting RNA polymerase, it appears that ppGpp may not inhibit B. subtilis RNA polymerase directly. Rather, increases in the ppGpp concentration might reduce the available GTP pools, thereby modulating rRNA promoter activity indirectly.

Unique roles of the rrn P2 rRNA promoters in Escherichia coli

In bacteria, genes are often expressed from multiple promoters to allow for a greater spectrum of regulation. Transcription of rRNA genes in Escherichia coli uses two promoters, rrn P1 and rrn P2. Under the conditions examined previously, the P1 and P2 promoters were regulated in response to many of the same changes in nutritional conditions. We report here that rrn P2 promoters play unique roles in rRNA expression during transitional situations. rrn P2 promoters play a dominant role in rRNA synthesis as cells enter into and persist in stationary phase. rrn P2 promoters also play a role in the rapid increases in rRNA synthesis that occur during outgrowth from stationary phase and during the initial stages of rapid shifts to richer media. We demonstrate that rrnB P2 directly senses the concentrations of guanosine 5'-disphosphate 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp) and the initiating nucleoside triphosphate (iNTP), thereby accounting, at least in part, for the observed patterns of regulation. Our work significantly extends previous information about the regulators responsible for control of the rrn P2 promoters and the relationship between the tandem rRNA promoters.

Structural basis for transcription regulation by alarmone ppGpp

Guanosine-tetraphosphate (ppGpp) is a major regulator of stringent control, an adaptive response of bacteria to amino acid starvation. The 2.7 A resolution structure of the Thermus thermophilus RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme in complex with ppGpp reveals that ppGpp binds to the same site near the active center in both independent RNAP molecules in the crystal but in strikingly distinct orientations. Binding is symmetrical with respect to the two diphosphates of ppGpp and is relaxed with respect to the orientation of the nucleotide base. Different modes of ppGpp binding are coupled with asymmetry of the active site configurations. The results suggest that base pairing of ppGpp with cytosines in the nontemplate DNA strand might be an essential component of transcription control by ppGpp. We present experimental evidence highlighting the importance of base-specific contacts between ppGpp and specific cytosine residues during both transcription initiation and elongation.

Essential steps in the ppGpp-dependent regulation of bacterial ribosomal RNA promoters can be explained by substrate competition

Transcription of stable RNA genes is known to be dramatically reduced in the presence of guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), the mediator of the stringent response. Using in vitro transcription systems with ribosomal RNA P1 promoters, we have analyzed which step of the initiation cycle is inhibited by the effector ppGpp. We show that formation of the ternary transcription initiation complex consisting of RNA polymerase holoenzyme, the promoter DNA, and the first initiating nucleotide triphosphate is the major step at which ppGpp exerts its regulation. Neither primary binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter nor isomerization to the open binary complexes or the subsequent promoter clearance steps contributes notably to the observed inhibition. The effect of ppGpp-dependent inhibition in the formation of the ternary transcription initiation complex could be mimicked by nucleotide derivatives known to bind to the RNA polymerase active center. Using these model compounds, almost identical inhibition characteristics were observed as seen with ppGpp. The results support the previously published model, which suggests that ppGpp-dependent inhibition is based on competition between the inhibitor molecules and NTP substrates for access to the active center of RNA polymerase.

Regulation of the Escherichia coli rrnB P2 promoter

The seven rRNA operons in Escherichia coli each contain two promoters, rrn P1 and rrn P2. Most previous studies have focused on the rrn P1 promoters. Here we report a systematic analysis of the activity and regulation of the rrnB P2 promoter in order to define the intrinsic properties of rrn P2 promoters and to understand better their contributions to rRNA synthesis when they are in their natural setting downstream of rrn P1 promoters. In contrast to the conclusions reached in some previous studies, we find that rrnB P2 is regulated: it displays clear responses to amino acid availability (stringent control), rRNA gene dose (feedback control), and changes in growth rate (growth rate-dependent control). Stringent control of rrnB P2 requires the alarmone ppGpp, but growth rate-dependent control of rrnB P2 does not require ppGpp. The rrnB P2 core promoter sequence (-37 to +7) is sufficient to serve as the target for growth rate-dependent regulation.

Stationary phase gene regulation: what makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigmaS-selective?

The general stress sigma factor sigma(S) and the vegetative sigma(70) are highly related and recognise the same core promoter elements. Nevertheless, they clearly control different sets of genes in vivo. Recent studies have demonstrated that Esigma(S) selectivity is based on modular combinations of several sequence and structural features of a promoter, to which also trans-acting factors can strongly contribute. These results throw novel light on the details of transcription initiation, as well as on the co-evolution of sigma factors and their cognate promoter sequences.

Multiple mechanisms of transcription inhibition by ppGpp at the lambdap(R) promoter

General stress conditions in bacterial cells cause a global cellular response called the stringent response. The first event in this control is production of large amounts of a regulatory nucleotide, guanosine-3',5'-(bis)pyrophospahte (ppGpp). It was proposed recently that ppGpp acts by decreasing stability of open complexes at promoters that make short-lived open complexes, e.g. the rRNA promoters. However, here we report that the bacteriophage lambdap(R) promoter, which forms long-lived open complexes, is inhibited by ppGpp in vitro as observed in vivo. We performed a systematic investigation of the ppGpp-specific inhibition of transcription initiation at lambdap(R) and found that ppGpp does decrease stability of open complexes at lambdap(R), but only slightly. Likewise the equilbrium binding constant and rate of open complex formation by RNA polymerase at lambdap(R) are only slightly affected by ppGpp. The major effect of ppGpp-mediated inhibition is to decrease the rate of promoter escape. We conclude that ppGpp-mediated inhibition of transcription initiation is not restricted to promoters that make short-lived open complexes. Rather we conclude that the initial catalytic step of transcript formation is affected by ppGpp, specifically formation of the first phosphodiester bond is inhibited by ppGpp at lambdap(R).

Characterization of regions of the cyanobacterial tRNA(pro) gene that affect the expression of a beta-glucuronidase reporter gene

The E3 strong promoter-active fragment harbors the tRNA(pro) (GGG) gene upstream of the promoterless beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene in plasmid pKG-E3. The 74-bp tRNA(pro) coding sequence contains two regions exhibiting strong homology to blocks A and B which are the split promoter elements of eukaryotic tRNA genes. Results in this study showed that the promoter region of tRNA(pro) gene located upstream of its coding sequence and harbored the putative -10 (TACATT) and -35 (TTGGCA) regions which conformed to the Escherichia coli sigma(70) promoter. Differentiation of the 5' end of tRNA(pro)-GUS transcripts of pKG-E3 revealed that the true transcription initiation sites were located at positions -3, -4, and -6, while the processed sites were located at position +75, +76 and +78 with respect to the first nucleotide of the tRNA(pro) coding sequence. The presence of block A decreased GUS activity about three-fold, whereas block B and the 3' end of tRNA(pro) gene completely abolished GUS expression. However, the presence of full-length tRNA(pro) gene did not affect the GUS expression. Downstream of the tRNA(pro) coding sequence in chromosomal DNA contained a 32-bp stem-loop structure with a predicted DeltaG value of -21.7 kcal x mol(-1). The absence of this stem-loop structure downstream of the tRNA(pro) coding sequence in pKG-E3 resulted in read-through transcription into the adjoining GUS gene.

Regulation of rRNA transcription correlates with nucleoside triphosphate sensing

We have previously shown that the activity of the Escherichia coli rRNA promoter rrnB P1 in vitro depends on the concentration of the initiating nucleotide, ATP, and can respond to changes in ATP pools in vivo. We have proposed that this nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) sensing might contribute to regulation of rRNA transcription. To test this model, we have measured the ATP requirements for transcription from 11 different rrnB P1 core promoter mutants in vitro and compared them with the regulatory responses of the same promoters in vivo. The seven rrnB P1 variants that required much lower ATP concentrations than the wild-type promoter for efficient transcription in vitro were defective for response to growth rate changes in vivo (growth rate-dependent regulation). In contrast, the four variants requiring high ATP concentrations in vitro (like the wild-type promoter) were regulated with the growth rate in vivo. We also observed a correlation between NTP sensing in vitro and the response of the promoters in vivo to deletion of the fis gene (an example of homeostatic control), although this relationship was not as tight as for growth rate-dependent regulation. We conclude that the kinetic features responsible for the high ATP concentration dependence of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro are responsible, at least in part, for the promoter's regulation in vivo, consistent with the model in which rrnB P1 promoter activity can be regulated by changes in NTP pools in vivo (or by hypothetical factors that work at the same kinetic steps that make the promoter sensitive to NTPs).

Expression of cspH, encoding the cold shock protein in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium UK-1

Both Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli contain the cspH gene encoding CspH, one of the cold shock proteins (CSPs). In this study, we investigated the expression of cspH in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and found that it was induced in response to a temperature downshift during exponential phase. The cspH promoter was activated at 37 degrees C, and its mRNA was more stable than the other csp mRNAs at 37 degrees C. Moreover, lacZ expression of the translational cspH-lacZ fusion was induced at that temperature. Interestingly, the cspH mRNA had a much shorter 5'-untranslated region than those in the other cold-shock-inducible genes, and the promoter sequence, which was only 55 bp, was sufficient for cspH expression. The 14-base downstream box located 12 bases downstream of the initiation codon of cspH mRNA was essential for its cold shock activation.

What makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigma(S) dependent? Role of the -13/-14 nucleotide promoter positions and region 2.5 of sigma(S)

The sigmaS and sigma70 subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase recognize very similar promoter sequences. Therefore, many promoters can be activated by both holoenzymes in vitro. The same promoters, however, often exhibit distinct sigma factor selectivity in vivo. It has been shown that high salt conditions, reduced negative supercoiling and the formation of complex nucleoprotein structures in a promoter region can contribute to or even generate sigmaS selectivity. Here, we characterize the first positively acting sigmaS-selective feature in the promoter sequence itself. Using the sigmaS-dependent csiD promoter as a model system, we demonstrate that C and T at the -13 and -14 positions, respectively, result in strongest expression. We provide allele-specific suppression data indicating that these nucleotides are contacted by K173 in region 2.5 of sigmaS. In contrast, sigma70, which features a glutamate at the corresponding position (E458), as well as the sigmaS(K173E) variant, exhibit a preference for a G(-13). C(-13) is highly conserved in sigmaS-dependent promoters, and additional data with the osmY promoter demonstrate that the K173/C(-13) interaction is of general importance. In conclusion, our data demonstrate an important role for region 2.5 in sigmaS in transcription initiation. Moreover, we propose a consensus sequence for a sigmaS-selective promoter and discuss its emergence and functional properties from an evolutionary point of view.

Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. I. Effects of ppGpp on transcription initiation in vivo and in vitro

To determine the role of ppGpp in both negative and positive regulation of transcription initiation during exponential growth in Escherichia coli, we examined transcription in vivo and in vitro from the growth-rate-dependent rRNA promoter rrnB P1 and from the inversely growth-rate-dependent amino acid biosynthesis/transport promoters PargI, PhisG, PlysC, PpheA, PthrABC, and PlivJ. rrnB P1 promoter activity was slightly higher at all growth-rates in strains unable to synthesize ppGpp (deltarelAdeltaspoT) than in wild-type strains. Consistent with this observation and with the large decrease in rRNA transcription during the stringent response (when ppGpp levels are much higher), ppGpp inhibited transcription from rrnB P1 in vitro. In contrast, amino acid promoter activity was considerably lower in deltarelAdeltaspoT strains than in wild-type strains, but ppGpp had no effect on amino acid promoter activity in vitro. Detailed kinetic analysis in vitro indicated that open complexes at amino acid promoters formed much more slowly and were much longer-lived than rrnB P1 open complexes. ppGpp did not increase the rates of association with, or escape from, amino acid promoters in vitro, consistent with its failure to stimulate transcription directly. In contrast, ppGpp decreased the half-lives of open complexes at all promoters, whether the half-life was seconds (rrnB P1) or hours (amino acid promoters). The results described here and in the accompanying paper indicate that ppGpp directly inhibits transcription, but only from promoters like rrnB P1 that make short-lived open complexes. The results indicate that stimulation of amino acid promoters occurs indirectly. The accompanying paper evaluates potential models for positive control of amino acid promoters by ppGpp that might explain the requirement of ppGpp for amino acid prototrophy.

Growth-phase regulation of the Escherichia coli thioredoxin gene

The two promoters of Escherichia coli trxA gene were separately cloned into pKO100 as well as pJEL170. Galactokinase expression in cells containing the pKO100 derivatives was found to be negatively correlated with growth rate and was 6- to 20-fold higher in stationary cultures than in exponential cultures. The expression of trxA-galK was induced by amino acid starvation in a RelA(+) strain but not in an isogenic Rel(-) strain indicating that the control involves guanosine 3',5'-bispyrophosphate (ppGpp). RpoS, which appears to be essential for expression of most stationary phase expressed genes, is not required for trxA expression. Increased expression of relA, which increases ppGpp concentration, increases trxA expression.

The study of guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate-mediated transcription regulation in vitro using a coupled transcription-translation system

The effects of the "alarmone" guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp) on regulation of the Salmonella typhimurium histindine operon and the Escherichia coli tRNA(leu) operon were analyzed in vitro using a DNA-dependent transcription-translation system, S-30. The expression of the hisG promoter is positively regulated by ppGpp, whereas that of the leuV promoter (of tRNA(1eu)) is negatively regulated by ppGpp. In an attempt to understand the global regulatory mechanism of ppGpp control, interrelationship between ppGpp-dependent activation and repression of gene expression was examined using these promoters as models. It has been traditionally supposed that the ppGpp-dependent regulation, at least for the activation, is by a passive mode of control: the activation of gene expression by ppGpp is a consequence of the repression of stable RNA gene expression in the condition of RNA polymerase limiting. To test this model, the ppGpp-dependent regulations of both an activable promoter (hisGp) and a repressible promoter (leuVp) were determined in vitro simultaneously using a mixed template setup. The rationale for this exercise was to see whether the ppGpp-dependent activation and repression are inversely correlated in the in vitro condition in which RNA polymerase is limiting. No correlation was observed. It was concluded that the ppGpp-dependent activation is independent of the repression. Moreover, it was proposed that ppGpp-dependent activation and repression are mediated by titratable factors, each of which operate independently.

Identification of the miaB gene, involved in methylthiolation of isopentenylated A37 derivatives in the tRNA of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli

The tRNA of the miaB2508::Tn10dCm mutant of Salmonella typhimurium is deficient in the methylthio group of the modified nucleoside N(6)-(4-hydroxyisopentenyl)-2-methylthioadenosine (ms(2)io(6)A37). By sequencing, we found that the Tn10dCm of this strain had been inserted into the f474 (yleA) open reading frame, which is located close to the nag locus in both S. typhimurium and Escherichia coli. By complementation of the miaB2508::Tn10dCm mutation with a minimal subcloned f474 fragment, we showed that f474 could be identified as the miaB gene, which is transcribed in the counterclockwise direction on the bacterial chromosome. Transcriptional studies revealed two promoters upstream of miaB in E. coli and S. typhimurium. A Rho-independent terminator was identified downstream of the miaB gene, at which the majority (96%) of the miaB transcripts terminate in E. coli, showing that the miaB gene is part of a monocistronic operon. A highly conserved motif with three cysteine residues was present in MiaB. This motif resembles iron-binding sites in other proteins. Only a weak similarity to an AdoMet-binding site was found, favoring the idea that the MiaB protein is involved in the thiolation step and not in the methylating reaction of ms(2)i(o)(6)A37 formation.

The supercoiling sensitivity of a bacterial tRNA promoter parallels its responsiveness to stringent control

In Salmonella typhimurium, expression of the hisR locus, a tRNA operon, decreases upon inhibiting DNA gyrase. Here, the hisR promoter dependence on negative DNA supercoiling was examined in vivo and in vitro. Mutant analysis showed the sequence determinants of this dependence to lie in the region between the -10 box and the transcription start site. As with most promoters subject to stringent control, this portion of the hisR promoter is C-G-rich. Replacing a C/G bp with T/A at position -7 partially relieves the supercoiling response while changing the sequence between -5 and + 1 (-CCCCCG-) for -GTTAA- abolishes the response in vitro and in vivo. The relief of the supercoiling dependence closely correlates with increased promoter susceptibility to melting in vivo and a lesser requirement for initiating nucleotides in the formation of stable initiation complexes in vitro. Studies in isoleucine-starved cells showed that such sequence changes mitigate and abolish the hisR promoter response to stringent control, respectively. The data presented suggest that the hisR promoter's sensitivity to stringent regulation arises from the same physical property that confers supercoiling sensitivity, i.e. resistance to melting. We propose that the stringent control mechanism acts by hampering the ability of RNA polymerase to melt the DNA helix.

tRNA(Arg) (fimU) and expression of SEF14 and SEF21 in Salmonella enteritidis

A Tn10 insertion affecting SEF14 fimbrial synthesis in Salmonella enteritidis was located 13 bp upstream of a gene designated fimU. The 77-bp DNA sequence of fimU from S. enteritidis was identical to that of fimU encoding tRNA(Arg) (UCU) from Salmonella typhimurium and 96% identical to that of the Escherichia coli argU homolog. Furthermore, the open reading frame adjacent to and overlapping the 3' end of fimU was similar to the prophage DLP12 integrase gene. The fimU-encoded transcript comigrated with total cellular tRNA and was predicted to form a tRNA-like cloverleaf structure containing the arginine anticodon UCU. Thus, fimU encoded a tRNA(Arg) specific for the rare codon AGA. fimU mapped to the SEF21 fim operon located 15 C's from the sef14 gene cluster. Although fimU was located within the SEF21 fim gene cluster, the fimU Tn10 insertion mutant of S. enteritidis was found to be defective in SEF14 as well as SEF21 (type 1) fimbria production. SEF17 and SEF18 fimbria production was not affected. Complementation of this mutant with plasmid-borne fimU restored normal production of the fimbrins SefA and FimA as well as their respective fimbriae SEF14 and SEF21. This is the first description of tRNA simultaneously controlling the production of two distinct fimbriae.

Non-canonical sequence elements in the promoter structure. Cluster analysis of promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Nucleotide sequences of 441 promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase were subjected to a site-specific cluster analysis based on the hierarchical method of classification. Five regions permitting promoter subgrouping were identified. They are located at -54 +/- 4, -44 +/- 3, -35 +/- 3 (-35 element), -29 +/- 2 and -11 +/-4 (-10 element). Promoters were independently subgrouped on the basis of their sequence homology in each of these regions and typical sequence elements were determined. The putative functional significance of the revealed elements is discussed on the basis of available biochemical data. Those promoters that have a high degree of homology with the revealed sequence elements were selected as representatives of corresponding promoter groups and the presence of other sequence motifs in their structure was examined. Both positive and negative correlations in the presence of particular sequence motifs were observed; however, the degree of these interdependencies was not high in all cases, probably indicating that different combinations of the signal elements may create a promoter. The list of promoter sequences with the presence of different sequence elements is available on request by Email: ozoline@venus.iteb. serpukhov.su.

Mutations that render the promoter of the histidine operon of Salmonella typhimurium insensitive to nutrient-rich medium repression and amino acid downshift

The effects of mutations in the promoter of the histidine operon of Salmonella typhimurium were examined in vivo. The wild-type chromosomal copy of the his promoter was replaced with mutations in the -10 hexamer sequence and in the region between the -10 hexamer and the transcriptional start point-termed the discriminator sequence. The substitutions were performed with a phage M13 allele replacement system. Expression of the his operon is known to correlate with levels of guanosine 5',3'-bispyrophosphate (ppGpp) in vivo. Strains containing either the wild-type his promoter or his promoter mutations were grown in both nutrient-rich and minimal media under steady-state conditions known to alter intracellular levels of ppGpp in a predictable way. The effect of the presence or absence of the his attenuator was assessed under these conditions as well. Expression of the his operon was studied by measuring the differential rate of beta-galactosidase synthesis with a his-lac transcriptional fusion. Regulation of the his operon in the promoter mutants was also studied under conditions of a transient amino acid downshift induced by the addition of serine hydroxamate to cultures growing in nutrient-rich medium. These growth conditions cause elevated levels of ppGpp. The results provide physiological confirmation of previous evidence obtained with a coupled transcription-translation system in vitro which indicated that ppGpp regulates interaction of RNA polymerase at the his promoter. More specifically, the in vivo evidence shows that the region of the his promoter that includes the -10 hexamer and discriminator sequences is the target at which ppGpp stimulates transcription.

rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli

The synthesis of ribosomal RNA is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria. There are multiple mechanisms that determine the rate of rRNA synthesis. Ribosomal RNA promoter sequences have evolved for exceptional strength and for regulation in response to nutritional conditions and amino acid availability. Strength derives in part from an extended RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognition region involving at least two RNAP subunits, in part from activation by a transcription factor and in part from modification of the transcript by a system that prevents premature termination. Regulation derives from at least two mechanistically distinct systems, growth rate-dependent control and stringent control. The mechanisms contributing to rRNA transcription work together and compensate for one another when individual systems are rendered inoperative.

Transcriptional pausing of RNA polymerase in the presence of guanosine tetraphosphate depends on the promoter and gene sequence

We have studied the response of the effector molecule guanosine 3',5'-bisdiphosphate (ppGpp) on RNA polymerase pausing during in vitro transcription elongation. Pausing was followed during single round extension of stalled ternary complexes excluding possible ppGpp effects on initiation. The ppGpp dependences of early pausing sites within different transcription systems controlled by promoters with known response to enhanced ppGpp levels in vivo were quantitatively characterized. Transcription of stable RNAs and mRNA genes were analyzed. In addition, the in vitro pausing behavior of two promoter variants directing the same sequence but differing in their in vivo ppGpp sensitivity were compared. In the presence of ppGpp we noted a slight general enhancement of specific pauses in all transcription systems. However, genes known to be under stringent or growth rate control in vivo revealed a notably stronger pausing enhancement. The sites of pausing are not changed by the presence of ppGpp but appear to be sequence-specific. The effect of ppGpp on the extent of pausing depends on the particular promoter and closely adjacent sequences that the RNA polymerase has passed during initiation. Pausing enhancement requires the presence of ppGpp during elongation but not during initiation. The results underline the importance of pausing for transcription regulation and offer a plausible explanation for inhibition of stable RNA expression under conditions of elevated concentrations of ppGpp.

Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli

The control of rRNA synthesis in response to both extra- and intracellular signals has been a subject of interest to microbial physiologists for nearly four decades, beginning with the observations that Salmonella typhimurium cells grown on rich medium are larger and contain more RNA than those grown on poor medium. This was followed shortly by the discovery of the stringent response in Escherichia coli, which has continued to be the organism of choice for the study of rRNA synthesis. In this review, we summarize four general areas of E. coli rRNA transcription control: stringent control, growth rate regulation, upstream activation, and anti-termination. We also cite similar mechanisms in other bacteria and eukaryotes. The separation of growth rate-dependent control of rRNA synthesis from stringent control continues to be a subject of controversy. One model holds that the nucleotide ppGpp is the key effector for both mechanisms, while another school holds that it is unlikely that ppGpp or any other single effector is solely responsible for growth rate-dependent control. Recent studies on activation of rRNA synthesis by cis-acting upstream sequences has led to the discovery of a new class of promoters that make contact with RNA polymerase at a third position, called the UP element, in addition to the well-known -10 and -35 regions. Lastly, clues as to the role of antitermination in rRNA operons have begun to appear. Transcription complexes modified at the antiterminator site appear to elongate faster and are resistant to the inhibitory effects of ppGpp during the stringent response.

Escherichia coli tyrT gene transcription is sensitive to DNA supercoiling in its native chromosomal context: effect of DNA topoisomerase IV overexpression on tyrT promoter function

We have investigated the in vivo DNA supercoiling sensitivity of the Escherichia coli tRNA(1tyr) gene (tyrT) promoter in its normal chromosomal location. Here, the native tyrT promoter is found to be exquisitely sensitive to mutations and to drugs which alter the level of DNA supercoiling. We show that the response of the tyrT promoter to supercoiling is qualitatively similar to that of a known supercoiling-sensitive tRNA gene promoter, hisR. Specifically, treatments which increase in vivo DNA supercoiling levels enhance transcription of these tRNA genes. Particularly striking is the strong enhancement of expression from both promoters by a transposon insertion mutation in the topA gene encoding DNA toposisomerase I. This phenotypic effect can be complemented by providing active topoisomerase I in trans from a recombinant plasmid. Interestingly, it can also be complemented by overexpression of the genes encoding the subunits of DNA topoisomerase IV. We believe that this is the first demonstration that DNA topoisomerase IV can influence gene expression and it suggests that DNA topoisomerase I is partially redundant, at least in E. coli.

Starvation-induced expression of SspA and SspB: the effects of a null mutation in sspA on Escherichia coli protein synthesis and survival during growth and prolonged starvation

Maxicell labelling and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-D PAGE) have identified the proteins encoded by sspA and sspB (SspA, SspB) as proteins D27.1 and A25.8, respectively, in the Escherichia coli gene-protein database. SspA expression increases with decreasing growth rate and is induced by glucose, nitrogen, phosphate or amino acid starvation. The promoter, Pssp, is similar to gearbox promoters. Inactivation of SspA (sspA::neo) blocks sspB expression. [35S]-methionine-labelled proteins synthesized during growth and during stationary phase are different in delta sspA strains compared to sspA+ strains. This difference is enhanced during extended stationary phase (24-72 h). Long-term (10 d) viability of arginine-starved isogenic strains shows that sspA+ cultures remain viable significantly longer than delta sspA mutants. 2-D PAGE of proteins expressed during exponential growth shows that expression of at least 11 proteins is altered in delta sspA strains. A functional relA gene is required for sspA to affect protein synthesis.

The Escherichia coli gapA gene is transcribed by the vegetative RNA polymerase holoenzyme E sigma 70 and by the heat shock RNA polymerase E sigma 32

Escherichia coli D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is produced by the gapA gene and is structurally related to eukaryotic GAPDHs. These facts led to the proposal that the gapA gene originated by a horizontal transfer of genetic information. The yields and start sites of gapA mRNAs produced in various fermentation conditions and genetic contexts were analyzed by primer extension. The transcriptional regulatory region of the gapA gene was found to contain four promoter sequences, three recognized by the vegetative RNA polymerase E sigma 70 and one recognized by the heat shock RNA polymerase E sigma 32. Transcription of gapA by E sigma 32 is activated in the logarithmic phase under conditions of starvation and of heat shock. Using a GAPDH- strain, we found that GAPDH production has a positive effect on cell growth at 43 degrees C. Thus, E. coli GAPDH displays some features of heat shock proteins. One of the gapA promoter sequences transcribed by E sigma 70 is subject to catabolic repression. Another one has growth phase-dependent efficiency. This complex area of differentially regulated promoters allows the production of large amounts of gapA transcripts in a wide variety of environmental conditions. On the basis of these data, the present view of E sigma 32 RNA polymerase function has to be enlarged, and the various hypotheses on E. coli gapA gene origin have to be reexamined.

Control of transcription of gal repressor and isorepressor genes in Escherichia coli

Two regulatory proteins, Gal repressor and isorepressor, control the expression of the gal and mgl operons in Escherichia coli. The transcription start sites for galR and galS, the genes for the repressor and isorepressor, were determined by primer extension of in vivo transcripts. Study of the promoter-lacZ gene fusions introduced into the chromosome indicated that galS expression was elevated in cells in which the normal galS gene was interrupted, but not in cells in which the galR gene was deleted. When both genes were disrupted, galS expression was further elevated. Expression from the galS promoter was stimulated by the addition of D-fucose, repressed by glucose, and dependent on cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP). Expression of a similar gene fusion of the galR promoter to lacZ was unregulated. Both galR and galS genes contain two potential operator sites (OE and OI) and a CRP-binding site. The arrangement of OE, OI, and the CRP-binding site in the galS gene is analogous to the arrangement in the gal and mgl promoters, but the arrangement in galR is atypical. The increased concentration of the isorepressor when inducer is present may facilitate early shutoff of the isorepressor-regulated genes of the gal regulon when inducer (substrate) concentration falls.

The rates of macromolecular chain elongation modulate the initiation frequencies for transcription and translation in Escherichia coli

Here we show that most macromolecular biosynthesis reactions in growing bacteria are sub-saturated with substrate. The experiments should in part test predictions from a previously proposed model (Jensen & Pedersen 1990) which proposed a central role for the rates of the RNA and peptide chain elongation reactions in determining the concentration of initiation competent RNA polymerases and ribosomes and thereby the initiation frequencies for these reactions. We have shown that synthesis of ribosomal RNA and the concentration of ppGpp did not exhibit the normal inverse correlation under balanced growth conditions in batch cultures when the RNA chain elongation rate was limited by substrate supply. The RNA chain elongation rate for the polymerase transcribing lacZ mRNA was directly measured and found to be reduced by two-fold under conditions of high ppGpp levels. In the case of translation, we have shown that the peptide elongation rate varied at different types of codons and even among codons read by the same tRNA species. The faster translated codons probably have the highest cognate tRNA concentration and the highest affinity to the tRNA. Thus, the ribosome may operate close to saturation at some codons and be unsaturated at synonymous codons. Therefore, not only translation of the codons for the seven amino acids, whose biosynthesis is regulated by attenuation, but also a substantial fraction of the other translation reactions may be unsaturated. Recently, we have obtained results which indicate that also many ribosome binding sites are unsaturated with their substrate, i.e. with ribosomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The promoter of the tgt/sec operon in Escherichia coli is preceded by an upstream activation sequence that contains a high affinity FIS binding site

The tgt/sec operon in E. coli consists of five genes: queA, tgt, ORF12, secD, and secF. QueA and Tgt participate in the biosynthesis of the hypermodified t-RNA nucleoside Queuosine, whereas SecD and SecF are involved in protein secretion. Examination of the promoter region of the operon showed structural similarity to promoter regions of the rrn-operons. An upstream activation sequence (UAS) containing a potential binding site for the factor of inversion stimulation (FIS) was found. Gel retardation assays and DNaseI footprinting indicated, that FIS binds specifically and with high affinity to a site centred at position -58. Binding of FIS caused bending of the DNA, as deduced from circular permutation analysis. Various 5' deletion mutants of the promoter region were constructed and fused to a lacZ reporter gene to determine the influence of the UAS element on the promoter strength. An approximately two-fold activation of the promoter by the UAS element was observed.

The mechanism of trans-activation of the Escherichia coli operon thrU(tufB) by the protein FIS. A model

Transcription of the thrU(tufB) operon is trans-activated by the protein FIS which binds to the promoter upstream activator sequence (UAS). Deletions of parts of the UAS and insertions show that optimal trans-activation requires occupation by FIS of the two FIS-binding regions on the UAS and specific helical positioning of these regions. On the basis of these and other data, a model for the mechanism of thrU(tufB) trans-activation by FIS is proposed. This model implies that the mechanisms underlying stimulation by FIS of two totally different processes: inversion of viral DNA segments and transcription of stable RNA operons, are essentially the same.

Expression of argU, the Escherichia coli gene coding for a rare arginine tRNA

The Escherichia coli argU gene encodes the rare arginine tRNA, tRNA(UCUArg), which decodes the similarly rare AGA codons. The argU promoter is, with two exceptions, a typical, strongly expressed stable RNA gene promoter which is stimulated by an upstream activator sequence. Unlike other tRNA operons, however, argU expression is severely inhibited by sequences downstream of the transcription start point. In vivo, nucleotides +2 to +45 inhibited expression by 25- to 100-fold when measured by fusion of argU promoter regions to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene or by quantitative primer extension analysis. In vitro, linearized argU promoter fragments on which the argU region ended at +1 supported 5- to 10-fold-more transcription than when the argU region ended at +45. This difference in degree of inhibition between in vivo and in vitro conditions suggests that several factors, some of which could be absent in vitro, might limit expression in vivo. Alternatively, one mechanism might limit expression both in vivo and in vitro but function more efficiently in vivo. A second difference from strongly expressed stable RNA promoters is the fact the argU gene is relatively insensitive to growth rate regulation, at least when assayed on a multicopy plasmid.