Histone H1 and HMG 14/17 are deposited nonrandomly in the nucleus

Assembling chromatin: the long and winding road

It has been over 35 years since the acceptance of the "chromatin subunit" hypothesis, and the recognition that nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating units of chromatin fibers. Major subjects of inquiry in the intervening years have included the steps involved in chromatin assembly, and the chaperones that escort histones to DNA. The following commentary offers an historical perspective on inquiries into the processes by which nucleosomes are assembled on replicating and nonreplicating chromatin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and Chromatin assembly.

Opposite replication polarities of transcribed and nontranscribed histone H5 genes

We used an in vitro nuclear runoff replication assay to analyze the direction of replication of the active and inactive histone H5 genes in avian cells. In embryonic erythrocytes the transcribed histone H5 gene displayed sensitivity to endogenous nuclease cleavage. In contrast, this gene was insensitive to endogenous nuclease digestion under the same conditions in nuclei of the lymphoblastoid cell line MSB-1, and histone H5 gene transcripts were not detectable by dot-blot analysis of MSB-1 cell RNA. When nuclei were isolated from embryonic erythrocytes and incubated with bromodeoxyuridine triphosphate, runoff replication from endogenous nuclease cleavage sites led to a relative enrichment for fragments near the 3' end of the histone H5 gene in the density-labeled DNA. In nuclei of MSB-1 cells or chicken embryo fibroblasts, however, runoff replication from restriction enzyme-cut sites (or induced endogenous nuclease-cut sites in MSB-1 nuclei) led to a relative enrichment for fragments near the 5' end of the H5 gene in dense DNA. Based on the enhanced incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine into origin-distal regions of DNA during the in vitro runoff replication assay, we conclude that the active histone H5 gene in embryonic erythrocytes is preferentially replicated in the transcriptional direction from an origin in the 5'-flanking DNA, whereas its inactive counterparts in MSB-1 cells and chicken embryo fibroblasts are preferentially replicated in the opposite direction.

Opposite replication polarities of transcribed and nontranscribed histone H5 genes

We used an in vitro nuclear runoff replication assay to analyze the direction of replication of the active and inactive histone H5 genes in avian cells. In embryonic erythrocytes the transcribed histone H5 gene displayed sensitivity to endogenous nuclease cleavage. In contrast, this gene was insensitive to endogenous nuclease digestion under the same conditions in nuclei of the lymphoblastoid cell line MSB-1, and histone H5 gene transcripts were not detectable by dot-blot analysis of MSB-1 cell RNA. When nuclei were isolated from embryonic erythrocytes and incubated with bromodeoxyuridine triphosphate, runoff replication from endogenous nuclease cleavage sites led to a relative enrichment for fragments near the 3' end of the histone H5 gene in the density-labeled DNA. In nuclei of MSB-1 cells or chicken embryo fibroblasts, however, runoff replication from restriction enzyme-cut sites (or induced endogenous nuclease-cut sites in MSB-1 nuclei) led to a relative enrichment for fragments near the 5' end of the H5 gene in dense DNA. Based on the enhanced incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine into origin-distal regions of DNA during the in vitro runoff replication assay, we conclude that the active histone H5 gene in embryonic erythrocytes is preferentially replicated in the transcriptional direction from an origin in the 5'-flanking DNA, whereas its inactive counterparts in MSB-1 cells and chicken embryo fibroblasts are preferentially replicated in the opposite direction.

Microheterogeneity in H1 histones and its consequences

The extent of microheterogeneity of H1 histones in individual higher organisms, without considering post-translational modifications, is such that five to eight molecular species can be recognized. The H1 variants differ among themselves in their ability to condense DNA and chromatin fragments, and they are non-uniformly distributed in chromatin. This review assembles data that support the notion that the differences in chromatin condensation (heterochromatization) observed through the microscope are maintained by the non-uniform distribution of H1 variants, and that this pattern of chromatin condensation may determine the dynamics of chromatin during replication and may represent the commitment aspect of differentiation. The differential response of the multiple H1 variants with regard to their synthesis and turnover is consistent with this notion.

Phosphorylation of high-mobility-group protein 14 by two specific kinases modifies its interaction with histone oligomers in free solution

Chromosomal protein HMG14 can be specifically phosphorylated by the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase at the N-terminus and by casein kinase 2 at the acidic C-terminus. Under the same conditions used for HMG14, HMG17 is not significantly phosphorylated by either of the two kinases. Further, we have studied the effect of phosphorylation by these kinases on the interaction of HMG14 with histone oligomers, using chemical cross-linking. Our results indicate that the phosphorylation of HMG14 by casein kinase 2 enhances its interaction with histone oligomers in free solution, whereas a minor effect was observed by phosphorylation with cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. In contrast, HMG17 does not interact at all with any histone oligomer in free solution under the conditions used. To gain insight into the possible effect that phosphorylation may play in vivo, the pattern of distribution among different chromatin fractions was analysed. It was found that, although phosphorylation of HMG14 by both kinases allowed reconstitution of HMG14 to chromatin, the patterns obtained showed some slight differences.

Binding of HMG14 non-histone protein to histones H2A, H2B, H1 and DNA in reconstituted chromatin

The interaction between calf thymus HMG14 and rat liver chromatin components has been studied via reconstitution and chemical cross-linking. Selective labeling of HMG14 with photoactivable reversible heterobifunctional reagents has allowed a clear identification of the histones interacting with it (histones H2A, H2B and H1). These results are not dependent on whether the chromatin samples used were bulk chromatin, mononucleosomes, or core particles (for H2A and H2B). In addition to histone proteins, DNA also seems to be involved in HMG14 attachment to nucleosome.