The pathway of E. coli RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation as visualized by footprinting

Quantitative parameters of bacterial RNA polymerase open-complex formation, stabilization and disruption on a consensus promoter

Transcription initiation is the first step in gene expression, and is therefore strongly regulated in all domains of life. The RNA polymerase (RNAP) first associates with the initiation factor \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\sigma$\end{document} to form a holoenzyme, which binds, bends and opens the promoter in a succession of reversible states. These states are critical for transcription regulation, but remain poorly understood. Here, we addressed the mechanism of open complex formation by monitoring its assembly/disassembly kinetics on individual consensus lacUV5 promoters using high-throughput single-molecule magnetic tweezers. We probed the key protein–DNA interactions governing the open-complex formation and dissociation pathway by modulating the dynamics at different concentrations of monovalent salts and varying temperatures. Consistent with ensemble studies, we observed that RNAP-promoter open (RP_O) complex is a stable, slowly reversible state that is preceded by a kinetically significant open intermediate (RP_I), from which the holoenzyme dissociates. A strong anion concentration and type dependence indicates that the RP_O stabilization may involve sequence-independent interactions between the DNA and the holoenzyme, driven by a non-Coulombic effect consistent with the non-template DNA strand interacting with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\sigma$\end{document} and the RNAP \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\beta$\end{document} subunit. The temperature dependence provides the energy scale of open-complex formation and further supports the existence of additional intermediates.

Fluorescence-Detected Conformational Changes in Duplex DNA in Open Complex Formation by Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase: Upstream Wrapping and Downstream Bending Precede Clamp Opening and Insertion of the Downstream Duplex

FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) between far-upstream (-100) and downstream (+14) cyanine dyes (Cy3, Cy5) showed extensive bending and wrapping of λP_R promoter DNA on Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) in closed and open complexes (CC and OC, respectively). Here we determine the kinetics and mechanism of DNA bending and wrapping by FRET and of formation of RNAP contacts with -100 and +14 DNA by single-dye protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE). FRET and PIFE kinetics exhibit two phases: rapidly reversible steps forming a CC ensemble ({CC}) of four intermediates [initial (RP_C), early (I_1E), mid (I_1M), and late (I_1L)], followed by conversion of {CC} to OC via I_1L. FRET and PIFE are first observed for I_1E, not RP_c. FRET and PIFE together reveal large-scale bending and wrapping of upstream and downstream DNA as RP_C advances to I_1E, decreasing the Cy3-Cy5 distance to ∼75 Å and making RNAP-DNA contacts at -100 and +14. We propose that far-upstream DNA wraps on the upper β'-clamp while downstream DNA contacts the top of the β-pincer in I_1E. Converting I_1E to I_1M (∼1 s time scale) reduces FRET efficiency with little change in -100 or +14 PIFE, interpreted as clamp opening that moves far-upstream DNA (on β') away from downstream DNA (on β) to increase the Cy3-Cy5 distance by ∼14 Å. FRET increases greatly in converting I_1M to I_1L, indicating bending of downstream duplex DNA into the clamp and clamp closing to reduce the Cy3-Cy5 distance by ∼21 Å. In the subsequent rate-determining DNA-opening step, in which the clamp may also open, I_1L is converted to the initial unstable OC (I₂). Implications for facilitation of CC-to-OC isomerization by upstream DNA and upstream binding, DNA-bending transcription activators are discussed.

Transcriptional regulation of a gonococcal gene encoding a virulence factor (L-lactate permease)

GdhR is a GntR-type regulator of Neisseria gonorrhoeae encoded by a gene (gdhR) belonging to the MtrR regulon, which comprises multiple genes required for antibiotic resistance such as the mtrCDE efflux pump genes. In previous work we showed that loss of gdhR results in enhanced gonococcal fitness in a female mouse model of lower genital tract infection. Here, we used RNA-Seq to perform a transcriptional profiling study to determine the GdhR regulon. GdhR was found to regulate the expression of 2.3% of all the genes in gonococcal strain FA19, of which 39 were activated and 11 were repressed. Within the GdhR regulon we found that lctP, which encodes a unique L-lactate transporter and has been associated with gonococcal pathogenesis, was the highest of GdhR-repressed genes. By using in vitro transcription and DNase I footpriting assays we mapped the lctP transcriptional start site (TSS) and determined that GdhR directly inhibits transcription by binding to an inverted repeat sequence located 9 bases downstream of the lctP TSS. Epistasis analysis revealed that, while loss of lctP increased susceptibility of gonococci to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) the loss of gdhR enhanced resistance; however, this GdhR-endowed property was reversed in a double gdhR lctP null mutant. We assessed the effect of different carbon sources on lctP expression and found that D-glucose, but not L-lactate or pyruvate, repressed lctP expression within a physiological concentration range but in a GdhR-independent manner. Moreover, we found that adding glucose to the medium enhanced susceptibility of gonococci to hydrogen peroxide. We propose a model for the role of lctP regulation via GdhR and glucose in the pathogenesis of N. gonorrhoeae.

Initial events in bacterial transcription initiation

Transcription initiation is a highly regulated step of gene expression. Here, we discuss the series of large conformational changes set in motion by initial specific binding of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) to promoter DNA and their relevance for regulation. Bending and wrapping of the upstream duplex facilitates bending of the downstream duplex into the active site cleft, nucleating opening of 13 bp in the cleft. The rate-determining opening step, driven by binding free energy, forms an unstable open complex, probably with the template strand in the active site. At some promoters, this initial open complex is greatly stabilized by rearrangements of the discriminator region between the -10 element and +1 base of the nontemplate strand and of mobile in-cleft and downstream elements of RNAP. The rate of open complex formation is regulated by effects on the rapidly-reversible steps preceding DNA opening, while open complex lifetime is regulated by effects on the stabilization of the initial open complex. Intrinsic DNA opening-closing appears less regulated. This noncovalent mechanism and its regulation exhibit many analogies to mechanisms of enzyme catalysis.

The reduction in σ-promoter recognition flexibility as induced by core RNAP is required for σ to discern the optimal promoter spacing

Sigma (σ) factors are bacterial transcription initiation factors that direct transcription at cognate promoters. The promoters recognized by primary σ are composed of -10 and -35 consensus elements separated by a spacer of 17±1 bp for optimal activity. However, how the optimal promoter spacing is sensed by the primary σ remains unclear. In the present study, we examined this issue using a transcriptionally active Bacillus subtilis N-terminally truncated σA (SND100-σA). The results of the present study demonstrate that SND100-σA binds specifically to both the -10 and -35 elements of the trnS spacing variants, of which the spacer lengths range from 14 to 21 bp, indicating that simultaneous and specific recognition of promoter -10 and -35 elements is insufficient for primary σ to discern the optimal promoter spacing. Moreover, shortening in length of the flexible linker between the two promoter DNA-binding domains of σA also does not enable SND100-σA to sense the optimal promoter spacing. Efficient recognition of optimal promoter spacing by SND100-σA requires core RNAP (RNA polymerase) which reduces the flexibility of simultaneous and specific binding of SND100-σA to both promoter -10 and -35 elements. Thus the discrimination of optimal promoter spacing by σ is core-dependent.

The core-independent promoter-specific interaction of primary sigma factor

Previous studies have led to a model in which the promoter-specific recognition of prokaryotic transcription initiation factor, sigma (σ), is core dependent. Most σ functions were studied on the basis of this tenet. Here, we provide in vitro evidence demonstrating that the intact Bacillus subtilis primary sigma, σ(A), by itself, is able to interact specifically with promoter deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), albeit with low sequence selectivity. The core-independent promoter-specific interaction of the σ(A) is -10 specific. However, the promoter -10 specific interaction is unable to allow the σ(A) to discern the optimal promoter spacing. To fulfill this goal, the σ(A) requires assistance from core RNA polymerase (RNAP). The ability of σ, by itself, to interact specifically with promoter might introduce a critical new dimension of study in prokaryotic σ function.

Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase with the lambdaP(R) promoter: large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates

The kinetics of interaction of Esigma(70) RNA polymerase (R) with the lambdaP(R) promoter (P) were investigated by filter binding over a broad range of temperatures (7.3-42 degrees C) and concentrations of RNA polymerase (1-123 nM) in large excess over promoter DNA. Under all conditions examined, the kinetics of formation of competitor-resistant complexes (I(2), RP(o)) are single-exponential with first order rate constant beta(CR). Interpretation of the polymerase concentration dependence of beta(CR) in terms of the three step mechanism of open complex formation yields the equilibrium constant K(1) for formation of the first kinetically significant intermediate (I(1)) and the forward rate constant (k(2)) for the conformational change converting I(1) to the second kinetically significant intermediate I(2): R + P-->(K(1))<--I(1)(k(2))-->I(2). Use of rapid quench mixing allows K(1) and k(2) to be individually determined over the entire temperature range investigated, previously not possible at this promoter using manual mixing. Given the large (>60 bp) interface formed in I(1), its relatively small binding constant K(1) at 37 degrees C at this [salt] (approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) strongly argues that binding free energy is used to drive large-scale structural changes in polymerase and/or promoter DNA or other coupled processes. Evidence for coupling of protein folding is provided by the large and negative activation heat capacity of k(a)[DeltaC(o,++)(a)= -1.5(+/-0.2)kcal K(-1)], now shown to originate directly from formation of I(1) [DeltaC(o)(1)= -1.4(+/-0.3)kcal K(-1)] rather than from the formation of I(2) as previously proposed. The isomerization I(1)-->I(2) exhibits relatively slow kinetics and has a very large temperature-independent Arrhenius activation energy [E(act)(2)= 34(+/-2)kcal]. This kinetic signature suggests that formation of the transition state (I(1)-I(2)++ involves large conformational changes dominated by changes in the exposure of polar and/or charged surface to water. Structural and biochemical data lead to the following hypotheses to interpret these results. We propose that formation of I(1) involves coupled folding of unstructured regions of polymerase (beta, beta' and sigma(70)) and bending of promoter DNA (in the -10 region). We propose that interactions with region 2 of sigma(70) and possibly domain 1 of beta induce a kink at the -11/-12 base pairs of the lambdaP(R) promoter which places the downstream DNA (-5 to +20) in the jaws of the beta and beta' subunits of polymerase in I(1). These early interactions of beta and beta' with the DNA downstream of position -5 trigger jaw closing (with coupled folding) and subsequent steps of DNA opening.

Dissection of two hallmarks of the open promoter complex by mutation in an RNA polymerase core subunit

Deletion of 10 evolutionarily conserved amino acids from the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase leads to a mutant enzyme that is unable to efficiently hold onto DNA. Open promoter complexes formed by the mutant enzyme are in rapid equilibrium with closed complexes and, unlike the wild-type complexes, are highly sensitive to the DNA competitor heparin (Martin, E., Sagitov, V., Burova, E., Nikiforov, V., and Goldfarb, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20175-20180). Here we show that despite this instability, the mutant enzyme forms partially open complexes at temperatures as low as 0 degrees C when the wild-type complex is fully closed. Thus, the two hallmarks of the open promoter complex, the stability toward a challenge with DNA competitors and the sensitivity toward low temperature, can be uncoupled by mutation and may be independent in the wild-type complex. We use the high resolution structure of Thermus aquaticus RNA polymerase core to build a functional model of promoter complex formation that accounts for the observed defects of the E. coli RNA polymerase mutants.

Transcription initiation at the flagellin promoter by RNA polymerase carrying sigma28 from Salmonella typhimurium

The sigma subunit of RNA polymerase is a critical factor in positive control of transcription initiation. Primary sigma factors are essential proteins required for vegetative growth, whereas alternative sigma factors mediate transcription in response to various stimuli. Late gene expression during flagellum biosynthesis in Salmonella typhimurium is dependent upon an alternative sigma factor, sigma28, the product of the fliA gene. We have characterized the intermediate complexes formed by sigma28 holoenzyme on the pathway to open complex formation. Interactions with the promoter for the flagellin gene fliC were analyzed using DNase I and KMnO4 footprinting over a range of temperatures. We propose a model in which closed complexes are established in the upstream region of the promoter, including the -35 element, but with little significant contact in the -10 element or downstream regions of the promoter. An isomerization event extends the DNA contacts into the -10 element and the start site, with loss of the most distal upstream contacts accompanied by DNA melting to form open complexes. Melting occurs efficiently even at 16 degrees C. Once open complexes have formed, they are unstable to heparin challenge even in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates, which have been observed to stabilize open complexes at rRNA promoters.

DNA footprints of the two kinetically significant intermediates in formation of an RNA polymerase-promoter open complex: evidence that interactions with start site and downstream DNA induce sequential conformational changes in polymerase and DNA

Kinetic studies of formation and dissociation of open-promoter complexes (RPo) involving Esigma70 RNA polymerase (R) and the lambdaPR promoter (P) demonstrate the existence of two kinetically significant intermediates, designated I1 and I2, and facilitate the choice of conditions under which each accumulates. For such conditions, we report the results of equilibrium and transient DNase I and KMnO4 footprinting studies which characterize I1 and I2. At 0 degreesC, where extrapolation of equilibrium data indicates I1 is the dominant complex, DNA bases in the vicinity of the transcription start site (+1) do not react with KMnO4, indicating that this region is closed in I1. However, the DNA backbone in I1 is extensively protected from DNase I cleavage; the DNase I footprint extends approximately 30 bases downstream and at least approximately 40 bases upstream from the start site. I1 has a short lifetime (</=15 seconds), based on its sensitivity to competition with heparin. Shortly after a temperature downshift from 37 degreesC to 0 degreesC, in the time-range where we conclude that the dominant, transiently accumulated complex is I2, DNase I and KMnO4 footprinting reveal a complex with a closed-start site and an extended DNase I footprint like that of I1. However, unlike I1, I2 is insensitive to heparin competition and has a much longer dissociation lifetime at 0 degreesC. Based on footprinting, kinetic and thermodynamic studies, we conclude that in the short-lived intermediate I1 the promoter start site and downstream region are bound in a cleft defined by the open clamp-like jaws of Esigma70. We propose that binding of the start site and downstream DNA in this cleft triggers massive, relatively slow conformational changes which likely include RNA polymerase jaw closing with coupled folding. These proposed conformational changes occur prior to opening of the promoter start site region, and are responsible for the much longer lifetime of I2. Closing of the jaws of polymerase around the downstream region of promoter DNA appears to trigger opening of the start site region. From a quantitative analysis of the biphasic decay of KMnO4 reactivity of RPo at 0 degreesC, we obtain the equilibrium constant K3 for the conversion of I2 to RPo and the rate constant k-2 for the conversion of I2 to I1 (i.e. jaw opening). These quantitative results were previously unavailable at any temperature, and are necessary for the dissection of dissociation kinetic data at higher temperatures.

Characterization of the closed complex intermediate formed during transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

We have carried out detailed DNase I footprinting studies of the closed complex formed on the phage lambda prmup-1 Delta265 promoter under reaction conditions such that the contribution of the open complex to the footprint was negligible. Detailed quantification shows that the closed complex detected has the same binding constant as that determined in kinetic studies. The footprinting pattern of the closed complex shows major differences from that of the open complex. Not only is it about 20 base pairs shorter, there are also many fewer positions being protected around and upstream of the -35 region. We have derived potential contact regions in the closed and open complexes based on the DNase I footprinting patterns, and confirmed the contact region for the open complex by hydroxyl radical footprinting. One important finding is that most of the essential contacts with the phosphate groups in the -35 region are formed during the isomerization step, a conclusion consistent with our kinetic data showing that this step is salt dependent on this promoter. In addition, we found that the derived contact regions for the closed and open complexes are offset by about three base pairs in the -35 region, which suggests a shift of the contact during isomerization. Finally, we found that the footprinting pattern of the complex formed at 4 degreesC has some similarities to as well as differences from the closed complex formed under standard transcription conditions.

Non-canonical sequence elements in the promoter structure. Cluster analysis of promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Nucleotide sequences of 441 promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase were subjected to a site-specific cluster analysis based on the hierarchical method of classification. Five regions permitting promoter subgrouping were identified. They are located at -54 +/- 4, -44 +/- 3, -35 +/- 3 (-35 element), -29 +/- 2 and -11 +/-4 (-10 element). Promoters were independently subgrouped on the basis of their sequence homology in each of these regions and typical sequence elements were determined. The putative functional significance of the revealed elements is discussed on the basis of available biochemical data. Those promoters that have a high degree of homology with the revealed sequence elements were selected as representatives of corresponding promoter groups and the presence of other sequence motifs in their structure was examined. Both positive and negative correlations in the presence of particular sequence motifs were observed; however, the degree of these interdependencies was not high in all cases, probably indicating that different combinations of the signal elements may create a promoter. The list of promoter sequences with the presence of different sequence elements is available on request by Email: ozoline@venus.iteb. serpukhov.su.

Activation of RpoS-dependent proP P2 transcription by the Fis protein in vitro

The proP gene, encoding a transporter of the osmoprotecting compounds proline and glycine betaine, is expressed from two promoters. Transcription of the P2 promoter occurs at a transient period in late exponential phase and is dependent upon Fis and the RpoS (sigma38) sigma factor. Here we characterize Fis-mediated activation of the P2 promoter in vitro. We find that this promoter displays unusually high specificity for sigma38. Fis strongly activates P2 when bound to site I centered at -41 within the promoter region. There is a complex relationship involving DNA supercoiling and potassium glutamate concentration on Fis activation, but most efficient transcription occurs under high salt conditions when the superhelical density is above -0.03. The major stimulatory effect of DNA supercoiling occurs between superhelical densities of 0 to -0.02 suggesting that, while supercoiling is mechanistically important, it may not be a physiologically relevant controlling factor. However, the stimulation of transcription by high potassium glutamate concentrations may contribute to the osmotic inducibility of the P2 promoter. We show that Fis and E sigma38 bind cooperatively on supercoiled DNA to form a stable complex at P2 that involves promoter melting. Fis also binds to a second site within the proP regulatory region. While binding to this site appears to play no role in Fis activation of the P2 promoter, it functions as a repressor of transcription initiating from the P1 promoter by either sigma70 or sigma38.

Structure of open promoter complexes with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase as revealed by the DNase I footprinting technique: compilation analysis

Footprinting data for 33 open promoter complexes with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, as well as 17 ternary complexes with different regulators, have been compiled using a computer program FUTPR. The typical and individual properties of their structural organization are analyzed. Promoters are subgrouped according to the extent of the polymerase contact area. A set of alternative sequence elements that could be responsible for RNA polymerase attachment in different promoter groups is suggested on the basis of their sequence homology near the hyperreactive sites. The model of alternative pathways used for promoter activation is discussed.

The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NTRC is a molecular machine: ATP hydrolysis is coupled to transcriptional activation

NTRC is a prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein that activates transcription by sigma 54-holoenzyme. NTRC has an ATPase activity that is required for transcriptional activation, specifically for isomerization of closed complexes between sigma 54-holoenzyme and a promoter to open complexes. In the absence of ATP hydrolysis, there is known to be a kinetic barrier to open complex formation (i.e., the reaction proceeds so slowly that the polymerase synthesizes essentially no transcripts even from a supercoiled template). We show here that open complex formation is also thermodynamically unfavorable. In the absence of ATP hydrolysis the position of equilibrium between closed and open complexes favors the closed ones. Use of linear templates with a region of heteroduplex around the transcriptional start site--"preopened" templates--does not bypass the requirement for either NTRC or ATP hydrolysis, providing evidence that the rate-limiting step in open complex formation does not lie in DNA strand denaturation per se. These results are in contrast to recent findings regarding the ATP requirement for initiation of transcription by eukaryotic RNA polymerase II; in the latter case, the ATP requirement is circumvented by use of a supercoiled plasmid template or a preopened linear template.

Conformational changes in E. coli RNA polymerase during promoter recognition

We analysed complexes formed during recognition of the lacUV5 promoter by E. coli RNA polymerase using formaldehyde as a DNA-protein and protein-protein cross-linking reagent. Most of the cross-linked complexes specific for the open complex (RPO) contain the beta' subunit of RNA polymerase cross-linked with promoter DNA in the regions: -50 to -49; -5 to -10; + 5 to +8 and +18 to +21. The protein-protein cross-linking pattern of contacting subunits is the same for the RNA polymerase in solution and in RPO: there are strong sigma-beta' and beta-beta' interactions. In contrast, only beta-beta' cross-links were detected in the closed (RPC) and intermediate (RPI) complexes. In presence of lac repressor before or after formation of the RPO cross-linking pattern is similar with that of RPI (RPC) complex.

Different thermal energy requirement for open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at two related promoters

We have studied the effect of temperature on transcription initiation in vitro at two related promoters ga/Pcon and ga/P1, which have the same nucleotide sequence around the -10 region and transcription start site, but differ in upstream sequences. One of the promoters, ga/Pcon, carries the consensus -35 hexamer, 5'TTGACA 3', whilst ga/P1 contains a block of 'distortable' upstream sequences that allow promoter function in the absence of a -35 region consensus sequence. RNA polymerase can form complexes with both promoters at a range of temperatures. However, the thermal energy requirement for open complex formation differs: open complexes can form at ga/P1 at low temperatures, whereas ga/Pcon requires higher temperatures. The thermal energy requirement for transcription from preformed open complexes is the same for both promoters.

Interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigma 32 with heat shock promoters. DNase I footprinting and methylation protection

The DNase I protection pattern of E sigma 32 was assayed on three heat shock promoters, the E sigma 32 promoter for the groESL operon, P2 of the dnaKJ operon, and rpoD PHS, the E sigma 32 promoter upstream from rpoD. E sigma 32 protected each of these promoters from DNase I digestion from around -60 to around +20. Protection from dimethyl sulfate methylation was assayed at the groE promoter. E sigma 32 binding altered the sensitivity to methylation of bases in the vicinity of both the -10 and -35 regions. The DNase I footprints for the E sigma 32 promoters were very similar to the DNase I footprint of E sigma 70 on the lacUV5 promoter. After analyzing the DNase I footprints by taking into account the contacts predicted to be made by DNase I, it appeared that E sigma 32, like E sigma 70, contacts the DNA primarily on one face of the helix in the -35 region and on both faces in the -10 region.

Function of a bacterial activator protein that binds to transcriptional enhancers

The nitrogen regulatory (NtrC) protein of enteric bacteria, which binds to sites that have the properties of transcriptional enhancers, is known to activate transcription by a form of RNA polymerase that contains the NtrA protein (sigma 54) as sigma factor (referred to as sigma 54-holoenzyme). In the presence of adenosine triphosphate, the NtrC protein catalyzes isomerization of closed recognition complexes between sigma 54-holoenzyme and the glnA promoter to open complexes in which DNA in the region of the transcription start site is locally denatured. NtrC is not required subsequently for maintenance of open complexes or initiation of transcription.

Protein-DNA interactions in regulation of P1 plasmid replication

The P1 RepA protein appears to play three roles in P1 plasmid replication: acting at the origin both as a specific initiator and as a repressor of transcription, and interacting with the copy-control locus incA to bring about a negative control of initiation. We have used the DNase I footprinting technique to show that RepA binds specifically to repeat units of a 19-base-pair consensus sequence present in both the origin and incA control regions. RNA polymerase was shown to bind to two specific regions within the origin repeats. One of these constitutes the known promoter sequence for the repA gene. We show evidence that the polymerase can be efficiently displaced from the promoter by subsequent RepA binding, thus providing a direct mechanism for RepA autoregulation. Under the conditions used, there were no obvious differences in the affinities of individual repeat sequences for the purified protein.

Molecular interactions in the control region of the carAB operon encoding Escherichia coli carbamoylphosphate synthetase

The control region of the carAB operon, encoding carbamoylphosphate synthetase, comprises two tandem promoters (P1, upstream and P2, downstream) located 67 base-pairs apart and repressed respectively by pyrimidines and arginine. RNA polymerase and pure arginine repressor bind to the P2 region in mutually exclusive ways. Repressor protects the two adjacent palindromic ARG boxes overlapping P2 against DNase I. Binding of RNA polymerase to P1 is abnormal; the region protected against DNase I is shifted upstream by about 20 nucleotides with respect to the position expected from the transcription startpoint. This pattern is not due to interference with polymerase binding at P2, since it is observed also in the presence of repressor and on an isolated P1 region. Binding of RNA polymerase is relatively weak and heparin-sensitive suggesting that, in vivo, an ancillary factor is required to promote the formation of an open complex. S1 nuclease mapping experiments show that the simultaneous presence of pyrimidines and arginine represses the downstream arginine-specific promoter (P2) more efficiently than arginine alone. This effect is not due to a direct regulatory interaction between pyrimidines and P2, since it is not observed when P1 is inactivated by insertion mutations or partial deletion. It has been shown that transcription initiated at P1 can proceed even when arginine represses P2. We therefore suggest that P2 operator-arginine repressor complex is destabilized by RNA polymerase binding at P1 or transcription from P1. We describe a novel technique to select for expression-down mutants in a lac fusion context.

Visualization and quantitative analysis of complex formation between E. coli RNA polymerase and an rRNA promoter in vitro

We have established conditions that stabilize the interaction between RNA polymerase and the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro. The requirements for quantitative complex formation are unusual for E. coli promoters: (1) The inclusion of a competitor is required to allow visualization of a specific footprint. (2) Low salt concentrations are necessary since complex formation is salt sensitive. (3) The addition of the initiating nucleotides ATP and CTP, resulting in a low rate of dinucleotide production, is required in order to prevent dissociation of the complexes. The complex has been examined using DNAase I footprinting and filter binding assays. It is characterized by a region protected from DNAase I cleavage that extends slightly upstream of the region protected by RNA polymerase in most E. coli promoters. We find that only one mole of active RNA polymerase is required per mole of promoter DNA in order to detect filter-bound complexes. Under the conditions measured, the rate of association of RNA polymerase with rrnB P1 is as rapid as, or more rapid than, that reported for any other E. coli or bacteriophage promoter.

Sigma-like activity from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) chloroplasts conferring DNA-binding and transcription specificity to E. coli core RNA polymerase

A protein fraction which lacks DNA-binding activity itself, but confers enhanced protein-DNA complex formation to E. coli core RNA polymerase, was obtained from mustard chloroplasts by heparin Sepharose chromatography. Gel retardation and competition assays as well as DNase I footprinting experiments with a chloroplast DNA fragment containing the psbA promoter indicate that this reflects sequence-specific binding. Transcription of the psbA template by E. coli core enzyme in the presence of the chloroplast fraction results in enhanced formation of transcripts of the size expected for correct initiation at the in vivo start site. We conclude that the chloroplast fraction reveals sigma-like activity with E. coli RNA polymerase and thus might contain factor(s) of equivalent function in chloroplast transcription.

A second RNA-polymerase can bind specifically to the bla promoter of Tn3, repressing transcription initiation

We showed earlier that the region of the bla promoter of Tn3 protected by the RNA-polymerase (RNAP), has the normal size (about 60bp) at RNAP/promoter molar ratio r less than or equal to 2, but rises to about twice this extent as r increases. We confirm here that the species corresponding to normal and extended footprint distinguish by their electrophoretic mobilities. Furthermore, inspection of the complexes by electron microscopy confirms that at r greater than 2, the bla promoter can bind specifically a second RNAP particle, as compared to the 1:1 complex observed at r less than or equal to 2. At r greater than 2, the ability of the bla promoter to initiate transcription in vitro is repressed when compared to the complex 1:1 obtained at r less than or equal to 2. The unexpected decrease in initiation efficiency as the concentration of RNAP particles is increased, together with the striking sequence homology of the bla promoter with promoters of stable RNA, suggest that in vivo, this promoter could be regulated by growth rate.

Far upstream sequences of the bla promoter from TN3 are involved in complexation with E. coli RNA-polymerase

The structure of the final initiation complex between E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the bla promoter from the transposon TN3 has been probed by footprinting experiments and base accessibility to dimethyl sulfate at 37 degrees C. At RNAP/promoter molar ratios "standard" for these experiments (greater than or equal to 10), the contacts on bla extend from -100 to +20, i.e. a length exceeding twice the dimension of the RNAP major axis [33]. Since footprinting at about equimolar amounts of RNAP and bla extends to the usual (-55 to +20) promoter domain, it is very likely that at least two RNAP's participate in the complex observed at tenfold higher RNAP/bla ratios. Under the latter conditions, the extended footprint (-100 to +20) is observed above 30 degrees C, whereas at 15 degrees C, only the -55 to +20 promoter area is contacted. Furthermore, gel retardation experiments show the presence of two complexes of different migration rates. We have reported earlier [21] that at the "standard" RNAP/bla ratio, transcription initiation from the bla promoter is inhibited. The correlation of this inhibition with the postulated two RNAP/bla complex suggests a regulation of bla gene expression by RNAP availability controlled for instance by growth rate. These results can be correlated with those reported in [14, 15] for the tyrT promoter. Interestingly, both promoter share significant sequence homologies.

Interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with DNA in an elongation complex arrested at a specific psoralen crosslink site

We have probed the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with DNA in an elongation complex arrested by a site-specifically placed psoralen crosslink using DNase I footprinting techniques. The psoralen derivative 4'-hydroxymethyl-4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen was first placed at a specific site in the middle of a chemically synthesized double-stranded DNA fragment containing an E. coli RNA polymerase promoter at one end. The psoralen molecule was photochemically attached to two adjacent thymidine residues on opposite strands as a diadduct. Using this crosslinked DNA as the template for transcription, we found that the E. coli RNA polymerase was blocked at the psoralen diadduct, yielding a transcript 29 nucleotides long. The arrested elongation complex inhibited DNase I digestion of both the coding strand and the non-coding strand from about 22 nucleotides upstream to 15 nucleotides downstream from the diadduct. These results, which suggest that the unwindase and the catalytic sites of the polymerase are very close to each other, have been incorporated into a model of the transcription elongation complex.

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase binding to a DNA terminus prevents formation of a closed promoter complex

A 302 bp DNA fragment and a 113 bp subfragment of the former, both containing the fd gene VIII promoter (P VIII), were found to exhibit temperature-dependent differential behaviour in RNA chain initiation from P VIII. At 37 degrees C no significant differences were observed, while at 17 degrees C chain initiation was strongly suppressed only with the 113 bp fragment. This phenomenon depended on the presence of the (blunt) DNA terminus upstream from P VIII (position -70). Footprinting revealed that at 17 degrees C RNA polymerase was bound to this DNA fragment in a different mode. Contacts were observed only upstream from position -25. On the contrary, at 37 degrees C only the promoter complex footprint was visible. These results indicate that at 17 degrees C formation of the non-initiating complex is more favourable than formation of the promoter complex (which is closed at 17 degrees C; Hofer, B., Müller, D. and Köster, H. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 5995-6013) and that formation of both complexes is mutually exclusive. No footprints of RNA polymerase were observed at other DNA termini. This indicates a sequence-specificity for the interaction at the terminus of the 113 bp fragment. The footprint pattern, together with features of the DNA sequence, suggests that the contacts involved in this interaction are similar to those promoter contacts formed upstream from position -20 and that DNA without a -10 region can be specifically recognized by RNA polymerase.

Comparison of the open complexes formed by RNA polymerase at the Escherichia coli lac UV5 promoter

In transcription initiation at the lac UV5 promoter, Escherichia coli RNA polymerase forms two open complexes, called Ou and O1, which can be separated by electrophoresis on native polyacrylamide gels. We have compared the properties of these two open complexes, with the objective of rationalizing the functional difference previously reported between the two forms: the complex which is dominant at high temperature (Ou) is better able to escape abortive transcriptional cycling into productive mRNA elongation. Methylation protection and binding domain probing with exonuclease III were used to investigate differences in polymerase binding strength to particular DNA domains. Also, we examined the difference in the extent and temperature dependence of promoter unwinding in the two complexes, as probed by methylation of unpaired cytosines and cleavage by phage T7 endonuclease. We find that O1 has stronger promoter interactions in the DNA domain whose upstream edge is defined by an exonuclease III stop at -24. These -24 domain interactions, which presumably aid in promoter binding and nucleation of DNA unwinding, are inferred to be strong enough to hinder escape of the polymerase from the open complex contacts that are maintained during abortive initiation. The Ou complex has weaker binding to the -24 domain, partially compensated by better upstream interactions and a better ability to accommodate extensive DNA unwinding. It thus escapes abortive initiation more readily because of weaker critical open complex contacts that must be lost when stable initiation occurs from the corresponding stressed intermediates.

Structure and function of E. coli promoter DNA

The process of transcription initiation requires both the recognition of a promoter site by RNA polymerase and the melting of a short stretch of DNA. In this review I discuss the properties of promoters that are relevant to sequence recognition and to the ability of the polymerase to act as a melting protein. The regulation of promoter activity is thus dependent on both factors interacting with RNA polymerase and so altering its affinity for promoter sites and also modulations of DNA structure.

Activity of a phage-modified RNA polymerase at hybrid promoters. Effects of substituting thymine for hydroxymethyluracil in a phage SP01 middle promoter

Transcription of bacteriophage SP01 middle promoters is specifically initiated by a complex of the Bacillus subtilis host's RNA polymerase core (E) with the SP01 gene 28 transcription-regulating protein, gp28. Normal SP01 DNA contains hydroxymethyluracil (hmUra) in place of thymine and E . gp28 preferentially transcribes hmUra-containing DNA. Hybrid DNA molecules containing an SP01 middle promoter, PM25 . 1, have been constructed in which one DNA strand contains T and the other hmUra. The major feature of these reciprocal hybrid promoters is that one has, predominantly, T substituted for hmUra in the central -35 recognition sequence in the transcribed strand, while the other has, predominantly, T substituted for hmUra in the -10 recognition sequence in the non-transcribed strand. Binding by the E . gp28 RNA polymerase and transcription of these hybrid promoters and of the normal, all-hmUra, promoter have been compared. Both hybrid promoters are weaker than the normal PM25 . 1 promoter, but the hybrid promoter with T substituted in the -10 sequence is the weakest of the set. The DNase I footprint of the normal PM25 . 1 promoter shows temperature-dependent protection of a relatively long stretch of DNA downstream from the transcriptional start site, correlating with a thermal transition of transcriptional activity of promoter complexes. The stronger of the hybrid promoters also undergoes this transition, but the weaker does not. We discuss these findings in terms of protein-DNA interactions determining specificity for a modified nucleotide at this promoter.

Interactions of the RNA polymerase of bacteriophage T7 with its promoter during binding and initiation of transcription

Promoters for T7 RNA polymerase have a highly conserved sequence of 23 continuous base pairs located at position -17 to +6 relative to the initiation site for the RNA. The complex of T7 RNA polymerase with the phage phi 10 promoter has been visualized indirectly by exploiting the ability of the polymerase to protect DNA sequences from cleavage by methidiumpropyl-EDTA X Fe(II). The DNA contacts made by T7 RNA polymerase have been mapped during binding and during the subsequent initiation of transcription. The RNA polymerase alone protects 19 bases in a region from -21 to -3. Synthesis of the trinucleotide r(GGG) expands the length of the sequence protected by the RNA polymerase and stabilizes the complex; 29 bases (-21 to +8) are protected, and the observed equilibrium association constant of the r(GGG) complex is 5 X 10(5) M-1. The formation of a hexanucleotide mRNA, r(GGGAGA), further extends the protected region; 32 bases (-21 to +11) are protected. Finally, the synthesis of a pentadecanucleotide mRNA leads to a translocation of the region protected by the protein; the sequence now protected is reduced to 24 bases (-4 to +20).

Interaction between E. coli RNA polymerase and the tetR promoter from pSC101: homologies and differences with other E. coli promoter systems from close contact point studies

The interaction between E. coli RNA polymerase and the tetR promoter from pSC101, was studied by protection and premodification experiments, using dimethyl sulfate, methylation of single stranded cytosines, and DNAase I footprinting. Whereas qualitative and quantitative results from the chemical approach conform to patterns already displayed by other promoter systems, hypersensitive sites to DNAase I attack differ from those of other promoters. Distribution and nature of the contacts suggest that regions of the promoter sequence participates differently in complex formation. The involvement of major and minor grooves of the double helix in the complex with the enzyme, differs along the promoter. After a comparison of the results from seven different promoters, a pattern of conserved contacts seem to appear. Comparison of temperature dependence of local unwinding around the transcription start site (detected by the appearance of single stranded cytosines), and DNAase I footprinting, reveals that the process leading to stable complex formation can be achieved without disruption of base-pairing.