Peptides at the tRNA binding site of the crystallizable monomeric form of E. coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase

Identification of the tRNA anticodon recognition site of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase

We have previously shown that the anticodon of methionine tRNAs contains most, if not all, of the nucleotides required for specific recognition of tRNA substrates by Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase [Schulman, L. H., & Pelka, H. (1988) Science 242, 765-768]. Previous cross-linking experiments have also identified a site in the synthetase that lies within 14 A of the anticodon binding domain [Leon, O., & Schulman, L. H. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 5416-5422]. In the present work, we have carried out site-directed mutagenesis of this domain, creating conservative amino acid changes at residues that contain side chains having potential hydrogen-bond donors or acceptors. Only one of these changes, converting Trp461----Phe, had a significant effect on aminoacylation. The mutant enzyme showed an approximately 60-100-fold increase in Km for methionine tRNAs, with little or no change in the Km for methionine or ATP or in the maximal velocity of the aminoacylation reaction. Conversion of the adjacent Pro460 to Leu resulted in a smaller increase in Km for tRNA(Mets), with no change in the other kinetic parameters. Examination of the interaction of the mutant enzymes with a series of tRNA(Met) derivatives containing base substitutions in the anticodon revealed sequence-specific interactions between the Phe461 mutant and different anticodons. Km values were highest for tRNA(mMet) derivatives containing the normal anticodon wobble base C. Base substitutions at this site decreased the Km for aminoacylation by the Phe461 mutant, while increasing the Km for the wild-type enzyme and for the Leu460 mutant to values greater than 100 microM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Understanding structural relationships in proteins of unsolved three-dimensional structure

The locations of functionally important sequences and general structural motifs have been assigned to Ile-tRNA synthetase. However, a function has not been established for some segments of the protein (e.g., CP1). The method of structural modeling described here cannot establish the details of a 3 A crystal structure, and, in contrast to a crystal structure, the precision of the model varies according to the extent of a sequence similarity or the functional importance of a region. In Ile-tRNA synthetase, the signature sequence and the flanking regions are likely to be similar in structure to the proteins on which the model is based. For other regions, it may be possible to build a three-dimensional model by connecting well defined regions and refining the positions of the connecting elements by energy minimization. Structural modelling of this kind must be done cautiously, because the order and orientation of the elements of a structural motif can change in subtle ways. In the case of Tyr-tRNA synthetase, the beta-strand nearest the N-terminus is the outermost strand of the nucleotide binding fold; in Met-tRNA synthetase, the same strand is innermost. Furthermore, the orientation of this strand may be antiparallel (Tyr-tRNA synthetase) or parallel (Met-tRNA synthetase). Because multiple structures that differ in their orientations of structural elements are possible, the structural analogies between proteins should not be naively extrapolated without independent experimental support. As described above, some regions of proteins tolerate internal deletions and insertions. This provides further experimental support for the practice of allowing for gaps in computer-generated sequence alignments. Nevertheless, because some regions are more tolerant of insertions and deletions than others, the structural and functional significance of a region of broken alignment must be assessed carefully. All gaps in sequence alignments cannot be treated equally, and each must be evaluated within its own context. In the synthetases of known structure, structural analogy can be used to identify important functional elements. For example, the amino acid binding site of Met-tRNA synthetase might be formed, at least in part, by a peptide that encompasses Ala50; this amino acid aligns with Gly94 of the Ile-tRNA synthetase. This is an example in which results on a protein of unknown structure (Ile-tRNA synthetases) can lead to identification of a potential substrate binding site in a protein of known structure (Met-tRNA synthetase).

Construction of intra-domain chimeras of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

To explore new approaches to enzyme engineering, intra-domain chimeras of two aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases were constructed. Connections were made within the nucleotide folds of these enzymes at sites earlier shown either to be dispensable for activity or able to accommodate oligopeptide insertions. (R.M. Starzyk, T.A. Webster and P. Schimmel, Science 237, 1614 (1987); R.M. Starzyk, J.J. Burbaum and P. Schimmel, Biochemistry, in press). Based on the known structure of one synthetase and structural modeling of the other, the locations of the connection sites allow the possibility of functional "compound" ATP and tRNA binding sites. Of five chimeric genes which were constructed, three direct synthesis of polypeptides that accumulate in vivo. These stable hybrids provide prototypes to which mutagenesis procedures may be applied to produce enzymatically active chimeric synthetases.