The tL structure within the leader region of Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA operons has post-transcriptional functions

Roles of the leader-trailer helix and antitermination complex in biogenesis of the 30S ribosomal subunit

Ribosome biogenesis occurs co-transcriptionally and entails rRNA folding, ribosomal protein binding, rRNA processing, and rRNA modification. In most bacteria, the 16S, 23S and 5S rRNAs are co-transcribed, often with one or more tRNAs. Transcription involves a modified RNA polymerase, called the antitermination complex, which forms in response to cis-acting elements (boxB, boxA and boxC) in the nascent pre-rRNA. Sequences flanking the rRNAs are complementary and form long helices known as leader-trailer helices. Here, we employed an orthogonal translation system to interrogate the functional roles of these RNA elements in 30S subunit biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Mutations that disrupt the leader-trailer helix caused complete loss of translation activity, indicating that this helix is absolutely essential for active subunit formation in the cell. Mutations of boxA also reduced translation activity, but by only 2- to 3-fold, suggesting a smaller role for the antitermination complex. Similarly modest drops in activity were seen upon deletion of either or both of two leader helices, termed here hA and hB. Interestingly, subunits formed in the absence of these leader features exhibited defects in translational fidelity. These data suggest that the antitermination complex and precursor RNA elements help to ensure quality control during ribosome biogenesis.

Importance of transient structures during post-transcriptional refolding of the pre-23S rRNA and ribosomal large subunit assembly

An important step of ribosome assembly is the folding of the rRNA into a functional structure. Despite knowledge of the folded state of rRNA in the ribosomal subunits, there is very little information on the rRNA folding pathway. We are interested in understanding how the functional structure of rRNA is formed and whether the rRNA folding intermediates have a role in ribosome assembly. To this end, transient secondary structures around both ends of pre-23S rRNA were analyzed by a chemical probing approach, using pre-23S rRNA transcripts. Metastable hairpin loop structures were found at both ends of 23S rRNA. The functional importance of the transient structures around the ends of 23S rRNA was tested by mutations that alter only the transient structure. The effect of mutations on 23S rRNA folding was tested in vitro and in vivo. It was found that both stabilization and destabilization of the transient structure around the 5' end of 23S rRNA inhibits post-transcriptional refolding in vitro and ribosome formation in vivo. The data suggest that the transient structure of rRNA has a function during 23S rRNA folding and thereby in ribosome assembly.

Effects of base change mutations within an Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA leader region on rRNA maturation and ribosome formation

The effects of base change mutations in a highly conserved sequence (boxC) within the leader of bacterial ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) was studied. The boxC sequence preceding the 16S rRNA structural gene constitutes part of the RNase III processing site, one of the first cleavage sites on the pathway to mature 16S rRNA. Moreover, rRNA leader sequences facilitate correct 16S rRNA folding, thereby assisting ribosomal subunit formation. Mutations in boxC cause cold sensitivity and result in 16S rRNA and 30S subunit deficiency. Strains in which all rRNA operons are replaced by mutant transcription units are viable. Thermodynamic studies by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis reveal that mutant transcripts have a different, less ordered structure. In addition, RNA secondary structure differences between mutant and wild-type transcripts were determined by chemical and enzymatic probing. Differences are found in the leader RNA sequence itself but also in structurally important regions of the mature 16S rRNA. A minor fraction of the rRNA transcripts from mutant operons is not processed by RNase III, resulting in a significantly extended precursor half-life compared to the wild-type. The boxC mutations also give rise to a new aberrant degradation product of 16S rRNA. This intermediate cannot be detected in strains lacking RNase III. Together the results indicate that the boxC sequence, although important for RNase III processing, is likely to serve additional functions by facilitating correct formation of the mature 16S rRNA structure. They also suggest that quality control steps are acting during ribosome biogenesis.

Mutations in the leader region of ribosomal RNA operons cause structurally defective 30 S ribosomes as revealed by in vivo structural probing

The biogenesis of functional ribosomes is regulated in a very complex manner, involving different proteins and RNA molecules. RNAs are not only essential components of both ribosomal subunits but also transiently interacting factors during particle formation. In eukaryotes snoRNAs act as molecular chaperones to assist maturation, modification and assembly. In a very similar way highly conserved leader sequences of bacterial rRNA operons are involved in the correct formation of 30 S ribosomal subunits. Certain mutations in the rRNA leader region cause severe growth defects due to malfunction of ribosomes which are assembled from such transcription units. To understand how the leader sequences act to facilitate the formation of the correct 30 S subunits we performed in vivo chemical probing to assess structural differences between ribosomes assembled either from rRNA transcribed from wild-type operons or from operons which contain mutations in the rRNA leader region. Cells transformed with plasmids containing the respective rRNA operons were reacted with dimethylsulphate (DMS). Ribosomes were isolated by sucrose gradient centrifugation and modified nucleotides within the 16 S rRNA were identified by primer extension reaction. Structural differences between ribosomes from wild-type and mutant rRNA operons occur in several clusters within the 16 S rRNA secondary structure. The most prominent differences are located in the central domain including the universally conserved pseudoknot structure which connects the 5', the central and the 3' domain of 16 S rRNA. Two other clusters with structural differences fall in the 5' domain where the leader had been shown to interact with mature 16 S rRNA and within the ribosomal protein S4 binding site. The other differences in structure are located in sites which are also known as sites for the action of several antibiotics. The data explain the functional defects of ribosomes from rRNA operons with leader mutations and help to understand the altered biogenesis pathway from mutations in an rRNA leader region to the formation of functionally defective ribosomes.

The Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA leader nut region interacts specifically with mature 16S RNA

All ribosomal RNAs are preceded by leader sequences not present in the final ribosome particles. The highly conserved leader sequences of bacterial rRNAs are known to be important for the folding and assembly of functional ribosomes. Very likely transient binding of the leader to mature parts of the 16S RNA occurs during transcription. To better understand the mechanistic details of these functions we have performed a secondary structural analysis of E. coli ribosomal RNA leader transcripts by chemical modification and enzymatic hydrolysis studies. The data were combined with results from thermodynamic stability calculations to yield a generalized structural model. The same secondary structure of the leader core, comprising the nut-like sequences up to the mature 5' end of the 16S RNA, was deduced, irrespective if transcripts started at promoter P1 or 120 nucleotides downstream at P2. Employing gelshift and cross-linking studies we were able to demonstrate that a part of the leader core, namely the nut-like sequence elements bind directly to specific regions within the mature 16S RNA. The sites of RNA-RNA cross-linking could be localized by sequencing. They map in the 16S RNA 5' domain at nucleotide positions G27 to G42, C48, G68, G117 and G126. The results may explain the recently observed scaffolding function of the leader RNA during ribosome biogenesis.

Analysis of sequence elements important for the synthesis and control of ribosomal RNA in E coli

The regulation of the synthesis of ribosomal RNA is a key problem for the understanding of bacterial growth. Many different regulatory mechanisms involving cis and trans acting components participate in a concerted way to achieve the very efficient, flexible and coordinated production of this class of molecules. We have studied three different sequence regions within a ribosomal RNA transcription unit which are believed to control different stages of ribosomal RNA expression. In the first part of the study the function of AT-rich sequences upstream of the -35 hexamer of rRNA promoter P1 in the activation of rRNA transcription was analyzed. We confirm that a sequence dependent bend upstream of P1 is responsible for the high promoter activity. Experiments employing linker scanning mutations demonstrated that the distance as well as the angular orientation of the bent DNA is crucial for the degree of activation. In addition, the effect of the trans activating protein Fis on the transcription initiation of promoter P1 was investigated. We can show, using the abortive initiation assay, that the predominant effect of Fis is due to an increase in the affinity of RNA polymerase for the promoter (binding constant KB) while the isomerisation rate (kf) from a closed to an open RNA polymerase promoter complex is not altered significantly. We also describe the characterization of sequence determinants important for stringent regulation and growth rate control. Evidence is provided that the discriminator motif GCGC is a necessary but not sufficient element for both types of control. Furthermore we show that not simply a particular DNA primary structure but the higher order conformation of the complete promoter region is recognized and triggers the two regulatory mechanisms, both of which are apparently mediated by the effector molecule guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp). Finally, we have carried out a systematic mutational analysis of the rrnB leader region preceding the structural gene for 16S RNA. We could demonstrate that highly conserved sequence elements within the rrnB leader, which were believed to be involved in transcription antitermination have post-transcriptional functions. We present evidence that these sequence elements direct the biogenesis of active ribosomal particles.

Functional importance of the Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA leader box A sequence for post-transcriptional events

To shed more light on the controversial findings concerning the functional participation of the highly conserved nut-like leader box A sequence element in ribosomal RNA transcription antitermination we have carried out a mutational study. We have substituted the box A and combined this mutation with several deletions comprising the rRNA leader elements box B, box C and the tL region. The mutations are located within the genuine rrnB operon cloned on multicopy plasmids. We determined the effects of the mutations on cell growth, rRNA accumulation and ribosomal subunit stoichiometry. Cells transformed with the mutated plasmids were affected in their growth rate, and showed a surprising deficiency of the promoter-proximal 16S compared to the 23S RNA, indicative of a post-transcriptional degradation event. Accordingly, we could demonstrate a reduced amount of free 30S relative to 50S ribosomal subunits in exponentially growing cells. Similar stoichiometric aberrations in the ribosome pool were detected in conditionally Nus factor-defective strains. The results show that the leader box A sequence within rRNA operons has important post-transcriptional functions for 16S RNA stability and ribosomal subunit stoichiometry. A model is proposed, describing the biogenesis and quality control of ribosomes based on rRNA leader and Nus-factor interactions. It is compatible with the previously observed effects of box A in antitermination.